let the games begin: Forza 3 vs GT 5 comparison pictures


Recommended Posts

Both look amazing, though my choice goes to Forza 3, not that it's better looking, but it appeals more to me. the livery editor is a huge plus and this announced rewind assist also pulls me over to Forza's side, who cares we don't get 800 cars? I think 400 is more than enough...

Most of the cars are the same car with different livery anyway though.

better to wait for the 2 games to be released and then compare.

Someone posting sense?!?! :o :p

It's fine just wait till both games are out and Eurogamer will post their insightful PS3 vs 360 comparison article number 873.

These topics on GT5 vs Forza 3 are really becoming quite asinine. Two unreleased games getting sparred off, you might as well just change the topic title to 360 vs PS3, as that's all it ever becomes...

I think the bigger concern in this economic crisis is how the hell do we prevent ourselves spending hundreds on a steering wheel with two big racing simulators incoming? :(

I'm sitting here in the states tempted so badly to buy a steering wheel and bring it home. However I'm also eyeing up an iPod touch to replace my old 5G. The iPhone gaming scene is picking up a fair bit.

double post

Hey, I know how eager you are to reach to 20k :laugh: :p

Hopefully won't be too long until both GT5 and FIII are out :rofl:

I think we all know that it won't look that good in-game. There, I said it. :boo:

I think we'll see wrenches being thrown at instead of tomatoes :laugh:

I think we all know that it won't look that good in-game. There, I said it. :boo:

It won't they're not in-game screens.

It's a combination of replay mode, of which I know in GT5 Prologue drops from 60FPS to 30FPS and adds AA/Lighting/Shadow improvements, and also PR/media touch ups. In other words even more AA/detail added on top of the replay mode additions.

and @ Munky from earlier (in another topic as well), Jimmy Carr FTW :woot:

Well wichever one of the games you look at. actual racing graphics don't need to be anywhere close to the replay and pause/screenshot graphics.

when playing your' racing a long at high speed, you can't see any track details, you can't really see much of the reflections on other cars than your own. what you can see is only the stuff that is far away and don't move as fast as the stuff around you. And it's not like you focus on the distant mountains when racing in a car :)

of course, the cars and roads will still have the same poly count and textures, which is what's really important. The times when you need and will notice extra high res reflection on the other cars, normal mapping on the road edges++ is when you are in replay or photoshoot modes.

Even so I doubt the difference will be huge anyway, a lot of the improvements aren't taking much away from performance anyway. They're just doing stuff new palces and things they didn't think of before.

In any case, the one graphics upgrade I want is that they actually use Anisotropic filtering. both in Forza 2 and PGR the bilinear/trilinear filtering cutoff line is painfully obvious. even more so because they're racing games, so you're allways going along a road.

These topics on GT5 vs Forza 3 are really becoming quite asinine. Two unreleased games getting sparred off, you might as well just change the topic title to 360 vs PS3, as that's all it ever becomes...

Well, no one is forcing you into the threads ;)

Doesn't GT5 have a better physics engine? Isn't that the point of the franchise from the very beginning? The producer wanted to make a game that had realistic damage and controls. I know that GT5 is used sometimes for simulations unlike Forza.

If you'd go strictly by the shots in OP,it's clearly that Forza 3 wipes the floor with GT5 when we talk details.

But... they're both touched up shots and GT5 one is really an OLD pic.Regardless,look at the Ferrari logo on the side,door handle,wheels etc...

I'm a big fan of GT but Forza 3 is the only game that actually made me feel GT was surpassed graphically and I'd thought I'd never ever say that. :blush:

5oysuo.jpg

Doesn't GT5 have a better physics engine? Isn't that the point of the franchise from the very beginning? The producer wanted to make a game that had realistic damage and controls. I know that GT5 is used sometimes for simulations unlike Forza.

GT's physics system was never anything to write home about. Everything felt very static and pre-determined. Forza 3 is going to feature 'realistic' Tire wear even up to a point where you could get a blow-out - Now just that one feature blows away every single generation of GT "physic" up to this point. So unless GT5 goes above and beyond with something special, Forza definitely have and always had the better physics engine. Even Forza 2 allowed you to see the real-time movement of the shock absorbers and tire wear was based on the heat of the tires.

They look pretty identical to me except the forza one looks dull and flat.

Different, lighting, different enviroment, different car color.

look at the Forza video wich show red, blue and dark cars, and you'll see that the cars are just as vibrant and reflective as the GT5 car.

bright and grey colors just doesn't show off the shiny and reflections very well comparatively.

To me, the car in Forza 3 looks more detailed. It has self-shadowing whereas the car in GT5 doesn't show any shadows at all, let alone self-shadows. Of course, there are shadows (and perhaps self-shadows) in GT5. I'm just going by the two screenshots. In any case, one thing that really stands out to me are the environments in Forza 3.

As already mentioned, play fair, it's an old GT5:P picture against a just released Forza 3 pic. Lets see what they both look like on release :)

For those commenting on the environment, GT5's is blurred out for more attention to be given to the car model. If you want to see a detailed mountian shot from Prologue ....

gran-turismo-hd-20061019041333801.jpg

Edited by AbandonedTrolley
GT's physics system was never anything to write home about. Everything felt very static and pre-determined. Forza 3 is going to feature 'realistic' Tire wear even up to a point where you could get a blow-out - Now just that one feature blows away every single generation of GT "physic" up to this point. So unless GT5 goes above and beyond with something special, Forza definitely have and always had the better physics engine. Even Forza 2 allowed you to see the real-time movement of the shock absorbers and tire wear was based on the heat of the tires.

Gran Turismo has had tire wear since GT3, the tires could not blow up, but it had tire wear. So I don't know what you're talking about.

Gran Turismo has had tire wear since GT3, the tires could not blow up, but it had tire wear. So I don't know what you're talking about.

I knew someone would mention it, have you actually played those games? That tire wear was pathetic and predictable. Plus, as far as I remember, was only enabled during endurance races?

( And why did you create yet another account, don't you get bored of it? )

Gran Turismo has had tire wear since GT3, the tires could not blow up, but it had tire wear. So I don't know what you're talking about.

yeah. Forza has had tire wear too, just like the ancient F1 game on PC from before Forza was even thought of.

The difference is that Forza 3 uses accurate real physics for the tires. to calculate air pressure, friction, contacts surface and wear from all of that. Not a pre determined formula determining wear and grip simply from time and speed driven.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • >Improved system sounds when using Windows in dark mode. The story being that bug would be an interesting one.
    • Edifier S3000MKII hi-fi audiophile grade bookshelf speaker is at its lowest price now by Sayan Sen Yesterday we covered a bunch of Dolby Atmos soundbar deals with several ones from Sony, as well as from JBL, Samsung, Polk Audio, and more. You can check them out in this dedicated piece. Those are not audiophile category speakers though as they are built with home theater use in mind. If you are searching for the former then Edifier has its S3000MKII at its lowest price at the moment (purchase link under the specs table down below). This is a two-way bookshelf monitor speaker designed to produce accurate sound. While it may not produce the best high-fidelity audio possible out there, it should still be significantly better than what you will get on soundbars of this price range. As such it will do justice to high-res audio played back through it. The only thing that may feel lacking is sub-bass as Edifier claims the unit can go down to 38 Hz, which should be enough for studio monitor purposes, but not for deep room-shaking rumbling bass. Where this does excel though is in its treble reproduction. With its super-tweeter, it claims to go as high as 40 kHz in the frequency spectrum, which should offer a sense of "air"yness. This is an active speaker which means it packs its own amplfication. It has a top-notch Class D amp that may be able to rival many Class AB designs too in terms of sound reproduction quality. The technical specs of the Edifier S3000MKII are given in the table below: Specification Value RMS Output Power 256W RMS (Treble: 8W × 2, Mid-Low: 120W × 2) Tweeter Driver 107mm × 107mm Planar Magnetic Tweeter Mid-Low Driver 6.5-inch (179mm) Long-Throw Aluminum Diaphragm Driver Frequency Response 38Hz – 40kHz Signal-to-Noise Ratio ≥ 85dB (A) Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth Codec Qualcomm® aptX™ HD Wireless Speaker Link Proprietary 5.8GHz wireless connection between speakers Supported Hi-Res Audio Hi-Res Audio Certified, up to 24-bit/192kHz Digital Processing XMOS XU216 Digital Signal Processor Audio Inputs Balanced XLR, Optical, Coaxial, USB Type-B, Line In, Bluetooth Input Sensitivity (USB) 400 ± 50mFFs Input Sensitivity (Optical) 400 ± 50mFFs Input Sensitivity (Coaxial) 400 ± 50mFFs Input Sensitivity (Bluetooth) 450 ± 50mFFs Input Sensitivity (Balanced XLR) 1000 ± 50mV Input Sensitivity (Line In) 600 ± 50mV ADC Capability Up to 24-bit/192kHz DSP Capability Up to 24-bit/192kHz DIX Capability Up to 24-bit/216kHz DAC Capability Up to 32-bit/384kHz XMOS Processing Power Up to 2,000 MIPS Edifier S3000MKII Audiophile Active (Powered) Wireless Speakers: $799.99 (Sold by Edifier US, Shipped by Amazon US) If you do not have the kind of budget to spend on the S3000MKII, you can also check out the Edifier R1280Ts which is right now on sale at just $114 (its lowest price in a very long time). Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • > The G 7 Pro supports wireless (XBOX Wireless, proprietary dongle, or Bluetooth) If anybody else's brain translates this to 'it works wirelessly on Xbox', according to the linked product page, it does not.
    • Ignoring the fact that this "colony" kicked the empire of King George's arse during those early years... You are confusing the First Industrial Revolution (which was clearly pulled out of some butt-hurt Brit historian's arse after the fact) with the Second Industrial Revolution (aka now called the Technological Revolution, undoubtedly by that same butt-hurt Brit), which transitioned the world from the UK/UPS Empire to the USA as the world's only superpower. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_Revolution I hope you realize that I am having big fun here.
    • OpenAI announces GPT‑5.6 Sol, its next-generation flagship model beating Claude Mythos 5 by Pradeep Viswanathan Credit: OpenAI OpenAI today announced a limited preview of its new GPT-5.6 model series, which includes the Sol, Terra, and Luna models targeting different price points. GPT-5.6 Sol is the flagship model targeted at demanding reasoning and agentic workloads. GPT-5.6 Terra is positioned as a balanced model for everyday work, featuring performance competitive with GPT-5.5 while being half the cost. GPT-5.6 Luna is the fastest and most affordable model, delivering strong capability at a lower price point. Unlike previous model releases from OpenAI, GPT-5.6 is starting with a limited preview for a small group of trusted partners due to U.S. government restrictions. As expected, OpenAI previewed its plans and the models' capabilities to the U.S. government ahead of launch, and the government asked OpenAI to limit the first wave of access to select partners. OpenAI also mentioned in the official announcement blog post that it does not believe this type of government access process should become the long-term default. OpenAI highlighted that GPT-5.6 Sol comes with a robust safety stack featuring improved protections for higher-risk activity, sensitive cyber requests, and repeated misuse. The company also spent several weeks pressure-testing the system and hardening it against real-world attacks. On the capability side, as expected, GPT-5.6 Sol is OpenAI’s strongest model yet. It delivers better results in agentic performance across coding, biology, and cybersecurity. On the Terminal-Bench 2.1 benchmark, which tests command-line workflows requiring planning, iteration, and tool coordination, GPT-5.6 Sol sets a new record with a score of 91.9%, beating Anthropic's Claude Mythos 5. Additionally, GPT-5.6 introduces a new "max" reasoning effort for even deeper reasoning. The new "ultra" mode uses subagents to accelerate complex work beyond what a single agent can handle. Pricing starts at $5 per million input tokens and $30 per million output tokens for Sol. Terra costs $2.50 for input and $15 for output, while Luna costs $1 for input and $6 for output. GPT-5.6 comes with more predictable prompt caching, including support for explicit cache breakpoints and a 30-minute minimum cache life. Sol will also launch on Cerebras in July at speeds up to 750 tokens per second for select customers. OpenAI plans to make GPT-5.6 Sol, Terra, and Luna broadly available in ChatGPT, Codex, and the API in the coming weeks.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      197
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!