Recommended Posts

Sooooo, the screenshots are just based on someone who has an xp with patched uxtheme or Jemaho's Vistaskin for windowblinds without AlphaBlending...

Am i right?

-- Update: those torrents are just fake. Version number of wmplayer.exe is 10.00.00.3802 (different from screenshots) and language is Danish (wtf?)... Don't get how they did that...

ever heard of uxtheme hacking?

I wouldn't expect many people to be using the non-glass theme from Vista under XP.

Nevertheless, why not post a complete desktop shot with winver? Anyone can post a screenie of just Wmp11 now from Vista with the XP SP2 Wmp11 skin and reshack the version number if they wanted to.

Torrents are fake, probably screenshots too...

Torrents are just Danish WMP10 with reshacked version number..., the tmp file in the torrent has version number 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 3 8 0 2, so it's just all fake fake fake i guess...

Edited by Ambroos

Torrents are fake, probably screenshots too...

Torrents are just version reshacked, the tmp file in the torrent has version number 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 3 8 0 2, so it's just all fake fake fake i guess...

I can guarantee to you that the screenshots for the real Wmp11 build (4779) under XP with the Royale theme are not faked, seeing as they came from the network I'm from, WinBeta.org and knowing who showed the pics. Nevertheless, that build will not get leaked for many reasons, that's certain.

I can guarantee to you that the screenshots for the real Wmp11 build (4779) under XP with the Royale theme are not faked, seeing as they came from the network I'm from, WinBeta.org and knowing who showed the pics. Nevertheless, that build will not get leaked for many reasons, that's certain.

good. so now u know.

I can guarantee to you that the screenshots for the real Wmp11 build (4779) under XP with the Royale theme are not faked, seeing as they came from the network I'm from, WinBeta.org and knowing who showed the pics. Nevertheless, that build will not get leaked for many reasons, that's certain.

Well the torrent is faked...

Well the torrent is faked...

The torrent has nothing to do with the screenshots. 4779 will not get released so there's no point looking for any torrents for that build.

good. so now u know.

Are we going to get see your whole desktop with winver or should we just judge whether your pic is real or fake based on just Wmp11 being in the screenshot with a Vista non-glass theme?

Are we going to get see your whole desktop with winver or should we just judge whether your pic is real or fake based on just Wmp11 being in the screenshot with a Vista non-glass theme?

get masterhack to print u tons of screenshots for ur viewing pleasure if thats what u want. enough tips.

get masterhack to print u tons of screenshots for ur viewing pleasure if thats what u want. enough tips.

Thanks for proving to us that your screenshots are nothing more than Wmp11 under Vista.

Btw, 6140 is the Vista 5342 Wmp11 build with the exact same version etc. in the About window that your screenshot has,

http://www.win-vista.net/albums/Vista5342/wmp_2_ver.png , so yes I do think that your screenshot is not XP at all, but just 5342 with the compatibility mode.

Edited by Arneh

Thanks for proving to us that your screenshots are nothing more than Wmp11 under Vista.

wmp11 build 6161 is on vista 5365. it has a blue progress bar and a different shuffle/repeat icon. wmp11 build 4779 and 6140 on xp has the green progress bar with a new shuffle/repeat icon. enabling visualization on 6140 will screw up ur machine display. hang > reboot.

wmp11 build 6161 is on vista 5365. it has a blue progress bar and a different shuffle/repeat icon. wmp11 build 4779 and 6140 on xp has the green progress bar with a new shuffle/repeat icon. enabling visualization on 6140 will screw up ur machine display. hang > reboot.

I would suggest you look again at my previous post, I edited it after finding the right screenshot. Your 6140 is nothing more than just Vista 5342 Wmp11 with compatibility mode. http://www.win-vista.net/albums/Vista5342/wmp_2_ver.png shows the 5342 Wmp11 build which does indeed have the Green rather than blue.

Anyone know if it supports ipods? Or is MS boycotting it still?

If not, I think its daft not supporting it. If they did I would use it over Itunes any day of the week.

Do you actually think apple would allow any other program except iTunes have official support for ipod?

So WMP11 with XP SP2 compatibility on vista just shows us something that looks like WMP11 on XP... Nice...

What's the difference between build 4779 and 6140 on xp?

6140 is not on XP. My previous post shows the screenshot of 6140 is nothing more than just Vista 5342 Wmp11 with compatibility mode for XP. 4779 is the only real Wmp11 XP build so far.

Do you actually think apple would allow any other program except iTunes have official support for ipod?

Exactly. If anything did support it they'd probably issue a firmware update to disable it. Apple + community = joke.

Anyone know if it supports ipods? Or is MS boycotting it still?

If not, I think its daft not supporting it. If they did I would use it over Itunes any day of the week.

Same here. I just hope someone releases a plugin for WMP 11 just like they did for Winamp.

I would suggest you look again at my previous post, I edited it after finding the right screenshot. Your 6140 is nothing more than just Vista 5342 Wmp11 with compatibility mode. http://www.win-vista.net/albums/Vista5342/wmp_2_ver.png shows the 5342 Wmp11 build which does indeed have the Green rather than blue.

u just wont give up dont u? that is because 4779 and 6140 is the older build from 6161. so what will 6789 or 7999.9 be? red? just sit back and pray u get ur hands on the leak.

u just wont give up dont u? so what will 6789 or 7999.9 be? red? just sit back and pray u get ur hands on the leak.

I really do hate it when people claim something but can't stand up to their claim, especially when the facts are right in front of them that prove them wrong. Skoogie, without any more proof from you, for example a build date, a full screenshot with winver, your screenshots are nothing more than Wmp11 under 5342. If you really do want, I can even install 5342 and take a screenshot that looks exactly the same as yours with the same build number and UI.

Obviously 6140 and 4779 are older than 6161. The 6140 screenshot however is from Vista 5342. The 4779 screenshot is from XP. Btw, 4779 was built on the 13th of March.

WMP11 is colorable, you can choose a color but it isn't affecting the buttons as in WMP10, and not (yet) affecting slider colors, and it also isn't changing the taskbar mode yet...

Screenshot: WMP 11 in Vista (5365) XP SP2 compatibility colored red (attachment)

post-151800-1146422883_thumb.jpg

Edited by Ambroos

Why make it so complicated:

WMP11 quick build overview:

4779 (XP) ---green sliders (13th march)

6140 (Vista 5345) ---green sliders

6161 (Vista 5365) --- blue sliders

assuming that all screenshots are real it just means that microsoft decided to make the sliders blue, not green, and that the XP build was made BEFORE they made that decision.

I can guarantee to you that the screenshots for the real Wmp11 build (4779) under XP with the Royale theme are not faked, seeing as they came from the network I'm from, WinBeta.org and knowing who showed the pics. Nevertheless, that build will not get leaked for many reasons, that's certain.

Nice bragging. :rolleyes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!