Recommended Posts

LOL.........funny video, amazing what you can do with a computer these days.

Ok, for your theory to be true, then one has to ask, if the plane didn't hit the pentagon,

then where is it? Did aliens just snatch it off the earth? No wait, I know! The people and

the plane, along with Jim Morrision, Amielia Eahardt, Elvis and John Kennedy are all laughing

on a deserted island somewhere. Give me a break. There isn't ONE airplane crash that

is the same. The dynamics of each crash are always different. The fact there wasn't any

"tail or wings" just shows how little you know the effects of a jet fueled fire on MAGNESIUM

and aluminum. The amount of heat generated by a fire like that would melt the structure.

Just look at what happend at the WTC. The impact, which was a tremendous force did NOT

bring down the building. What caused the collapse of the building was the LARGE fire with

the heat. This MELTED the solid STEEL beams, causing the building to collapse. The same

can be said for the pentagon. The plane disappeared into the building, and BURNED. The

plane hit the building, just like planes hit the WTC........period.

:alien:

wow.. so naive... i posted this before... before you make any comments on this threaad at least do some research on the topic... you have just spit back everything that the govt and media has brainwashed the public w/.. we all know this stuff and we're calling bullsh1t on it... thats what this thread is about... the fact is... a steel building has NEVER been destroyed or taken down by fire. the fire does not burn hot enough.

in the case of the fire melting the plane at the pentagon is just rubbish... the fire didnt burn long enough or get hot enough, there would still be clear evidence of SOME pieces of a plane, which there are not.

again, you cant just spit back things we all have heard before... theyre wrong and thats what we're discussing.

Interesting flash, but we don't know who created it or what credibility they have. They may be anti-Bush and fabricated it. I'm not saying it is because I have no proof, but I'm also not going to believe everything I see on the internet. I just don't get who supposedly shot this "missle."

my opinion on who shot the missle , was probly the usa to cover up the whole twin towers because they knew it was going to happen , if u have seen ferinheit(sp) 9/11 u'd understand what i mean

beacause they knew it was going to happen so they set it up to make it look like it was a complete surpirise which it wasnt

but thats my opinion , thats why i think osama bin laden is still not captured lol common its the states they can twist anyones arm and get info

makes me proud to be a canadian :)

my opinion on who shot the missle , was probly the usa to cover up the whole twin towers because they knew it was going to happen , if u have seen ferinheit(sp) 9/11 u'd understand what i mean

beacause they knew it was going to happen so they set it up to make it look like it was a complete surpirise which it wasnt

but thats my opinion , thats why i think osama bin laden is still not captured lol common its the states they can twist anyones arm and get info

makes me proud to be a canadian :)

First of all Fahrenheit 9/11 was an admittedly biased movie against the current administration. Using that movie to prove anything really isn't reasonable. And just because the United States is the most powerful country on Earth does not mean that they can search every single inch of every single country in the world. I doubt Bin Laden is walking around the streets of Iraq or any other Middle Eastern country.

Now I think this whole "missile theory" is complete rubbish, but I will play your little game for a moment. Ok, lets assume all of 9/11 was planed by the government, and in truth Bin Laden really loves us and best buddies with George Bush, why the Pentagon? Why attack your military HQ? Something totally vital to the future wars you are going to start because of 9/11. Why not send the ?missile? into Michael Moore?s house? Why not the capital, or the Empire State Building, or the Statue of Liberty or countless other buildings/monuments that would stir the American people even more? The destruction of the Statue of Liberty would keep all of America ****ed off and fighting for the next hundred years, knocking a wall down at the Pentagon doesn?t have the same effect.

Now to criticize the movie; how do people on the ground know what a missile sounds like? A missile uses a jet engine, as does the plane that crashed into the Pentagon. I would be willing to bet serious money none of those people have ever even heard a missile in real life. In the movie itself it mentions the fact that the Pentagon was under reconstruction, when I was in Washington DC in 2000 I took a tour of the Pentagon and they talked about how the renovations would make the building one of the strongest in the world, better at withstanding bombs etcetera. The ?glass? is in fact bulletproof Lexon I believe too.

I don?t think I changed anyone?s mind with this, the crazies will still think this whole thing was a massive government plot like in the Hollywood movies or the X-Files. And the rest of us believe the truth, barbaric terrorists who hate the USA did this, not our own government.

my opinion on who shot the missle , was probly the usa to cover up the whole twin towers because they knew it was going to happen , if u have seen ferinheit(sp) 9/11 u'd understand what i mean

beacause they knew it was going to happen so they set it up to make it look like it was a complete surpirise which it wasnt

but thats my opinion , thats why i think osama bin laden is still not captured lol common its the states they can twist anyones arm and get info

makes me proud to be a canadian :)

F 9/11 is completely irrelevant to this thread... while the movie makes you think... for the general public... it's dodging the point. not only did the govt know, but they planned it... the "terrorists" were the scapegoat... they had nothing to do w/ it

Now I think this whole "missile theory" is complete rubbish, but I will play your little game for a moment. Ok, lets assume all of 9/11 was planed by the government, and in truth Bin Laden really loves us and best buddies with George Bush, why the Pentagon? Why attack your military HQ? Something totally vital to the future wars you are going to start because of 9/11. Why not send the ?missile? into Michael Moore?s house? Why not the capital, or the Empire State Building, or the Statue of Liberty or countless other buildings/monuments that would stir the American people even more? The destruction of the Statue of Liberty would keep all of America ****ed off and fighting for the next hundred years, knocking a wall down at the Pentagon doesn?t have the same effect.

Now to criticize the movie; how do people on the ground know what a missile sounds like? A missile uses a jet engine, as does the plane that crashed into the Pentagon. I would be willing to bet serious money none of those people have ever even heard a missile in real life. In the movie itself it mentions the fact that the Pentagon was under reconstruction, when I was in Washington DC in 2000 I took a tour of the Pentagon and they talked about how the renovations would make the building one of the strongest in the world, better at withstanding bombs etcetera. The ?glass? is in fact bulletproof Lexon I believe too.

I don?t think I changed anyone?s mind with this, the crazies will still think this whole thing was a massive government plot like in the Hollywood movies or the X-Files. And the rest of us believe the truth, barbaric terrorists who hate the USA did this, not our own government.

like i said before... do some factual research before posting here.

thats a whole other thread in itself... Oswald was just a martyr and a scapegoat for the cause... Kennedy was shot b/c he wouldnt do "their" bidding... he actually cared about the common person, instead of the elite's personal and wordly gain... he ****ed too many people off by actually being a good president, so they couldnt have that. they shot him. i dont even know why this is debated anymore. it's clear that in the footage, Kennedy's head thrusts backwards and he is hit in the face/forehead. this means the "grassy knoll" theory is true... oswald was supposedly shooting from behind which means kennedy's head would blow forward.

anyways, back on the pentagon topic.

is there any conspiracy theory that you don't buy?

Now I think this whole "missile theory" is complete rubbish, but I will play your little game for a moment. Ok, lets assume all of 9/11 was planed by the government, and in truth Bin Laden really loves us and best buddies with George Bush, why the Pentagon? Why attack your military HQ? Something totally vital to the future wars you are going to start because of 9/11. Why not send the ?missile? into Michael Moore?s house? Why not the capital, or the Empire State Building, or the Statue of Liberty or countless other buildings/monuments that would stir the American people even more? The destruction of the Statue of Liberty would keep all of America ****ed off and fighting for the next hundred years, knocking a wall down at the Pentagon doesn?t have the same effect.

Now to criticize the movie; how do people on the ground know what a missile sounds like? A missile uses a jet engine, as does the plane that crashed into the Pentagon. I would be willing to bet serious money none of those people have ever even heard a missile in real life. In the movie itself it mentions the fact that the Pentagon was under reconstruction, when I was in Washington DC in 2000 I took a tour of the Pentagon and they talked about how the renovations would make the building one of the strongest in the world, better at withstanding bombs etcetera. The ?glass? is in fact bulletproof Lexon I believe too.

I don?t think I changed anyone?s mind with this, the crazies will still think this whole thing was a massive government plot like in the Hollywood movies or the X-Files. And the rest of us believe the truth, barbaric terrorists who hate the USA did this, not our own government.

Ever thought why there are people who hate the USA ? Is it maybe because this country always messes around in other countries ? Iraq had no terrorists, until the US invaded. Why are there US troops all over this planet ? To protect the US ? Or for having enough power to help the US economy to run the show ?

How many people have died in Iraq for what ? Just because a stuipd guy from Texas needs more oil ?

Believe it or not I think the world would be in more trouble without US intervention. Was invading Iraq such a bad thing ? I mean the stated intentions might have been shady, but we didnt get rid of an evil dictator. Where are you facts that the US invaded because of oil ? Do you see gas prices becoming lower since the invasion ? Because i dont

Believe it or not I think the world would be in more trouble without US intervention. Was invading Iraq such a bad thing ? I mean the stated intentions might have been shady, but we didnt get rid of an evil dictator. Where are you facts that the US invaded because of oil ? Do you see gas prices becoming lower since the invasion ? Because i dont

I don't believe it had anything to do with oil. Bush had an agenda against Hussein since he got into office, simply because of what happened with his father and Hussein... It was a personal thing that has led to thousands of people dying. Do you find that to be a just cause for the loss of American (and Iraqi) lives? I don't.

That is true. They were planning to attack Iraq long before they did Afghanistan.

The world was sympathetic with regards to Afghanistan (retaliation for 9/11) - the world was outraged (and I think still is) over Iraq. A documentary I was watching last night said that intelligence agencies strongly reccomended AGAINST going to war, as it would do nothing to contain terrorism but rather make it get more out of hand. Seems like they were right.

God Bless America!!!

Have you ever heard that "People hate you, only because they are jeolous."

Why everyone doesn't remember good things that the US have done?

w/o the US entering the WWII, you think europe could win the war!!!

w/o the US stopping the bloody dream of the Soviet Union... what the world would be like today!!!...

... just many.. many more good thing the US have done... just because of the hatred ... people are just blind to see that...

... and again.. God Bless America!!!

By no means am I saying anything bad about my country, the good ol' U.S. of A.

I am saying something bad about Bush. That's it. I am ashamed to have him representing this country.

I mean, here's how it breaks down: I don't like Kerry too much, but Bush is 100 times worse, so I'm voting for Kerry simply to get Bush out of office. I hope most people will be doing the same...

Ever thought why there are people who hate the USA ? Is it maybe because this country always messes around in other countries ? Iraq had no terrorists, until the US invaded. Why are there US troops all over this planet ? To protect the US ? Or for having enough power to help the US economy to run the show ?

How many people have died in Iraq for what ? Just because a stuipd guy from Texas needs more oil ?

Iraq had no terrorists? Really, because I remember seeing pictures of terrorist training camps and the weapon stockpiles they had. Moreover Saddam Hussein paid the family of suicide bombers $20,000 USD for each family member then blew themselves up. Finally Saddam let the terrorists use Baghdad as a safe heaven, one of the most famous terrorist was Abu Abbas, who killed Leon Klinghoffer on October 7, 1985. (http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Apr2003/n04162003_200304161.html) Yeah so no terrorists here, nope none at all, in fact Saddam and Baghdad was a great place full of friendly folk.

Why are American Troops all over the planet? Well mostly because of past wars, Cuba from the Spanish-American War, Japan from WWII, Germany from WWII and the Cold War, South Korea from the Korean War. Another reason is to protect American interests world wide (Embassies or American Civilians). And lastly American soldiers are around the world to fight for freedom (Afghanistan, Iraq), help keep the peace (Bosnia) or give aid to those in need (Somalia in the early 90?s)

