Windows Vista Service Pack 1 RTM x86 leaked

By Hell_Of_Doom
in The Fast Ring (Insider Previews)

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Raa

Posted
Posted
yea this has been leaked... now i wait for the xp sp3

Source? Confirmed final build?

Didn't think so.

And agreed, that Server 2008 post has nothing to do with this topic!

Torrentthief : Go post in the right thread :p Thanks for the info, nothing my email didn't already tell me (its on connect now)

Grand Master

neo1911

Posted
Posted (edited)

Based on various responses this can be possible

6001.18000.080118-1840 ----> RC Refresh 2 (Mistakenly taken as RTM Build since it doesnt have time bomb and watermark)

6001.18000.080126-2040 ----> Possibly an Escrow Build (Build of which final testing of SP1 took place as previous one had some serious flaw... Still a very mysterious build)

6001.18000.080131-1830 ---->Supposedly The final build of Vista SP1

EDIT: Story takes new turn as microsoft have posted Automated Installation Kit (AIK) for Windows Vista SP1 which has build 6001.18000.080118-1840

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...;DisplayLang=en

Edited by sanke1
Neowinian

atabrk

Posted
Posted
Based on various responses this can be possible

6001.18000.080118-1840 ----> RC Refresh 2 (Mistakenly taken as RTM Build since it doesnt have time bomb and watermark)

6001.18000.080126-2040 ----> Possibly an Escrow Build (Build of which final testing of SP1 took place as previous one had some serious flaw... Still a very mysterious build)

6001.18000.080131-1830 ---->Supposedly The final build of Vista SP1

RTM Build is 6001.18000.080118-1840

You can be sure by looking at the build number of Windows AIK on the ms download center.

Windows AIK Build 6001.18000.080118-1840

Oops, the same time sanke1 :)

Grand Master

lardiop Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

I've got a somewhat crazy idea here,

Why don't we all just wait until it appears on Connect, MS Download or MSDN/TechNet? I'm all for getting SP1 installed on every Vista box I take care of, heck I live for this kind of stuff. Being the earliest of early adopters definitely has its moments, but I'm not going to risk downloading and installing a build off of some warez site.

Enthusiast

midway40

Posted
Posted

So the download on that Vista forum is the real deal? It shows "6001.longhorn_rtm.080118-1840" in the registry. It was posted on Friday so I thought it would be RTM.

I hope this is true as I have spent almost six hours installing it on my desktop and laptop :sleep:

Grand Master

NEVER85

Posted
Posted
So the download on that Vista forum is the real deal? It shows "6001.longhorn_rtm.080118-1840" in the registry. It was posted on Friday so I thought it would be RTM.

I hope this is true as I have spent almost six hours installing it on my desktop and laptop :sleep:

I dunno WHAT to believe. It seems half say "it's the old RC Refresh 2", while the other half say "it's the RTM". Guess the only way is to find out for yourself.

Grand Master

torrentthief

Posted
Posted

I'm gunna wait till it hits technet/msdn/connect and get ppl to find out the exact build number and number of bytes the .iso is and .exe is, not worth formatting and setting up vista sp1 to find out a few days later it isnt the rtm build.

Grand Master

torrentthief

Posted
Posted
The AIK kit build does NOT reflect the final build of Vista SP1.

It could be the same build number, or it might not be.

The ONLY fact we have right now is that Vista SP1 is RTM, but has NOT been released to web.

correct. that AIK Kit is just a kit to help you use sp1, im sure that would have been finished before vista itself. im thinking the 0131 build is the rtm or even newer as they said on friday it wasnt finished which was 1st feb (0201).

So just be patient and hang in there:) cant believe no-one from dell etc has leaked the build number or anything.

Mentor

M118LR

Posted
Posted
I'm gunna wait till it hits technet/msdn/connect and get ppl to find out the exact build number and number of bytes the .iso is and .exe is, not worth formatting and setting up vista sp1 to find out a few days later it isnt the rtm build.

NO

Having to much fun with this.

Grand Master

Raa

Posted
Posted
question: i see torrents with the full dvd(sp1 integrated) with build 6001.18000.080118-1840. i guess this is the real deal? since i have read somewhere that sp1 cant be slipstreamed, i would guess this is the real deal...right?

NO! It is NOT!

It has NOT been RELEASED TO WEB (Inc MSDN, Connect, etc.)

