[Official] Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2


Recommended Posts

maybe modding with mw2 will go back to the roots of modding... as in what would be called 'hacking' today, when people werent given tools to mess with games, and they had to make their own and figure their own way of modding games...

And me sticking to the console changes what exactly :rofl: ?

I'm planning on getting both now, after this excellent piece of news was announced.

i know that you dont care about coming off as a jerk to PC gamers, but yeah, you do... this news is in no ways 'excellent' for those who have any idea about the community, the freedom and the control that characterizes multiplayer on the PC, and that clearly doesnt include you

i know that you dont care about coming off as a jerk to PC gamers, but yeah, you do... this news is in no ways 'excellent' for those who have any idea about the community, the freedom and the control that characterizes multiplayer on the PC, and that clearly doesnt include you

Yeah, must be why I've been a PC gamer all my life, clean leader of several major Danish clans including Counter-strike, Condition Zero, ArmA 2 and Company of Heroes. One of those clans was one of the biggest and most active communities in Denmark. Stop assuming crap because you're all just throwing a tantrum and realise not everyone just jumps on the cry-bandwagon because changes are coming.

Consoles have just become the new norm due to their seamless integration of a lot of aspects, something I quickly learned to appreciate - I'm still a PC gamer but I'm not one of those narrow-minded PC gamers that sees consoles as the devil.

It's really obvious what the gaming studios are trying to do. Consoles are closed systems unlike the PC platform. The more control they have over the consumer, the better (according to gaming studios). I'll never switch from PC as my primary platform because consoles can't offer custom mods to games like Oblivion or Half Life 2

At the end of the day, IW won't get a cent from me. So far, the only pro PC gaming studios that release blockbuster video games are Valve and Blizzard. Bioware is redeeming itself by releasing the PC versions Mass Effect 2 and Dragon Age: Origins on the same day as the consoles. On top of that, it's releasing its Star Wars MMORPG.

It's really obvious what the gaming studios are trying to do. Consoles are closed systems unlike the PC platform. The more control they have over the consumer, the better (according to gaming studios). I'll never switch from PC as my primary platform because consoles can't offer custom mods to games like Oblivion or Half Life 2

At the end of the day, IW won't get a cent from me. So far, the only pro PC gaming studios that release blockbuster video games are Valve and Blizzard. Bioware is redeeming itself by releasing the PC versions Mass Effect 2 and Dragon Age: Origins on the same day as the consoles. On top of that, it's releasing its Star Wars MMORPG.

Would you rather have no MW2 on PC or MW2 with no dedicated servers?

Would you rather have no MW2 on PC or MW2 with no dedicated servers?

Would you rather have salt in your eyes or vinegar?

Defending the crippling of something that didn't need to happen by throwing out a sweeping statement like "Do you want it crippled or not want it at all" doesn't justify displeasing the masses.

I've already said they could of added matchmaking and kept everything from COD4. The dedicated servers with default rules such as official Activision servers and those ran by the likes of Multiplay/Jolt/Wireplay could be included in the matchmaking, and obviously a client hosted option.

Then the clans and PC enthusiasts could also have their server browser and dedicated server options.

Everyone wins in that scenario, "console tards" and the "PC elite".

People who like the console experience will buy the console versions, leaving who exactly to buy the PC version if they're trying to clone the console onto PC? I doubt many are going to double dip. ****ing off the hardcore audience that tends to fuel what sales PC games do get is a bit of a retarded move.

im thinking that sooner or later, someones gonna find a way to make MW2 the way they like it... like they have private servers for WOW and all that, i cant see why it wont be the same for MW2

speaking of WOW .... i think that by forcing all multiplayer to be on servers they run, theyre one step closer to having paid subscriptions, just like WOW... not sure if theyre actually gonna do that, but its one step in that direction nonetheless...

Actually if you read various interviews and information, it seems they might actually not have servers at all. It seems players will be the ones that are hosting, and when the original host is disconnected, the reigns move to another of the players.

I think I've said a million times now I KNOW you don't want that, I'm saying _I_ want that and don't give a toss about the rest of you - I approve of this approach.

Which is pretty pathetic really. Thanks for helping to ruin PC gaming, just so you can get the same experience you can already get on a console. Fantastic.

Anybody know proper PC System requirements for this game, googling gives me vague results.

I think you can look at Call of Duty 4 / World at War specs and perhaps add about 10%, then you should have your answer. The engine is exactly the same they are just tweaking it slightly every time.

Everyone is complaining about this yet I don't mind too much. Why is that you say? Because sometimes when I want to play CoD4 and want to just 'jump in' I find that it is either laggy, the server is for low ping players only, or full/empty. Yes I can get a good game in sometimes and it's fun. But having this means that the players themselves aren't forking out for servers.

Think of it this way, you don't have to pay to host a server anymore, and I'm sure Hamachi will become a lot more popular now.

EDIT: Read as, I'm still buying it on PC. Because it's my preferred format.

I'm not sure what to make of the lack of dedicated servers yet. One thing that always bugged me with CoD4 was servers restricting certain weapons/perks. They were put in the game for a reason ya know. So if no dedicated servers gets rid of people putting up servers and then kicking you if you use a claymore or martyrdom or whatever then it might not be so bad after all. I guess we'll just have to wait and see how it works in practice.

I'm not sure what to make of the lack of dedicated servers yet. One thing that always bugged me with CoD4 was servers restricting certain weapons/perks. They were put in the game for a reason ya know. So if no dedicated servers gets rid of people putting up servers and then kicking you if you use a claymore or martyrdom or whatever then it might not be so bad after all. I guess we'll just have to wait and see how it works in practice.

Exactly one of the reasons why I'm happy with this, it means you can play the game how it's meant to be played. Means you can use Marty on CQB classes, because it's effective there.

Great to see some people understand the positive side about this change. I've said it time and time again, the PC version of Call of Duty 4 was ruined by the community and how 'all over the place' the entire experience felt. Each and every server had a different rule-set, despite applying various filters you could never avoid these massively customized servers. Then some guy felt a few perks should be restricted, then he felt certain weapons shouldn't be allowed on the server, then you had a player-count 300% above the actual comfortable limit of the map, then the host had to change core settings and worst of all, you had a player who always suffered from god-complex, kicking and banning everyone he disagreed with.

Players should not be allowed to have this kind of control at all, it has been the Achilles' heel of "server browser" games for ages, plus the worst of all, most hosts have no idea how terrible their connections or computers were - So despite the server browser reporting green connection, the lag could be horrendous due to terrible internet connections - At least matchmaking 'pings' the host before choosing and actually selects the best host available almost every time.

Matchmaking provides for standardized settings EACH AND EVERY TIME! Select your game-mode and you are 100% sure you won't get thrown in some terrible, messed up game. By creating a more closed environment it's easier to leave pirates in the cold and get rid of cheaters the first time around.

RUMOR: Modern Warfare 2 Features International Space Station

:woot: Would be awesome

I'm warming to the idea now. But on the flip side, if someone is being a bitch and is spawn-killing, hacking or some other nasty tactic, is there any way for them to be kicked if there's no server admin? Does it go to a player kick vote?

There is sure to be a vote-kick system

"While that might very be the case if the game flops on our platform, it would also send a clear message to both the publisher and developer that we won't put up with this kind of crap. If we pay substantially more for hardware, if patching a game is absolutely required to make it stable post-launch, if our games implement DRM schemes that prevent resale, and if we get content far later than our console counterparts do, the absolute least a developer can do is to ensure the features they just cut from the game are in place.

Privately owned servers ensure that, when IW's gets yanked offline for maintenance or goes down because they can't handle the player load they've been given, people can still play the game online. This is why some of the most touted exclusives for the Xbox 360 and PS3 were unplayable online for days (or even weeks) after they were launched. IW and Activision both know this, so their decision to remove a feature just to "streamline" online connectivity in a market that had online multiplayer years before any console did (and did just fine) is simply an anti-consumer act that is nigh retarded.

Completely removing mod support from a PC title is, also, an act of unfathomable stupidity. PC games are often bought because they provide the consumer with an opportunity to create their own content in an environment where they don't have the money or technical expertise to do otherwise. Counter Strike started off as a Half-life mod; it is still one the most played games online for any platform despite having been released a decade ago. Team Fortess? It's Quake mod that's had infinity longer legs (and arguable more success) than the very game it was spawned from. The PC port of RE4 looked worse than the PS2 version did when it was released; because of the community, updates were made to the game that not only allow it to easily compete with most current gen titles, but fixed the well documented control issues and even provided others (I'm sure you can now use a Wiimote for the PC version). We could delve into the countless weapons, characters, custom maps, custom levels, and total conversions that the modding community have made. These are all things the console ecosystem often does not provide (sometimes for copyright issues, sometimes to wring money out of wallets in order to sell you things the community could've created in a day) and it's always been a major factor in purchasing a game for one platform over another. Which, I'm sure, is why they killed MW2's modding community before it had a chance to begin; they now have the opportunity to sell us 3 maps at the low price of $10 and there's no way for us to compete with them. With IW pulling the feature from one of the year's most advertised and anticipated games in order to hock **** to us we would've made on our own, they risk giving other developer a precedent to do the same for future titles. ::claps:: Way to **** on the fans that made you a top developer, Infinity Ward.

To do all of that while charging us $60 for a game that offers substantially less than its $50 predecessor did while forcing us to use Steam so our games can't be resold after they're played and then to completely hack out any feature that would've made the game desirable to a PC gamer in the first g*ddamn place...well...there's just no point in playing or owning the PC version even if it does look and perform better.

To all Infinity Ward and Activision employees (which I'm sure is none) who read this site, I have the following kind words for your consideration. Go **** yourselves, your games, and I hope to see all of your future endeavors flop horrifically. We made you (Infinity Ward) what you are today and you ****wits can't even make a clean stab to our backs as a token of appreciation; no, you've got to twist the blade slightly so we actually feel the pain. Your FPS is one of many available to a platform that spawned and still dominates the genre; no matter how anticipated, no matter how advertised, you're just one fish in a sea of many. I hope Activision runs you and your franchise into the ground just like they have to every one of their pet developers; at this point in time, you don't deserve anything else."

- A quote by Jackal on Joystiq's post of MW2 not having dedicated servers.

http://www.joystiq.com/2009/10/18/modern-w...rvers/#comments

The argument that sums it up for us PC gamers.

LOL @ restricted console player's mind

LOL @ Not reading my post.

EDIT: Read as, I'm still buying it on PC. Because it's my preferred format.

And if the ISS was in it that would be mental!

