Windows Vista Service Pack 1 RTM x86 leaked


Recommended Posts

yea this has been leaked... now i wait for the xp sp3

Source? Confirmed final build?

Didn't think so.

And agreed, that Server 2008 post has nothing to do with this topic!

Torrentthief : Go post in the right thread :p Thanks for the info, nothing my email didn't already tell me (its on connect now)

Based on various responses this can be possible

6001.18000.080118-1840 ----> RC Refresh 2 (Mistakenly taken as RTM Build since it doesnt have time bomb and watermark)

6001.18000.080126-2040 ----> Possibly an Escrow Build (Build of which final testing of SP1 took place as previous one had some serious flaw... Still a very mysterious build)

6001.18000.080131-1830 ---->Supposedly The final build of Vista SP1

EDIT: Story takes new turn as microsoft have posted Automated Installation Kit (AIK) for Windows Vista SP1 which has build 6001.18000.080118-1840

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...;DisplayLang=en

Edited by sanke1
Based on various responses this can be possible

6001.18000.080118-1840 ----> RC Refresh 2 (Mistakenly taken as RTM Build since it doesnt have time bomb and watermark)

6001.18000.080126-2040 ----> Possibly an Escrow Build (Build of which final testing of SP1 took place as previous one had some serious flaw... Still a very mysterious build)

6001.18000.080131-1830 ---->Supposedly The final build of Vista SP1

RTM Build is 6001.18000.080118-1840

You can be sure by looking at the build number of Windows AIK on the ms download center.

Windows AIK Build 6001.18000.080118-1840

Oops, the same time sanke1 :)

I've got a somewhat crazy idea here,

Why don't we all just wait until it appears on Connect, MS Download or MSDN/TechNet? I'm all for getting SP1 installed on every Vista box I take care of, heck I live for this kind of stuff. Being the earliest of early adopters definitely has its moments, but I'm not going to risk downloading and installing a build off of some warez site.

So the download on that Vista forum is the real deal? It shows "6001.longhorn_rtm.080118-1840" in the registry. It was posted on Friday so I thought it would be RTM.

I hope this is true as I have spent almost six hours installing it on my desktop and laptop :sleep:

So the download on that Vista forum is the real deal? It shows "6001.longhorn_rtm.080118-1840" in the registry. It was posted on Friday so I thought it would be RTM.

I hope this is true as I have spent almost six hours installing it on my desktop and laptop :sleep:

I dunno WHAT to believe. It seems half say "it's the old RC Refresh 2", while the other half say "it's the RTM". Guess the only way is to find out for yourself.

I'm gunna wait till it hits technet/msdn/connect and get ppl to find out the exact build number and number of bytes the .iso is and .exe is, not worth formatting and setting up vista sp1 to find out a few days later it isnt the rtm build.

The AIK kit build does NOT reflect the final build of Vista SP1.

It could be the same build number, or it might not be.

The ONLY fact we have right now is that Vista SP1 is RTM, but has NOT been released to web.

correct. that AIK Kit is just a kit to help you use sp1, im sure that would have been finished before vista itself. im thinking the 0131 build is the rtm or even newer as they said on friday it wasnt finished which was 1st feb (0201).

So just be patient and hang in there:) cant believe no-one from dell etc has leaked the build number or anything.

I'm gunna wait till it hits technet/msdn/connect and get ppl to find out the exact build number and number of bytes the .iso is and .exe is, not worth formatting and setting up vista sp1 to find out a few days later it isnt the rtm build.

NO

Having to much fun with this.

question: i see torrents with the full dvd(sp1 integrated) with build 6001.18000.080118-1840. i guess this is the real deal? since i have read somewhere that sp1 cant be slipstreamed, i would guess this is the real deal...right?

NO! It is NOT!

It has NOT been RELEASED TO WEB (Inc MSDN, Connect, etc.)

Any links or downloads are UNCONFIRMED at this time.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Payday TWO!! Is 13 years old man I feel old - I remember trying it out and if I did not know I would say 5-6 years ago or something
    • Payday 2 engine upgrade adds 64-bit and DX11 support, drastically shrinks install size by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Payday 2, the most popular entry in the heisting game franchise, is getting a surprising update after all these years. This is slated to be a complete engine upgrade that will enhance almost every aspect of the 13-year-old title, targeting performance, loading times, file size, rendering backend, and more. Developer Sidetrack Games is planning a beta to test out the new version ahead of the full public launch. The development team today revealed that the long-awaited upgrade to the 64-bit architecture is happening with this Diesel 3.0 engine update. By letting the game use more ram than 4GB, it is said to improve stability and compatibility on most hardware. It should also help modders in the long term with implementing larger changes too. "While many of the changes are made on the backend and not everything will be visible to you guys because it is a massive rewrite of the entire codebase, there will be a lot of things that you can look forward to," Sidetrack explained. Payday 2 will also hop over from DirectX 9 to 11. Instead of visual improvements, this is slated to reduce the amount of VRAM used by the title, letting more lower-end hardware access the title and run it better. Since these changes would require a complete redownload of the game anyway, Sidetrack says it has revamped "the game's packaging and bundling system." This should reduce the installation size from 86GB to 32GB. "So, now it's time to finally move the game to your SSDs," added the studio. The Payday 2 Diesel Engine 3.0 update is entering open beta on June 30 for Steam users. No console release plans were announced today. Sidetrack Games says it has been working on this complete rewrite of the codebase for the last nine months. While these changes should break most mods, the studio encouraged modders to use the beta period to repair their creations with support from the development team.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      Kolakid60 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      440
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!