Acid 3 - The Web Browsers Test

[Unto Darkness]

I just hope Apple fixes the Safari 3 memory issue on Windows....

Oh and Crazysah, it is EPL not BPL, in your signaure :p

[Crazysah]

I just hope Apple fixes the Safari 3 memory issue on Windows....

Oh and Crazysah, it is EPL not BPL, in your signaure :p

Umm no... It is BPL (Barclays Premier League)

Crazysah

[Marcel T]

Webkit nightlies are now up to 91/100 apparently.

http://webkit.org/blog/159/another-acid-3-...ument-mutation/

[LOC Veteran]

Webkit nightlies are now up to 91/100 apparently.

http://webkit.org/blog/159/another-acid-3-...ument-mutation/

Yup, my 3.1 beta build with the newest webkit nightly is at 91/100 at this point.

[sanctified Veteran]

Webkit nightlies are now up to 91/100 apparently.

http://webkit.org/blog/159/another-acid-3-...ument-mutation/

And lighting fast I might say.

[SnowRanger13]

The webkit nightlies that was just released does 92/100... there getting a lot more stable then before I find, and amazing fast.

[User6060]

so i've downloaded the webkit nightly to see if these claims of speed are true, i couldn't believe there would be much difference over my already quick FF and IE7 browsing... i was wrong.

there is some serious rendering going on there, lightning quick.

[Crazysah]

Yeah. It is a brilliant browser. Seems they are doing alot of work@!

[sanctified Veteran]

Webkit latest nightly now scores 93 on Acid 3

[Randolph]

When can we expect this to land in Safari for Windows?

I will switch ASAP. (Y)

[LOC Veteran]

When can we expect this to land in Safari for Windows?

I will switch ASAP. (Y)

You can already get it for Windows :)

Just gotta download the 3.1 build(s) and the webkit nightly.

[Yeggstry]

Current Firefox 3 nightly scores 71 :)

[The_Decryptor Veteran]

Webkit latest nightly now scores 93 on Acid 3

Which is due to a change on the test.

The test, tested for something which no browsers do, and wasn't written anywhere (not in any standard), so they've decided to standardise on the current practice.

[Uniquitous]

New Opera 9.50 beta now scores 77 :)

Download

[sanctified Veteran]

Which is due to a change on the test.

The test, tested for something which no browsers do, and wasn't written anywhere (not in any standard), so they've decided to standardise on the current practice.

It was in there since the beggining? Because some days ago Webkit droped from 90 to 88 misteriously but it bounced back with the next nightly and it has been increasing its score steadily since then.

[torrentthief]

Safari 3.1 is now FINAL: http://appldnld.apple.com.edgesuite.net/co...SafariSetup.exe

what does it score apple users?

[adsadsads]

It was in there since the beggining? Because some days ago Webkit droped from 90 to 88 misteriously but it bounced back with the next nightly and it has been increasing its score steadily since then.

Our learned friend is probably referring to this.

[torrentthief]

no-one tried safari 3.1 yet?

[crazzyyfool]

Safari 3.1 is now FINAL: http://appldnld.apple.com.edgesuite.net/co...SafariSetup.exe

what does it score apple users?

no-one tried safari 3.1 yet?

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=626275

[Coded Matrix]

Sounds pretty cool :) I may just have to try it...

-Coded

[The_Decryptor Veteran]

It was in there since the beggining? Because some days ago Webkit droped from 90 to 88 misteriously but it bounced back with the next nightly and it has been increasing its score steadily since then.

It would have been there from the beginning, But it would only account for 1 point.

There's a bug or two in WebKit which cause some tests to fail (and possibly crash sometimes) depending on the timing, the best way to test (in any browser) is to load up the test, then refresh, so all the required content is loaded out of the cache.

[Azmodan]

Webkit's 95 now.

[LOC Veteran]

Webkit's 95 now.

Yeah, and this newest nightly is somehow even FASTER than before. I mean, does Safari see into the future and just render future stuff for you? :D

[Bryan000]

I'm using the latest webkit nightly with safari 3.1 frontend. As advertised, it does get 95/100 (not that I doubted it). Awesome job!! I've decided to start using safari 3.1/webit as part of my Windows webdevelopment testbed. Previously I only tested in Firefox, Opera and IE. I'm definitely gonna give more priority to Webkit now.

[sundayx Veteran]

So given this rate of improvement are we presuming Safari 3.2 will be fully Acid3 compatible? Webkit development is external to Safari though isn't it.