Recommended Posts

The overwhelming majority of consumers don't delay individual updates.  This is a totally niche activity and it's not unreasonable to limit it to pro versions of Windows.  For those complaining, you can either buy pro or lose control over updates.  It's not that big a deal and it's certainly not worth complaining about.  Personally, I prefer to have more computers patched than to give a few people an ability they don't really need.

It is not for you to judge what is or is not worth me complaining about. Anyone can say that about anyone else. Also, if I think I need an ability then I have that right. Especially if I already have that ability and it is simply being taken away that is of no benefit to me. 

 

If your Microsoft, you want people to be able to help themselves as much as possible. You don't want people going out on Twitter and b*** and saying how bad Windows 10 is. You get too many of those Tweets, Retweets, it starts trending, and pretty soon everyone is going to be looking at it.

 

If Microsoft had a history where Updates were seamless this would not be questioned. I've been on too many threads and read too many articles, though, where people have been having trouble. Heck they've even had Genuine Advantage trouble recently. You want a nightmare? That's a nightmare!

  • Like 2

So far , I've not seen any discussion of what on any site as to the following::  Say one allows the auto-upgrade to Windows 10. If after trying it for a period of time and the user decides that they don't want to keep Win10, will it be a simple process of "undoing" the MS update OR would one have to wipe the drive clean and reinstall Win 7 / 8.1 ?

It is not for you to judge what is or is not worth me complaining about. Anyone can say that about anyone else. Also, if I think I need an ability then I have that right. Especially if I already have that ability and it is simply being taken away that is of no benefit to me. 

 

If your Microsoft, you want people to be able to help themselves as much as possible. You don't want people going out on Twitter and b*** and saying how bad Windows 10 is. You get too many of those Tweets, Retweets, it starts trending, and pretty soon everyone is going to be looking at it.

 

If Microsoft had a history where Updates were seamless this would not be questioned. I've been on too many threads and read too many articles, though, where people have been having trouble. Heck they've even had Genuine Advantage trouble recently. You want a nightmare? That's a nightmare!

 

Of course there's a benefit to you.  More people running patched versions of Windows means fewer problems for everyone.  I also struggle to believe that the small number of people that want to micro-manage updates on Windows Home installations is likely to lead to anything trending on social media. 

 

I always set my PCs to update automatically and I've never run into any trouble (other than the odd automatic reboot at an inconvenient time).  For those rare cases where updates have cause problems, as others have pointed out, patches will now be tested by fast ring insiders before being pushed out to everyone else so they will be tested in the wild before being pushed out to your PC.   

 

At the end of the day, if the ability to delay updates is that important to you then you can just use a Pro edition. 

  • Like 2

Of course there's a benefit to you.  More people running patched versions of Windows means fewer problems for everyone.  I also struggle to believe that the small number of people that want to micro-manage updates on Windows Home installations is likely to lead to anything trending on social media. 

 

I always set my PCs to update automatically and I've never run into any trouble (other than the odd automatic reboot at an inconvenient time).  For those rare cases where updates have cause problems, as others have pointed out, patches will now be tested by fast ring insiders before being pushed out to everyone else so they will be tested in the wild before being pushed out to your PC.   

 

At the end of the day, if the ability to delay updates is that important to you then you can just use a Pro edition. 

 

I have auto update on a few of those computers that I work with or support but I don't want to give up that feature because I have had issues (even recently) with patches causing issues too so there are a few people's computers I have limited updates (so I can watch them), and I'm not going to tell someone to spend more money for pro when at the end of the day they can stick with 7 or 8.1.

The not being about to defer updates thing, I think thats just someone talking out of their ass again. Seriously that would cause all kinds of hell if you could not say no to updates, especially the way they been breaking stuff lately.

The not being about to defer updates thing, I think thats just someone talking out of their ass again. Seriously that would cause all kinds of hell if you could not say no to updates, especially the way they been breaking stuff lately.

 

 

 

  • Windows 10 Home users will have updates from Windows Update automatically available. Windows 10 Pro and Windows 10 Enterprise users will have the ability to defer updates.

 

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/windows-10-specifications

uh heck no to mandatory updates, at least in the pro version you can still pick..... I do so much software testing with development that I have to be able to apply updates one at a time.. I can't imagine how much stuff could break with mandatory updates if an update breaks your code...

 

WMC yeah it should of died off a while ago...

 

DVD playback, honestly when was the last time you watched a DVD on your system?

 

CD/DVD Recording (not on the list but just a point), when was the last time you recoded a CD/DVD?

 

Floppy Drive - this one speaks for its self....

Think the auto update is quite a silly mistake. Home users will be the ones with the least knowledge when something goes wrong. This could be a huge PR blunder, one that could destroy trust. I understand that we need to get users up to date but MS are not good enough at this yet - it's inevitably going to go wrong :-(

Think the auto update is quite a silly mistake. Home users will be the ones with the least knowledge when something goes wrong. This could be a huge PR blunder, one that could destroy trust. I understand that we need to get users up to date but MS are not good enough at this yet - it's inevitably going to go wrong :-(

By and far this is what is going on for home users already.  All of the home users I know have it automatically apply windows updates.

