Windows Vista Service Pack 1 RTM x86 leaked


Recommended Posts

yea this has been leaked... now i wait for the xp sp3

Source? Confirmed final build?

Didn't think so.

And agreed, that Server 2008 post has nothing to do with this topic!

Torrentthief : Go post in the right thread :p Thanks for the info, nothing my email didn't already tell me (its on connect now)

Based on various responses this can be possible

6001.18000.080118-1840 ----> RC Refresh 2 (Mistakenly taken as RTM Build since it doesnt have time bomb and watermark)

6001.18000.080126-2040 ----> Possibly an Escrow Build (Build of which final testing of SP1 took place as previous one had some serious flaw... Still a very mysterious build)

6001.18000.080131-1830 ---->Supposedly The final build of Vista SP1

EDIT: Story takes new turn as microsoft have posted Automated Installation Kit (AIK) for Windows Vista SP1 which has build 6001.18000.080118-1840

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...;DisplayLang=en

Edited by sanke1
Based on various responses this can be possible

6001.18000.080118-1840 ----> RC Refresh 2 (Mistakenly taken as RTM Build since it doesnt have time bomb and watermark)

6001.18000.080126-2040 ----> Possibly an Escrow Build (Build of which final testing of SP1 took place as previous one had some serious flaw... Still a very mysterious build)

6001.18000.080131-1830 ---->Supposedly The final build of Vista SP1

RTM Build is 6001.18000.080118-1840

You can be sure by looking at the build number of Windows AIK on the ms download center.

Windows AIK Build 6001.18000.080118-1840

Oops, the same time sanke1 :)

I've got a somewhat crazy idea here,

Why don't we all just wait until it appears on Connect, MS Download or MSDN/TechNet? I'm all for getting SP1 installed on every Vista box I take care of, heck I live for this kind of stuff. Being the earliest of early adopters definitely has its moments, but I'm not going to risk downloading and installing a build off of some warez site.

So the download on that Vista forum is the real deal? It shows "6001.longhorn_rtm.080118-1840" in the registry. It was posted on Friday so I thought it would be RTM.

I hope this is true as I have spent almost six hours installing it on my desktop and laptop :sleep:

So the download on that Vista forum is the real deal? It shows "6001.longhorn_rtm.080118-1840" in the registry. It was posted on Friday so I thought it would be RTM.

I hope this is true as I have spent almost six hours installing it on my desktop and laptop :sleep:

I dunno WHAT to believe. It seems half say "it's the old RC Refresh 2", while the other half say "it's the RTM". Guess the only way is to find out for yourself.

I'm gunna wait till it hits technet/msdn/connect and get ppl to find out the exact build number and number of bytes the .iso is and .exe is, not worth formatting and setting up vista sp1 to find out a few days later it isnt the rtm build.

The AIK kit build does NOT reflect the final build of Vista SP1.

It could be the same build number, or it might not be.

The ONLY fact we have right now is that Vista SP1 is RTM, but has NOT been released to web.

correct. that AIK Kit is just a kit to help you use sp1, im sure that would have been finished before vista itself. im thinking the 0131 build is the rtm or even newer as they said on friday it wasnt finished which was 1st feb (0201).

So just be patient and hang in there:) cant believe no-one from dell etc has leaked the build number or anything.

I'm gunna wait till it hits technet/msdn/connect and get ppl to find out the exact build number and number of bytes the .iso is and .exe is, not worth formatting and setting up vista sp1 to find out a few days later it isnt the rtm build.

NO

Having to much fun with this.

question: i see torrents with the full dvd(sp1 integrated) with build 6001.18000.080118-1840. i guess this is the real deal? since i have read somewhere that sp1 cant be slipstreamed, i would guess this is the real deal...right?

NO! It is NOT!

It has NOT been RELEASED TO WEB (Inc MSDN, Connect, etc.)

Any links or downloads are UNCONFIRMED at this time.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm so conflicted with the Google Search AI summaries. On one hand I don't like how it's harming smaller websites by greatly reducing traffic which will harm us all in the long run but on the other hand those AI summaries often give me the information I'm after. I have never once clicked on 'show me more' though and never will.
    • Not a single company as small or large it may be is obligated to subsidize its products and sell them at a loss. Your way of thinking is socialist and as a West German with a German brother state but impoverished by state dictatorship and a socialist command economy situated to the East i can tell you - this kind of thinking very quickly leads to products not being produced anymore at all.
    • Apple reportedly has a second-generation iPhone Fold planned for 2027 by Hamid Ganji The iPhone Fold is one of the most anticipated tech products expected to debut this fall. It will be Apple’s first foldable iPhone, ushering in a new product category for the company. While the first generation has yet to hit the shelves, a new leak suggests Apple has already begun work on its successor. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claims that the second-generation iPhone Fold has already been confirmed, meaning Apple could launch a successor in fall 2027. The foldable iPhone is also reportedly referred to as the “iPhone Ultra,” though it remains unclear whether Apple will ultimately choose that branding, especially as Samsung is rumored to rename the Galaxy Z Fold 8 as the Galaxy Z Fold Ultra this year. The leaker also claims that the second-generation foldable will feature a wider folding display while reusing the same screen found in the first generation. Apple’s first foldable iPhone is expected to feature a 7.8-inch inner display and a 5.3-inch outer screen in a passport-style form factor. It has already been reported that Apple plans to change its iPhone release cycle in 2026 to spread launches throughout the year. Under this strategy, the iPhone Fold is expected to debut this fall alongside the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max. The standard iPhone 18 and iPhone Air 2 are expected to arrive later in 2026 or in early 2027. Speaking of the iPhone Air, Digital Chat Station says Apple remains undecided about a third-generation model. The company is reportedly waiting to see how the iPhone Air 2 performs in the market, and if sales disappoint, a successor may never materialize. As we reported this week, the iPhone Air has not been scrapped from Apple’s plans. The second-generation model is reportedly scheduled for spring 2027 and could introduce upgrades such as an additional rear camera for ultrawide photography and improved battery life.
    • ahh yes the good old your opinion differs from mine so you are therefore insane lol destiny 1 had no agenda pushing and was a massive success of a game, if you clearly look online the team for some reason thought they had too many men on the team and went on a woman and dei recruitment drive and we all know how destiny 2 performed from then on in
    • The limited imaginations and business acumen of non-dominant players is simply that: the abject lack of creative business acumen. Businesses often want to operate in a financially-rewarding marketplace (free market economics) and/or exit/cash-out at maximal financial recompense. Money is their incentive; regulations are both their obstacles and their tools; politics is their means of influencing the marketplace. Google, in this story's example, is crying that AWS and Azure are "too dominant" -- cuz Google Cloud is not printing as much money as Alphabet wants (although it is still dramatically more than they actually need). The EU DMA should truly follow-the-money and treat the EU as its own sovereign nation in order to protect European market players: Domestic entities are exempt from market-influence regulations until absolute monopoly is achieved; Foreign (non-EU/non-Euro) entities are all regulated via stricter DMA measures whereby regulated partnership with independent domestic entity becomes the only way for foreign entities to 'tip the scale' for favorable financial remunerations. Basically create a dual-track aligning with China's foreign investment models. In my eyes, this is the only way to properly protect the European marketplace beyond the current dot-com/ai-bubble/social-media crazes.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Vistor earned a badge
      One Year In
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      406
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      131
    4. 4
      Xenon
      72
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!