Sub_Zero_Alchemist Posted October 31, 2008 Share Posted October 31, 2008 opera 9.62 gets 1 less than 9.61, just 84/100. Actually i get a 85 here with opera 9.62, i think the test lags or something. opera 9x are not going to pass the test fully but i suspect opera 10 will fully pass it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torrentthief Posted January 26, 2009 Share Posted January 26, 2009 i get 20/100 with IE8 RC1 on XP SP3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lechio Posted January 26, 2009 Share Posted January 26, 2009 Opera 10: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pc_Madness Posted January 26, 2009 Share Posted January 26, 2009 i get 20/100 with IE8 RC1 on XP SP3 Serious? :\ I thought IE 8 was supposed to be an improvement. IE 7 = 12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathachew Veteran Posted January 26, 2009 Veteran Share Posted January 26, 2009 But does it really matter if IE8 passes the test? No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ViZioN Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 But does it really matter if IE8 passes the test? No. I thought web standards were important? Surely it should be getting more than 20/100? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathachew Veteran Posted January 27, 2009 Veteran Share Posted January 27, 2009 They are very important, but ACID 2 is more important because it is more applicable today than ACID 3 is. Eventually passing ACID 3 will be relevant, but my understanding is that today, it is not, hence my pessimistic attitude toward whether something passes it now or not :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shakey_snake Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 They are very important, but ACID 2 is more important because it is more applicable today than ACID 3 is. Eventually passing ACID 3 will be relevant, but my understanding is that today, it is not, hence my pessimistic attitude toward whether something passes it now or not :) acid 3's things it tests for will continue to remain irrelevant, because it doesn't really test for anything in particular. It tests for random parts of various standards that browsers were failing at the time. There's no cohesion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fix-this! Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 i just got a 71/100 using ff3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazlo Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 I thought this test had been released long ago (perhaps 6 months I think?). Anyhow, I remember getting higher than 90, with Opera if I remember correctly. Couldn't reproduce it on reload though, somehow strange. o.o Anyhow, to all those wondering on IE's score, I think they should first attempt to succeed the second test before even trying the third. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirkburn Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 Serious? :\ I thought IE 8 was supposed to be an improvement. IE 7 = 12 As far as I can tell, 20 is a larger number than 12. I could be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pc_Madness Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 As far as I can tell, 20 is a larger number than 12.I could be wrong. Hahaha! Oh god that was funny! *wipes tear* .. Just did a quick google, apparently IE 8 passes Acid2, which is good. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+shift. MVC Posted January 27, 2009 MVC Share Posted January 27, 2009 As far as I can tell, 20 is a larger number than 12.I could be wrong. As far as I know the number has no bearing on whether it's better or not. It's either the browser passes; or it doesn't. There's no grey area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lechio Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 IE8 RC1 (EPIC) FAIL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pulgafree Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Compatibility Mode ON Compatibility Mode OFF Windows / build 7000. IE 8.0.7000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torrentthief Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 anyone fancy testing firefox 3.1 beta 3 that was just released? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torrentthief Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 for some reason there is no edit button on neowin anymore after a few minutes so i couldnt edit my previous post. FF3 Beta 3 scores 93/100 on acid test 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Decryptor Veteran Posted March 13, 2009 Veteran Share Posted March 13, 2009 Beta 4 will get 93/100 and so will the final release. It passed the "large bug fixes" stage a while back, they aren't fixing up large chunks of engine features in 3.5 any more, those are reserved for the nightlies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirkburn Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 I assume that was an image of the latest Minefield nightly? (And 93/100 ain't bad!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Decryptor Veteran Posted March 13, 2009 Veteran Share Posted March 13, 2009 It's a few days old, but nothing's landed that would change the score (apart from one bug, the rest is hard stuff, like a proper implementation of SVG fonts and a fleshed out SMIL implementation) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tsupersonic Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 you mean 96/100, not 93/100... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirkburn Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 93/100 = Firefox 3.1/5 96/100 = Minefield nightly builds. Will not occur even in final Fx 3.5 This is what I parse from the above (and fits with what I know to be happening anyway). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torrentthief Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 is minefield just someone who makes a 64bit version of firefox or is it developed by mozilla itself? will mozilla be offering a 64bit firefox any time soon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+jamesyfx Subscriber² Posted March 23, 2009 Subscriber² Share Posted March 23, 2009 Minefield is an official nightly build of Firefox as far as I know. They've been using that name for a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torrentthief Posted June 9, 2009 Share Posted June 9, 2009 (edited) ff 3.5 beta99 aka 3.5 preview that was just released gets 93/100 incase anyone wondered. Safari 4.0 gets 100/100 on win xp and win7 x64. Edited June 9, 2009 by torrentthief Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts