The 2005 Baseball Thread


Recommended Posts

it's stupid to have both games at the same time, but they were both on, you just had to switch to FX.

when they showed the zoom in of the ball, it looked like it hit dirt to me, and was at least a trap. i don't think the lip of his glove got underneath.

it really annoyed me how the announcers made it sound like it was the easiest call ever. it was damn close, and i think the umps got it right.

either way, after all the BS calls the angels got in their favor against the yankees, i'm glad to finally see one go against them.

i forget the catchers name, but it wasn't molina. john or jerry something.

man, they showed it again, i still think it hit dirt. just inside the tip of the glove. i wish i had a catchers glove, all i have is a fielders and 1st base.

now they are interviewing all the angels fans, and they are saying the sox don't deserve it, it's tainted, cheaters, bla bla bla.

how quickly they forget the 2 or 3 gifts the umps gave them in the yanks series.

plus, it's like the thing with the cubs 2 years ago, the catcher should've tagged or thrown jsut to be safe, and then the pitcher still gave up the double off the wall. it wasn't like the ump gave them a run, it still had to be earned.

it's stupid to have both games at the same time, but they were both on, you just had to switch to FX.?

either way, after all the BS calls the angels got in their favor against the yankees, i'm glad to finally see one go against them.

586664533[/snapback]

See above, I don't have FX lol.

And yeah the call, I was thinking karma for the Cano running out of the basepath call lol. But to me it did look like a catch. I mean most cathcers throw down to first by instinct when they know it hit the dirt and Molina sure seemed to think he caught it. And again the ump gave what I always thought to be the strike-out sign not just that he swung and missed. Either way they need to take the umps back to umpire school. Not just for this call.

i forget the catchers name, but it wasn't molina.

586664558[/snapback]

Just realized that. Josh Paul. Why in the hell wasn't Molina in there anyway? Isn't he one of the best defensive catchers? The cathcer definitely should have just put the tag on to be safe. Bad mistake.

And I still see a catch lol. Either way a bad way to end a game.

Meh whatever, I'm pulling for the Cards anyway. I just want to see a good series lol.

O the Angels have too many Molinas. This is what happens when you turn the game on in the 9th. Bengie, the great defensive cather was DH'ing so brother Jose was catching and then they took him out for the Paul dude. Got it now. Still don't know why Bengie wasn't catching. Is he hurting or something?

Angels didn't give up an earned run lol. Insanity.

Edited by bigbluepride35
i just want the white sox to win it all.

586664927[/snapback]

Why, because it would kill you to see the team that put you out win? ;)

I'm just kidding. I'm behind the Sox since it's been almost 80 years while the Angels won it all only three years back.

I must say that I enjoy the playoffs ten-fold when the Yankees are eliminated.

Regardless of how you think that play should have turned out I think they need universal signs like in football. Each ump has his own little nuances and it can drive a player insane trying to keep track of who has witch sign. That Eddings guy uses what I always took for an "out" sign as a strike sign (the fist pump). That's why I thought the play was so nuts. Because once he pumped that fist I thought it was an out. For the amjority of umps I've seen it would have been. Anyway, yeah I think that would solve any problem like this. Get all the umps together for a two hour class go over all hand signs and what they need to do on a ball in the dirt. WHter it's yell "no catch" or what-not. Consistency can go a long way in preventing things like this from happening in the future.

My father was an umpire for 8 years for high school and collegiate baseball. He said one of the first things a home plate ump learns is to never call an out. The move that was made by the homeplate umpire was to signal strike 3. Never will you hear a MLB home plate ump call an out. Umpires said on the postgame press conference that they looked at the replay several times, enhanced it and everything, and the video was inconclusive to change the call. Officials said they saw the ball change direction, which would give the impression that it definitely did hit the ground.

Anyways, I though Mike Scioscia was very classy in the fact that he never blamed the game on the last call. Angels had more than enough chances to score earlier in the game and couldn't come through. But I'm sitting here saying the same thing as the Sox left 7 on base, including a bases load with 2 outs.

