Recommended Posts

On 13/12/2023 at 20:24, DocM said:

How boring, and utterly predictable. I like people who push technology and disrupt industries. Musk is one, but there have been others throughout history. Many of them had  personality and/or mental disorders, learn to live with it. 

You didn’t answer the question. 

On 13/12/2023 at 21:59, adrynalyne said:

You didn’t answer the question. 

What's wrong with him talking all things positive? Everyone else just posts all things negative.

Go Tesla! Go Elon, Go Cybertruck!

I'm slightly bias as I own Tesla stock! 🤣I'm gonna hold it for 25 to 30 years.

On 13/12/2023 at 21:13, Warwagon said:

What's wrong with him talking all things positive? Everyone else just posts all things negative.

Go Tesla! Go Elon, Go Cybertruck!

I'm slightly bias as I own Tesla stock! 🤣I'm gonna hold it for 25 to 30 years.

No need to answer now that you invalidated yourself. 
 

Just remember: it’s the people who are working for Musk that are innovating, not him. 

On 13/12/2023 at 23:30, adrynalyne said:

No need to answer now that you invalidated yourself. 
 

Just remember: it’s the people who are working for Musk that are innovating, not him. 

Exactly.

 

If you call failing QA innovative (bad panel gaps, missing/falling off trim) then damn,

  • Like 2
On 14/12/2023 at 04:53, DocM said:

It wasn't a serious question, it was a puerile insult. 

So are you gonna answer it or not?

On 14/12/2023 at 00:04, Matthew S. said:

Exactly.

 

If you call failing QA innovative (bad panel gaps, missing/falling off trim) then damn,

I think they innovate but they do so at the cost of quality and safety for sure. There seems to be a culture of cutting corners. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
On 14/12/2023 at 09:24, adrynalyne said:

So are you gonna answer it or not?

So anyone who says positive things is sucking on Elon scrotum?

Personally it's refreshing to see DocM's positive posts in a sea of negativity.

On 14/12/2023 at 12:22, Warwagon said:

Personally it's refreshing to see DocM's positive posts in a sea of negativity.

Everyone has their faults 🤣

  • Haha 1
On 14/12/2023 at 17:22, Warwagon said:

So anyone who says positive things is sucking on Elon scrotum?

Tricky with  mouth full of testicle sack

(I’m doing the noise it would make right now - giggling)

In fairness, I want to see Tesla succeed, the Cybertruck to me is two things: a gimmick for the press to jump all over, but also a bed for the technologies to be tested on. If he can get people to buy it, fair play - using early adopters as your testers and funding for what comes next isn’t new.

Dislike the guy as a human, but hey - if I were in the market for a car I would consider a Tesla.

On 14/12/2023 at 10:22, Warwagon said:

So anyone who says positive things is sucking on Elon scrotum?

Personally it's refreshing to see DocM's positive posts in a sea of negativity.

Only when they leave out both sides of a story. If you filter everything to only show positive things, you give an inaccurate picture. I have no respect for those that do it. 

  • Like 5

Tesla confirmed they have over 2 million reservations.

They no longer need HFS (Hard Freaking Steel)  to be 2.5-3 mm thick , they can do with 1.4-1.8 mm and retain bullet resistance. 

Firearm tested using

Glock (9mm 115g),

H&K MP5 (9mm 115g),

M4 tactical shotgun (12g 00 buckshot), and

Thompson submachine gun (.45 ACP) 

 

 

On 19/12/2023 at 02:49, DocM said:

Tesla confirmed they have over 2 million reservations.

They no longer need HFS (Hard Freaking Steel)  to be 2.5-3 mm thick , they can do with 1.4-1.8 mm and retain bullet resistance. 

Firearm tested using

Glock (9mm 115g),

H&K MP5 (9mm 115g),

M4 tactical shotgun (12g 00 buckshot), and

Thompson submachine gun (.45 ACP) 

 

 

But the windows aren't bulletproof right?

image.png.52efae011297f16550a625688f515794.png

Edited by PmRd
On 19/12/2023 at 00:49, DocM said:

Tesla confirmed they have over 2 million reservations.

They no longer need HFS (Hard Freaking Steel)  to be 2.5-3 mm thick , they can do with 1.4-1.8 mm and retain bullet resistance. 

Firearm tested using

Glock (9mm 115g),

H&K MP5 (9mm 115g),

M4 tactical shotgun (12g 00 buckshot), and

Thompson submachine gun (.45 ACP) 

 

 

You are getting a little forgetful. This video is over several weeks old and the video you posted from Musk’s presentation several pages back showed clips of it. There is no new development here. 
 

I guess you are really excited about it being bulletproof. Good thing people don’t want to kill the occupants but instead their vehicle. 

  • Like 3
On 19/12/2023 at 04:14, adrynalyne said:

You are getting a little forgetful. This video is over several weeks old and the video you posted from Musk’s presentation several pages back showed clips of it. There is no new development here. 
 

