• Sign in to Neowin Faster!

    Create an account on Neowin to contribute and support the site.

Sign in to follow this  

what will be the final name of Longhorn?

Recommended Posts

Glowstick    3

Noone knows, but if they go with the numbering scheme, they should pick 2007, which sounds and looks better than 2006.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fred Derf    217

Windows ST (Secure Technology)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
csabo2    0

im wondering they will drop "windows" they were going to do so a while back, if you install neptune, it says "microsoft neptune" MS wanted to pull away from the word windows. not exactly sure why though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
pirokiko    0

Bearing in mind the competition...

Win OS X

Windows 10.0

Windows LX

Wind0ze (come all, we've ALL called it that once)

Tim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hurmoth    518

What does the LX stand for?

I still say that it should be renamed to Microsoft Doors 1.0 :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mad_onion    13

Why do people keep saying it will be the sixth version

wont it be the seventh?

win3.0

95

98

me

2000

xp

longhorn

SEE!!

i think it should be windowsRX that would be cool or 2007 would be fine

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Akirajds    0

Windows LSSDETI

Windows (Linux sucks so dont even try it)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Veiva    200
Why do people keep saying it will be the sixth version

wont it be the seventh?

win3.0

95

98

me

2000

xp

longhorn

SEE!!

i think it should be windowsRX that would be cool or 2007 would be fine

Actually if you go by that it would be the 17th:

DOS 1.0 - 6.0

Windows 1.0 - 3.0

Windows 95

Windows NT

Windows 98

Windows 98SE

Windows 2000

Windows ME (or did 2k come out after?)

Windows XP

THEN Longhorn.

It is actually NT 6.0 (Windows NT), that is why oit would be # 6.

But I think they should do eitheir

Windows Longhorn

Windows 2006

Windows 6.0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hotrod    0

Windows ND

(next decade) :huh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hankyone    0

hmm... what about

Windows S

Windows U

Windows X

:p

but seriously i like how they did in XP with the two letters

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dixon    0

Windows 5.0L

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dixon    0

Windows OSX+

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dixon    0

Well seeing as they just bought the name... maybe they intend to name Longhorn LINDOWS!

No?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
McGazza    0

Chill! I been hearing it could be possibly called Windows 4Q Fouth Quarter. Lol very lame i know and im not saying its true. :p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hurmoth    518
Why do people keep saying it will be the sixth version

wont it be the seventh?

win3.0

95

98

me

2000

xp

longhorn

SEE!!

i think it should be windowsRX that would be cool or 2007 would be fine

Because Windows 3.0 was just a shell over DOS, not an actual OS. Plus it was only 16-bit, not 32 like 95 through Longhorn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hankyone    0
Because Windows 3.0 was just a shell over DOS, not an actual OS. Plus it was only 16-bit, not 32 like 95 through Longhorn.

but it still a "windows"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hurmoth    518
but it still a "windows"

Technically speaking you're right, but I'm almost sure that they are counting only 32-bit Windows though. That's the only thing that works to make Windows 6.0.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
metal_termite    0

I don't see Microsoft abandoning the XP name after only one version. They had 3 versions of the generic "microsoft windows". Another 3 versions of the year based name (95, 98, ME). They had the NT versions. And now XP. I'm pretty sure it will be called XP2. MS seems to only change names after a major overhaul of the OS. Longhorn is just carrying where XP left off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
+Human.Online    8,608

"Longhorn is just carrying on where XP left off"...

If you say so buddy! I see a new name, as they are really trying to push so many new ideas.

Win 3.0 was not the first windows anyhow!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Steve Lampkins    1

I think Windows 2007 sounds more futeristic than Windows 2006.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Apollo    0

Windows XT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jason    5
Because Windows 3.0 was just a shell over DOS, not an actual OS. Plus it was only 16-bit, not 32 like 95 through Longhorn.

Why are there no NT builds listed ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jason    5
Technically speaking you're right, but I'm almost sure that they are counting only 32-bit Windows though. That's the only thing that works to make Windows 6.0.

Longhorn is NT 6 as 2000 was NT 5 and previous to that there was NT 4, NT 3.51 etc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jason    5
I don't see Microsoft abandoning the XP name after only one version. They had 3 versions of the generic "microsoft windows". Another 3 versions of the year based name (95, 98, ME). They had the NT versions. And now XP. I'm pretty sure it will be called XP2. MS seems to only change names after a major overhaul of the OS. Longhorn is just carrying where XP left off.

Longhorn is a major overhall, probably the biggest since the NT 4 to 2000 upgrade or 3.1 to 95.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kryptonate    0
Longhorn is just carrying where XP left off.

that's not true at all, Longhorn might look a bit like Windows XP (from the outside, and it are still builds) but from the inside it's totally different with the new WinFS, Avalon/Aero,...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.