Ajapi Posted January 18, 2005 Share Posted January 18, 2005 The iPod Shuffle is great for its price. Those who complain about the lack of a screen forget agbout this: all that would fit on that tiny player would be a 1-line screen. How useless is a screen if it isn't at least 3 lines? Come on, you have to admit that a tiny flash player with 512mb at just $99 is a hot deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InternalStorm Posted January 19, 2005 Share Posted January 19, 2005 No LCD is a big turn off. It's not that expensive to put a little LCD on the damn thing, I mean even a 30 dollar CD player has one. You mean I have to flip through 512MB worth of songs just to find what I want to listen to? That's just retarded. Put a screen on it and voila you got a ten times more appealing player. It's not gonna break the bank... As for the Mini, It's a great concept... but the fact that you can't upgrade the parts inside, and that only Apple makes APPLE COMPUTERS, means that you really have no upgrade options and you get stuck with the stuff you buy it with. It's like going to WalMart and picking up a premade computer with crappy GPU, RAM and Processor and not just building it yourself and putting what you want in it. That's the only gripe. And probably the only way you can get a powerful Mac is to spend a fortune, YOU CAN"T BUILD YOUR OWN!!!! It sucks... lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdodson Posted January 19, 2005 Share Posted January 19, 2005 Because Apple is obsessed with trying to take the market any way they can. It's very lame. Anything to get ahead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DELETEMYACCOUNTTTTTTTT Posted January 19, 2005 Share Posted January 19, 2005 Because Apple is obsessed with trying to take the market any way they can. It's very lame. Anything to get ahead. 585317479[/snapback] Becuase making products people like and will purchase is SO wrong, eh? Honestly, I see the Shuffle and the Mac Mini's target audiences and think they're perfect for them. The Mac Mini (which by all appearences, IS upgradeable in the RAM, HD, and maybe even CD sense) is targeted at PC users tired of massive, gaping holes in their OS that are bigger than goatse. The Shuffle is for people who either don't have a lot of music, or for those who have a lot, but only want to carry their favorite songs because they don't want or need an full iPod. I for one fit in none of the aforementioned catagories, but I still want both, since they are better than any offering for the same pricepoint from other manufacturers, and I can't very well build my own Mac, but I undestand that, as then we'd see idiots who can't build anything right harping on Apple for making a crappy OS and having crappy hardware makers screwing up the quality of components of Macs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slipdisc210 Posted January 19, 2005 Share Posted January 19, 2005 I was blown away when I first saw Mac mini..then i read the details...saw the external power supply and I'd been thinking does Apple really deserve all the praise for designing "the smallest" "Desktop" ever ?I mean come on they've used all the notebook components they could find and pack it in a nice cubical box and call it a "desktop" 585315372[/snapback] I tend to agree with you. Also what will happen the first time this thing gets knocked off the desk or table. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DELETEMYACCOUNTTTTTTTT Posted January 19, 2005 Share Posted January 19, 2005 the same thing that would happen to ANY small-form-factor, or any PC for that matter. Now that the price complaint and power BS is shattered, everyone seems to be reaching far to find things to whine about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macman87 Posted January 19, 2005 Share Posted January 19, 2005 (edited) Because Apple is obsessed with trying to take the market any way they can. It's very lame. Anything to get ahead. 585317479[/snapback] If you were a shareholder don't you expect that from your company? :laugh: Ass I have already said in another thread, the choice is clear, you can get the iPod shuffle with no screen OR a zillion other flash MP3 players with a screen that cost a bit more. No which product stands out to consumers? And no, Apple can't just pull and product out of their *** and sell it. Look at the Cube. Edited January 19, 2005 by Phillip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesse Carlton Posted January 19, 2005 Share Posted January 19, 2005 look at the size of it, there's no room for a screen, you don't need one, and if you want one that bad, get an ipod g4. the shuffle is $50 less than any comparable mp3 player with a screen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catharsis Posted January 21, 2005 Share Posted January 21, 2005 Why do I hate the iPod Shuffle and Mac Mini?Because Apple has always been about expensive, quality computers/accessories. They are like the elite of computers, in my mind. Don't get me wrong, I love the concept behind the new products: cheaper/smaller makes them more affordable to others. But think of the long run. If everyone has a Mac, they will turn in to the PC world. More and more viruses will appear on the Mac platform, cheaper, lesser grade hardware will show up in stores, and that's just the beginning. 