Any links or downloads are UNCONFIRMED at this time.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • 7-Zip 26.02

      By Copernic · Posted

      7-Zip 26.02 by Razvan Serea 7-Zip is a open source file archiver with a high compression ratio. The program supports 7z, XZ, BZIP2, GZIP, TAR, ZIP, WIM, ARJ, CAB, CHM, CPIO, CramFS, DEB, DMG, FAT, HFS, ISO, LZH, LZMA, MBR, MSI, NSIS, NTFS, RAR, RPM, SquashFS, UDF, VHD, WIM, XAR, Z. Most of the source code is under the GNU LGPL license. The unRAR code is under a mixed license: GNU LGPL + unRAR restrictions. Check license information here: 7-Zip license. You can use 7-Zip on any computer, including a computer in a commercial organization. You don't need to register or pay for 7-Zip. The main features of 7-Zip are: High compression ratio in 7z format with LZMA compression Compression ratio for ZIP and GZIP formats: 2-10 % better than the ratio provided by PKZip and WinZip Strong AES-256 encryption in 7z and ZIP formats Self-extracting capability for 7z format Integration with Windows Shell Powerful File Manager Powerful command line version Plugin for FAR Manager Localizations for 74 languages 7-Zip 26.02 changelog: Some bugs and vulnerabilities were fixed. Download: 7-Zip 26.02 (64-bit) | 1.6 MB (Open Source) Download: 7-Zip 26.02 (32-bit) | 1.3 MB Download: 7-Zip 26.02 (ARM64) | 1.5 MB View: 7-Zip Website | Release Notes | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • The official Funny Pictures thread

      By Steven P. · Posted

      Blast from the past.
    • The Trump administration doesn't want you to use OpenAI's GPT-5.6 without its approval

      By ad47uk · Posted

      Fine by me, I don't want to use it anyway,.
    • Microsoft Authenticator - Constant Login Approval Requests

      By goretsky · Posted

      Hello, Were you using a product or service from one of the companies affected by the Klue data breach?  See https://klue.com/blog/an-update-on-recent-klue-security-incident for the company's public statement.  That blog post does not list affected customer. From looking around at reports, I created this list: Gong HackerOne Huntress Insurity Jamf LastPass OneTrust Recorded Future ReliaQuest Salesforce Snyk Sprout Social Tanium It is likely there are other companies affected as well. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • SpaceX reportedly plans a Starlink mobile service for U.S. consumers

      By Karthik Mudaliar · Posted

      SpaceX reportedly plans a Starlink mobile service for U.S. consumers by Karthik Mudaliar SpaceX reportedly wants to sell mobile phone plans directly to consumers in the United States as part of a wider expansion of Starlink. According to a report from the Financial Times, SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell discussed the plan with investors during the company’s recent IPO roadshow. The company is also said to be considering building a terrestrial mobile network to complement Starlink’s satellite coverage. The plan is quite different from how Starlink currently operates in the U.S. mobile market. SpaceX already provides satellite connectivity for T-Mobile’s T-Satellite service, but T-Mobile remains responsible for the subscription, billing, and customer support. A Starlink-branded mobile service would give SpaceX control of the customer relationship instead. It could also turn the company from a partner of traditional mobile operators into a direct competitor. T-Mobile also began testing its Starlink-powered satellite service in early 2025. The beta was initially limited to text messaging and was also available to some AT&T and Verizon customers. The service has since expanded to support limited data access through selected apps, including WhatsApp, Google Maps, AccuWeather, and AllTrails. It is designed to provide a connection in areas where normal cell towers are unavailable, rather than replace a conventional mobile network. However, if SpaceX actually has a plan to serve nationwide, it needs to do more than just satellite networks and actually support on-ground operations. It can also partner up with existing carriers and become a mobile virtual network operator (MVNO). With that said, SpaceX has already spent heavily to support its mobile ambitions. Just last year, the company agreed to acquire wireless spectrum licences from EchoStar in deals worth a combined $19.6 billion. EchoStar's spectrum includes AWS-4, H-Block, and AWS-3 frequencies that could be used for both satellite and terrestrial communications. According to a SpaceX securities filing, the Federal Communications Commission approved the transaction in May 2026, although it is not expected to close until late 2027. There's no official statement by SpaceX for now. Pricing, availability, and other details remain unknown. Source: Financial Times

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Enthusiast
      Xonos went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      400
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      neufuse
      69
    5. 5
      Xenon
      66
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!