Recommended Posts

I’m a little disappointed with the finale.  I don’t think it’s believable that romulan fleet would just turn back so easily after hundreds of years of believing something. 

 

i would have liked to have seen that advanced AI in the portal come through, but if they’re watching and so powerful why did they need to be invited in and need the portal to stay open. I mean, say they did successfully destroy the transmitter, would they just say “well guess they don’t need our help”..

 

 

  • Like 2
12 minutes ago, DramaInc said:

I’m a little disappointed with the finale.  I don’t think it’s believable that romulan fleet would just turn back so easily after hundreds of years of believing something. 

 

i would have liked to have seen that advanced AI in the portal come through, but if they’re watching and so powerful why did they need to be invited in and need the portal to stay open. I mean, say they did successfully destroy the transmitter, would they just say “well guess they don’t need our help”..

 

 

The finale was confusing and now that Picard is basically a synthetic, now what?

2 hours ago, DramaInc said:

I’m a little disappointed with the finale.  I don’t think it’s believable that romulan fleet would just turn back so easily after hundreds of years of believing something. 

 

i would have liked to have seen that advanced AI in the portal come through, but if they’re watching and so powerful why did they need to be invited in and need the portal to stay open. I mean, say they did successfully destroy the transmitter, would they just say “well guess they don’t need our help”..

 

 

First point: They almost didn't, they were going to engage Starfleet's ships until the transmitter was powered down and it seemed obvious they were outgunned as well.  

 

Second point: Remember the sphere builders from Enterprise? They needed help from our side in order for them to come through, what I saw from the episode looked almost exactly the same or at least the same idea.

Personally, I thought that finale was utterly glorious.  If you watch sci-fi to pick holes in plots then that's fine - I watched it for enjoyment and absolutely was not disappointed.

 

Comments like "Can someone please tell me just WTH just happened there?" and "The finale was confusing" - it really wasn't hard to follow.

  • Like 4
Spoiler

Going easy on this one (as opposed to binge watching).  Just watched E07 last night - by far the worst episode of the season - and absolutely hated it as it was too soapy and cheesy for my taste.

 

Glad to know you guys liked the finale. My faith has been restored.

 

So, if I understood what they told Picard,

he is not really a 'synth' in the sense that he has any extra powers, etc, but they simply transferred his mind into a new body that will still die based on the estimated live he had left prior to this brain issue.

Did I miss anything?

6 hours ago, jnelsoninjax said:

So, if I understood what they told Picard,

  Hide contents

he is not really a 'synth' in the sense that he has any extra powers, etc, but they simply transferred his mind into a new body that will still die based on the estimated live he had left prior to this brain issue.

Did I miss anything?

Nope, that's spot on. Basically it's a McGuffin to do away with his brain abnormality.

 

  • Thanks 1

Was a predictable ending with the synths/big baddie. Wrapped up a little fast to me. Glad we got some Data closure, how it was handled in Nemesis was terrible. Hope we hear more about the omnipotent androids, have a feeling it's control based. 

 

Having Picard as a synth initially was off putting, really cheapened his death, and he did die. The synth is a clone. Not Picard. They specifically said they mapped an image of his brain and overlaid it on. Would have preferred them using terms like transferred or moved as opposed to copied.

 

Happy Seven got back on track. All in all a solid series.season, slow burn and then a too fast ending. B+.

Overall I loved the season.

 

Spoiler

Even though I kinda wished that Data would have been resurrected, but I knew the gollum was for Picard.  Brent Spiner is officially done playing the character, https://wegotthiscovered.com/tv/star-trek-picards-brent-spiner-play-data/
 

I’m hoping that whatever was coming through the portal is going to be a repeat of the Borg and decide to find a way to the Alpha quadrant.

 

10 minutes ago, primortal said:

Overall I loved the season.

 

  Hide contents

Even though I kinda wished that Data would have been resurrected, but I knew the gollum was for Picard.  Brent Spiner is officially done playing the character, https://wegotthiscovered.com/tv/star-trek-picards-brent-spiner-play-data/
 

I’m hoping that whatever was coming through the portal is going to be a repeat of the Borg and decide to find a way to the Alpha quadrant.

 

Spoiler

 

Never really stated how the borg was created.  Glad they put closed the loop on what happened after Nemesis, but hoping fora Borg origin story.

 

 

8 minutes ago, techbeck said:
  Hide contents

 

Never really stated how the borg was created.  Glad they put closed the loop on what happened after Nemesis, but hoping fora Borg origin story.

 

 

I always wanted them to tie V’Ger to the Borg.  After Decker merged with Ilia, the “human condition” tainted the machine planet resulted in the creation of the Borg.

 

I think that Discovery might pave the way to the creation of the Borg.

17 hours ago, Nogib said:

I didn't have any real big issue with the way it wrapped up things.  Only thing I didn't really like was the "magic tool that just does whatever you think in your head"

That was it's biggest issue - a complete deus ex machina and was just poor writing!

Something I wanna discuss/clarify in the finale (because I'm a nerd lmao) ....

 



The class of ship Riker (and the Federation Fleet) was using ... Arbiter (description and images) hull + Avenger (description and images) saucer section from Star Trek Online? Sort of a kitbash of the two?

6 hours ago, Human.Online said:

That was it's biggest issue - a complete deus ex machina and was just poor writing!

They could have used the Borg ship as fodder against the Romulans instead of inserting a macguffin to pull off a duplicating ship illusion. It was there the whole time and the writers overlooked it.

1 hour ago, jpqf said:

They could have used the Borg ship as fodder against the Romulans instead of inserting a macguffin to pull off a duplicating ship illusion. It was there the whole time and the writers overlooked it.

I was wondering if the hanmdheld-doodad could be asymlilated by the bube to use the tech to repair itself

4 hours ago, Unobscured Vision said:

Something I wanna discuss/clarify in the finale (because I'm a nerd lmao) ....

 

One had a very BSG looking hull to it's saucer section

2 hours ago, Human.Online said:

I was wondering if the hanmdheld-doodad could be asymlilated by the bube to use the tech to repair itself

I think the Borg ship shouldn't have been crashed in the first place. It's been well established that one Borg ship is a colossal power against any races fleet of starships. The Artifact is a half broken ship so that gives the writers leeway to gimp the power level as they see fit. It's still kind of silly that the flower things could take down the Artifact but I digress. It could have been left in orbit and the story doesn't play out much different. The Romulans show up. The cube is just powerful enough to buy time. The Romulans cause enough damage to the cube to result in crashing to the planet. Same end result without having to use a deus ex machina device. 

 

If Leonard McCoy is anything to go by (last seen at age 137 in TNG) Picard's natural lifespan should last another 40 years. 😄 Not sure if Patrick has the energy for that, although he is only 14 years behind his character and still going strong.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!