Recommended Posts

LOL.........funny video, amazing what you can do with a computer these days.

Ok, for your theory to be true, then one has to ask, if the plane didn't hit the pentagon,

then where is it? Did aliens just snatch it off the earth? No wait, I know! The people and

the plane, along with Jim Morrision, Amielia Eahardt, Elvis and John Kennedy are all laughing

on a deserted island somewhere. Give me a break. There isn't ONE airplane crash that

is the same. The dynamics of each crash are always different. The fact there wasn't any

"tail or wings" just shows how little you know the effects of a jet fueled fire on MAGNESIUM

and aluminum. The amount of heat generated by a fire like that would melt the structure.

Just look at what happend at the WTC. The impact, which was a tremendous force did NOT

bring down the building. What caused the collapse of the building was the LARGE fire with

the heat. This MELTED the solid STEEL beams, causing the building to collapse. The same

can be said for the pentagon. The plane disappeared into the building, and BURNED. The

plane hit the building, just like planes hit the WTC........period.

:alien:

wow.. so naive... i posted this before... before you make any comments on this threaad at least do some research on the topic... you have just spit back everything that the govt and media has brainwashed the public w/.. we all know this stuff and we're calling bullsh1t on it... thats what this thread is about... the fact is... a steel building has NEVER been destroyed or taken down by fire. the fire does not burn hot enough.

in the case of the fire melting the plane at the pentagon is just rubbish... the fire didnt burn long enough or get hot enough, there would still be clear evidence of SOME pieces of a plane, which there are not.

again, you cant just spit back things we all have heard before... theyre wrong and thats what we're discussing.

Interesting flash, but we don't know who created it or what credibility they have. They may be anti-Bush and fabricated it. I'm not saying it is because I have no proof, but I'm also not going to believe everything I see on the internet. I just don't get who supposedly shot this "missle."

my opinion on who shot the missle , was probly the usa to cover up the whole twin towers because they knew it was going to happen , if u have seen ferinheit(sp) 9/11 u'd understand what i mean

beacause they knew it was going to happen so they set it up to make it look like it was a complete surpirise which it wasnt

but thats my opinion , thats why i think osama bin laden is still not captured lol common its the states they can twist anyones arm and get info

makes me proud to be a canadian :)

my opinion on who shot the missle , was probly the usa to cover up the whole twin towers because they knew it was going to happen , if u have seen ferinheit(sp) 9/11 u'd understand what i mean

beacause they knew it was going to happen so they set it up to make it look like it was a complete surpirise which it wasnt

but thats my opinion , thats why i think osama bin laden is still not captured lol common its the states they can twist anyones arm and get info

makes me proud to be a canadian :)

First of all Fahrenheit 9/11 was an admittedly biased movie against the current administration. Using that movie to prove anything really isn't reasonable. And just because the United States is the most powerful country on Earth does not mean that they can search every single inch of every single country in the world. I doubt Bin Laden is walking around the streets of Iraq or any other Middle Eastern country.

Now I think this whole "missile theory" is complete rubbish, but I will play your little game for a moment. Ok, lets assume all of 9/11 was planed by the government, and in truth Bin Laden really loves us and best buddies with George Bush, why the Pentagon? Why attack your military HQ? Something totally vital to the future wars you are going to start because of 9/11. Why not send the ?missile? into Michael Moore?s house? Why not the capital, or the Empire State Building, or the Statue of Liberty or countless other buildings/monuments that would stir the American people even more? The destruction of the Statue of Liberty would keep all of America ****ed off and fighting for the next hundred years, knocking a wall down at the Pentagon doesn?t have the same effect.

Now to criticize the movie; how do people on the ground know what a missile sounds like? A missile uses a jet engine, as does the plane that crashed into the Pentagon. I would be willing to bet serious money none of those people have ever even heard a missile in real life. In the movie itself it mentions the fact that the Pentagon was under reconstruction, when I was in Washington DC in 2000 I took a tour of the Pentagon and they talked about how the renovations would make the building one of the strongest in the world, better at withstanding bombs etcetera. The ?glass? is in fact bulletproof Lexon I believe too.

