let the games begin: Forza 3 vs GT 5 comparison pictures


Recommended Posts

Both look amazing, though my choice goes to Forza 3, not that it's better looking, but it appeals more to me. the livery editor is a huge plus and this announced rewind assist also pulls me over to Forza's side, who cares we don't get 800 cars? I think 400 is more than enough...

Most of the cars are the same car with different livery anyway though.

better to wait for the 2 games to be released and then compare.

Someone posting sense?!?! :o :p

It's fine just wait till both games are out and Eurogamer will post their insightful PS3 vs 360 comparison article number 873.

These topics on GT5 vs Forza 3 are really becoming quite asinine. Two unreleased games getting sparred off, you might as well just change the topic title to 360 vs PS3, as that's all it ever becomes...

I think the bigger concern in this economic crisis is how the hell do we prevent ourselves spending hundreds on a steering wheel with two big racing simulators incoming? :(

I'm sitting here in the states tempted so badly to buy a steering wheel and bring it home. However I'm also eyeing up an iPod touch to replace my old 5G. The iPhone gaming scene is picking up a fair bit.

double post

Hey, I know how eager you are to reach to 20k :laugh: :p

Hopefully won't be too long until both GT5 and FIII are out :rofl:

I think we all know that it won't look that good in-game. There, I said it. :boo:

I think we'll see wrenches being thrown at instead of tomatoes :laugh:

I think we all know that it won't look that good in-game. There, I said it. :boo:

It won't they're not in-game screens.

It's a combination of replay mode, of which I know in GT5 Prologue drops from 60FPS to 30FPS and adds AA/Lighting/Shadow improvements, and also PR/media touch ups. In other words even more AA/detail added on top of the replay mode additions.

and @ Munky from earlier (in another topic as well), Jimmy Carr FTW :woot:

Well wichever one of the games you look at. actual racing graphics don't need to be anywhere close to the replay and pause/screenshot graphics.

when playing your' racing a long at high speed, you can't see any track details, you can't really see much of the reflections on other cars than your own. what you can see is only the stuff that is far away and don't move as fast as the stuff around you. And it's not like you focus on the distant mountains when racing in a car :)

of course, the cars and roads will still have the same poly count and textures, which is what's really important. The times when you need and will notice extra high res reflection on the other cars, normal mapping on the road edges++ is when you are in replay or photoshoot modes.

Even so I doubt the difference will be huge anyway, a lot of the improvements aren't taking much away from performance anyway. They're just doing stuff new palces and things they didn't think of before.

In any case, the one graphics upgrade I want is that they actually use Anisotropic filtering. both in Forza 2 and PGR the bilinear/trilinear filtering cutoff line is painfully obvious. even more so because they're racing games, so you're allways going along a road.

These topics on GT5 vs Forza 3 are really becoming quite asinine. Two unreleased games getting sparred off, you might as well just change the topic title to 360 vs PS3, as that's all it ever becomes...

Well, no one is forcing you into the threads ;)

Doesn't GT5 have a better physics engine? Isn't that the point of the franchise from the very beginning? The producer wanted to make a game that had realistic damage and controls. I know that GT5 is used sometimes for simulations unlike Forza.

If you'd go strictly by the shots in OP,it's clearly that Forza 3 wipes the floor with GT5 when we talk details.

But... they're both touched up shots and GT5 one is really an OLD pic.Regardless,look at the Ferrari logo on the side,door handle,wheels etc...

I'm a big fan of GT but Forza 3 is the only game that actually made me feel GT was surpassed graphically and I'd thought I'd never ever say that. :blush:

5oysuo.jpg

Doesn't GT5 have a better physics engine? Isn't that the point of the franchise from the very beginning? The producer wanted to make a game that had realistic damage and controls. I know that GT5 is used sometimes for simulations unlike Forza.

GT's physics system was never anything to write home about. Everything felt very static and pre-determined. Forza 3 is going to feature 'realistic' Tire wear even up to a point where you could get a blow-out - Now just that one feature blows away every single generation of GT "physic" up to this point. So unless GT5 goes above and beyond with something special, Forza definitely have and always had the better physics engine. Even Forza 2 allowed you to see the real-time movement of the shock absorbers and tire wear was based on the heat of the tires.

They look pretty identical to me except the forza one looks dull and flat.

Different, lighting, different enviroment, different car color.

look at the Forza video wich show red, blue and dark cars, and you'll see that the cars are just as vibrant and reflective as the GT5 car.

bright and grey colors just doesn't show off the shiny and reflections very well comparatively.

To me, the car in Forza 3 looks more detailed. It has self-shadowing whereas the car in GT5 doesn't show any shadows at all, let alone self-shadows. Of course, there are shadows (and perhaps self-shadows) in GT5. I'm just going by the two screenshots. In any case, one thing that really stands out to me are the environments in Forza 3.

As already mentioned, play fair, it's an old GT5:P picture against a just released Forza 3 pic. Lets see what they both look like on release :)

For those commenting on the environment, GT5's is blurred out for more attention to be given to the car model. If you want to see a detailed mountian shot from Prologue ....

gran-turismo-hd-20061019041333801.jpg

Edited by AbandonedTrolley
GT's physics system was never anything to write home about. Everything felt very static and pre-determined. Forza 3 is going to feature 'realistic' Tire wear even up to a point where you could get a blow-out - Now just that one feature blows away every single generation of GT "physic" up to this point. So unless GT5 goes above and beyond with something special, Forza definitely have and always had the better physics engine. Even Forza 2 allowed you to see the real-time movement of the shock absorbers and tire wear was based on the heat of the tires.

Gran Turismo has had tire wear since GT3, the tires could not blow up, but it had tire wear. So I don't know what you're talking about.

Gran Turismo has had tire wear since GT3, the tires could not blow up, but it had tire wear. So I don't know what you're talking about.

I knew someone would mention it, have you actually played those games? That tire wear was pathetic and predictable. Plus, as far as I remember, was only enabled during endurance races?

( And why did you create yet another account, don't you get bored of it? )

Gran Turismo has had tire wear since GT3, the tires could not blow up, but it had tire wear. So I don't know what you're talking about.

yeah. Forza has had tire wear too, just like the ancient F1 game on PC from before Forza was even thought of.

The difference is that Forza 3 uses accurate real physics for the tires. to calculate air pressure, friction, contacts surface and wear from all of that. Not a pre determined formula determining wear and grip simply from time and speed driven.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Simple answer is yes, you will still get the Windows updates and as long as browser is up to date, you will be good. Only thing secure boot does is protect you against boot level threats and make it harder to install other OS's. I've been looking into this pretty thoroughly lately myself as wifes computer has secure boot disabled plus my other, older computers that run Linux, don't have secure boot enabled. Have seen all kinds of questions about this on the Linux Mint and MX Linux forums. Just don't suddenly enable secure boot now.
    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!