Malaysia Airlines 'loses contact with plane' (and search effort updates)


Recommended Posts

Hello,

Someone is laughing right now, counting cash.

That engine thing is very strange. I mean, engines HAVE to work with power. They cant just transmit for hours without having any power...

Has the 'engines continuing story' been corroborated by Rolls Royce?  I see nothing from them...

 

No. Even when WSJ posted the story originally, RR could not be reached for comment.

 

Malaysia has stated the story of the plane flying on for 4 hours from the engine was ... "incorrect". Boeing and RR are there helping with the investigation.

Has the 'engines continuing story' been corroborated by Rolls Royce?  I see nothing from them...

RR and Boeing are denying the story.

 

My question is, who started this story, and why ....

The problem with something of this scale is that someone can say something in passing or a suggestion or even a joke and someone else will pick it up as fact as they are throwing ideas around trying grasp onto anything. And the other side of the coin is people coming up with wild speculation to try to keep viewers on their channel gaining them revenue.

  • Like 1

The problem with something of this scale is that someone can say something in passing or a suggestion or even a joke and someone else will pick it up as fact as they are throwing ideas around trying grasp onto anything. And the other side of the coin is people coming up with wild speculation to try to keep viewers on their channel gaining them revenue.

 

This.  It doesn't help that the world media pickup on the ###### before confirming it either.

Today in Australia (News Ltd) I woke to the article title of "MISSING PLANE WRECKAGE FOUND".

Hello,

Someone is laughing right now, counting cash.

That engine thing is very strange. I mean, engines HAVE to work with power. They cant just transmit for hours without having any power...

 

Who is saying that the engines didn't have power?

This.  It doesn't help that the world media pickup on the ######## before confirming it either.

Today in Australia (News Ltd) I woke to the article title of "MISSING PLANE WRECKAGE FOUND".

 

Who is saying that the engines didn't have power?

 

 

 

Pretty common now for the media to want to be first in reporting, second in accuracy.

The problem with something of this scale is that someone can say something in passing or a suggestion or even a joke and someone else will pick it up as fact as they are throwing ideas around trying grasp onto anything. And the other side of the coin is people coming up with wild speculation to try to keep viewers on their channel gaining them revenue.

 

This, indeed - the global media seem to be totally off the leash with this story.  The 'engines running' story would have material facts to support it there were never there, it seems.

They shouldn't make this be possible on a passenger airliner... 

 

It'll still give a primary radar return. And a 777 is going to give a pretty damn big return. On our Radars in the RAF they highlight targets on the radar screen that have lost their SSR information with a flashing (WARNING) that follows the target, and we're dealing with borderline Soviet-level tech in the RAF  :rofl:

It'll still give a primary radar return. And a 777 is going to give a pretty damn big return. On our Radars in the RAF they highlight targets on the radar screen that have lost their SSR information with a flashing (WARNING) that follows the target, and we're dealing with borderline Soviet-level tech in the RAF  :rofl:

I could be wrong, but wasn't their a suggestion that Primary Radar was pretty weak in this area and this is the reason that it was possible for this plane to suddenly vanish?

I could be wrong, but wasn't their a suggestion that Primary Radar was pretty weak in this area and this is the reason that it was possible for this plane to suddenly vanish?

 

I heard mentions of blackspots in the area. So there's a chance it could have flown into a blackspot and then crashed in the same area. Depending on the locations of the radars and how mountains/big hills might get in the way

Hello,

Who is saying that the engines didn't have power?

Well, in order to transmit the data, it would have to have power.

I agree; There are too many crazy unconfirmed reports being thrown around by US (as in Neowinians) and the media.

Hello,

Well, in order to transmit the data, it would have to have power.

I agree; There are too many crazy unconfirmed reports being thrown around by US (as in Neowinians) and the media.

 

The thing I don't get, it's been clear for days that the transponder and ACARS stopped, so I don't understand how some media outlet has come up with a story that the engine and aircraft manufactures would be getting data, when that data is transmitted via ACARS.

Latest news.  The image found by the Chinese satellite is not linked to the Boeing 777.  The myster deepends...

 

Say the Malaysians - but if not, then what are they of?  

 

Seeing as they loosely corroborate a professional-looking report from an oil-right worker in the same area, I imagine there might be some egg/face-type embarrassment if those objects were to be permanent man-made fixtures....

I think they just hijacked the airplane to an unknown location or the airplane crash in a remote jungle area which is difficult to access. These are to me the most logical answers.

 

Plausible tho?   Is there anywhere in the tropics these days so sparsely inhabited that the unexpected arrival of a large aircraft, in a controlled manner or otherwise, would go unnoticed, considering the media-storm that follows it?

 

My bet is it suffered massive in-air damage (malicious or otherwise), a lot of on-board equipment was damaged, the pilots try to alter its course before rapid asphyxiation and now it's in the ocean somewhere in a direction opposed to it's original path.   I really hope it's as prosaic as that (which an aircrash isn't really, ever), and the only odd thing is the relative lack of flotsam.

