97 members have voted

  1. 1. What race do you play as (the most)?

    • Protoss
      36
    • Terran
      38
    • Zerg
      14
    • Random
      9


Recommended Posts

Well I have to go to work, but for the last 5 hours I have been playing SC2 on Campaign. No problems and runs smoothly. Did anyone try the secondary game in SC2? Its awesome. If you don't know what I am talking about, go to the Bar on the starship and click on the Arcade machine!

Of course! It's called Lost Viking and it was made using the map editor. :)

Damn it, I can't log into the game!

I'm getting "This battle.net account does not include an associated copy of starcraft" error :angry: :devil:

Try this:

- Log into your Battle.net account.

- Go: Account > Settings > Communication Preferences

- Switch your language to match the play region.

http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=26262988238&sid=3000

Can we zoom out a little bit?

It feels really claustrophobic.

The zoom levels are variable depending on your screen resolution, they did this so that people with varying screen resolutions could all see the same amount of the battlefield this not letting people feel they are being cheated for having a smaller screen.

The zoom levels are variable depending on your screen resolution, they did this so that people with varying screen resolutions could all see the same amount of the battlefield this not letting people feel they are being cheated for having a smaller screen.

That's a crap decision. A really truly terrible decision.

That's like only releasing movies in SD because not everyone can afford HDTV.

That's a crap decision. A really truly terrible decision.

That's like only releasing movies in SD because not everyone can afford HDTV.

Not necessarily. Remember, StarCraft II isn't a tactical RTS game like Supreme Commander. It's more like a complex chess game with micro- and macro-management. The former referring to units and the latter referring to resources. Since the game is largely determined by the player that can micro/macro the best, it only makes sense that they level the playing field (in terms of viewing area). If someone with a larger screen can see a larger area, that person has a distinct advantage over someone with a smaller screen. That simply isn't fair when dancing your units around could mean a win or loss.

But unexplored areas are black - how can being able to see more blackness be an advantage?

They Obviously refer to area where you have current units & structures. You don't(rather can't) have your whole base in a 10 foot square area (not at scale of course). When someone can see at a 20 foot radius VS someone who can see 25, yes it's a huge difference and can easily be the difference between winning and losing.

Its sad to see that some people are trolling this game on amazon reviews when they havent even played it.. Most of the complaints are about only having the terran campaign (but they dont know how good it is or weither it is worth it) or even saying that you always need a connection to play (when you can play as a guest in offline mode).

But unexplored areas are black - how can being able to see more blackness be an advantage?

Are they gonna limit APM because I have slightly slower fingers? :/

In that case, you won't get an advantage unless you play as Terran. They can build sensor towers that detect enemy units hidden within the fog of war. Back to my earlier post though, I was talking about an ideal case where the fog of war is revealed (e.g. enemy units running by friendly units/structures).

By the way, I completely forgot... post your character names and codes. I'll try my best to update the OP. If I miss your name then send me a message. :)

Here's mine: Anaron - 758.

By the way, I completely forgot... post your character names and codes. I'll try my best to update the OP. If I miss your name then send me a message. :)

Here's mine: Anaron - 758.

Where do you see your code? I haven't noticed it yet.

Ah, I found it.. not that anyone wants to play with a noob (me) but mine is: Fellyn - 773.

:laugh:

Its sad to see that some people are trolling this game on amazon reviews when they havent even played it.. Most of the complaints are about only having the terran campaign (but they dont know how good it is or weither it is worth it) or even saying that you always need a connection to play (when you can play as a guest in offline mode).

Very true, but Amazon reviews isn't really the ideal place (for me) for reviews on games. Trolls will always be around. I still agree, though. ;)

Does it require a DVD to play a game? Just curious because my main DVD drive is broken, so I have to install Starcraft 2 on my second DVD drive (extremely slow ._.) and my second DVD drive tends to cause scratches

No, it fully installs to your hard drive (about 12GB). You can also download it if you enter your key on the battle.net website if you do have a physical copy and download it there.

Does it require a DVD to play a game? Just curious because my main DVD drive is broken, so I have to install Starcraft 2 on my second DVD drive (extremely slow ._.) and my second DVD drive tends to cause scratches

no it doesnt require a dvd to play , or install , when you add the serial key to your account you can download a digital copy of it to install.

Does it require a DVD to play a game? Just curious because my main DVD drive is broken, so I have to install Starcraft 2 on my second DVD drive (extremely slow ._.) and my second DVD drive tends to cause scratches

You can play it without the DVD. It's only used to install the game. My DVD drive broke too so I had to download the digital version via the Blizzard Downloader. All you have to do is add the key for StarCraft II to your Battle.net account. (Y)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!