Recommended Posts

Aside from the graphical upgrade and change of setting, is this any different from Oblivion? Not that I've been following very closely, but I'm not seeing them address any of Oblivion's flaws:

- boring main quest

- copy-pasted dungeons

- npc behavior and conversations ("Radiant AI") were hilarious at best

- UI was inappropriate for PC

- Enemy level scaling was abusive

Aside from the graphical upgrade and change of setting, is this any different from Oblivion? Not that I've been following very closely, but I'm not seeing them address any of Oblivion's flaws:

- boring main quest

- copy-pasted dungeons

- npc behavior and conversations ("Radiant AI") were hilarious at best

- UI was inappropriate for PC

- Enemy level scaling was abusive

Mods have fixed all of this for Oblivion. With enough mods, Oblivion becomes an actual awesome game to play.

My experience with modding Oblivion (like Morrowind before it, but vanilla Morrowind had the merit of being actually interesting) is that it quickly becomes a nightmare of maintenance, bugs and performance issues, and when it works, it's a patchwork of conflicting artistic visions of wildly varying quality with no coherent vision.

Some may find it rewarding, but to me the fun/pain ratio of doing that < 1.

Aside from the graphical upgrade and change of setting, is this any different from Oblivion? Not that I've been following very closely, but I'm not seeing them address any of Oblivion's flaws:

- boring main quest

- copy-pasted dungeons

- npc behavior and conversations ("Radiant AI") were hilarious at best

- UI was inappropriate for PC

- Enemy level scaling was abusive

I don't know anything about Skyrim's mainquest, but all of those other points have been mentioned by Bethesda. I believe it was in some gaming magazine interview. Basically they said it would get much better in Skyrim. Sorry I can't recall the source.

My experience with modding Oblivion (like Morrowind before it, but vanilla Morrowind had the merit of being actually interesting) is that it quickly becomes a nightmare of maintenance, bugs and performance issues, and when it works, it's a patchwork of conflicting artistic visions of wildly varying quality with no coherent vision.

Some may find it rewarding, but to me the fun/pain ratio of doing that < 1.

It's honestly not that bad and with the mods now, everything is relatively simple to install and the texture packs at least are pretty uniform.

The only "conflicting artistic visions" there are are if you start getting into the Japanese made races, body models, and clothes/armor...

Aside from the graphical upgrade and change of setting, is this any different from Oblivion? Not that I've been following very closely, but I'm not seeing them address any of Oblivion's flaws:

- boring main quest

- copy-pasted dungeons

- npc behavior and conversations ("Radiant AI") were hilarious at best

- UI was inappropriate for PC

- Enemy level scaling was abusive

In this months issue of PS3 magazine they answered some of these questions

-30 hour Main story quest with 300 hours of total play time if you do all the side quests and such

-Instead of 1 dungeon/cave designer they now have 8

-NPC are now programmed to have the ability to randomly generate their quests and conversations based on variables that their character was created with (Family, job, location. etc...)

-UI has been redone completely (can now view 3d models of all items, skills are done with a Constellation system)

-Enamy's now have a completely redone AI, The Dragons are Full on AI that are not pathed or scheduled.

Mods have fixed all of this for Oblivion. With enough mods, Oblivion becomes an actual awesome game to play.

Yeah but i'm not 20 yo anymore. I'm in the 30 with a family and responsability. Don't have time to search for mods and install them anymore. If they want to sell me a game they'll need to do the hard work and not expect the community to do the work for them and take the cash. Was kinda the same thing with wow. It was not playable without mod. You had to find, install and update 10+ mods.

The UI of Oblivion PC was so bad and so console oriented that it's hard to imagine devs worked more than 15 minutes on it. I mean take a student and give him one day at the minimum salary and you got something better. As a consumer with a limited budget for video game (around 20-30$ a month) i find things like this frustrating and not acceptable.

AI was so bad. It was not better than Morrowind. It's 2010 not 1990. NPC felt more human in the original Baldur's Gate than Oblivion ... Bethesda needs to wake up imo.

In this months issue of PS3 magazine they answered some of these questions

-30 hour Main story quest with 300 hours of total play time if you do all the side quests and such

-Instead of 1 dungeon/cave designer they now have 8

-NPC are now programmed to have the ability to randomly generate their quests and conversations based on variables that their character was created with (Family, job, location. etc...)

-UI has been redone completely (can now view 3d models of all items, skills are done with a Constellation system)

-Enamy's now have a completely redone AI, The Dragons are Full on AI that are not pathed or scheduled.

oh snap. good news indeed.

In this months issue of PS3 magazine they answered some of these questions

-30 hour Main story quest with 300 hours of total play time if you do all the side quests and such

I'm not really interested in how much time it takes to finish it, rather, if it's something original, with enjoyable dialogue and characters and such. If they don't recognize that their main quest line lacked character and originality, it doesn't bode well for TES V.
-Instead of 1 dungeon/cave designer they now have 8
They seriously only had 1 dungeon/cave designer for Oblivion? ROTFL!!! That explains things! :laugh:

Good news though, shows they've learned at least one thing.

-NPC are now programmed to have the ability to randomly generate their quests and conversations based on variables that their character was created with (Family, job, location. etc...)

Since Oblivion's "Radiant AI" I get VERY suspicious every time Bethesda says the word "random", "generated" or "radiant". If they extend the fail to how quests are attributed, we could be in for a disaster of epic proportions. Hopefully they'll prove me wrong, but my expectations are low.
-UI has been redone completely (can now view 3d models of all items, skills are done with a Constellation system)
Yes but is there a different UI for PC and consoles?
-Enamy's now have a completely redone AI, The Dragons are Full on AI that are not pathed or scheduled.
Hum, ok. Enemy AI wasn't that bad in TES IV I thought.
  • 2 weeks later...

Aside from the graphical upgrade and change of setting, is this any different from Oblivion? Not that I've been following very closely, but I'm not seeing them address any of Oblivion's flaws:

- boring main quest

- copy-pasted dungeons

- npc behavior and conversations ("Radiant AI") were hilarious at best

- UI was inappropriate for PC

- Enemy level scaling was abusive

You have no idea what the actual main quest is... if you do.. how? They haven't said anything about it yet.

Again, they've shown at most two dungeons, how do you know they're "copy and pasted"?

NPC behavior is apparently LOADS better, and you've not seen anything of it yet.. so you're assuming a lot.

The UI was fine, the problem was the user.

What? Abusive? How long did you play? It was easy at most. I've got about 800 hours in my game, and I've got a mod that scales according to your level. It's difficult, but not "Abusive".

Just how long did you play Oblivion for?

Your post is just... I don't know. Can't tell if trolling or.. just trying to get people to respond. Baiting the forums if you will.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

... late reply, but better late than never...

You have no idea what the actual main quest is... if you do.. how? They haven't said anything about it yet.
I know they didn't say anything and that's what worries me. It was a flaw in the original so if they're not saying anything in particular about it, and are, as usual, emphasizing that's it's all about doing what you want, going where you want when you want, then the main quest's probably going to be an afterthought just like in TES IV.
Again, they've shown at most two dungeons, how do you know they're "copy and pasted"?
I said they didn't address this publicly which made me worried. Which they now did, by the way. They said all their dungeons would be hand-crafted. So that's one good thing at least.
NPC behavior is apparently LOADS better, and you've not seen anything of it yet.. so you're assuming a lot.
Where did you see NPC behavior be a lot better?
The UI was fine, the problem was the user.
The problem was the user? I don't know what's that supposed to mean, but how do you think Bethesda will address that problem then?
What? Abusive? How long did you play? It was easy at most. I've got about 800 hours in my game, and I've got a mod that scales according to your level. It's difficult, but not "Abusive".
I don't mean that it scales badly, I mean that it scales too well. There's no point in doing +5% damage with my new level up, if every enemy gains an according +5% hit points. If the whole world scales with you in power, it defeats the point of building up your character because you never feel more powerful.
Just how long did you play Oblivion for?
Maybe 30 hours.

My experience with modding Oblivion (like Morrowind before it, but vanilla Morrowind had the merit of being actually interesting) is that it quickly becomes a nightmare of maintenance, bugs and performance issues, and when it works, it's a patchwork of conflicting artistic visions of wildly varying quality with no coherent vision.

This.

Skyrim will be addressing most of Oblivion's problems - Ugly characters, mediocre character animation, annoying npc interaction, dungeon variety, bad UI (the map & skill screens look great, not so sure about the new inventory just yet, I do like the fact that your full inventory comes up with the object you're looting as an option on the menu).. etc, all while bringing current graphics to the series.

that 5670 will be more than enough. i'm getting the 360 version and that's not even close to a 5670, i'll still be happy. if you have the cash, upgrade, otherwise, stick with the 5670. can't believe it's been like six years almost since Oblivion!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • No news articles about the Arch Linux repo being majorly infected with malware?!?
    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!