Plausible tho?   Is there anywhere in the tropics these days so sparsely inhabited that the unexpected arrival of a large aircraft, in a controlled manner or otherwise, would go unnoticed, considering the media-storm that follows it?

 

My bet is it suffered massive in-air damage (malicious or otherwise), a lot of on-board equipment was damaged, the pilots try to alter its course before rapid asphyxiation and now it's in the ocean somewhere in a direction opposed to it's original path.   I really hope it's as prosaic as that (which an aircrash isn't really, ever), and the only odd thing is the relative lack of flotsam.

If they were on the ocean, there will be already signs of the crash, like pieces of the airplane plus fuel on the water. An airplane like the 777 can't crash on the ocean unnoticed like a toy. 

If there were on the ocean, there will be already signs of the crash, like pieces of the airplane plus fuel on the water. An airplane like the 777 can't crash on the ocean unnoticed like a toy. 

 

I don't disagree.  What if, somehow, it made a soft landing (rather like the Hudson incident) but no-one on-board had the capacity to exit the aircraft whilst afloat?  Again, somewhere some way away from the search focus?

 

You always find something in the last place looked, etc...  

Hello,

Plausible tho?   Is there anywhere in the tropics these days so sparsely inhabited that the unexpected arrival of a large aircraft, in a controlled manner or otherwise, would go unnoticed, considering the media-storm that follows it?

I think Im gonna be wrong but Im going with a highjacking too.

First, because of the people's safety and second, with enough planning, it can be pulled off....

There are A LOT of people with A LOT of money that do stupid things with it.

First, because of the people's safety

 

What does that mean?  Why it went out of control will be a matter to deal with once it's been located, which is the present challenge.   It seems they've profiled the passengers already, and apart from the Iranian teenagers, no-one else has been mentioned.  I do wonder if the Malaysians know more than they're prepared to say.

Hello,

I think Im gonna be wrong but Im going with a highjacking too.

First, because of the people's safety and second, with enough planning, it can be pulled off....

There are A LOT of people with A LOT of money that do stupid things with it.

highjack the airplane can be done only with total control and perfect precision

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "Not found" - this is what you get when you embed a tweet instead of just taking a screenshot.
    • Wonder if they will let you go into an Apple Store and have your white glass back swapped for a silver one, will they refuse even if you pay?
    • Honestly that feels even more useless than it did when Win11 was first released. In 2021, the uproar was somewhat justified, but only when comparing how good we've had it since Windows 7. Prior to that, a new Windows release would often require new, or very recent hardware. Windows XP wouldn't run (in any usable way) on hardware released when it's predecessor Win98 was released (let's ignore ME). It was time to shift the goal post, and the way Microsoft did that was actually ok. People have still had another FIVE YEARS of free software support with Windows 10, and those of us who want to have used these tools to bypass the limitations, all while understanding the impacts that may have. Most laptops don't last 5 years (sadly), so now the youngest unsupported hardware is 9 years old, and apparently has another year of support with Windows 10. That's good. Meanwhile, understanding the impacts and limitations, I have my 2013 laptop running Win11 perfectly fine. The thing that's failing on it is the hardware, the 2.5" SATA cable/chip is failing and corrupting the SSDs I put in. Thankfully it has a functional M.2 sata drive that works fine!
    • iPhone 18 Pro drop-test video and photos leak on the dark web following a data breach by Hamid Ganji iPhone 17 Pro - Image via Apple Apple is seemingly facing one of the biggest data breaches in its history, and just a few months before the official debut of the iPhone 18 Pro series, photos, a drop-test video, a supplier list, and key phone components have reportedly been leaked by hackers. Last week, we reported that Tata Electronics, an Apple supplier and iPhone producer in India, was hit by a data breach. As a result, it was reported that more than 200,000 trade secrets and confidential documents belonging to Apple and Tesla were stolen by the ransomware group World Leaks. According to Reuters, the group has now leaked supplier lists, component details, and photos of the upcoming iPhone 18 Pro models on the dark web. One of the materials leaked by the hackers is a drop-test video of the iPhone 18 Pro, which is due to launch this September. The phone is shown in a gray color and has the same familiar design we saw on last year's iPhone 17 Pro series. The device also appears to be quite durable, though it seems to be thicker than last year's model. One possible explanation is that Apple may be using a larger battery in the iPhone 18 Pro series. Moreover, Reuters says it has seen at least six documents mapping many components in the iPhone 18 Pro models to their respective suppliers, including details on chips on the main circuit board and on battery and camera components. The documents reportedly detail hundreds of parts that will be used in the iPhone 18 Pro models. A person familiar with the matter told the outlet that Apple classifies this data as sensitive and “is concerned about the documents being shared on the dark web as they relate to unreleased models.” Apple is reportedly investigating the issue but has yet to issue an official statement.
    • You do you, I've just said that it first appeared in "home" version before it will be available in "work" one. I use Edge only because it still supports MV2 uBO extension even on Android - I'll switch when they stop.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Juan Dela earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      273
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      141
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      100
    5. 5
      macoman
      53
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!