Recommended Posts

Oi vey. He wouldn't compare it to the GBA or N-gage since neither is a competitor, in the same bracket, to the PSP. The DS and PSP are dueling consoles and, thus, Dazzla decided to use the DS as a basis for some very simple observations regarding the size of the unit, the screen, and some OS basics. Just because the PSP comes off looking better to some of us, doesn't mean you need to get all worried.

585157413[/snapback]

Wrong.. Gizmondo and PSP can compete more than DS, ds is worse than Gizmondo

Has anyone though of cracking the UMD casing open, and putting the disc in a CD-Rom drive?  See if it reads?  I have a strange feeling UMD is just a mini dvd in a case :s .

585502160[/snapback]

I thought thats exactly what it was, a 1.8gb mini DVD.

Prob is, even if comp does read it, then what?

Unfortunatley, we cant buy blank ones to write own own info to to put in the PSP.

Plus I think its a bit early for PSP Emulators! LOL :D

The original reviewer wrote the following regarding encoding video to the PSP: "Full screen is the option I use all the time, it makes the movie touch the borders of all 4 sides. If you convert a 16:9 movie into 320*240 then use full screen it will stretch it back out and retain the correct ratio."

The advice the reviewer gives is in direct conflict from what I have heard througout the net and several other forums. I'm not saying he is wrong. As a matter of fact, I am ready to believe his view over others as his review was very thorough and well put together.

One of the main reasons other than gameplay on why I want the PSP so bad is because of its video playback capability. Prior to focusing in on the PSP, I was in the market for a Personal Video Player, machines that look like the PSP, but carry 20-40 Gb harddrives and work off of microsofts media center software. They are priced anywhere from $450-$1000, so you can see why I am really excited about the PSP.

Anyways, I have already ripped several of my DVD's (ALL widescreen) and have used two encoding programs (raPIZ & 3GP) to get them in the proper MPEG-4 format so the PSP will recognize them.

As everyone knows, the PSP's screen native resolution is 480X272, a 16:9 ratio widescreen format. Everyone also knows that the PSP will not accept any video playback in it's native resolution. Here is where I have questions.

The reviewer states that when encoding a widescreen movie (16:9 ratio), encode the movie at a standard screen resolution of 320X240. If you do this and then set the PSP's screen option to "FULL", the movies will be stretched to fit the screen, and the movie will retain the correct ratio. There is where I would like to expound a little.

If you encode a movie to format of less than 16:9, and then stretch it to fit a 16:9 ratio, how would you be able to retain the correct ratio? The general consensus on this subject in some other forums I visit was that you could "hack" the PSP as it were into recognizing widecreen resolutions, just not it's native resolution of 480X272. One of the encoders I use, raPIZ, has a screen resolution option of 368X208. I have been told that it would be better to encode all movies in this widescreen resolution as when it plays back on the PSP, it will be able to uilize the entire screen, and will retain its correct ratio and not look stretched.

Sorry for being so long winded. I am not saying anyone is wrong here. Not having a PSP of my own to test this out definitively, I am left to the advice of those that have imported them.

That said, if the reviewer or anyone else that has experience with movie playback on the PSP could expound a bit on getting 16:9 movies to playback on the PSP using the entire screen and retaining it's correct ratio. Thanks so much!

Firstly, I have heard that there is an updated version of a encoding prog that now converts to correct ratio, res etc. Hopefully this is true.

Secondly, I have a widescreen tv, and when the tv pic isnt widescreen it shows it with black bars down each of the left n rught side, however you can force the picture to use all of the screen, but then you may lose a bit of the picture as the tv trys to keep everythin in perspective, thats jus my tv though. reason I am tryin to use my tv as an example is i think the psp does exactly the same thing.

I encoded a episode of friends, and when on the psp, it showed it only using part of the screen, with the black borders as previously mentioned. the zoom options I had were, normal, full screen, zoom, and one other cant rem wat called.

Dunno if this helps or not, its jus my take on it. Hopefully this software update is out there and we can all encode happily utilising the fullness of the psp screen! :)

Firstly, I have heard that there is an updated version of a encoding prog that now converts to correct ratio, res etc. Hopefully this is true.

Secondly, I have a widescreen tv, and when the tv pic isnt widescreen it shows it with black bars down each of the left n rught side, however you can force the picture to use all of the screen, but then you may lose a bit of the picture as the tv trys to keep everythin in perspective, thats jus my tv though. reason I am tryin to use my tv as an example is i think the psp does exactly the same thing.

