let the games begin: Forza 3 vs GT 5 comparison pictures


Recommended Posts

This is the thing, Forza is clearly the technically better of the two games :rolleyes: ..... yet doesn't run at 1080 natively and has less cars on track :rofl: of course none of these matter because it suits the Forza players needs to perfection, who needs more than 8 cars in a race??

The arguments are getting silly now, especially over 2 games no one really knows too much about.

Well tbh, the 8 cars limit is pretty perfect, seeing as you can have 8 people in an XBL Party :p

Single player?

This is what I mean though, the arguements are getting stupid. Okay yeah the 360 party system allows 8 people, what if later they increase that to 10/12/14 etc, is 8 still pretty perfect?

Being honest I can't wait for both games to come out, can easily see myself trying out Forza and buying the 360 again for it, but at the moment there are posts upon posts saying one is better than the other when really, we don't have much of a clue right now.

No if you look at the name its just someones screenshots SCE309 Sony Computer Entertainment 09? Sony Computer E3 09?

no, it's a sig.

Hence the Sig and siguber part :p

http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/530580/SCE309Sig/SCSiguber_01.jpg

Single player?

This is what I mean though, the arguements are getting stupid. Okay yeah the 360 party system allows 8 people, what if later they increase that to 10/12/14 etc, is 8 still pretty perfect?

Being honest I can't wait for both games to come out, can easily see myself trying out Forza and buying the 360 again for it, but at the moment there are posts upon posts saying one is better than the other when really, we don't have much of a clue right now.

I personally find 8 cars perfect. GT5 will have obviously 12 cars.. I'm not sure about Forza 3.. I have not noticed how many cars are on track in gameplay but it might very well be 12 as well.

However the more I look at Forza 3 screenshots all over .. especially compared to Forza 2 I find that Turn 10 guys actaully really killed off reflections on the cars. They look very much matte and quite a bit lifeless. I don't know how it will look in motion but I can definitly see they sacrificed something, not sure if it is on purpose or not.

A comparison between Forza 2 and Forza 3 shots:

65rfcg.jpg

mf38.jpg

4lr5f4.jpg

mf39.jpg

Wow thats quite a striking difference you would be forgiven for thinking that Forza 2 was a previous gen game (thats not a bash just looking at the screenshots).

Which begs the question if the dev team is the same as Forza 2 then why didnt Forza 2 look that good.

Which begs the question if the dev team is the same as Forza 2 then why didnt Forza 2 look that good.

Much like any console since PS1 it takes time to properly exploit the power of the hardware used.

In this case,XBOX 360.

Look at the launch NFS (most games only had an "HD" boost) and NFS Shift...now games really show what current gen is capable of.

What you should ask yourself is.. why is Forza 3 the only game looking like this of all racers to be launched in 2009/2010.It has great AA,60fps and great textures.. which is quite an achievement above all racing games.I didn't think anyone but Polyphony could pull 60fps and detailed cars,as GT series was the elite for me,for many years.

Because its not running in 1080p im sure its already been stated that its running in 720p which is why they can pile on the AA and get it running 60FPS then leave the xbox scaler to do the 1080p.

GT5 is the closest to 1080p with 1440x1080.

Because its not running in 1080p im sure its already been stated that its running in 720p which is why they can pile on the AA and get it running 60FPS then leave the xbox scaler to do the 1080p.

GT5 is the closest to 1080p with 1440x1080.

As long as AA works and it's 720p,I'm fine. :)

but can it do 60fps?

I'm sure it will run at 60fps,K.Yamauchi wouldn't do a half-assed job of GT.Even the PSP GT runs at 60fps.

GT5 will have obviously 12 cars..

Please explain why this is obvious to you?

GT5P has 16 cars, is 1080p and 60FPS and is a snapshot build of the engine over 2 years old...

Being honest I can't wait for both games to come out, can easily see myself trying out Forza and buying the 360 again for it, but at the moment there are posts upon posts saying one is better than the other when really, we don't have much of a clue right now.

I'm glad other people are realising how neurotic some of the Forza 3 fans are becoming. Hopefully with the OPM France/UK GT5 previews later this month/early next, they'll actually have some substance to argue on...

Yep GT5P was 60fps racing and 30fps in replays as they turned a lot of post processing on in the replays.

Yup, the main thing they need to work on is environments for GT5, the cars in GT5P looked awesome. They need damage, better lighting and some texture improvement on the cars still, but the environments need the biggest boost.

GT5P

2z8vyap.jpg

2gt5c2g.jpg

11jqbo9.jpg

yes but because of the Xbox 360s 10mb of fast EDRam or what ever a daughter chip on the GPU they can have 4xAA HDR and other post processing effects FREE no performance loss it has allot of bandwidth between the 2 chips so it can perform all of those types of things without sacrificing performance .

500 MHz 10 MiB daughter embedded DRAM (eDRAM) framebuffer on 65 nm process.

NEC designed eDRAM die includes additional logic (192 parallel pixel processors) for color, alpha compositing, Z/stencil buffering, and anti-aliasing called ?Intelligent Memory? (eDRAM), giving developers 4-sample anti-aliasing at very little performance cost.

he GPU package contains two separate silicon dies, each built on a 90 nm process with a clock speed of 500 MHz; the GPU proper, manufactured by TSMC and a 10 MB eDRAM daughter-die, manufactured by NEC. Thanks to the daughter die, the Xenos can do 4x FSAA, z-buffering, and alpha blending with no appreciable performance penalty on the GPU.

The Xbox 360 has an extensive amount of bandwidth in comparison to its competition;[4] however this statistic includes the eDRAM logic to memory bandwidth, and not internal CPU bandwidths. The eDRAM internal logic to its internal memory bandwidth is 256 GB/s. The high bandwidth is used primarily for z-buffering, alpha blending, and antialiasing; it saves time and space on the GPU die. Between the eDRAM die and the GPU,

So ther we have it because of this all effects like that can be done on the 360 at no performance cost or loss

If its all "free" at "no performance cost" then why are they running the game in 720p?

So as not to cause any unwanted RROD's :rofl:

But seriously, as you say, if it can do ALL that with no performance loss, why not aim for 1080p ? :D

Those comparison shots on the last page are just stupid, you mean to tell me that you want to drive a car that reflects like a piece of chrome? The Forza 3 shots look far more realistic... The thread is getting pretty damn retarded, wait til both games are released then we can compare. And GT getting the NASCAR rights, as far as I know only iRacing and EA have the exclusive rights for the NASCAR name and cars. The tracks is a different story since those rights can be bought from the track owners and most tracks are privately owned.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Simple answer is yes, you will still get the Windows updates and as long as browser is up to date, you will be good. Only thing secure boot does is protect you against boot level threats and make it harder to install other OS's. I've been looking into this pretty thoroughly lately myself as wifes computer has secure boot disabled plus my other, older computers that run Linux, don't have secure boot enabled. Have seen all kinds of questions about this on the Linux Mint and MX Linux forums. Just don't suddenly enable secure boot now.
    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      149
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!