I also noticed that two former White Sox players (Tony Graffanino and now Josh Paul) have made costly errors in favor of the White Sox. Conspiracy maybe? :laugh:

the ump was consistant the entire game with his strike out/in the dirt calls and motions with his hands. this did not win the game for the whitesox, just like the bad calls earlier didn't lose the game for the whitesox ( ie.. crede getting doubled up on 2nd base..bull****). But this is the game, and the angels could of still got the crede out or not let the whitesox steal 2nd base...

yeah, i was watching the baseball tonight crew just a little bit ago, and they all thought the call was correct, but his mechanic for calling strike 3 was unusual. 

this is in contrast to all the retarded fox announcers who said it was 100% completely obvious that it was a clear as day catch.  those guys were so annoying.  no matter how certain you are of what it was, it was still a close call nonetheless.  refs are always gonna make bad calls, but the golden rule is you play until the whistle.  the ump never said out, just called strike 3, so the catcher has to know that the play is still alive, no matter how certain he was he caught it.

586668375[/snapback]

exactly! just like kevin jones picking up the "fumble" from harrington and running for 30 yards.

bad call. heads up play. play reviewed, play stands.

heads up play DAWG!

Detroit Lions at 07:58

1-10-DET39 (7:58) J.Harrington pass incomplete to R.Williams (S.Rolle).

2-10-DET39 (7:52) K.Jones up the middle to DET 42 for 3 yards (T.Polley).

3-7-DET42 (7:10) J.Harrington pass to R.Williams to BLT 46 for 12 yards (W.Demps).

1-10-BAL46 (6:26) K.Jones right tackle to BLT 43 for 3 yards (R.Lewis).

2-7-BAL43 (5:49) J.Harrington pass incomplete to M.Williams.

3-7-BAL43 (5:45) J.Harrington pass to S.Bryson pushed ob at BLT 25 for 18 yards (E.Reed).

1-10-BAL25 (5:26) J.Harrington sacked at BLT 31 for -6 yards. FUMBLES, recovered by DET-K.Jones at BLT 29. K.Jones to BLT 2 for 27 yards (E.Reed). Play Challenged by BLT and Upheld. (Timeout #1 by BLT.)

1-2-BAL2 (5:21) K.Jones up the middle to BLT 1 for 1 yard (T.Suggs; B.Scott).

2-1-BAL1 (4:44) K.Jones left tackle for 1 yard, TOUCHDOWN.

J.Hanson extra point is GOOD, Center-J.Maese, Holder-N.Harris.

BAL 0  DET 14,  Plays: 9  Yards: 61  Possession: 3:18.

diff sport, same drama. gotta love it.

yeah, i was watching the baseball tonight crew just a little bit ago, and they all thought the call was correct, but his mechanic for calling strike 3 was unusual.

this is in contrast to all the retarded fox announcers who said it was 100% completely obvious that it was a clear as day catch. those guys were so annoying. no matter how certain you are of what it was, it was still a close call nonetheless. refs are always gonna make bad calls, but the golden rule is you play until the whistle. the ump never said out, just called strike 3, so the catcher has to know that the play is still alive, no matter how certain he was he caught it.

exactly! just like kevin jones picking up the "fumble" from harrington and running for 30 yards.

bad call. heads up play. play reviewed, play stands.

heads up play DAWG!

diff sport, same drama. gotta love it.

586668391[/snapback]

exactly....refs are gonna make bad calls. every sport. they always have, they always will. even if harrington's arm WAS going forward, the ref didn't blow the whistle, so you keep playing.

the only thing uncertain here is that there is no official call for balls in the dirt. some umps say something, some don't. they should become uniform in their calls.

I never knew umps don't call "out." So are catchers supposed to turn around each time to see what hnad signal he makes after a ball that is close to the dirt? I always here umps calling strikes. Never realized they didn't call "out." Seems like it would be a good idea to do that actually. Any idea why they're not supposed to?

edit> That question's directed at IlliniPi, btw.

was at the game of the controversial call and nobody in the stands knew what was going on, we just saw A.J. at first...

but the best part of the night was a guy from the band Rusted Root played before the game and then said something about how he loves Chicago or something and then said "go Red Sox!!!!"

it was awful and pitiful and hysterical all at the same time

was at the game of the controversial call and nobody in the stands knew what was going on, we just saw A.J. at first...

but the best part of the night was a guy from the band Rusted Root played before the game and then said something about how he loves Chicago or something and then said "go Red Sox!!!!"