I encoded a episode of friends, and when on the psp, it showed it only using part of the screen, with the black borders as previously mentioned. the zoom options I had were, normal, full screen, zoom, and one other cant rem wat called.

Dunno if this helps or not, its jus my take on it. Hopefully this software update is out there and we can all encode happily utilising the fullness of the psp screen! :)

585516218[/snapback]

Hulibecker, that's my point exactly. I have an HDTV as well, and when I am watching normal 4:3 TV, it has the vertical black bars, but I can set my TV to 16:9 mode wich fills up the entire screen, but, you lose the original picture ratio, and everyones heads are fat, etc, as the picture is being stretch horizontally.

That was my question in reference to the reviewers post. He says encode and 320X240, and then stretch the movie to fit the screen, and if the movie you encoded was in widescreen, the stretched image will not be distorted. At least that is what I took him to say.

If that is true, then I was wondering why on other boards people are "hacking" different resolutions for the PSP trying to attain as close to a "widescreen 16:9" image as they can.

Am I as clear as mud on this, lol?

Anyhow, any and all comments and responses to my questions would be greatly appreciated!

The hacking thing which has recently come about isn't anything to do with ratios, it's about perceived quality. People are trying to get more vertical detail in their encodes because the full screen option stretches horizontally more than vertically. It makes sense to add as much vertical resolution into the video file as you can (to an extent).

View a 16:9 movie at 320*240 and it will be squashed up vertically (the opposite to 4:3 on a HDTV), using full screen will stretch it back up to the right ratio but stretching from 320 -> 480 is less than desirable than stretching a 368px wide movie (this being the "hack" which has recently come about). Either way every pixel of the video is stretched to fill the entire screen in "full screen" mode so what was originally a 16:9 video will still be 16:9 regardless of which "new" encoding size you choose.

From now on I will be encoding into something like 368*208, nothing to do with aspect ratio you understand but the perceived increase in quality due to 368 -> 480 being better than 320 -> 480. Both will result in the original 16:9 movie being 16:9 o the PSP screen when viewed in full screen.

As for wider than 16:9 movies, i.e. 2.35:1 I used to add black borders to the file via virtualdub so it was a 16:9 movie file with borders.

The hacking thing which has recently come about isn't anything to do with ratios, it's about perceived quality. People are trying to get more vertical detail in their encodes because the full screen option stretches horizontally more than vertically. It makes sense to add as much vertical resolution into the video file as you can (to an extent).

View a 16:9 movie at 320*240 and it will be squashed up vertically (the opposite to 4:3 on a HDTV), using full screen will stretch it back up to the right ratio but stretching from 320 -> 480 is less than desirable than stretching a 368px wide movie (this being the "hack" which has recently come about). Either way every pixel of the video is stretched to fill the entire screen in "full screen" mode so what was originally a 16:9 video will still be 16:9 regardless of which "new" encoding size you choose.

From now on I will be encoding into something like 368*208, nothing to do with aspect ratio you understand but the perceived increase in quality due to 368 -> 480 being better than 320 -> 480. Both will result in the original 16:9 movie being 16:9 o the PSP screen when viewed in full screen.

As for wider than 16:9 movies, i.e. 2.35:1 I used to add black borders to the file via virtualdub so it was a 16:9 movie file with borders.

585516757[/snapback]

Well, that is the most intelligent and articulate post I have seen on this question.

You cannot imagine how many people and how many forums I have asked this questions with no real answer.

One last question. You did say that you would in fact be encoding at the 368X208 not so much for how the movie will fit the PSP's screen, but do to the effect that you will have more vertical resolution, which I can understand.

I have encoded movies in both the 320X240 and 368X208 modes. The one difference that I can see for sure is the movie itself. By that I mean when I play the 320X240 movie in quicktime, the movie plays perfect in a 16:9 ratio. However, when I play back a movie encoded in 368X208, the movie plays back like a 2.35:1 movie would on an HDTV, that is, it is widescreen, but still has horizontal black bars above and below the movie.

My question is, when you play a movie encoded in 368X208 on the PSP, and then play it stretched under full mode, will you have those same horizontal black bars above and below the movie???

Thanks again!!!

The only reason why I keep asking these questions trying to get this right is because I would like to have about 10-15 of my movies encoded and ready to go when the PSP launches.