585298752[/snapback] You think that just because they have one affordable computer, that everone in the long run might have a Mac? Are you forgetting they still have to dish out more money for the keyboard, mouse, and Apple's stinkin expensive displays? You think just because they have an inexpense computer that that makes it not elite??? I don't see the logic behind any of this. I think that they should stay smaller than the PC world because they are elite. I use the same reasoning on why I would like to see Firefox remain less used that Internet Explorer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZZOOzzoo Posted January 21, 2005 Share Posted January 21, 2005 I don't like iPod shuffle because it lacks too many things. But I think Mac mini is one of the coolest thing ever, in terms of look, power and the price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xer34 Posted January 21, 2005 Share Posted January 21, 2005 um, this thread is called why do people hate the ipod shuffle, and i was telling him why i hate itA) why is it called the ipod shuffle? B&C) If all they are buying it for is jogging, they can also make do with a no name mp3 player D) I realize that 1gig flash doesnt play music, but then again, i was stating how expensive it was Read the thread name before you scold me for whining and "talking about things i dont know" 585315735[/snapback] I have every right to scold you about things you dont know about, for youre speaking out of ignorance. You just now asked me why it was called the ipod shuffle if you are not obliged to use the shuffle feature. Why the hell are you asking me that? Ask Apple. Its just a sales pitch, everyone here knows shuffle is nothing new. As for the no-name MP3 player you pretty much repeated what I said. People never cease to amaze me. :rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southern Patriot Posted January 21, 2005 Share Posted January 21, 2005 Are you forgetting they still have to dish out more money for the keyboard, mouse, and Apple's stinkin expensive displays? 585332098[/snapback] Are you forgetting that it will work with pretty much any display, mouse or keyboard (including that old junk one you probably have laying around in your closet). This computer is marketed at people wanting to REPLACE an older computer! How many times does that have to be said???????????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macman87 Posted January 22, 2005 Share Posted January 22, 2005 You think that just because they have one affordable computer, that everone in the long run might have a Mac? Are you forgetting they still have to dish out more money for the keyboard, mouse, and Apple's stinkin expensive displays? You think just because they have an inexpense computer that that makes it not elite??? I don't see the logic behind any of this. 585332098[/snapback] Apple NEVER recommended you get their displays. They don't even put that as an option when you buy your Mac mini. Even if you did want it, you have to get that separately. The mouse and keyboard are option too. Apple doesn't force you. It does even say "RECOMMENDED" like Dell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetechroom Posted January 22, 2005 Share Posted January 22, 2005 Because Apple is obsessed with trying to take the market any way they can. It's very lame. Anything to get ahead. 585317479[/snapback] doesn't every company try to do that? Personally I believe that the hate towards the Shuffle is the lack of LCD screen but thats not a worry to me; I can live with my 20GB 4G Player thank you very much! And as for the Mac Mini, well I've been nothing but good things about this, its a great little product designed like a beaut. The price is also very good; this product will increase Apple's Market Share, however much that may be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lare2 Posted January 22, 2005 Share Posted January 22, 2005 I find the mac mini being a great solution for first timers. It's a great way to get your hands on Mac OS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ph3412t3h13 Posted January 23, 2005 Author Share Posted January 23, 2005 iPod Shuffle = i wish it looked a bit more like this concept from iPod lounge, but its meant to be the smaller and cheaper version of the iPods anyway. 585300486[/snapback] that i wouldve bought right off the bat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kestrel Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 The two largest groups of people complaining are: (1) The Linux freaks - mainly this is penis envy... the current Macs beat them in every way and that, frankly, scares the hell out of them. (2) Mac geeks - they've always had a sense of elitism that is threatened by a mainstream Mac. They both have missed the point. The Mac Mini is NOT for Mac people - it's designed to attract PC users who are ga-ga over OS-X but don't want to commit to a full Mac system. This is a VERY smart move on Apple's part... it's a market that's got plenty of interest but until now no way of tapping it. Besides... the sales of these two items speak louder than the critics... they are both flying off the shelves. You have a MINIMUM three week wait for a Mac Mini and most places are reporting they can't meet demand for the iPod shuffle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ph3412t3h13 Posted January 24, 2005 Author Share Posted January 24, 2005 mainly this is penis envy... 585344836[/snapback] :blink: :blink: :blink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leedogg Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 There really is no reason for apple to not have an lcd on this. If it was for design reasons they could have put the screen on the side edge of the player or they could have put a sliding cover on it. I think they got greedy, wanted more for less, simply counting on ipods popularity, trendiness, and fanaticism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PureEdit Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 There really is no reason for apple to not have an lcd on this. If it was for design reasons they could have put the screen on the side edge of the player or they could have put a sliding cover on it. I think they got greedy, wanted more for less, simply counting on ipods popularity, trendiness, and fanaticism. 