why are people hating the shuffle and mini?


Recommended Posts

So, ph3412t3h13 makes a perfectly valid comment in his own, quite useful thead, and ripgut decides it would be "cool" be a jackass and peddle his idiocy in the same thread?  Oh, and quote flames are so lame it actually makes me pity you.

585364325[/snapback]

thank you sir

it almost hurts me to realize that we are going to reach page 13 all because of this bitching

Someone care to mention that that player is larger than the shuffle? Or that the only reason it's "cheaper" is because you can get it from vendors that put it on sale? No, I guess you forgot those points.

585359305[/snapback]

leedogg pretty much said everything I wanted to.

The size difference is small enough to be almost negligible. How many people really care about a few millimeters? And if you do, give me a good reason why. What's funny is the Sandisk has better battery life even though it includes a screen (there go all the claims that a screen would reduce battery life).

Why in the world would I care if it's cheaper because of a sale? Would you not buy an iPod if BestBuy decided to put it on sale tomorrow? Give me a break...

I already posted that along with the fact that the Sandisk MP3 player died on me in a span of a month. The toggle switch has a tendency to come off lose.

585362536[/snapback]

Isolated cases don't say much. Electronics die all the time. You could very well get the most expensive player you can find and there's still a chance it could be a lemon.

Isolated cases don't say much. Electronics die all the time. You could very well get the most expensive player you can find and there's still a chance it could be a lemon.

585364361[/snapback]

Agreed but the saying goes ... first impression is the last impression ;)

grossly underpowered? it seems to be faster than the pc in your sig  :whistle:  :whistle:

and actually its not underpowered at all thats what makes it so good

:laugh:  :laugh:  :laugh:  :laugh:  :ninja:

585358926[/snapback]

yeah but my computer is over 3 years old AND is whorth far less than $500 today

yeah but my computer is over 3 years old AND is whorth far less than $500 today

585365251[/snapback]

And your point is? You stating the Mini is underpowered is like a farmer driving a 57 chevy pickup saying an 05 Mercedes is underpowered; you have no way of knowing what a 1.25 ghz G4 is like, or even a modern computer for that matter.

And your point is?  You stating the Mini is underpowered is like a farmer driving a 57 chevy pickup saying an 05 Mercedes is underpowered; you have no way of knowing what a 1.25 ghz G4 is like, or even a modern computer for that matter.

585365331[/snapback]

lol

good example

Thanks for creating a flamebait thread, you knew the comments that were gonna be posted in here werent gonna be all positive. Wow i guess your IQ has just been lifted a whole 1 point. :rolleyes:

585368059[/snapback]

well usee the whole thread was for 11 pages a perfectly fine thread until u came in

the rest of the comment wasn't needed

Edited by Wickedkitten
I will never get an IPOD because 1 month after I get one they will come out with another one that is twice as small and twice the capacity. I'll stick with my RIO Karma thankyou.

585369760[/snapback]

thats true

apple does have a tendancy to make things better fast (DAMN THEM! AND THEIR AWESOMENESS!)

just a few days ago they lowered teh price of the mac mini and made it faster

I will never get an IPOD because 1 month after I get one they will come out with another one that is twice as small and twice the capacity. I'll stick with my RIO Karma thankyou.

585369760[/snapback]

I will never get a Prescott because 1 month after I get one they will come out with another one that is cheaper to boot and twice the capacity to heat up my room. I'll stick with my Cyrix MII PR233 thank you.

:rofl:

...

:rolleyes:

I Hate Mac Mini because this gonna see atractive to the windows and linux users to switch... then if apple gets more user we gonna have to worry about the Vitus, Spyware, and that kind of stuff.. but for the other part the design its perfect confortable and for the iPod shuffle perfect for me mrathon runner that likes to hear music when running its perfect THANKS APPLE FOR MAKE MY LIFE HAPPY :p:P:D:D:D

It was a joke, since he made his post sound as though he disliked Apple products in general, much like you fanboyish self.

585370421[/snapback]

Fanboyish of what? please find a post from me where i say im a fanboy or express my fanboyism of a certain product or company.

Is alot better than before.

Please dont waste space, its not nice to have to scroll down to a more interesting post. Its annoying!

585370533[/snapback]

Dont even bother telling him, its like talking to a shoe. :pinch:

He'll just get all defensive and tell you to

BACK

AWAY

FROM

HIS

THREAD!!!1

This has gotta stop. Why are so many people bitching about 2 products that are selling like hot cakes? If I think Microsoft comes out with crappy software I wouldn't bitch about it to the people who do find it useful and great. I wouldn't do that with any other company. If you find Apple's products overpriced, overrated, and too "trendy" for you then don't by it. No one is forcing you to. Simple as that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you don't care to read what I said, then you prove my point. Maybe written media is beyond your attention span. Titles are not summaries my friend.
    • Nobody asked... in fact, I said "I don't care about political leanings"  
    • TLDR. Here is a far better title (just a basic example): Windows 11 26H2 to allow disabling Web search results
    • Restore will get my vote, only if to see if things are any different, doubt it though but Labour and Conservatives too out of touch and same thing over and over and over…, Lib Dem who?
    • There is nothing wrong with this title. You have completely missed the plot when it comes to "clickbait." The issue was never that a title tries to entice you to click, that is how titles have worked for over 100 years. The issue is when the title subverts expectations, getting you to click expecting something that isn't there. The classic clickbait example is "Boyfriend caught cheating, what happens next will shock you," then what happened next is the girlfriend was upset...which is probably the least shocking outcome imaginable. If sounds like what you want is for the titles to be a collection of 10-word summaries that you can skim, get the just of the story, and only click if you want more details. That is not, never has been, and never will be what titles are. You can go all the way back to print newspapers during the great depression and see the same thing. The newspaper was locked in a vending machine, all you can see is the headline, you choose to put in 5¢ to buy the paper and read the rest if you want. Those headlines were written in a way to sell the paper, not just to provide a summery. Here are two actual headlines from that time, "Wall Street Lays an Egg," or "Stocks Hit Bottom?" Maybe you'd say something like "it was wrong then and it's still wrong now." Okay, fine opinion to have, but it isn't like Neowin is doing something unjurnalistic, they are just following the age-old standards for written media.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!