Windows Vista Service Pack 1 RTM x86 leaked


Recommended Posts

yea this has been leaked... now i wait for the xp sp3

Source? Confirmed final build?

Didn't think so.

And agreed, that Server 2008 post has nothing to do with this topic!

Torrentthief : Go post in the right thread :p Thanks for the info, nothing my email didn't already tell me (its on connect now)

Based on various responses this can be possible

6001.18000.080118-1840 ----> RC Refresh 2 (Mistakenly taken as RTM Build since it doesnt have time bomb and watermark)

6001.18000.080126-2040 ----> Possibly an Escrow Build (Build of which final testing of SP1 took place as previous one had some serious flaw... Still a very mysterious build)

6001.18000.080131-1830 ---->Supposedly The final build of Vista SP1

EDIT: Story takes new turn as microsoft have posted Automated Installation Kit (AIK) for Windows Vista SP1 which has build 6001.18000.080118-1840

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...;DisplayLang=en

Edited by sanke1
Based on various responses this can be possible

6001.18000.080118-1840 ----> RC Refresh 2 (Mistakenly taken as RTM Build since it doesnt have time bomb and watermark)

6001.18000.080126-2040 ----> Possibly an Escrow Build (Build of which final testing of SP1 took place as previous one had some serious flaw... Still a very mysterious build)

6001.18000.080131-1830 ---->Supposedly The final build of Vista SP1

RTM Build is 6001.18000.080118-1840

You can be sure by looking at the build number of Windows AIK on the ms download center.

Windows AIK Build 6001.18000.080118-1840

Oops, the same time sanke1 :)

I've got a somewhat crazy idea here,

Why don't we all just wait until it appears on Connect, MS Download or MSDN/TechNet? I'm all for getting SP1 installed on every Vista box I take care of, heck I live for this kind of stuff. Being the earliest of early adopters definitely has its moments, but I'm not going to risk downloading and installing a build off of some warez site.

So the download on that Vista forum is the real deal? It shows "6001.longhorn_rtm.080118-1840" in the registry. It was posted on Friday so I thought it would be RTM.

I hope this is true as I have spent almost six hours installing it on my desktop and laptop :sleep:

So the download on that Vista forum is the real deal? It shows "6001.longhorn_rtm.080118-1840" in the registry. It was posted on Friday so I thought it would be RTM.

I hope this is true as I have spent almost six hours installing it on my desktop and laptop :sleep:

I dunno WHAT to believe. It seems half say "it's the old RC Refresh 2", while the other half say "it's the RTM". Guess the only way is to find out for yourself.

I'm gunna wait till it hits technet/msdn/connect and get ppl to find out the exact build number and number of bytes the .iso is and .exe is, not worth formatting and setting up vista sp1 to find out a few days later it isnt the rtm build.

The AIK kit build does NOT reflect the final build of Vista SP1.

It could be the same build number, or it might not be.

The ONLY fact we have right now is that Vista SP1 is RTM, but has NOT been released to web.

correct. that AIK Kit is just a kit to help you use sp1, im sure that would have been finished before vista itself. im thinking the 0131 build is the rtm or even newer as they said on friday it wasnt finished which was 1st feb (0201).

So just be patient and hang in there:) cant believe no-one from dell etc has leaked the build number or anything.

I'm gunna wait till it hits technet/msdn/connect and get ppl to find out the exact build number and number of bytes the .iso is and .exe is, not worth formatting and setting up vista sp1 to find out a few days later it isnt the rtm build.

NO

Having to much fun with this.

question: i see torrents with the full dvd(sp1 integrated) with build 6001.18000.080118-1840. i guess this is the real deal? since i have read somewhere that sp1 cant be slipstreamed, i would guess this is the real deal...right?

NO! It is NOT!

It has NOT been RELEASED TO WEB (Inc MSDN, Connect, etc.)

Any links or downloads are UNCONFIRMED at this time.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
    • >Improved system sounds when using Windows in dark mode. The story behind that bug would be an interesting one.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      442
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      200
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!