-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Similar Content
-
What was the last movie you watched? (2017 Edition) 1 2 3 4 6
By 4CxbqFxVnstmA,
- recently watched
- movies
- (and 1 more)
- 138 replies
- 11657 views
-
- 104 replies
- 9047 views
-
- 314 replies
- 16981 views
-
- 1004 replies
- 84052 views
-
(480p).thumb.jpg.2ac315e4c5c69cd7a06c4ee447dab4ca.jpg)
-
Posts
-
By bikeman25 · Posted
Been using Outlook all my Life on Windows, But Classic Outlook---Briefly Tried NEW Outlook, but wasn't to my tastes, but i feel if and when forced to switch in the future--i could get used to it if i had to -
By skinnyJM · Posted
Apple has clarified Series 9 was left off the watchOS 27 compatibility list by mistake. -
By David Uzondu · Posted
Signal accuses UK government of using child safety as cover for mass surveillance by David Uzondu Recently, the UK's Home Office announced a sweeping set of proposals to make Britain the "first country in the world" where children cannot share or view nude photos on their smart devices, an initiative that authorities claim will protect children from online predators and combat pornography. In response, Signal believes that while the government must keep children "safe" and "protected," it should do so through social services and education, not by "surveillance, funding cuts, and cover-ups." The company called the plan "dystopian" and warned that it violates everyone's fundamental right to privacy, arguing that scanning on the presumption of nudity will only strengthen the market dominance and data control of giant corporations like Apple and Google. The statement continues by accusing the government of hiding its true intentions under the guise of child safety. Signal argues that the Home Office is building an invisible surveillance infrastructure that remains ripe for exploitation by future administrations and authoritarian regimes. According to the company, this aggressive approach completely ignores the actual needs of young people, such as properly funded schools and mental health services. Tech companies like Apple and Google have a three-month window to implement these mandatory device-level filters across the United Kingdom. If these tech firms refuse to comply with the mandate, the government will pass emergency legislation to force them to comply, threatening massive fines and even going after the CEOs of these companies with criminal charges. The technology will work by blocking explicit images directly on the operating system of all smartphones and tablets by default. This system monitors the device camera and third-party apps to intercept nudity before anyone can upload or send the image. Adults can still view explicit content, but only after completing a strict age verification check to unlock their devices. Several bodies like the NSPCC and Barnardo's praised the Home Office's decision, arguing that device-level intervention stops the cycle of grooming before it starts. The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) also supported the policy, claiming that tech companies can implement on-device checks "without threatening privacy or collecting any data." -
By ExPat · Posted
Did you watch the keynote? It is way beyond what is described in this article. Looks interesting. Now it is time for them to deliver unlike what happened in 24. -
By ExPat · Posted
It pretty much has to be compatible with MS Office or it is going nowhere. The rest of the world runs office including Europe. If it is not compatible it will not survive.
-
-
Recent Achievements
-
Captain_Eric earned a badge
Very Popular
-
amusc earned a badge
One Month Later
-
DJC50PLUS earned a badge
One Month Later
-
DJC50PLUS earned a badge
Week One Done
-
Eric Biran went up a rank
Proficient
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Tell a friend
.thumb.png.b7089ebbdf00d96b3b92dddbd04bac02.png)
Recommended Posts