I guess you are really excited about it being bulletproof. Good thing people don’t want to kill the occupants but instead their vehicle. 

 

Info about the steel upgrade was published yesterday, Sandy Munro took a tour of their panel fabrication area and a lead engineer talked about it.

This new stronger steel could have implications for the Starship program, primarily for the recently announced Starship 2 upgrade. 

Long ad in the middle of the video, but it's at the beginning.

 

On 19/12/2023 at 09:44, DocM said:

 

Info about the steel upgrade was published yesterday, Sandy Munro took a tour of their panel fabrication area and a lead engineer talked about it.

This new stronger steel could have implications for the Starship program, primarily for the recently announced Starship 2 upgrade. 

Long ad in the middle of the video, but it's at the beginning.

 

So to confirm the list of all the weapons you said it still protects against, 7 hours ago, was a lie?

 

Instead of admitting that you lied, you just write another word salad of nothignness insetad.

 

Got it.

  • Thanks 3
On 19/12/2023 at 10:41, DeathLace said:

So to confirm the list of all the weapons you said it still protects against, 7 hours ago, was a lie?

 

Instead of admitting that you lied, you just write another word salad of nothignness insetad.

 

Got it.

He was just looking for an excuse to talk about guns.

On 19/12/2023 at 10:41, DeathLace said:

So to confirm the list of all the weapons you said it still protects against, 7 hours ago, was a lie?

Nope. The weapons test video documented the weapons. 

On 19/12/2023 at 10:41, DeathLace said:

Instead of admitting that you lied, you just write another word salad of nothignness insetad.

Got it.

 

The weapons test was published \ December 1st, the factory tour December 18th. The applicable term is contemporaneous.

On 19/12/2023 at 07:44, DocM said:

 

Info about the steel upgrade was published yesterday, Sandy Munro took a tour of their panel fabrication area and a lead engineer talked about it.

This new stronger steel could have implications for the Starship program, primarily for the recently announced Starship 2 upgrade. 

Long ad in the middle of the video, but it's at the beginning.

 

They talked about the thickness of the steel in that video from weeks ago that you posted yesterday. Go watch it.

Edited by adrynalyne
On 19/12/2023 at 10:54, DocM said:

Nope. The weapons test video documented the weapons. 

 

The weapons test was published \ December 1st, the factory tour December 18th. The applicable term is contemporaneous.

The whole "bulletproof" thing is typical Elon Musk stupidity and people like you are eating it up, would you be man enough to be inside a cybertruck while somebody was firing at it with a glock? No you wouldn't, because even you know its ###### stupid.

Edited by PmRd
On 19/12/2023 at 11:08, PmRd said:

The whole "bulletproof" thing is typical Elon Musk stupidity and people like you are eating it up, would you be man enough to be inside a cybertruck while somebody was firing at it with a 9mm? No you wouldn't? Oh ok

Being able to withstand the 21,000 PSI impact of a .45 ACP is more a metaphor for how tough the load-bearing stainless steel skin of the vehicle is. 

What can withstand the bullet can also withstand most incidental damage to rhe metal of a truck/offb-road vehicle. Visually obvious when you see those bullets shatter.

Now add the optional skid plate to the underside.

On 19/12/2023 at 11:20, DocM said:

Being able to withstand the 21,000 PSI impact of a .45 ACP is more a metaphor for how tough the load-bearing stainless steel skin of the vehicle is. 

What can withstand the bullet can also withstand most incidental damage to rhe metal of a truck/offb-road vehicle. Visually obvious when you see those bullets shatter.

Now add the optional skid plate to the underside.

"Metaphor" lol... I think the word you're looking for is "analogy". I wish there was a "metaphor" that would make you realize that assault weapons shouldn't be sold to civilians but that's a whole other topic.

Edited by PmRd

But are the tires bulletproof?

Seems like those would be good targets if you were hellbent on disabling the truck and killing its occupants...

🤔

  • Like 3
On 19/12/2023 at 02:49, DocM said:

Tesla confirmed they have over 2 million reservations.

They no longer need HFS (Hard Freaking Steel)  to be 2.5-3 mm thick , they can do with 1.4-1.8 mm and retain bullet resistance. 

Firearm tested using

Glock (9mm 115g),

H&K MP5 (9mm 115g),

M4 tactical shotgun (12g 00 buckshot), and

Thompson submachine gun (.45 ACP) 

 

 

The militias will love the cybertruck.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I sort of agree with you on that. I had a telescope - a real hefty thing, although only around 500CHF - that got me so fascinated about the stars and planets. I would stare for hours, amazed that I could see the craters of the moon or the rings of Saturn in "realtime" (quotations because, y'know, speed of light and whatnot). A friend of mine has a telescope like the one mentioned in the review, and the pictures are amazing to look at. But there is something missing for me. I may as well just go to NASA's website and look through their gallery.
    • As opposed to catching bad press because it's the engine's fault? You didn't really think this through did you? lol
    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!