Recommended Posts

On 10/01/2024 at 16:59, virtorio said:

People might not know what's being conveyed by that, but it's not confusing.
On the CT, it seems like the smaller red bar and illuminated indicator lights means braking?

 

NHTSA* approved the CT configuration, and they are the agency which sets the standards. 

* National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

On 11/01/2024 at 11:35, DocM said:

 

NHTSA* approved the CT configuration, and they are the agency which sets the standards. 

* National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Well if a government agency thinks it's good, then it must be good.

On 10/01/2024 at 17:44, virtorio said:

Well if a government agency thinks it's good, then it must be good.

Well, I wouldn't go that far. They're mostly worried about spacing, a certain number of square inches, hide off the ground, brightness, etc.

On the other hand, they made us wait ~30 years for quartz headlights, and they still won't let automakers replace exterior rear view mirrors with TV cameras - which is becoming common everywhere else.

At least they let Tesla and a few others introduce drive by wire; no mechanical connection between the steering wheel and steering gear, it's like a gaming force feedback steering wheel on steroids plus electronic and mechanical redundancy.

Edited by DocM
On 10/01/2024 at 18:30, DocM said:

 

At least they let Tesla and a few others introduce drive by wire; no mechanical connection between the steering wheel and steering gear, it's like a gaming force feedback steering wheel on steroids plus electronic and mechanical redundancy.

That is the single most stupid thing I can think of for a car/trucks design.  So if you loose all power and are rolling down a hill ###### being able to steer.

  • Thanks 3
On 10/01/2024 at 16:47, Matthew S. said:

That is the single most stupid thing I can think of for a car/trucks design.  So if you loose all power and are rolling down a hill ###### being able to steer.

Not to mention no mechanical connection has been shown to well....suck. Drive by wire is garbage.

  • Like 3
On 10/01/2024 at 17:30, DocM said:

At least they let Tesla and a few others introduce drive by wire; no mechanical connection between the steering wheel and steering gear, it's like a gaming force feedback steering wheel on steroids plus electronic and mechanical redundancy.

* At least they let Nissan and a few others introduce drive by wire ...

*fixed for you.  Nissan started this about a decade ago in mass produced vehicles. 

 

On 10/01/2024 at 17:47, Matthew S. said:

That is the single most stupid thing I can think of for a car/trucks design.  So if you loose all power and are rolling down a hill ###### being able to steer.

I'm sure there will be a backup clutch that links the steering wheel to the car's wheels...just in case. 

  • Like 2
On 11/01/2024 at 12:30, DocM said:

At least they let Tesla and a few others introduce drive by wire; no mechanical connection between the steering wheel and steering gear, it's like a gaming force feedback steering wheel on steroids plus electronic and mechanical redundancy.

So, a loss of power, connection failure, component failure, corrosion on some contact, and hundreds of other potential failures mean you could lose steering?

Groundbreaking stuff.

Edit: Just to be clear, as I don't like Tesla - my criticism of this applies to other manufactures as well, not just because Tesla is doing it.

On 10/01/2024 at 19:00, virtorio said:

So, a loss of power, connection failure,

Redundant power supply. There's a separate accessory lithium battery in the vehicle which can supply accessory equipment, or drive a high power system like a winch. In the Cybertruck, and future Tesla  vehicles, this is not a 12 volt system but a 48 volt. High power. 

 

On 10/01/2024 at 19:00, virtorio said:

component failure,

 

Redundant actuators, one fails and the other can continue. Of course you get a warning light.

 

On 10/01/2024 at 19:00, virtorio said:

corrosion on some contact, and hundreds of other

 

Multi-string redundancy of the control path, one goes out and the others vote it off the island if/until it reboots and passes tests.

 

On 10/01/2024 at 19:00, virtorio said:

potential failures mean you could lose steering?

The odds would be greater of a collapsible steering column (stops drivers from being impaled during front end collisions) spontaneously separating in half at the slip joint.

 

On 10/01/2024 at 19:00, virtorio said:

Groundbreaking stuff.

