Supergirl (TV Series)


Recommended Posts

That footage was cringeworthy.

Didn't even know who Melissa Benoist was, so I did a Google search.

My adult filter is off, so I had a bit of a shock at the pictures that showed up.

 

Yeah her past is actually porn well adult photoshoots lol

  • Like 1

Yeah her past is actually porn well adult photoshoots lol

 

She went from Adult stuff... to Glee? That must have been one hell of a reality change!

No plan for the UK showing of this? :(

Got to admit, I'm mainly interested because she is pretty damn cute  :blush:

I had a bit of interest till I saw that preview, now I've none.  It's like a bad early 90s tv series .... like superboy..............sooooooooooooooooooooo baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad

 

 

Seeing as how "Superboy" is from '88...............

Yea, not sure about this.  Especially after watching Daredevil on Netflix.  Seems like Super Girl is a poorly acted half assed attempted at making something good.  Yea, I am just going off the trailer but I would be surprised if this goes to season 2 and really surprised if there is a 3rd season.  And the fact that Supergirl reveals herself to the public by saving people on a plane...that was done in Superman and Superman 4.  Booooring.

She went from Adult stuff... to Glee?

>

NO. Private pics of her and her fiancee, along with dozens of other public figures and celebrities, were stolen during the iCloud hack and put up on 4Chan last year.

Lesson: turn off automatic image uploads and use complex passwords.

NO. Private pics of her and her fiancee, along with dozens of other public figures and celebrities, were stolen during the iCloud hack and put up on 4Chan last year.

Lesson: turn off automatic image uploads and use complex passwords.

 

Or don't take nude pics?  Let alone pics of you having sex to, I don't understand people today.  The whole selfie craze is one thing, but taking pics of yourself nude to?  How vain can we get?

  • Like 1

NO. Private pics of her and her fiancee, along with dozens of other public figures and celebrities, were stolen during the iCloud hack and put up on 4Chan last year.

Lesson: turn off automatic image uploads and use complex passwords.

 

Ah sorry, miss-understood what was said earlier.

NO. Private pics of her and her fiancee, along with dozens of other public figures and celebrities, were stolen during the iCloud hack and put up on 4Chan last year.

Lesson: turn off automatic image uploads and use complex passwords.

 

Yeah, but looking at the amount of different individuals that were "hacked" during the fappening, I can't believe it was as simple as that. I'm sure there was some security compromise in Apple's systems that they weren't ready to divulge.

 

OT, I think this looks cheesy as heck and I doubt it'll be interesting enough for me to continue watching this after the pilot.

  • Like 1

You should re-read what I said, I never said it'd crossover with the MoS movie universe, I'd said they'd be able to use the character, supergirl, in a future MoS movie, there's a difference.   This supergirl tv series could crossover with Arrow and Flash though, which is what I expect more.   Having "supergirl" on CBS and not the CW would just be because WB/DC wants to use the character in a movie, putting it on CW means you tie it to the other two shows at the hip, I'm guessing they don't want to, even though it's the same companies behind all 3 tv shows so they could do a crossover between the three or not.

 

"Though, I honestly don't get why it'd be hard to just link the movies with the tv series now, supergirl could be the show that does it actually."

"Though, I honestly don't get why it'd be hard to just link the movies with the tv series now, supergirl could be the show that does it actually."

 

That's just a hypothetical on my part, no one expects this to happen.  People have thought about Arrow and Flash linking to the new movie universe but WB doesn't want to do it.   And you can link the two without doing a full on crossover, just a comment about "supergirl" in one of the movies would do it.

That's just a hypothetical on my part, no one expects this to happen.  People have thought about Arrow and Flash linking to the new movie universe but WB doesn't want to do it.   And you can link the two without doing a full on crossover, just a comment about "supergirl" in one of the movies would do it.

 

And I don't expect my comments to be taken seriously by anyone, but they fit the context -- even hypothetically, the tone between the two is jarringly different. Then again, Marvel has Ant-Man in the same universe as the Daredevil...

 

And again, the show looks way too campy for me. If that's your thing, knock yourself out.

And I don't expect my comments to be taken seriously by anyone, but they fit the context -- even hypothetically, the tone between the two is jarringly different. Then again, Marvel has Ant-Man in the same universe as the Daredevil...

 

And again, the show looks way too campy for me. If that's your thing, knock yourself out.

 

I don't know if it'll be good or not, I don't take trailers and such to mean much personally.  I just find it interesting that they put this on CBS and not on the CW with the others.

I'll give it a shot but I'm doubtful. Also kind of curious how they'd handle it being supposedly in the Arrow/Flash universe when the Supergirl promo seems to imply Superman having been in the public eye for a noticeable amount of time, but characters from the other two shows see Barry as the world's introduction to superpowers.

I'll give it a shot but I'm doubtful. Also kind of curious how they'd handle it being supposedly in the Arrow/Flash universe when the Supergirl promo seems to imply Superman having been in the public eye for a noticeable amount of time, but characters from the other two shows see Barry as the world's introduction to superpowers.

I just read an article about them possibly setting up the idea of multiple universes in Flash next season... so with that in mind, it would be pretty easy to do crossovers if they wanted.

It does look awfully cheesy. I think the success of Arrow/The Flash has been the dark gritty aspect. Yes, I know that The Flash has been a lot more light hearted, but since the reveal of the true identity of the Reverse Flash at Christmas, it's been handling a very fine balance between light hearted-ness and dark aspects. This along with every other Superman related TV Show/Movie in the past just looks too cheesy. I guess Superman/girl just entails that cheesy airy fairy storyline. Whether it does enough to pull in the viewers is gonna be the hard part for the script writers!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!