97 members have voted

  1. 1. What race do you play as (the most)?

    • Protoss
      36
    • Terran
      38
    • Zerg
      14
    • Random
      9


Recommended Posts

Well I have to go to work, but for the last 5 hours I have been playing SC2 on Campaign. No problems and runs smoothly. Did anyone try the secondary game in SC2? Its awesome. If you don't know what I am talking about, go to the Bar on the starship and click on the Arcade machine!

Of course! It's called Lost Viking and it was made using the map editor. :)

Damn it, I can't log into the game!

I'm getting "This battle.net account does not include an associated copy of starcraft" error :angry: :devil:

Try this:

- Log into your Battle.net account.

- Go: Account > Settings > Communication Preferences

- Switch your language to match the play region.

http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=26262988238&sid=3000

Can we zoom out a little bit?

It feels really claustrophobic.

The zoom levels are variable depending on your screen resolution, they did this so that people with varying screen resolutions could all see the same amount of the battlefield this not letting people feel they are being cheated for having a smaller screen.

The zoom levels are variable depending on your screen resolution, they did this so that people with varying screen resolutions could all see the same amount of the battlefield this not letting people feel they are being cheated for having a smaller screen.

That's a crap decision. A really truly terrible decision.

That's like only releasing movies in SD because not everyone can afford HDTV.

That's a crap decision. A really truly terrible decision.

That's like only releasing movies in SD because not everyone can afford HDTV.

Not necessarily. Remember, StarCraft II isn't a tactical RTS game like Supreme Commander. It's more like a complex chess game with micro- and macro-management. The former referring to units and the latter referring to resources. Since the game is largely determined by the player that can micro/macro the best, it only makes sense that they level the playing field (in terms of viewing area). If someone with a larger screen can see a larger area, that person has a distinct advantage over someone with a smaller screen. That simply isn't fair when dancing your units around could mean a win or loss.

But unexplored areas are black - how can being able to see more blackness be an advantage?

They Obviously refer to area where you have current units & structures. You don't(rather can't) have your whole base in a 10 foot square area (not at scale of course). When someone can see at a 20 foot radius VS someone who can see 25, yes it's a huge difference and can easily be the difference between winning and losing.

Its sad to see that some people are trolling this game on amazon reviews when they havent even played it.. Most of the complaints are about only having the terran campaign (but they dont know how good it is or weither it is worth it) or even saying that you always need a connection to play (when you can play as a guest in offline mode).

But unexplored areas are black - how can being able to see more blackness be an advantage?

Are they gonna limit APM because I have slightly slower fingers? :/

In that case, you won't get an advantage unless you play as Terran. They can build sensor towers that detect enemy units hidden within the fog of war. Back to my earlier post though, I was talking about an ideal case where the fog of war is revealed (e.g. enemy units running by friendly units/structures).

By the way, I completely forgot... post your character names and codes. I'll try my best to update the OP. If I miss your name then send me a message. :)

Here's mine: Anaron - 758.

By the way, I completely forgot... post your character names and codes. I'll try my best to update the OP. If I miss your name then send me a message. :)

Here's mine: Anaron - 758.

Where do you see your code? I haven't noticed it yet.

Ah, I found it.. not that anyone wants to play with a noob (me) but mine is: Fellyn - 773.

:laugh:

Its sad to see that some people are trolling this game on amazon reviews when they havent even played it.. Most of the complaints are about only having the terran campaign (but they dont know how good it is or weither it is worth it) or even saying that you always need a connection to play (when you can play as a guest in offline mode).

Very true, but Amazon reviews isn't really the ideal place (for me) for reviews on games. Trolls will always be around. I still agree, though. ;)

Does it require a DVD to play a game? Just curious because my main DVD drive is broken, so I have to install Starcraft 2 on my second DVD drive (extremely slow ._.) and my second DVD drive tends to cause scratches

No, it fully installs to your hard drive (about 12GB). You can also download it if you enter your key on the battle.net website if you do have a physical copy and download it there.

Does it require a DVD to play a game? Just curious because my main DVD drive is broken, so I have to install Starcraft 2 on my second DVD drive (extremely slow ._.) and my second DVD drive tends to cause scratches

no it doesnt require a dvd to play , or install , when you add the serial key to your account you can download a digital copy of it to install.

Does it require a DVD to play a game? Just curious because my main DVD drive is broken, so I have to install Starcraft 2 on my second DVD drive (extremely slow ._.) and my second DVD drive tends to cause scratches

You can play it without the DVD. It's only used to install the game. My DVD drive broke too so I had to download the digital version via the Blizzard Downloader. All you have to do is add the key for StarCraft II to your Battle.net account. (Y)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Opinion. All you did was blame Democrats for everything. You offered nothing but a hit piece to support your pro Trump, anti union right wing ideology.
    • Excuse me for having an opinion, fella'... (Why am I not surprised?...) Congrats on your very informative post however...
    • By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread.
    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! * One additional problem corporations have that I also do not sympathize with is they don't want to pay to train their American employees. They could easily do so, but would rather not have to pay for it. I find that pathetic, actually. It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!