585345935[/snapback] it doesn't need a ****ing screen, sometimes its nice to have something SIMPLE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macman87 Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 There really is no reason for apple to not have an lcd on this. If it was for design reasons they could have put the screen on the side edge of the player or they could have put a sliding cover on it. I think they got greedy, wanted more for less, simply counting on ipods popularity, trendiness, and fanaticism. 585345935[/snapback] Maybe cause you can't make a intuitive interface with such a small screen. In the Shuffle dissection photos I have see, there is no space for a screen. If they did put a screen, they would have to sacrifice the size to make a player that is the same as everyone else's. A screen also would make the player cost more - the Shuffles margin is less than 20%. Every single damn company in the world is greedy. But in this case, Apple isn't counting on the iPods to make the money. They want people buying the more expensive iPods and Macs after they have had a good experience with the Shuffle. And plus there's nothing wrong with Apple 'simply counting on the iPods popularity' - I bet its what you would do if you were in charge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leedogg Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 it doesn't need a ****ing screen, sometimes its nice to have something SIMPLE. 585346525[/snapback] You're right, why did they even bother adding controls? Just set everything in itunes. :rolleyes: and since when do screens make them so damn complex anyway? Maybe cause you can't make a intuitive interface with such a small screen. In the Shuffle dissection photos I have see, there is no space for a screen. If they did put a screen, they would have to sacrifice the size to make a player that is the same as everyone else's. A screen also would make the player cost more - the Shuffles margin is less than 20%. Apple is known for its innovation and engineering feats, of which the shuffle is neither. As far as I'm concerned its a step backwards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macman87 Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 Apple is known for its innovation and engineering feats, of which the shuffle is neither. As far as I'm concerned its a step backwards. 585346820[/snapback] How is it backwards? Who ever said Flash MP3 players needed a screen? Most people who are going to buy a Shuffle don't need a screen. Its adds on weight, and adds on extra bucks. As far as I am concerned the Shuffle IS innovative in the sense, it doesn't have a screen, reducing the costs. Has anyone out there got a cheap player these days without a screen? Innovation doesn't always have to be engineering feats or scientific breakthroughs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leedogg Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 How is it backwards? Who ever said Flash MP3 players needed a screen? Most people who are going to buy a Shuffle don't need a screen. Its adds on weight, and adds on extra bucks. As far as I am concerned the Shuffle IS innovative in the sense, it doesn't have a screen, reducing the costs. Has anyone out there got a cheap player these days without a screen? Innovation doesn't always have to be engineering feats or scientific breakthroughs. 585347327[/snapback] Its a step backwards cause any dumbass company out there can remove their lcd if they wanted to, add a little more memory and voila: a shuffle. adds weight?? give me a break, maybe half an ounce. Add bucks yes. Innovative my ass, it removes & reduces functionality. Innovation would be creating a shuffle WITH a screen, that is just as elegant, unobtrusive, and sold for the same price. Now THAT would be a worthy feat. The shuffle is currently nothing but a pretty, glorified usb drive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ssvegeta384 Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 Its a step backwards cause any dumbass company out there can remove their lcd if they wanted to, add a little more memory and voila: a shuffle. adds weight?? give me a break, maybe half an ounce. Add bucks yes. Innovative my ass, it removes & reduces functionality. Innovation would be creating a shuffle WITH a screen, that is just as elegant, unobtrusive, and sold for the same price. Now THAT would be a worthy feat. The shuffle is currently nothing but a pretty, glorified usb drive. 585347385[/snapback] Shuffle with a screen, huh? I think they have a name for that: The iPod. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts