[Official] Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2


Recommended Posts

maybe modding with mw2 will go back to the roots of modding... as in what would be called 'hacking' today, when people werent given tools to mess with games, and they had to make their own and figure their own way of modding games...

And me sticking to the console changes what exactly :rofl: ?

I'm planning on getting both now, after this excellent piece of news was announced.

i know that you dont care about coming off as a jerk to PC gamers, but yeah, you do... this news is in no ways 'excellent' for those who have any idea about the community, the freedom and the control that characterizes multiplayer on the PC, and that clearly doesnt include you

i know that you dont care about coming off as a jerk to PC gamers, but yeah, you do... this news is in no ways 'excellent' for those who have any idea about the community, the freedom and the control that characterizes multiplayer on the PC, and that clearly doesnt include you

Yeah, must be why I've been a PC gamer all my life, clean leader of several major Danish clans including Counter-strike, Condition Zero, ArmA 2 and Company of Heroes. One of those clans was one of the biggest and most active communities in Denmark. Stop assuming crap because you're all just throwing a tantrum and realise not everyone just jumps on the cry-bandwagon because changes are coming.

Consoles have just become the new norm due to their seamless integration of a lot of aspects, something I quickly learned to appreciate - I'm still a PC gamer but I'm not one of those narrow-minded PC gamers that sees consoles as the devil.

It's really obvious what the gaming studios are trying to do. Consoles are closed systems unlike the PC platform. The more control they have over the consumer, the better (according to gaming studios). I'll never switch from PC as my primary platform because consoles can't offer custom mods to games like Oblivion or Half Life 2

At the end of the day, IW won't get a cent from me. So far, the only pro PC gaming studios that release blockbuster video games are Valve and Blizzard. Bioware is redeeming itself by releasing the PC versions Mass Effect 2 and Dragon Age: Origins on the same day as the consoles. On top of that, it's releasing its Star Wars MMORPG.

It's really obvious what the gaming studios are trying to do. Consoles are closed systems unlike the PC platform. The more control they have over the consumer, the better (according to gaming studios). I'll never switch from PC as my primary platform because consoles can't offer custom mods to games like Oblivion or Half Life 2

At the end of the day, IW won't get a cent from me. So far, the only pro PC gaming studios that release blockbuster video games are Valve and Blizzard. Bioware is redeeming itself by releasing the PC versions Mass Effect 2 and Dragon Age: Origins on the same day as the consoles. On top of that, it's releasing its Star Wars MMORPG.

Would you rather have no MW2 on PC or MW2 with no dedicated servers?

Would you rather have no MW2 on PC or MW2 with no dedicated servers?

Would you rather have salt in your eyes or vinegar?

Defending the crippling of something that didn't need to happen by throwing out a sweeping statement like "Do you want it crippled or not want it at all" doesn't justify displeasing the masses.

I've already said they could of added matchmaking and kept everything from COD4. The dedicated servers with default rules such as official Activision servers and those ran by the likes of Multiplay/Jolt/Wireplay could be included in the matchmaking, and obviously a client hosted option.

Then the clans and PC enthusiasts could also have their server browser and dedicated server options.

Everyone wins in that scenario, "console tards" and the "PC elite".

People who like the console experience will buy the console versions, leaving who exactly to buy the PC version if they're trying to clone the console onto PC? I doubt many are going to double dip. ****ing off the hardcore audience that tends to fuel what sales PC games do get is a bit of a retarded move.

im thinking that sooner or later, someones gonna find a way to make MW2 the way they like it... like they have private servers for WOW and all that, i cant see why it wont be the same for MW2

speaking of WOW .... i think that by forcing all multiplayer to be on servers they run, theyre one step closer to having paid subscriptions, just like WOW... not sure if theyre actually gonna do that, but its one step in that direction nonetheless...

Actually if you read various interviews and information, it seems they might actually not have servers at all. It seems players will be the ones that are hosting, and when the original host is disconnected, the reigns move to another of the players.