And Sethos makes a good point, many of the negatives that come from the normal PC style play can be avoided through this method. Albeit at a cost. LAN servers can still be created though correct?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ignoring the fact that this "colony" kicked the empire of King George's arse during those early years... You are confusing the First Industrial Revolution (which was clearly pulled out of some butt-hurt Brit historian's arse after the fact) with the Second Industrial Revolution (aka now called the Technological Revolution, undoubtedly by that same butt-hurt Brit), which transitioned the world from the UK/UPS Empire to the USA as the world's only superpower. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_Revolution I hope you realize that I am having big fun here.
    • OpenAI announces GPT‑5.6 Sol, its next-generation flagship model beating Claude Mythos 5 by Pradeep Viswanathan Credit: OpenAI OpenAI today announced a limited preview of its new GPT-5.6 model series, which includes the Sol, Terra, and Luna models targeting different price points. GPT-5.6 Sol is the flagship model targeted at demanding reasoning and agentic workloads. GPT-5.6 Terra is positioned as a balanced model for everyday work, featuring performance competitive with GPT-5.5 while being half the cost. GPT-5.6 Luna is the fastest and most affordable model, delivering strong capability at a lower price point. Unlike previous model releases from OpenAI, GPT-5.6 is starting with a limited preview for a small group of trusted partners due to U.S. government restrictions. As expected, OpenAI previewed its plans and the models' capabilities to the U.S. government ahead of launch, and the government asked OpenAI to limit the first wave of access to select partners. OpenAI also mentioned in the official announcement blog post that it does not believe this type of government access process should become the long-term default. OpenAI highlighted that GPT-5.6 Sol comes with a robust safety stack featuring improved protections for higher-risk activity, sensitive cyber requests, and repeated misuse. The company also spent several weeks pressure-testing the system and hardening it against real-world attacks. On the capability side, as expected, GPT-5.6 Sol is OpenAI’s strongest model yet. It delivers better results in agentic performance across coding, biology, and cybersecurity. On the Terminal-Bench 2.1 benchmark, which tests command-line workflows requiring planning, iteration, and tool coordination, GPT-5.6 Sol sets a new record with a score of 91.9%, beating Anthropic's Claude Mythos 5. Additionally, GPT-5.6 introduces a new "max" reasoning effort for even deeper reasoning. The new "ultra" mode uses subagents to accelerate complex work beyond what a single agent can handle. Pricing starts at $5 per million input tokens and $30 per million output tokens for Sol. Terra costs $2.50 for input and $15 for output, while Luna costs $1 for input and $6 for output. GPT-5.6 comes with more predictable prompt caching, including support for explicit cache breakpoints and a 30-minute minimum cache life. Sol will also launch on Cerebras in July at speeds up to 750 tokens per second for select customers. OpenAI plans to make GPT-5.6 Sol, Terra, and Luna broadly available in ChatGPT, Codex, and the API in the coming weeks.
    • I'm not sure if you are trolling because I saw people saying this with the straight face, but there were no United States of America when industrial revolution started, just United Colonies 🤣 p.s. I'm not British, so I'm not offended.
    • Glad I uninstalled this incredibly buggy browser. Looking at that changelog, they clearly don't test their updates at all.
    • UniGetUI 2026.2.2 by Razvan Serea UniGetUI is an application whose main goal is to create an intuitive GUI for the most common CLI package managers for Windows 10 and Windows 11, such as Winget, Scoop and Chocolatey. With UniGetUI, you'll be able to download, install, update and uninstall any software that's published on the supported package managers — and so much more. UniGetUI features Install, update and remove software from your system easily at one click: UniGetUI combines the packages from the most used package managers for windows: WinGet, Chocolatey, Scoop, Pip, Npm and .NET Tool. Discover new packages and filter them to easily find the package you want. View detailed metadata about any package before installing it. Get the direct download URL or the name of the publisher, as well as the size of the download. Easily bulk-install, update or uninstall multiple packages at once selecting multiple packages before performing an operation Automatically update packages, or be notified when updates become available. Skip versions or completely ignore updates in a per-package basis. Manage your available updates at the touch of a button from the Widgets pane or from Dev Home pane with UniGetUI Widgets. The system tray icon will also show the available updates and installed package, to efficiently update a program or remove a package from your system. Easily customize how and where packages are installed. Select different installation options and switches for each package. Install an older version or force to install a 32bit architecture. [But don't worry, those options will be saved for future updates for this package] Share packages with your friends to show them off that program you found. Here is an example: Hey @friend, Check out this program! Export custom lists of packages to then import them to another machine and install those packages with previously-specified, custom installation parameters. Setting up machines or configuring a specific software setup has never been easier. Backup your packages to a local file to easily recover your setup in a matter of seconds when migrating to a new machine Devolutions UniGetUI 2026.2.2 changelog: This release marks the completion of UniGetUI's migration from WinUI to Avalonia. With the remaining WinUI components and dependencies now removed, UniGetUI is fully powered by Avalonia. This update also brings Windows 11 Snap Layouts support, refined styling throughout the application, improved log viewing, new illustrations, and significantly smaller release packages. Highlights Further refined the Avalonia user interface to better match WinUI styling and behavior across package lists, navigation elements, dialogs, and controls. Added support for Windows 11 Snap Layouts when hovering the maximize button, matching the behavior of native Windows applications. Added illustrations for empty and loading package list states, improving visual feedback throughout the application. Improved the operation log window so automatic scrolling no longer interrupts users when reviewing previous log entries. Reduced installer and application package sizes, resulting in smaller downloads and a significantly leaner Windows distribution. User Interface Improvements Improved package list styling, column headers, backgrounds, hover states, and selection indicators for a more polished and consistent experience. Refined sidebar navigation and segmented controls to better align with modern Windows design patterns. Improved package tag badges and icon presentation throughout the application. Updated several labels, placeholders, and interface elements for improved clarity and consistency. Removed the remaining WinUI-specific styling dependencies, further consolidating the application around Avalonia. Windows Improvements Added native Windows 11 Snap Layouts integration for the maximize button. Improved maximize button hover and pressed visual states to more closely match native Windows behavior. Performance & Reliability Reduced the size of Windows release packages by removing unnecessary runtime dependencies and optimizing published builds. Reduced installer size through improved compression settings. Simplified application dependencies and reduced overall maintenance complexity. Fixes Fixed log output auto-scrolling behavior when manually reviewing previous entries. Resolved various UI inconsistencies and styling issues across the Avalonia interface. Addressed several minor issues and edge cases throughout the application. Other Changes Dependency cleanup and project maintenance. Internal code refactoring and infrastructure improvements. Additional test coverage and build pipeline optimizations. Download: UniGetUI 64-bit | Portable | ~90.0 MB (Open Source) Download: UniGetUI ARM64 | Portable Links: UniGetUI Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      197
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!