Supergirl (TV Series)


Recommended Posts

That footage was cringeworthy.

Didn't even know who Melissa Benoist was, so I did a Google search.

My adult filter is off, so I had a bit of a shock at the pictures that showed up.

 

Yeah her past is actually porn well adult photoshoots lol

  • Like 1

Yeah her past is actually porn well adult photoshoots lol

 

She went from Adult stuff... to Glee? That must have been one hell of a reality change!

No plan for the UK showing of this? :(

Got to admit, I'm mainly interested because she is pretty damn cute  :blush:

I had a bit of interest till I saw that preview, now I've none.  It's like a bad early 90s tv series .... like superboy..............sooooooooooooooooooooo baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad

 

 

Seeing as how "Superboy" is from '88...............

Yea, not sure about this.  Especially after watching Daredevil on Netflix.  Seems like Super Girl is a poorly acted half assed attempted at making something good.  Yea, I am just going off the trailer but I would be surprised if this goes to season 2 and really surprised if there is a 3rd season.  And the fact that Supergirl reveals herself to the public by saving people on a plane...that was done in Superman and Superman 4.  Booooring.

She went from Adult stuff... to Glee?

>

NO. Private pics of her and her fiancee, along with dozens of other public figures and celebrities, were stolen during the iCloud hack and put up on 4Chan last year.

Lesson: turn off automatic image uploads and use complex passwords.

NO. Private pics of her and her fiancee, along with dozens of other public figures and celebrities, were stolen during the iCloud hack and put up on 4Chan last year.

Lesson: turn off automatic image uploads and use complex passwords.

 

Or don't take nude pics?  Let alone pics of you having sex to, I don't understand people today.  The whole selfie craze is one thing, but taking pics of yourself nude to?  How vain can we get?

  • Like 1

NO. Private pics of her and her fiancee, along with dozens of other public figures and celebrities, were stolen during the iCloud hack and put up on 4Chan last year.

Lesson: turn off automatic image uploads and use complex passwords.

 

Ah sorry, miss-understood what was said earlier.

NO. Private pics of her and her fiancee, along with dozens of other public figures and celebrities, were stolen during the iCloud hack and put up on 4Chan last year.

Lesson: turn off automatic image uploads and use complex passwords.

 

Yeah, but looking at the amount of different individuals that were "hacked" during the fappening, I can't believe it was as simple as that. I'm sure there was some security compromise in Apple's systems that they weren't ready to divulge.

 

OT, I think this looks cheesy as heck and I doubt it'll be interesting enough for me to continue watching this after the pilot.

  • Like 1

You should re-read what I said, I never said it'd crossover with the MoS movie universe, I'd said they'd be able to use the character, supergirl, in a future MoS movie, there's a difference.   This supergirl tv series could crossover with Arrow and Flash though, which is what I expect more.   Having "supergirl" on CBS and not the CW would just be because WB/DC wants to use the character in a movie, putting it on CW means you tie it to the other two shows at the hip, I'm guessing they don't want to, even though it's the same companies behind all 3 tv shows so they could do a crossover between the three or not.

 

"Though, I honestly don't get why it'd be hard to just link the movies with the tv series now, supergirl could be the show that does it actually."

"Though, I honestly don't get why it'd be hard to just link the movies with the tv series now, supergirl could be the show that does it actually."

 

That's just a hypothetical on my part, no one expects this to happen.  People have thought about Arrow and Flash linking to the new movie universe but WB doesn't want to do it.   And you can link the two without doing a full on crossover, just a comment about "supergirl" in one of the movies would do it.

That's just a hypothetical on my part, no one expects this to happen.  People have thought about Arrow and Flash linking to the new movie universe but WB doesn't want to do it.   And you can link the two without doing a full on crossover, just a comment about "supergirl" in one of the movies would do it.

 

And I don't expect my comments to be taken seriously by anyone, but they fit the context -- even hypothetically, the tone between the two is jarringly different. Then again, Marvel has Ant-Man in the same universe as the Daredevil...

 

And again, the show looks way too campy for me. If that's your thing, knock yourself out.

And I don't expect my comments to be taken seriously by anyone, but they fit the context -- even hypothetically, the tone between the two is jarringly different. Then again, Marvel has Ant-Man in the same universe as the Daredevil...

 

And again, the show looks way too campy for me. If that's your thing, knock yourself out.

 

I don't know if it'll be good or not, I don't take trailers and such to mean much personally.  I just find it interesting that they put this on CBS and not on the CW with the others.

I'll give it a shot but I'm doubtful. Also kind of curious how they'd handle it being supposedly in the Arrow/Flash universe when the Supergirl promo seems to imply Superman having been in the public eye for a noticeable amount of time, but characters from the other two shows see Barry as the world's introduction to superpowers.

I'll give it a shot but I'm doubtful. Also kind of curious how they'd handle it being supposedly in the Arrow/Flash universe when the Supergirl promo seems to imply Superman having been in the public eye for a noticeable amount of time, but characters from the other two shows see Barry as the world's introduction to superpowers.

I just read an article about them possibly setting up the idea of multiple universes in Flash next season... so with that in mind, it would be pretty easy to do crossovers if they wanted.

It does look awfully cheesy. I think the success of Arrow/The Flash has been the dark gritty aspect. Yes, I know that The Flash has been a lot more light hearted, but since the reveal of the true identity of the Reverse Flash at Christmas, it's been handling a very fine balance between light hearted-ness and dark aspects. This along with every other Superman related TV Show/Movie in the past just looks too cheesy. I guess Superman/girl just entails that cheesy airy fairy storyline. Whether it does enough to pull in the viewers is gonna be the hard part for the script writers!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!