I don?t think I changed anyone?s mind with this, the crazies will still think this whole thing was a massive government plot like in the Hollywood movies or the X-Files. And the rest of us believe the truth, barbaric terrorists who hate the USA did this, not our own government.

my opinion on who shot the missle , was probly the usa to cover up the whole twin towers because they knew it was going to happen , if u have seen ferinheit(sp) 9/11 u'd understand what i mean

beacause they knew it was going to happen so they set it up to make it look like it was a complete surpirise which it wasnt

but thats my opinion , thats why i think osama bin laden is still not captured lol common its the states they can twist anyones arm and get info

makes me proud to be a canadian :)

F 9/11 is completely irrelevant to this thread... while the movie makes you think... for the general public... it's dodging the point. not only did the govt know, but they planned it... the "terrorists" were the scapegoat... they had nothing to do w/ it

Now I think this whole "missile theory" is complete rubbish, but I will play your little game for a moment. Ok, lets assume all of 9/11 was planed by the government, and in truth Bin Laden really loves us and best buddies with George Bush, why the Pentagon? Why attack your military HQ? Something totally vital to the future wars you are going to start because of 9/11. Why not send the ?missile? into Michael Moore?s house? Why not the capital, or the Empire State Building, or the Statue of Liberty or countless other buildings/monuments that would stir the American people even more? The destruction of the Statue of Liberty would keep all of America ****ed off and fighting for the next hundred years, knocking a wall down at the Pentagon doesn?t have the same effect.

Now to criticize the movie; how do people on the ground know what a missile sounds like? A missile uses a jet engine, as does the plane that crashed into the Pentagon. I would be willing to bet serious money none of those people have ever even heard a missile in real life. In the movie itself it mentions the fact that the Pentagon was under reconstruction, when I was in Washington DC in 2000 I took a tour of the Pentagon and they talked about how the renovations would make the building one of the strongest in the world, better at withstanding bombs etcetera. The ?glass? is in fact bulletproof Lexon I believe too.

I don?t think I changed anyone?s mind with this, the crazies will still think this whole thing was a massive government plot like in the Hollywood movies or the X-Files. And the rest of us believe the truth, barbaric terrorists who hate the USA did this, not our own government.

like i said before... do some factual research before posting here.

thats a whole other thread in itself... Oswald was just a martyr and a scapegoat for the cause... Kennedy was shot b/c he wouldnt do "their" bidding... he actually cared about the common person, instead of the elite's personal and wordly gain... he ****ed too many people off by actually being a good president, so they couldnt have that. they shot him. i dont even know why this is debated anymore. it's clear that in the footage, Kennedy's head thrusts backwards and he is hit in the face/forehead. this means the "grassy knoll" theory is true... oswald was supposedly shooting from behind which means kennedy's head would blow forward.

anyways, back on the pentagon topic.

is there any conspiracy theory that you don't buy?

Now I think this whole "missile theory" is complete rubbish, but I will play your little game for a moment. Ok, lets assume all of 9/11 was planed by the government, and in truth Bin Laden really loves us and best buddies with George Bush, why the Pentagon? Why attack your military HQ? Something totally vital to the future wars you are going to start because of 9/11. Why not send the ?missile? into Michael Moore?s house? Why not the capital, or the Empire State Building, or the Statue of Liberty or countless other buildings/monuments that would stir the American people even more? The destruction of the Statue of Liberty would keep all of America ****ed off and fighting for the next hundred years, knocking a wall down at the Pentagon doesn?t have the same effect.

Now to criticize the movie; how do people on the ground know what a missile sounds like? A missile uses a jet engine, as does the plane that crashed into the Pentagon. I would be willing to bet serious money none of those people have ever even heard a missile in real life. In the movie itself it mentions the fact that the Pentagon was under reconstruction, when I was in Washington DC in 2000 I took a tour of the Pentagon and they talked about how the renovations would make the building one of the strongest in the world, better at withstanding bombs etcetera. The ?glass? is in fact bulletproof Lexon I believe too.

I don?t think I changed anyone?s mind with this, the crazies will still think this whole thing was a massive government plot like in the Hollywood movies or the X-Files. And the rest of us believe the truth, barbaric terrorists who hate the USA did this, not our own government.

Ever thought why there are people who hate the USA ? Is it maybe because this country always messes around in other countries ? Iraq had no terrorists, until the US invaded. Why are there US troops all over this planet ? To protect the US ? Or for having enough power to help the US economy to run the show ?

How many people have died in Iraq for what ? Just because a stuipd guy from Texas needs more oil ?