Well that was off topi:laugh:h:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AI is the beginning, wait until real robots replace more jobs, specifically jobs that require physical work.
    • AI is indeed eliminating jobs, and Oracle just proved it by Hamid Ganji There’s no question that AI has become the hottest trend in workplaces, and every company is trying to adopt AI-driven solutions across its operations. While some industry leaders repeatedly say AI won’t lead to massive layoffs, recent data suggest that AI is actually one of the main reasons some companies are reducing their workforce. According to Oracle’s annual regulatory filing, the company has laid off about 21,000 employees, or 13% of its workforce, amid increasing AI adoption. “The adoption and deployment of AI technologies across our operations have resulted, and may continue to result, in reductions to our workforce,” Oracle said in the filing. The software giant now has approximately 141,000 full-time employees, a notable decrease from 162,000 during the same period last year. Restructuring expenses, including severance payments, cost Oracle $1.84 billion in fiscal 2026. Additionally, around 49,000 Oracle employees were based in the U.S., while approximately 92,000 were employed internationally. Like many other companies, Oracle has fully embraced AI and concentrated much of its efforts on the technology. The company is also a key participant in the United States’ $500 billion Stargate Project, which aims to build multiple AI data centers across the country. When it comes to AI adoption and its impact on the workforce, opinions remain divided. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, whose company has been one of the biggest beneficiaries of the AI boom, recently said in an interview that attributing job cuts to AI is a “lazy” narrative. “The narrative that connects AI to job loss, for many of the CEOs that are doing it – it is just too lazy. AI has just arrived, how is it possible they're already losing jobs?” Huang said. However, statistics and recent reports tell a different story. According to Layoffs.fyi, 196 tech companies have laid off about 119,800 employees so far this year. Reducing staff and replacing roles with AI agents could become one of the most significant trends in the job market in the years ahead.
    • Zoom Workplace 7.1.0.41345 by Razvan Serea Zoom Workplace for Windows is a reliable video conferencing tool that makes it easy to connect and collaborate. With features like messaging, file sharing, and app integrations, it’s designed to streamline teamwork. You’ll get high-quality audio and video, strong security with end-to-end encryption, and an intuitive interface—all of which help remote teams and businesses stay productive and connected. Zoom Workplace key features: High-Definition Video & Audio: Provides clear, reliable communication for virtual meetings. End-to-End Encryption: Ensures secure communication with strong data protection. Multi-Factor Authentication: Adds an extra layer of security for user accounts. Integration with Productivity Apps: Supports seamless integration with Microsoft Office, Google Workspace, and more. File Sharing: Easily share files during meetings for efficient collaboration. Real-Time Messaging: Enables team chat for ongoing communication. Collaborative Whiteboarding: Allows teams to brainstorm and collaborate visually. Webinar Support: Host large webinars with interactive features. Administrative Controls: Manage user permissions, meeting settings, and security features. Cloud Storage: Automatically stores meetings and files in the cloud for easy access. Cross-Platform Support: Available on Windows, macOS, and mobile devices. Meeting features: Virtual Backgrounds: Customize your background for meetings to maintain privacy or enhance professionalism. Touch Up My Appearance: Automatically smoothens skin tone for a more polished video appearance. Breakout Rooms: Divide meetings into smaller sessions for group discussions or workshops. Live Transcription: Automatically generate real-time captions during meetings for accessibility. Zoom Apps: Integrate third-party applications directly into Zoom for enhanced functionality. Meeting Reactions: Participants can use emojis for quick, non-verbal feedback during meetings. Polling: Conduct live polls during meetings to gather instant feedback from participants. Attention Tracking: Monitors participant attention during meetings to ensure engagement. Closed Captioning: Enable manual or automatic captions for a more inclusive experience. Webinar Replay: Record and share webinars with analytics for audience engagement. Download: Zoom 64-bit | 145.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Links: Zoom Website | Zoom ARM64 | Zoom Installers | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • UK funds £60M AI labs to challenge US tech dominance with open-source models by Paul Hill The UK government has awarded £60 million to Oxford University and University College London to help keep the country in the AI race by focusing on open-source, low-hardware alternatives. This is in stark contrast to the expensive, closed-source, and high-hardware-requirement models being created in the United States and elsewhere. The money will be shared among two new academic research labs over six years to help them redesign the fundamental mathematics and architectures of AI to help the UK reduce its reliance on a handful of US tech firms. Commenting on the development, AI Minister Kanishka Narayan said: Initially, the government planned to fund just one lab with a £40 million investment, but with this update, two labs will now get access to a larger pool of funds. The labs are expected to invest in the top AI researchers at every career stage, with £2 million per lab being set aside for hiring at least ten doctoral students. The government hopes that this will grow the UK’s talent in the field of AI. The labs are also expected to work closely with the leaders in British AI research, such as the Alan Turing Institute and UKRI’s AI research hubs. This will allow the various teams to collaborate and create new solutions faster than they could alone. This development is pretty interesting for a number of reasons, chiefly that it could create a long-term challenge for US tech firms if these labs successfully scale these open-source architectures that bypass the proprietary ecosystems. It could also give British businesses and public sector organizations access to AI features without paying high licensing fees to foreign providers or needing to invest in specialized server infrastructure.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!