FA Premier League 2007/08  

333 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will win the FA Premier League 2007/08?

    • Arsenal
      34
    • Blackburn Rovers
      1
    • Bolton Wanderers
      2
    • Chelsea
      7
    • Liverpool
      17
    • Manchester United
      58
    • Newcastle United
      2
    • Portsmouth
      1
    • Tottenham Hotspur
      1
    • Other
      4
  2. 2. Who be relegated from the FA Premier League 2007/08 (select 3)?

    • Aston Villa
      2
    • Birmingham City
      33
    • Derby County
      95
    • Everton
      5
    • Fulham
      36
    • Middlesbrough
      17
    • Reading
      28
    • Sunderland
      38
    • Wigan Athletic
      53
    • Other
      26
  3. 3. Who will be top scorer in the FA Premier League 2007/08?

    • Benni McCarthy
      1
    • Carlos Tevez
      7
    • Cristiano Ronaldo
      42
    • Didier Drogba
      21
    • Dimitar Berbatov
      10
    • Fernando Torres
      12
    • Michael Owen
      2
    • Wayne Rooney
      9
    • Yakubu Aiyegbeni
      1
    • Other
      22


Recommended Posts

Pompey - West Ham tomorrow. This will be a cracker of a match!

Portsmouth has new plans for the stadium, it will no longer be at the harbour as the Navy has refused the land. It would put the new Super Carriers at risk. However, the navy did say they would look at selling some of there land elsewhere. As normal, people are saying how can they do this! There is no transport links. We will wait and see. One of the main problems is Railway, it's like 2miles away.

Fine save from Robert Green there :D

It was a bad call from the Ref anyway :D

Bit of a boring match to be honest. ?Alan Curb's didn't really seem happy with any of his players. ?They did a good job playing pompey. ?You can't blame Solano for not winning the match. ?It's just one of them matches.

I think Pompey had the most shots on goal, no one was raving about how good we were.

Niko Kranjcar had a pretty good match, felt mendes was sort of left out. ?Prehaps couldn't fit into the formation.

So a stalemate between Liverpool and Arsenal. Only managed to watch the highlights, but both teams managed to carve out chances. Gerrard's goal was a cracker though to be fair Arsenal's gaping hole in the wall played a major role. Liverpool's remaining chances were largely long shots from outside the box from Gerrard, Riise and Crouch.

Arsenal on the other hand played their typical passing football with Hleb being great as usual this season. Fabregas should have scored an open goal after Eboue's shot rebounded off the left post but he scuffed it. Thank god he atoned for it by poking in the equalizer, fabulous run from him and another fabulous pass from Hleb. Curling shot from Fabs then rebounded off the post again and this time Bendtner missed the open goal.

A draw was probably fair but tbh if there was one side who should have won it was Arsenal.

Arsenal vs Liverpool sounded alright, I think Spurs losing was bad again this time in front of Ramos lets hope that changes if not Spurs are going down but not that it worries me as a West Ham fan.

Everyone seems to be having a go at Arsenal. Swipe all you want... we play the best football, so stfu ferguson, mourinho, blatter, coppell and ancelotti. What bollocks they talk about having too many foreign players... look what MU, Liverpool and Chelsea have been buying, I guess there is no spanish enclave at anfield and Ronaldo, Tevez, Nani, Anderson and co are actualy English eh? MU didnt produce Rooney, Ferdinand and Hargreaves. Out-of-job Mourinho made the funniest comment when he said "We didn't buy success". HAHA.

I really can't believe Liverpool lost to Reading. I am very angry because Reading's penalty wasn't even a penalty as there was contact outside the box and not inside. Liverpool has two clear penalties, and i mean CLEAR ones and they are waved away?!?

Rafa got the team wrong yes, but the ref was a joke. He was basically playing for Reading.

Maybe next year for the title..........

I really can't believe Liverpool lost to Reading. I am very angry because Reading's penalty wasn't even a penalty as there was contact outside the box and not inside. Liverpool has two clear penalties, and i mean CLEAR ones and they are waved away?!?

Rafa got the team wrong yes, but the ref was a joke. He was basically playing for Reading.

Maybe next year for the title..........

How many more years are Liverpool gonna say that tho, you have backing, you have the players and you have the boss it just seems every year there is something missing.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      480
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      67
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      56
    5. 5
      monterxz
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!