Believe it or not I think the world would be in more trouble without US intervention. Was invading Iraq such a bad thing ? I mean the stated intentions might have been shady, but we didnt get rid of an evil dictator. Where are you facts that the US invaded because of oil ? Do you see gas prices becoming lower since the invasion ? Because i dont

Believe it or not I think the world would be in more trouble without US intervention. Was invading Iraq such a bad thing ? I mean the stated intentions might have been shady, but we didnt get rid of an evil dictator. Where are you facts that the US invaded because of oil ? Do you see gas prices becoming lower since the invasion ? Because i dont

I don't believe it had anything to do with oil. Bush had an agenda against Hussein since he got into office, simply because of what happened with his father and Hussein... It was a personal thing that has led to thousands of people dying. Do you find that to be a just cause for the loss of American (and Iraqi) lives? I don't.

That is true. They were planning to attack Iraq long before they did Afghanistan.

The world was sympathetic with regards to Afghanistan (retaliation for 9/11) - the world was outraged (and I think still is) over Iraq. A documentary I was watching last night said that intelligence agencies strongly reccomended AGAINST going to war, as it would do nothing to contain terrorism but rather make it get more out of hand. Seems like they were right.

God Bless America!!!

Have you ever heard that "People hate you, only because they are jeolous."

Why everyone doesn't remember good things that the US have done?

w/o the US entering the WWII, you think europe could win the war!!!

w/o the US stopping the bloody dream of the Soviet Union... what the world would be like today!!!...

... just many.. many more good thing the US have done... just because of the hatred ... people are just blind to see that...

... and again.. God Bless America!!!

By no means am I saying anything bad about my country, the good ol' U.S. of A.

I am saying something bad about Bush. That's it. I am ashamed to have him representing this country.

I mean, here's how it breaks down: I don't like Kerry too much, but Bush is 100 times worse, so I'm voting for Kerry simply to get Bush out of office. I hope most people will be doing the same...

Ever thought why there are people who hate the USA ? Is it maybe because this country always messes around in other countries ? Iraq had no terrorists, until the US invaded. Why are there US troops all over this planet ? To protect the US ? Or for having enough power to help the US economy to run the show ?

How many people have died in Iraq for what ? Just because a stuipd guy from Texas needs more oil ?

Iraq had no terrorists? Really, because I remember seeing pictures of terrorist training camps and the weapon stockpiles they had. Moreover Saddam Hussein paid the family of suicide bombers $20,000 USD for each family member then blew themselves up. Finally Saddam let the terrorists use Baghdad as a safe heaven, one of the most famous terrorist was Abu Abbas, who killed Leon Klinghoffer on October 7, 1985. (http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Apr2003/n04162003_200304161.html) Yeah so no terrorists here, nope none at all, in fact Saddam and Baghdad was a great place full of friendly folk.

Why are American Troops all over the planet? Well mostly because of past wars, Cuba from the Spanish-American War, Japan from WWII, Germany from WWII and the Cold War, South Korea from the Korean War. Another reason is to protect American interests world wide (Embassies or American Civilians). And lastly American soldiers are around the world to fight for freedom (Afghanistan, Iraq), help keep the peace (Bosnia) or give aid to those in need (Somalia in the early 90?s)

Well that was off topi:laugh:h:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • There is a default resolution setting in Settings > Display that can be changed with a click. You can also change the settings on a per-game basis. No CLI needed. Also, Steam has countless games that are not "[perpetual] alpha/beta games", so no need for the straw man. Plus you can use other stores as well. And console games (e.g. PS5) cost a fortune, which itself more than negates the price subsidy on the system, unless you plan on exclusively playing 1 or 2 games. It's true that you shouldn't buy a system that doesn't support the game(s) you want to play, but I think that's kinda obvious, and applies to every console as well as PC. I don't game in the living room and have no need of a Steam Machine, but there is a clear market segment that would find it useful.
    • RSS Guard 5.2.0 by Razvan Serea RSS Guard is a simple (yet powerful) feed reader. It is able to fetch the most known feed formats, including RSS/RDF and ATOM. It's free, it's open-source. RSS Guard currently supports Czech, Dutch, English, French, German, Italian. RSS Guard will never depend on other services - this includes online news aggregators like Feedly, The Old Reader and others. RSS Guard is developed on top of the Qt library and it supports these operating systems: Windows GNU/Linux OS/2 (eComStation) Mac OS X xBSD (possibly) Android (possibly) other platforms supported by Qt The core features of RSS Guard are: support for online feed synchronization via plugins, Tiny Tiny RSS (from RSS Guard 3.0.0). multiplatform, support for all feed formats, simplicity, import/export of feeds to/from OPML 2.0, downloader with own tab and support for up to 6 parallel downloads, message filter with regular expressions, feed metadata fetching including icons, simple Adblock functionality, customized popup notifications, Google-based auto-completion for internal web browser location bar, ability to cleanup internal message database with various options, enhanced feed auto-updating with separate time intervals, multiple data backend support, SQLite (in-memory DBs too), MySQL. is able to specify target database by its name (MySQL backend), “portable” mode support with clever auto-detection, feed categorization, drap-n-drop for feed list, automatic checking for updates, ability to discover existing feeds on websites, full support of podcasts (both RSS & ATOM), ability to backup/restore database or settings, fully-featured recycle bin, printing of messages and any web pages, can be fully controlled via keyboard, feed authentication (Digest-MD5, BASIC, NTLM-2), handles tons of messages & feeds, sweet look & feel, fully adjustable toolbars (changeable buttons and style), ability to check for updates on all platforms + self-updating on Windows, hideable main menu, toolbars and list headers, KFeanza-based default icon theme + ability to create your own icon themes, fully skinnable user interface + ability to create your own skins, “newspaper” view, plenty of skins, support for "feed://" URI scheme, ability to hide list of feeds/categories, open-source development model based on GNU GPL license, version 3, tabbed interface, integrated web browser with adjustable behavior + external browser support, internal web browser mouse gestures support, desktop integration via tray icon, localizations to some languages, Qt library is the only dependency, open-source development model and friendly author waiting for your feedback, no ads, no hidden costs. RSS Guard 5.2.0 changelog: Added: Feed auto-fetch can now also be delayed while Feral GameMode is active on Linux and startup auto-fetch is skipped when GameMode is already active. (#2265) WebEngine builds can now use RSS Guard generated proxy auto-config (PAC) rules so article/web browsing follows per-account and per-feed proxy settings more closely. (#2273) Generated PAC rules now also cover related subdomains and use Public Suffix List data, so feeds such as feeds.bbc.co.uk can also proxy resources from images.bbc.co.uk. (#2273) Standard feeds can now define extra proxy domains, useful when article images, stylesheets or other page resources are loaded from a CDN or another domain that should use the same feed proxy. (#2273) RSS Guard now asks for proxy credentials when a WebEngine page needs proxy authentication and can fill credentials from the current feed proxy when available. (#2273) Network settings again include an option to ignore all cookies, which clears stored cookies and prevents new cookies from being accepted. Standard RSS/ATOM feeds can now individually ignore cookies while downloading feed data. Stored cookies can now be deleted from the Tools menu. Custom skin colors can now override the feed list article count color separately from feed titles, including a separate highlighted color. (#2275) Settings dialog can now search across available settings and highlight matching controls. (#1754) Standard RSS/ATOM feeds can now optionally be reported as broken when they are valid but contain no articles. (#2039) Standard RSS/ATOM feeds can now override the application-wide feed connection timeout per feed. (#1023) Tray icon can now use a custom background color and unread-count text color, with an option to reuse the generated icon as the application icon. (#1973) Support for more benevolent parsing of Gemlog entries (#2295). Article list can now show when an article was received by RSS Guard. (#947) Feed deep discovery now actually scrapes all links found in the website and checks if they are feeds or not. This greatly enhances usability of the deep discovery mode and discovers many more feeds than before. (#2306) Search boxes now show a small dot when the feed or article list is hiding some items because of active filtering. (#873) Articles now have a shortcut-assignable action to open the homepage of the feed they belong to. (#2060) Fixed: Parallel feed updates no longer crash when multiple update results are processed at the same time. (64cf521) Links in WebEngine articles opened from feeds such as Kill the Newsletter now open correctly instead of being swallowed by the embedded page. (#2272) Relative article URLs resolution was kinda broken. (#2282) Clicking article URL did not work when the URL had "fragment" set. (#2293) The default proxy setting now uses Qt/system default proxy behavior instead of forcing no proxy. (e0263ad) WebEngine article loading now keeps the current feed context, so feed-specific proxy credentials remain available while the article page loads. (fdd0f00) Download: RSS Guard 5.2.0 (64-bit) | Portable | ~ 130.0 MB (Open Source) Link: RSS Guard Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This is gonna separate the creeps from the rest of the crowd.
    • "Claude, is our CEO a compete and utter fool by wasting money on AI in this already worthless Teams chat?"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      110
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!