Recommended Posts

7 year rule. Also, wasn't quite the same thing. Also, you shouldn't be judging things based on just reading the results.

Easy boy, im not judging, i just said what it felt like, i'm away from home for 2 weeks. And there is no internet in The hotel. So ill have to catch up when im back, so the next best thing is Reading pwinsider or wrestlezone...

And by the way, dont judge me by reading what i said ;) XD

Easy boy, im not judging, i just said what it felt like, i'm away from home for 2 weeks. And there is no internet in The hotel. So ill have to catch up when im back, so the next best thing is Reading pwinsider or wrestlezone...

And by the way, dont judge me by reading what i said ;) XD

 

How can you know how it 'felt'? You didn't watch it. You just read about it. Honestly, it doesn't matter why you didn't watch - thats how it is. I'm not saying don't read or try to stay up to date, just saying its not fair to judge it (like you did) based on a block of text.

 

The reason for this is that the author will have (purposely or not) but his own feelings into the recap. That will then skew your opinion towards his opinion, because you're viewing the results through his eyes, not your own.

snipped, even though it was funny...

 

Seriously Episode? i can't know how it felt, to me?...

for someone saying "you cant judge...", you're doing it pretty well.

oh and keep your reason to yourself, it was funny, but not even close.

for me this discussion ends here

 

and if ya don't like it,

i got...

post-441689-0-56337500-1380646921.jpg

Seriously Episode? i can't know how it felt, to me?...

for someone saying "you cant judge...", you're doing it pretty well.

oh and keep your reason to yourself, it was funny, but not even close.

for me this discussion ends here

 

and if ya don't like it,

i got...

 

Are you kidding?

 

Would you judge the ending of a movie based on someone else's description of it? No. (At least I hope not.)

Would you judge the ending of Breaking Bad after reading about it on a forum? No. (Again, I hope not.)

Why is it OK to do it for wrestling? Hint - it isn't. It is presented as a visual medium, not a written one. And if you were going to get one presented in a written form as the WWE wanted without WZ's crap writers getting in the way, you should have read it on WWE.com, not WZ. 

 

The segment was well done and not really a rehash at all. Brie played her part without phyiscally getting involved (can't have guys hitting women anymore in WWE), Bryan took a beating, and Orton came off as the Viper again. But how would you know, you only read about it. If Orton had RKO'd Brie, I'd be more inclined to agree with you, but it was very different than the segment you're referring to.

ah for f**k sake,

episode, grow up, its was just my opinion.

aren't I entitled to my own opinion?

and FYI, I have the wwe app (which gets mentioned to much during shows), 

but I like to read more than just wwe's side.

 

don't like my opinion?

I got...

post-441689-0-16440700-1380652430.jpg

ah for f**k sake,

episode, grow up, its was just my opinion.

aren't I entitled to my own opinion?

and FYI, I have the wwe app (which gets mentioned to much during shows), 

but I like to read more than just wwe's side.

 

don't like my opinion?

I got...

 

I hate to tell you this, but opinions can be wrong. Just because you have one doesn't mean its correct or should be treated as such.

If logic and fact 'ruins' the thread for you, then you are beyond help.

I hate to tell you this, but opinions can be wrong. Just because you have one doesn't mean its correct or should be treated as such.

If logic and fact 'ruins' the thread for you, then you are beyond help.

 

Sure, i have been, and can be wrong, no argument there.

but its the way you react, accusing me of 'judging', when i simply said how it felt to me.

i don't care if its treated correct or not, you can even tell me that i'm wrong, no problem

but not in a disrespectfull, arrogant mannor.

logic, nor facts will 'ruin' this tread for me, but people that don't respect others there opinion, they do.

 

now that being said:

 

looks like cena haters wil get a lovely christmas present :)

 

 

John Cena will be appearing at WWE's post-Christmas house shows in December in non-wrestling roles.

 

 

About the taker tweets:

 

 

Designed by visionary Todd McFarlane, the WWE ICON Series begins with The Undertaker and will include both current WWE Superstars and Legends.

WWE fans amd collectors can look forward to all the statues featuring authentic WWE memorabilia, which are highly limited in production. Select statues will also feature a limited run of authentic WWE Superstar and Legends signatures. Each WWE ICON statue will be created, developed and designed by Todd McFarlane and his award-winning McFarlane Toys design group, in conjunction with WWE, and will be meticulously sculpted and hand-painted to a fully realized likeness.

 

 

 

and is there any word on Hogan and TNA?

is there any word on Hogan and TNA?

Still nothing. His contract expired today, so officially he's not with TNA right now. The dirtsheets seem to point towards him signing a new deal with them though, so our hopes are being dashed. There were rumours earlier that Eric Bischoff could be on the way out too; haven't heard anything recent on that though.

Hello,

I know this isnt what Undertaker is intrested in and it isnt what is "best for business" but shouldnt they give the Undertaker the Intercontinental and US chamipionship? The only two titles he hasnt held. They gave a 50+ year old man his 5th US championship just to drop it...

Hello,

I know this isnt what Undertaker is intrested in and it isnt what is "best for business" but shouldnt they give the Undertaker the Intercontinental and US chamipionship? The only two titles he hasnt held. They gave a 50+ year old man his 5th US championship just to drop it...

 

It would actually be 'best for business' if UT was competing for ANYTHING. But not going to happen.

It would actually be 'best for business' if UT was competing for ANYTHING. But not going to happen.

episode,

 

Yeah, I understand but just make it drop it to someone the next day. It was just a afterthought; Personally I dont see him holding either title but we have seen stranger things in wrestling...

I just read that creatieve is thinking of ? ryback vs ut at wm30, only if the rock is interested in ? match at wm, and that ryback Ends the streak, something punk coulnd't do... its still to early to make conclusions but i personaly wouldn't wanna see ut lose to ryback, even though he's a good wrestler

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!