As you know, it is very time consuming to rip and then encode these movies, so before I go through all of the trouble, I just want to make sure that I am encoding these movies properly.

I certainly want the movies to look the best they can, and I also would not like black bars on my PSP while I am watching the movies as well.

Thanks for your help!

Ok, well I gave it a try. I used 3GP Converter 0.29, it has the added options for 368*208. To be really honest, I don't see a huge difference in quality, there is an increase though, so I imagine I'll be using 360*208 in the future. One of the main reasons is that whatever the hack/patch does to enable this it automatically expands the video to fill the PSP screen. It still stretches, it's not native, but it's more convenient. As a consequence it's useless for 4:3 content but cool for 16:9. Only for ease of use you understand though.

320*240. The reason for this is that using the hack causes the video to instantly fill up the screen, and any option you choose on the PSP (Full screen, zoom etc) doesn't effect it. With 4:3 content it would force it to stretch to the screen if you used 368*208. With 320*240 you will have the various stretching options.

320*240. The reason for this is that using the hack causes the video to instantly fill up the screen, and any option you choose on the PSP (Full screen, zoom etc) doesn't effect it. With 4:3 content it would force it to stretch to the screen if you used 368*208. With 320*240 you will have the various stretching options.

585540477[/snapback]

Will there be vertical black bars if I encode with 320x240?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Nudge me when they bring back hardware audio acceleration so I can get my EAX 5 back. We've evolved graphics to real-time path tracing, but regressed audio some 15 years back in time with this stupid software audio stack.
    • Ocenaudio 3.19.4 by Razvan Serea  Ocenaudio is a full featured, fast and easy to use audio and music editor. It is the ideal software for people who need to edit and analyze audio files without complications. Ocenaudio also has powerful features that will please more advanced users. To assist ocenaudio development, a powerful toolset of audio editing, analysis and manipulation called Ocen Framework was created. ocenaudio is also based on Qt framework, a well known library for cross-platform development. Cross-platform support ocenaudio is available for all major operating systems: Microsoft Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. Native applications are generated for each platform from a common source, in order to achieve excelent performance and seamless integration with the operating system. All versions of ocenaudio have a uniform set of features and the same graphical interface, so the skills you learn in one platform can be used in the others. VST plugins support Ocenaudio supports VST (Virtual Studio Technology) plugins, giving its users access to numerous effects. Like the native effects, VST effects can use real-time preview to aide configuration. Real-time preview of effects Applying effects such as EQ, gain and filtering is an important part of audio editing. However, it is very tricky to get the desired result by adjusting the controls configuration alone: you must listen the processed audio. To ease the configuration of audio effects, ocenaudio has a real time preview feature: you hear the processed signal while adjusting the controls. The effect configuration window also includes a miniature view of the selected audio signal. You can navigate on this miniature view in the same way as you do on the main interface, selecting parts that interest you and listening to the effect result in real time. Multiselection for delicate editions To speed up complex audio files editing, ocenaudio includes multi-selection. With this amazing tool, you can simultaneously select different portions of an audio file and listen, edit or even apply an effect to them. For example, if you want to normalize only the excerpts of an interview where the interviewee is talking, just select them and apply the effect. Eficient edition of large files With ocenaudio, there is no limit to the length or the quantity of the audio files you can edit. Using an advanced memory management system, the application keeps your files open without wasting any of your computer's memory. Even in files several hours long, common editing operations such as copy, cut or paste happen almost instantly. Fully featured spectrogram Besides offering an incredible waveform view of your audio files, ocenaudio has a powerful and complete spectrogram view. In this view, you can analyze the spectral content of your audio signal with maximum clarity. Advanced users will be surprised to find that the spectrogram settings are applied in real time. The display is updated immediately when altering features such as the number of frequency bands, window type and size and dynamic range of the display. Ocenaudio 3.19.4 changelog: Adds fallback fonts so every language and symbol displays correctly Improves autosave and session recovery stability Improves region navigation and display Fixes a crash when the level meter is used on displays with a scaling greater than 200% Fixes memory corruption when using the silence selection tools Fixes crashes when closing a file while effects are still being processed Fixes a freeze when applying effects to many files at once (macOS) Fixes crashes related to audio devices on Windows Fixes invalid file names when exporting regions whose label is used as the file name Other bug fixes and improvements Download: Ocenaudio 64-bit | Portable | ~40.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Ocenaudio for Linux and Mac OS View: Ocenaudio Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      553
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!