Recommended Posts

Oi vey. He wouldn't compare it to the GBA or N-gage since neither is a competitor, in the same bracket, to the PSP. The DS and PSP are dueling consoles and, thus, Dazzla decided to use the DS as a basis for some very simple observations regarding the size of the unit, the screen, and some OS basics. Just because the PSP comes off looking better to some of us, doesn't mean you need to get all worried.

585157413[/snapback]

Wrong.. Gizmondo and PSP can compete more than DS, ds is worse than Gizmondo

Has anyone though of cracking the UMD casing open, and putting the disc in a CD-Rom drive?  See if it reads?  I have a strange feeling UMD is just a mini dvd in a case :s .

585502160[/snapback]

I thought thats exactly what it was, a 1.8gb mini DVD.

Prob is, even if comp does read it, then what?

Unfortunatley, we cant buy blank ones to write own own info to to put in the PSP.

Plus I think its a bit early for PSP Emulators! LOL :D

The original reviewer wrote the following regarding encoding video to the PSP: "Full screen is the option I use all the time, it makes the movie touch the borders of all 4 sides. If you convert a 16:9 movie into 320*240 then use full screen it will stretch it back out and retain the correct ratio."

The advice the reviewer gives is in direct conflict from what I have heard througout the net and several other forums. I'm not saying he is wrong. As a matter of fact, I am ready to believe his view over others as his review was very thorough and well put together.

One of the main reasons other than gameplay on why I want the PSP so bad is because of its video playback capability. Prior to focusing in on the PSP, I was in the market for a Personal Video Player, machines that look like the PSP, but carry 20-40 Gb harddrives and work off of microsofts media center software. They are priced anywhere from $450-$1000, so you can see why I am really excited about the PSP.

Anyways, I have already ripped several of my DVD's (ALL widescreen) and have used two encoding programs (raPIZ & 3GP) to get them in the proper MPEG-4 format so the PSP will recognize them.

As everyone knows, the PSP's screen native resolution is 480X272, a 16:9 ratio widescreen format. Everyone also knows that the PSP will not accept any video playback in it's native resolution. Here is where I have questions.

The reviewer states that when encoding a widescreen movie (16:9 ratio), encode the movie at a standard screen resolution of 320X240. If you do this and then set the PSP's screen option to "FULL", the movies will be stretched to fit the screen, and the movie will retain the correct ratio. There is where I would like to expound a little.

If you encode a movie to format of less than 16:9, and then stretch it to fit a 16:9 ratio, how would you be able to retain the correct ratio? The general consensus on this subject in some other forums I visit was that you could "hack" the PSP as it were into recognizing widecreen resolutions, just not it's native resolution of 480X272. One of the encoders I use, raPIZ, has a screen resolution option of 368X208. I have been told that it would be better to encode all movies in this widescreen resolution as when it plays back on the PSP, it will be able to uilize the entire screen, and will retain its correct ratio and not look stretched.

Sorry for being so long winded. I am not saying anyone is wrong here. Not having a PSP of my own to test this out definitively, I am left to the advice of those that have imported them.

That said, if the reviewer or anyone else that has experience with movie playback on the PSP could expound a bit on getting 16:9 movies to playback on the PSP using the entire screen and retaining it's correct ratio. Thanks so much!

Firstly, I have heard that there is an updated version of a encoding prog that now converts to correct ratio, res etc. Hopefully this is true.

Secondly, I have a widescreen tv, and when the tv pic isnt widescreen it shows it with black bars down each of the left n rught side, however you can force the picture to use all of the screen, but then you may lose a bit of the picture as the tv trys to keep everythin in perspective, thats jus my tv though. reason I am tryin to use my tv as an example is i think the psp does exactly the same thing.

I encoded a episode of friends, and when on the psp, it showed it only using part of the screen, with the black borders as previously mentioned. the zoom options I had were, normal, full screen, zoom, and one other cant rem wat called.

Dunno if this helps or not, its jus my take on it. Hopefully this software update is out there and we can all encode happily utilising the fullness of the psp screen! :)

Firstly, I have heard that there is an updated version of a encoding prog that now converts to correct ratio, res etc. Hopefully this is true.

Secondly, I have a widescreen tv, and when the tv pic isnt widescreen it shows it with black bars down each of the left n rught side, however you can force the picture to use all of the screen, but then you may lose a bit of the picture as the tv trys to keep everythin in perspective, thats jus my tv though. reason I am tryin to use my tv as an example is i think the psp does exactly the same thing.

I encoded a episode of friends, and when on the psp, it showed it only using part of the screen, with the black borders as previously mentioned. the zoom options I had were, normal, full screen, zoom, and one other cant rem wat called.

Dunno if this helps or not, its jus my take on it. Hopefully this software update is out there and we can all encode happily utilising the fullness of the psp screen! :)

585516218[/snapback]

Hulibecker, that's my point exactly. I have an HDTV as well, and when I am watching normal 4:3 TV, it has the vertical black bars, but I can set my TV to 16:9 mode wich fills up the entire screen, but, you lose the original picture ratio, and everyones heads are fat, etc, as the picture is being stretch horizontally.

That was my question in reference to the reviewers post. He says encode and 320X240, and then stretch the movie to fit the screen, and if the movie you encoded was in widescreen, the stretched image will not be distorted. At least that is what I took him to say.

If that is true, then I was wondering why on other boards people are "hacking" different resolutions for the PSP trying to attain as close to a "widescreen 16:9" image as they can.

Am I as clear as mud on this, lol?

Anyhow, any and all comments and responses to my questions would be greatly appreciated!

The hacking thing which has recently come about isn't anything to do with ratios, it's about perceived quality. People are trying to get more vertical detail in their encodes because the full screen option stretches horizontally more than vertically. It makes sense to add as much vertical resolution into the video file as you can (to an extent).

View a 16:9 movie at 320*240 and it will be squashed up vertically (the opposite to 4:3 on a HDTV), using full screen will stretch it back up to the right ratio but stretching from 320 -> 480 is less than desirable than stretching a 368px wide movie (this being the "hack" which has recently come about). Either way every pixel of the video is stretched to fill the entire screen in "full screen" mode so what was originally a 16:9 video will still be 16:9 regardless of which "new" encoding size you choose.

From now on I will be encoding into something like 368*208, nothing to do with aspect ratio you understand but the perceived increase in quality due to 368 -> 480 being better than 320 -> 480. Both will result in the original 16:9 movie being 16:9 o the PSP screen when viewed in full screen.

As for wider than 16:9 movies, i.e. 2.35:1 I used to add black borders to the file via virtualdub so it was a 16:9 movie file with borders.

The hacking thing which has recently come about isn't anything to do with ratios, it's about perceived quality. People are trying to get more vertical detail in their encodes because the full screen option stretches horizontally more than vertically. It makes sense to add as much vertical resolution into the video file as you can (to an extent).

View a 16:9 movie at 320*240 and it will be squashed up vertically (the opposite to 4:3 on a HDTV), using full screen will stretch it back up to the right ratio but stretching from 320 -> 480 is less than desirable than stretching a 368px wide movie (this being the "hack" which has recently come about). Either way every pixel of the video is stretched to fill the entire screen in "full screen" mode so what was originally a 16:9 video will still be 16:9 regardless of which "new" encoding size you choose.

From now on I will be encoding into something like 368*208, nothing to do with aspect ratio you understand but the perceived increase in quality due to 368 -> 480 being better than 320 -> 480. Both will result in the original 16:9 movie being 16:9 o the PSP screen when viewed in full screen.

As for wider than 16:9 movies, i.e. 2.35:1 I used to add black borders to the file via virtualdub so it was a 16:9 movie file with borders.

585516757[/snapback]

Well, that is the most intelligent and articulate post I have seen on this question.

You cannot imagine how many people and how many forums I have asked this questions with no real answer.

One last question. You did say that you would in fact be encoding at the 368X208 not so much for how the movie will fit the PSP's screen, but do to the effect that you will have more vertical resolution, which I can understand.

I have encoded movies in both the 320X240 and 368X208 modes. The one difference that I can see for sure is the movie itself. By that I mean when I play the 320X240 movie in quicktime, the movie plays perfect in a 16:9 ratio. However, when I play back a movie encoded in 368X208, the movie plays back like a 2.35:1 movie would on an HDTV, that is, it is widescreen, but still has horizontal black bars above and below the movie.

My question is, when you play a movie encoded in 368X208 on the PSP, and then play it stretched under full mode, will you have those same horizontal black bars above and below the movie???

Thanks again!!!

The only reason why I keep asking these questions trying to get this right is because I would like to have about 10-15 of my movies encoded and ready to go when the PSP launches.

As you know, it is very time consuming to rip and then encode these movies, so before I go through all of the trouble, I just want to make sure that I am encoding these movies properly.

I certainly want the movies to look the best they can, and I also would not like black bars on my PSP while I am watching the movies as well.

Thanks for your help!

Ok, well I gave it a try. I used 3GP Converter 0.29, it has the added options for 368*208. To be really honest, I don't see a huge difference in quality, there is an increase though, so I imagine I'll be using 360*208 in the future. One of the main reasons is that whatever the hack/patch does to enable this it automatically expands the video to fill the PSP screen. It still stretches, it's not native, but it's more convenient. As a consequence it's useless for 4:3 content but cool for 16:9. Only for ease of use you understand though.

320*240. The reason for this is that using the hack causes the video to instantly fill up the screen, and any option you choose on the PSP (Full screen, zoom etc) doesn't effect it. With 4:3 content it would force it to stretch to the screen if you used 368*208. With 320*240 you will have the various stretching options.

320*240. The reason for this is that using the hack causes the video to instantly fill up the screen, and any option you choose on the PSP (Full screen, zoom etc) doesn't effect it. With 4:3 content it would force it to stretch to the screen if you used 368*208. With 320*240 you will have the various stretching options.

585540477[/snapback]

Will there be vertical black bars if I encode with 320x240?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Anybody that thinks flying cars were possible are idiots. Everyone would basically need a pilot licence, can you imagine how insane and dangerous that would be, people can barely handle driving on land safely right now.
    • Microsoft Edge 149.0.4022.80 by Razvan Serea Microsoft Edge is a super fast and secure web browser from Microsoft. It works on almost any device, including PCs, iPhones and Androids. It keeps you safe online, protects your privacy, and lets you browse the web quickly. You can even use it on all your devices and keep your browsing history and favorites synced up. Built on the same technology as Chrome, Microsoft Edge has additional built-in features like Startup boost and Sleeping tabs, which boost your browsing experience with world class performance and speed that are optimized to work best with Windows. Microsoft Edge security and privacy features such as Microsoft Defender SmartScreen, Password Monitor, InPrivate search, and Kids Mode help keep you and your loved ones protected and secure online. Microsoft Edge has features to keep both you and your family protected. Enable content filters and access activity reports with your Microsoft Family Safety account and experience a kid-friendly web with Kids Mode. The new Microsoft Edge is now compatible with your favorite extensions, so it’s easy to personalize your browsing experience. Microsoft Edge 149.0.4022.80 changelog: Fixes Fixed an issue that prevented QR code generation from working. Feature updates Intune MAM Protected Downloads. The protected downloads feature for Intune MAM will now save downloaded files to the Documents > Microsoft Edge > Downloads folder in OneDrive. Extensions monitoring in the Edge management service. The Microsoft Edge management service now allows admins to gain visibility into extensions installed across their managed users. From the extensions monitoring page, admins can see which extensions have been installed as well as manage user requests for blocked extensions. For more information, see Microsoft Edge Extensions Monitoring. Validate Edge builds early with enterprise preview. Enterprise preview provides a simpler way for admins to flight pre-release Edge builds to their users. To reduce friction and bolster usage, users will receive pre-release builds directly inside of their Stable Edge application. Admins can allow users to easily opt-out of the preview experience, using built-in rollback to switch between their pre-release and stable channels with ease. Microsoft 365 admin center users can configure the feature, view their flighting population, and receive personalized recommendations all in one place. For more information, see Get started with Enterprise Preview in Microsoft Edge. Download: Microsoft Edge (64-bit) | 193.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Microsoft Edge (32-bit) | 170.0 MB Download: Microsoft Edge (ARM64) | 188.0 MB View: Microsoft Edge Website | Release History Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • The machines are starting to fight back any way they can.
    • No news articles about the Arch Linux repo being majorly infected with malware?!?
    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      599
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!