Recommended Posts

But they can't see you then. The whole point of video calling is that you see each other. Without a front camera, thats impossible.

The whole point of video calling is to see. Not to see each other. If you want to see each other, call up, set up a time and date, and in person you can feel, hear, see, smell, and taste them.

Thats gotta be the most stupid idea I've heard in ages. Seriously.

Why? Because all 3G phones support this and the iPhone doesnt? Yep. Its a stupid idea :rolleyes:

But they can't see you then. The whole point of video calling is that you see each other. Without a front camera, thats impossible.

Mirror? :laugh: No, it's a pity that there is no front camera for video phoning.

@funciona: The "turn the phone around-idea" was a stupid idea.

The whole point of video calling is to see. Not to see each other. If you want to see each other, call up, set up a time and date, and in person you can feel, hear, see, smell, and taste them.

Why? Because all 3G phones support this and the iPhone doesnt? Yep. Its a stupid idea :rolleyes:

No. The idea of not having a front-mounted camera yet having a video-conferencing app. You've got to keep turning your phone around. I mean, imagine if you had to do that with MSN video chat. LOL.

.

@funciona: The "turn the phone around-idea" was a stupid idea.

It may be for you but for some reason all 3G phone have it except the iPhone.

No. The idea of not having a front-mounted camera yet having a video-conferencing app. You've got to keep turning your phone around. I mean, imagine if you had to do that with MSN video chat. LOL.

Im sorry but I consider a worse idea having a camera on a phone that supports 3G and not having a video-conferencing application. Thats stupid.

Why on Earth would Apple, "hit the pause button on new features," maybe because they don't have anymore ideas? Man I am really disappointed in WWDC, although my predicts were all right on the money.

Given the fact this is a DEVELOPERS CONFERENCE and NOT MacWorld, I think it was pretty good.

It may be for you but for some reason all 3G phone have it except the iPhone.

Im sorry but I consider a worse idea having a camera on a phone that supports 3G and not having a video-conferencing application. Thats stupid.

Not when there is no front-mounted camera.

Not when there is no front-mounted camera.

Yes :) iPhone users dont have the option to video conference while the rest do.

Again its stupid idea that a 3G phone has a camera but can't video conference. Its like a phone that can't call. Same thing.

BTW, just to clear it up: At 127? I think the iPhone is a GREAT phone with its features. My Nokia E70 is better yet it costs more so Id understand anyone that would get a iPhone at 127?

Not all 3G phone can video conference? I had a BlackJack II, which is 3G, and I don't remember it having video conferencing. Of course, having the camera on the OPPOSITE side of the unit to screen is just retarded and I could never be bothered having to flip my phone around constantly. Can you imagine the people that would get motion sickness? You are watching your screen while the moron on the other end of the line is having to fidget with their phone turning it around and such. Absolutely priceless!

And I have a question: Engadget mentions a new charging connector and it being super small. The one I have for my iPhone now is REALLY small, so what are they on? I think that's something totally insignificant. It's not like the current iPhone chargers are the size of an Airport Express or something!

And I have a question: Engadget mentions a new charging connector and it being super small. The one I have for my iPhone now is REALLY small, so what are they on? I think that's something totally insignificant. It's not like the current iPhone chargers are the size of an Airport Express or something!

It's Apple... They always find some way to make things smaller.

prod-inthebox.png

Did you try? On my E70, I have to go in Call->Video call.

I don't have it anymore but I vaguely remember trying but then I remember none of my friends had 3G phones and if they did, wouldn't give a damn about video calls.

Honestly, I didn't see the point because of the camera location.

Yep it has video calling:

Using In-call options

During a call, you can access various options by pressing the Menu soft key.

For a voice call, the following options are available:

- Hold/Unhold: places the call on hold to place another call or to answer another

incoming call.

- Video Share: allows you to share video, both live and pre-recorded, with another

phone that has the video share option- Mute/Unmute: turns off the microphone so that the person with whom you are

speaking cannot hear you, or turns it back on.

- Speakerphone On/Off: turns on/off the speakerphone mode to talk and listen to the

phone a short distance away

Yep it has video calling:

Ah that's right. You know what, I remember now reading through the manual and reading about Video Share. I don't think it was video conferencing in the way we all are talking about it. Video Share is so you can share videos - like recording something and send it to a recipient. I suppose you could use it for a video call but that would be so backwards to what video conferencing is all about.

It's apparent very few people here use video conferencing either at home or work. The whole point is to see the other person 100% of the time. Same as iChat. You don't see Apple putting iSight cameras on the back of the computers. That's my point and argument. If the camera isn't next to the screen, it's a gimmick. Same as Video Share.

:blink:

...Im on vacation and I want to show someone where Im at.

Besides I think its better having one 2MP camera for video conferencing than having 2 cameras one 2MP and another front 0.3MP for video conferencing.

EXACLTY! Video Share is for just that...sharing videos. It's not for video calling! It's probably fantastic to use if I want to send a video to you of my cat sleeping but not for holding a conversation. Hell, video sharing has been around for a long time, before 3G. On the RAZR you can do it. Any phone with MMS can send video.

Ah that's right. You know what, I remember now reading through the manual and reading about Video Share. I don't think it was video conferencing in the way we all are talking about it. Video Share is so you can share videos - like recording something and send it to a recipient. I suppose you could use it for a video call but that would be so backwards to what video conferencing is all about.

It's apparent very few people here use video conferencing either at home or work. The whole point is to see the other person 100% of the time. Same as iChat. You don't see Apple putting iSight cameras on the back of the computers. That's my point and argument. If the camera isn't next to the screen, it's a gimmick. Same as Video Share.

If you read 100%, it says it supports LIVE video too....

The point and argument is not the placement of the camera: Its having a camera on a 3G phone that does not support video calling.

A good keynote if you ask me. My opinions:

iPhone3G: Very nice. GPS and such is awesome. The price is much better now. The plastic back looks a little cheap though.

iPod touch software upgrade: You get more for less this time round. Also doesn't feel like you were supposed to have all this from the start.

MobileMe: Awesome! What .Mac should have been.

Snow Leopard: Yes, I said they wouldn't do it. I also said they wouldn't release a WiFi enabled iPod and they wouldn't call the slim MacBook the MacBook Air. If it's coming out a year from now. That means it's almost 2 years after Leopard's release date. That is a much more stomachable timeframe if they are going to charge for it. Would be nice if Leopard users got some form of discount though.

Cara, where's the Mac Tablet?! :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!