 

A similar system, fly by wire, has been used in airliners and other aircraft since the 1980s. Best prepare yourself, because braking by wire is also a thing.

 

On 10/01/2024 at 19:00, virtorio said:

Edit: Just to be clear, as I don't like Tesla - my criticism of this applies to other manufactures as well, not just because Tesla is doing it.

 

Understood, but be aware that these redundant systems are used in modern  spacecraft because it makes them highly reliable.

The most extensive use of them in a passenger vehicle is SpaceX's Dragon, which NASA uses to fly astronauts to the space station, and it also flies commercial spaceflight missions. Highly reliable, reusable, even the Russians like it enough that their cosmonauts fly on it.

On 10/01/2024 at 18:50, adrynalyne said:

Not to mention no mechanical connection has been shown to well....suck. Drive by wire is garbage.

Bad enough that most modern vehicles use DBW for the throttle, I have both a 2018 Mazda3 and Mazda CX9, the CX9 has instant throttle response, the Mazda3 I have to "double tap" to get the same response.

 

My old 2012 Mazda5 has better throttle response than the 3 and that has a traditional throttle linkage.

 

On 10/01/2024 at 19:34, DocM said:

A similar system, fly by wire, has been used in airliners and other aircraft since the 1980s. Best prepare yourself, because braking by wire is also a thing.

The FBW systems in aircraft (mainly only used by Airbus btw) have been tested over many decades and are a REFINED system, they also have to pass far more stringent certifications than with the auto industry, want to know one caveat with them?  No feedback, that's one of the major complaints by Airbus pilots, is you feel nothing in the stick.

  • Like 2
On 10/01/2024 at 20:08, Matthew S. said:

Bad enough that most modern vehicles use DBW for the throttle, I have both a 2018 Mazda3 and Mazda CX9, the CX9 has instant throttle response, the Mazda3 I have to "double tap" to get the same response.

 

My old 2012 Mazda5 has better throttle response than the 3 and that has a traditional throttle linkage.

 

The FBW systems in aircraft (mainly only used by Airbus btw) have been tested over many decades and are a REFINED system, they also have to pass far more stringent certifications than with the auto industry, want to know one caveat with them?  No feedback, that's one of the major complaints by Airbus pilots, is you feel nothing in the stick.

What you're missing is the synergy between Tesla and SpaceX.

This started by sharing a Materials Science department but it's gone much further. When Tesla develops redundant systems they can tap into SpaceX's experience in building and qualifying redundant systems for use with NASA and the DoD - they run throughout their launchers, and their spacecraft. Tesla Energy provides SpaceX with  batteries and power systems. Cybertrucks steel was developed by SpaceX.

On 10/01/2024 at 13:15, DocM said:

 

According to the YouTube video the driver was in Montana, Snow & Ice Central, driving with all terrain tires which are inadequate for those conditions. Ask any Michigan yooper.

Once again, I live in Canada, where we get more snow. I see sedans driving around, including my own, with all season tires, that can easily drive through under a foot of snow.

Don't you get tired of making excuses for every failures of the people you worship?

You never want accountability.

It's the "independent"/republican way.

  • Like 3
On 11/01/2024 at 10:25, DeathLace said:

Once again, I live in Canada, where we get more snow. I see sedans driving around, including my own, with all season tires, that can easily drive through under a foot of snow.

Don't you get tired of making excuses for every failures of the people you worship?

You never want accountability.

It's the "independent"/republican way.

I just can't handle all this Musk masturbation. It is a bit creepy.

On 10/01/2024 at 18:53, Jim K said:

I'm sure there will be a backup clutch that links the steering wheel to the car's wheels...just in case. 

This is Tesla and Musk we're talking about, bright they ain't.

On 10/01/2024 at 13:15, DocM said:

 

According to the YouTube video the driver was in Montana, Snow & Ice Central, driving with all terrain tires which are inadequate for those conditions. Ask any Michigan yooper.

You don't get the lake effect snow that Lambton county does, take a hop over the bridge once the snow really starts and go up 21.

On 11/01/2024 at 15:58, Matthew S. said:

This is Tesla and Musk we're talking about, bright they ain't.

It's not just Tesla and Musk, drive by wire is going to be seen across the industry. Also Toyota, Lexus, Geely (Chinese maker which owns Volvo), Canoo (US EV truck maker)...growing list

On 11/01/2024 at 16:00, Matthew S. said:

You don't get the lake effect snow that Lambton county does, take a hop over the bridge once the snow really starts and go up 21.

I've spent a lot of time in the up, which is why I referred him to ask a yooper about snow. You guys have seen a max of 355 in, Montana more like 850.

My whole point was that the standard tire on most Cybertrucks are ATs which are  inadequate for snow over ice (esp. black ice) or deep snow.  

On 11/01/2024 at 12:46, hagjohn said:

I just can't handle all this Musk masturbation. It is a bit creepy.

 

And here I thought we were having an adult conversation about tires and snow in a part of the board that's not designated for politics. Silly me. You just can't help yourself.

I don't care where in Canada you live, in much of Michigan and in Montana driving without snow tires in the winter is for fools who want to get stuck.

On 11/01/2024 at 15:26, DocM said:

 

And here I thought we were having an adult conversation about tires and snow in a part of the board that's not designated for politics. Silly me. You just can't help yourself.

We were. You didn’t listen to anyone but yourself and the gospel of Musk. Any surprise that the conversation devolved because of it?

On 11/01/2024 at 17:27, adrynalyne said:

We were. You didn’t listen to anyone but yourself and the gospel of Musk. Any surprise that the conversation devolved because of it?

The topic of the threat is about Cybertruck, steered off course by the usual anti Musk hate using memes, political commentary, and 5th grade talk about masturbation. There's already a thread for that.

As for the rest, I thought personal attacks were against the tos? Guess that's why so many adults have left the building.

 

On 11/01/2024 at 16:01, DocM said:

The topic of the threat is about Cybertruck, steered off course by the usual anti Musk hate using memes, political commentary, and 5th grade talk about masturbation. There's already a thread for that.

As for the rest, I thought personal attacks were against the tos? Guess that's why so many adults have left the building.

 

That’s a pretty hypocritical response there bud. 

  • Like 6
On 11/01/2024 at 17:26, DocM said:

 

And here I thought we were having an adult conversation about tires and snow in a part of the board that's not designated for politics. Silly me. You just can't help yourself.

I don't care where in Canada you live, in much of Michigan and in Montana driving without snow tires in the winter is for fools who want to get stuck.

It is hard having an adult discussion with you.  You refuse to hear any criticism of the rich men you worship. Musk has some good business sense but it usually is over shadowed by his erratic emotional state. You cannot deny that.

  • Like 2
On 11/01/2024 at 13:34, DocM said:

...

I trust that airlines are keeping their aircraft properly maintained. People hit poles and never bother to get the damage fixed, drive through bodies of water - or get flooded (resulting in water going where it's not designed to go), fail to wash off salt and ignore maintenance schedules and warning lights. And sometimes they'll sell cars that have had these things happen and not disclose any of it.

I know there's nothing I can do about it, I'm just pessimistic about the reliability, safety (when core operating features could just fail while driving with no mechanical override) and lifespan of modern cars.

Don't people at SpaceX cheer and celebrate when their rockets explode? (I don't follow rocket launches, maybe their supposed to explode, I don't know)

On 11/01/2024 at 17:34, hagjohn said:

It is hard having an adult discussion with you.  You refuse to hear any criticism of the rich men you worship. Musk has some good business sense but it usually is over shadowed by his erratic emotional state. You cannot deny that.

Yes he can and that’s the problem. 

Don't condemn Tesla for Elon's ridiculous behavior.  There is some very hard working people there.

 

...but as far as the ridiculous behavior goes:  https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/elon-musk-cosigns-racist-claim-that-black-students-have-low-iqs/ar-AA1mOLVQ?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=57077e73671441199aec084670aaa7d7&ei=39

  • Sad 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!