I think I've said a million times now I KNOW you don't want that, I'm saying _I_ want that and don't give a toss about the rest of you - I approve of this approach.

Which is pretty pathetic really. Thanks for helping to ruin PC gaming, just so you can get the same experience you can already get on a console. Fantastic.

Anybody know proper PC System requirements for this game, googling gives me vague results.

I think you can look at Call of Duty 4 / World at War specs and perhaps add about 10%, then you should have your answer. The engine is exactly the same they are just tweaking it slightly every time.

Everyone is complaining about this yet I don't mind too much. Why is that you say? Because sometimes when I want to play CoD4 and want to just 'jump in' I find that it is either laggy, the server is for low ping players only, or full/empty. Yes I can get a good game in sometimes and it's fun. But having this means that the players themselves aren't forking out for servers.

Think of it this way, you don't have to pay to host a server anymore, and I'm sure Hamachi will become a lot more popular now.

EDIT: Read as, I'm still buying it on PC. Because it's my preferred format.

I'm not sure what to make of the lack of dedicated servers yet. One thing that always bugged me with CoD4 was servers restricting certain weapons/perks. They were put in the game for a reason ya know. So if no dedicated servers gets rid of people putting up servers and then kicking you if you use a claymore or martyrdom or whatever then it might not be so bad after all. I guess we'll just have to wait and see how it works in practice.

I'm not sure what to make of the lack of dedicated servers yet. One thing that always bugged me with CoD4 was servers restricting certain weapons/perks. They were put in the game for a reason ya know. So if no dedicated servers gets rid of people putting up servers and then kicking you if you use a claymore or martyrdom or whatever then it might not be so bad after all. I guess we'll just have to wait and see how it works in practice.

Exactly one of the reasons why I'm happy with this, it means you can play the game how it's meant to be played. Means you can use Marty on CQB classes, because it's effective there.

Great to see some people understand the positive side about this change. I've said it time and time again, the PC version of Call of Duty 4 was ruined by the community and how 'all over the place' the entire experience felt. Each and every server had a different rule-set, despite applying various filters you could never avoid these massively customized servers. Then some guy felt a few perks should be restricted, then he felt certain weapons shouldn't be allowed on the server, then you had a player-count 300% above the actual comfortable limit of the map, then the host had to change core settings and worst of all, you had a player who always suffered from god-complex, kicking and banning everyone he disagreed with.

Players should not be allowed to have this kind of control at all, it has been the Achilles' heel of "server browser" games for ages, plus the worst of all, most hosts have no idea how terrible their connections or computers were - So despite the server browser reporting green connection, the lag could be horrendous due to terrible internet connections - At least matchmaking 'pings' the host before choosing and actually selects the best host available almost every time.

Matchmaking provides for standardized settings EACH AND EVERY TIME! Select your game-mode and you are 100% sure you won't get thrown in some terrible, messed up game. By creating a more closed environment it's easier to leave pirates in the cold and get rid of cheaters the first time around.

RUMOR: Modern Warfare 2 Features International Space Station

:woot: Would be awesome

I'm warming to the idea now. But on the flip side, if someone is being a bitch and is spawn-killing, hacking or some other nasty tactic, is there any way for them to be kicked if there's no server admin? Does it go to a player kick vote?

There is sure to be a vote-kick system

"While that might very be the case if the game flops on our platform, it would also send a clear message to both the publisher and developer that we won't put up with this kind of crap. If we pay substantially more for hardware, if patching a game is absolutely required to make it stable post-launch, if our games implement DRM schemes that prevent resale, and if we get content far later than our console counterparts do, the absolute least a developer can do is to ensure the features they just cut from the game are in place.

Privately owned servers ensure that, when IW's gets yanked offline for maintenance or goes down because they can't handle the player load they've been given, people can still play the game online. This is why some of the most touted exclusives for the Xbox 360 and PS3 were unplayable online for days (or even weeks) after they were launched. IW and Activision both know this, so their decision to remove a feature just to "streamline" online connectivity in a market that had online multiplayer years before any console did (and did just fine) is simply an anti-consumer act that is nigh retarded.