it was awful and pitiful and hysterical all at the same time

586673227[/snapback]

oh man, rusted root is one of my favorite bands...that's really embarassing, i feel bad for mike.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
    • A roguelike and a 4X strategy game are free to claim on the Epic Games Store by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final leg of the Epic Games Store's mystery giveaways promotion just landed, and it brought along two more games to keep. Last week's Lonestar and Calico giveaways have now been replaced with copies of Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest to claim for PC gamers. As always, the game is yours to add permanently to your Epic Games Store library within the next seven days. Diving into the games, Songs of Conquest is developed by Lavapotion. This is a turn-based 4X strategy experience that has players making tough decisions and participating in tactical combat while also managing their kingdom. "Songs of Conquest is a turn-based strategy game inspired by 90s classics. Lead powerful magicians called Wielders and venture to lands unknown," explains the developer. "Wage battles against armies that dare oppose you, hunt for powerful artifacts and expand your territory. The world is ripe for the taking – seize it." Meanwhile, Rogue Waters comes from developer Ice Code Games. This rogue-lite experience has you taking the role of Captain Cutter as he commands his ship and crew through procedurally generated encounters. You'll be recruiting and training crew, use sea creatures, and battle with other ships and pirates. "Set sail as Captain Cutter, a pirate caught in a deadly struggle for power and vengeance," adds the developer. "Navigate dangerous waters, unleash mythical sea creatures, and outwit enemies as you chase legendary treasure and confront dark secrets." The newly available Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest giveaways on the Epic Games Store are set to run until June 11, giving PC gamers seven days to claim the latest offer. Once this closes out, a new freebie will take its place on the same day, which is slated to be Warhammer 40K Speed Freeks. Don't forget that mobile gamers can check out the Epic Game Store's weekly giveaways on Android and iOS to grab a freebie there as well.
    • Still using Classic Outlook? Microsoft highlights 15 reasons to switch to New Outlook by Usama Jawad As many of you may know, Microsoft has been trying to get customers to ditch Classic Outlook in favor of New Outlook for quite some time now. To that end, it has added numerous capabilities to the latter, including PST features, and it is working on several more, such as a unified inbox. However, customer response has been a bit lukewarm so far, with many considering the New Outlook to be "hot garbage". Now, Microsoft has highlighted 15 features that users can leverage in New Outlook in yet another attempt to get customers to migrate. Although not all of the 15 capabilities are exclusive to New Outlook, in fact, most of them are available in Classic Outlook as well. But Microsoft hopes that this combination of familiar and fresh features will be able to attract existing users as well as new ones. For ease of readability, we have summarized the 15 features below: Pin an email: This makes it easier to track important emails Snooze an email: You can temporarily snooze an email thread for a specific time frame until it becomes relevant again. This can be very useful in scenarios where you don't feel like actively following a thread or simply want to follow up on a later date Add multiple categories at the same time: You can assign multiple categories to an email through a single, simplified interface Sweep: As the name implies, you can define automated move processes on your inbox to declutter it, rather than cleaning it up manually Schedule send: Does exactly what it says on the tin, and can be useful when accommodating recipients in different timezones Simplified folder sharing: The sharing process has been simplified so permissions are automatically applied on parent folders Follow a meeting: This is an RSVP option that lets people know that you won't be able to join the meeting but would still like to access a recap Save calendar views: You can save different views for the calendar based on different workflows Improved meeting tracking: Organizers have more controls in viewing meeting responses, such as the ability to sort and download them. Typically useful when there is a large audience Meeting recap: The Outlook Calendar surfaces a meeting recap with recordings, transcripts, and shared files Filtered views: Allows you to declutter your Calendar so that it's easier to scan and schedule Change a recurring event: Users can modify future events of a series of meetings while preserving the configuration of previous ones Rename your email account: This labeling makes it easier to identify multiple accounts in Outlook Modern themes: Exactly what the name says, plus Dark Mode Keyboard shortcuts: This facilitates flexible user behavior as customers can choose between Outlook for Windows shortcuts, Outlook for the web, or turn them off completely There you have it. It's a decent list, but it remains to be seen if it will move the needle in a meaningful way for users who are attached to Classic Outlook. Again, a lot of the aforementioned features are already available in Outlook Classic, but for some, native functionality is not present, and people typically resort to workarounds. Microsoft will be hoping that it's primarily those capabilities that get people to finally switch.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      478
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!