Completely removing mod support from a PC title is, also, an act of unfathomable stupidity. PC games are often bought because they provide the consumer with an opportunity to create their own content in an environment where they don't have the money or technical expertise to do otherwise. Counter Strike started off as a Half-life mod; it is still one the most played games online for any platform despite having been released a decade ago. Team Fortess? It's Quake mod that's had infinity longer legs (and arguable more success) than the very game it was spawned from. The PC port of RE4 looked worse than the PS2 version did when it was released; because of the community, updates were made to the game that not only allow it to easily compete with most current gen titles, but fixed the well documented control issues and even provided others (I'm sure you can now use a Wiimote for the PC version). We could delve into the countless weapons, characters, custom maps, custom levels, and total conversions that the modding community have made. These are all things the console ecosystem often does not provide (sometimes for copyright issues, sometimes to wring money out of wallets in order to sell you things the community could've created in a day) and it's always been a major factor in purchasing a game for one platform over another. Which, I'm sure, is why they killed MW2's modding community before it had a chance to begin; they now have the opportunity to sell us 3 maps at the low price of $10 and there's no way for us to compete with them. With IW pulling the feature from one of the year's most advertised and anticipated games in order to hock **** to us we would've made on our own, they risk giving other developer a precedent to do the same for future titles. ::claps:: Way to **** on the fans that made you a top developer, Infinity Ward.

To do all of that while charging us $60 for a game that offers substantially less than its $50 predecessor did while forcing us to use Steam so our games can't be resold after they're played and then to completely hack out any feature that would've made the game desirable to a PC gamer in the first g*ddamn place...well...there's just no point in playing or owning the PC version even if it does look and perform better.

To all Infinity Ward and Activision employees (which I'm sure is none) who read this site, I have the following kind words for your consideration. Go **** yourselves, your games, and I hope to see all of your future endeavors flop horrifically. We made you (Infinity Ward) what you are today and you ****wits can't even make a clean stab to our backs as a token of appreciation; no, you've got to twist the blade slightly so we actually feel the pain. Your FPS is one of many available to a platform that spawned and still dominates the genre; no matter how anticipated, no matter how advertised, you're just one fish in a sea of many. I hope Activision runs you and your franchise into the ground just like they have to every one of their pet developers; at this point in time, you don't deserve anything else."

- A quote by Jackal on Joystiq's post of MW2 not having dedicated servers.

http://www.joystiq.com/2009/10/18/modern-w...rvers/#comments

The argument that sums it up for us PC gamers.

LOL @ restricted console player's mind

LOL @ Not reading my post.

EDIT: Read as, I'm still buying it on PC. Because it's my preferred format.

And if the ISS was in it that would be mental!

And Sethos makes a good point, many of the negatives that come from the normal PC style play can be avoided through this method. Albeit at a cost. LAN servers can still be created though correct?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
    • OK so SearXNG is a meta search engine that you can install locally or use via a public instance. It scrapes other search engines which you choose and then sorts the results. Not as complicated as multiple relays
    • The only difference here is that you think you came up with these reasons. You didn't. These age old fearmongering lies (that were NEVER true) were funded by and the anger stoked by Putin through proxies like Farage (and later in the USA, Trump) and filtered down through the skinheads, Neonazis, etc. until it reached the uninformed, ignorant, and gullible -- never realizing they were being played for fools against their own best interests. Even now, despite all of the EVIDENCE proving that Brexit was a terrible mistake for ALL citizens of the UK and that its supporters were tricked by Putin's proxies into sabotaging their own nation, you're still here defending these well-known lies as if they were ever true. Not only are they not true. They NEVER were. So, when are you going to realize that you were lied to and actually get angry at the liars and charlatans who lied to you, instead of blaming the innocent people they lied to you about?
    • Dupe of "Microsoft further improving Windows 11 Taskbar with latest builds", published <20 minutes apart
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!