Plus side very very few issues caused by an update.

Have had Windows update run automatically since Windows 7, never had an issue with an update. This was when MS did not have a fast track to test the updates with, now they have that I doubt there will be any large scale problems.

 

Does anyone have a list of differences between Windows 10 and Windows 10 Pro?

me too, I don't want MS to tell what to update, I don't want every single MS update.

 

 

For the record, you can still install 'desktop gadgets revived' and still have all your favorite gadgets running on the desktop with Windows 10.

 

 

Same, kinda thinking about just keeping 8.1 or 7 on computers other than the one I will have  Pro on, not sure I like the idea of not having the control over the updates.

 

Upgrade to the pro version then?  If you're modifying windows update settings then that makes you "pro". :p

Microsoft is obviously removing Media Center ...but no mention of Windows Media Player, which is still available....if not with RTM, at least there are all kinds of media players available..... I can see issues with glitchy updates rendering "home versions" with limited use till MS fixes an update...those with "home" will not be able to delay "glitchy updates" till MS has had a chance to fix them...another reason for those with "home" to pay the little extra to go from "home" to "pro"  :)

I can see issues with glitchy updates rendering "home versions" with limited use till MS fixes an update...those with "home" will not be able to delay "glitchy updates" till MS has had a chance to fix them...another reason for those with "home" to pay the little extra to go from "home" to "pro"  :)

Yeah, you need to read about how MS plans to move the updates, testing the first with Fast Ring Insiders.

Think the auto update is quite a silly mistake. Home users will be the ones with the least knowledge when something goes wrong. This could be a huge PR blunder, one that could destroy trust. I understand that we need to get users up to date but MS are not good enough at this yet - it's inevitably going to go wrong :-(

On the flip side, who are the users that get the most infections, especially due to not updating their machines?

 

Home users.

Knowing that there may be a broken update coming on... This is a must have setting

Which means you probably are not a typical home user. Get Pro.

 

 

They don't update, and they don't read about updates that break.

I'll bite...

 

I manage 2 computers at home, I do "support" (as someone calls it) to my friends and family, and I'm the IT guy at my small start up company.. Out of all these PCs I have turned off automatic updates on 2 (two) systems. 

 

Both of those computers are servers where uptime is critical so we want to do updates in our own time. 

 

A total of 0 (zero) times have there been anyone contacting me about troubles with their Windows update going wild and breaking things. Not even the old granny who live next door has had a problem that her computer updates automatically. 

 

I found the whole argument that the uneducated will now be the test subject for new patches rather silly. Most people who know nothing about computers accept recommended settings and then promptly forgets about it. The big incident with the never ending boot loop was the first in a long long time that affected more than a couple of random computers. And even then it was fixed even before most automatic updates had time to run.

 

Remember, a lot of casual PC users won't even have their computer on to run updates every 2nd Tuesday of the month, and probably won't run the update until any 0-day flaws have been ironed out anyway. 

 

Now, you can argue all you want that you need to disable updates because you are a developer, or your moms best friends brother in law once had a computer that crashed during patch tuesday, but then you clearly aren't in the demographics for using the Home edition, and you should just go for the Pro instead of calling this the thing that will kill Windows.

 

 

Now, DVD and Bluray players still exist, and for free too, so no big problem there, same with built in Floppy support, which still will work with vendor drivers. 

  • Like 3

Think the auto update is quite a silly mistake. Home users will be the ones with the least knowledge when something goes wrong. This could be a huge PR blunder, one that could destroy trust. I understand that we need to get users up to date but MS are not good enough at this yet - it's inevitably going to go wrong :-(

Precisely my point.

 

I've already addressed the "you don't have a right to complain" question so I'll move on.

 

Microsoft used to have different versions of Windows just like they do now. In today's parlance, the offer would be a Home version and a Pro version.

 

What they did was to put just enough features in the Pro version so that you didn't really want the Home version. You really wanted the Pro version because those features were neat enough that you were willing to shell out the few extra bucks for them.

 

That's what I want. I want MS to give me a reason to upgrade by offering more features, not by taking them away. I haven't seen the differences in features between Home and Pro but am eagerly awaiting the comparison.

Upgrade to the pro version then?  If you're modifying windows update settings then that makes you "pro". :p

Sooo pay more for a feature I already have....

 

*I have Windows 7 Ultimate on 2 of my computers but I'm not shelling out extra $$ just so I can update the others.

 

Plus I have a few people computers I work on (not for work but personal favors that have to watch it because I've had Windows update cause issues with them before) and another I manually update for him because he only has a hotspot (limited gigs) so I update for him on my connection.

 

*don't think I'm going to go to them and say hay you get a free "upgrade for window 10 but need to shell out a extra 99$ if you want it not to break anything, but hay now you can use the window store...

what are power users doing using home edition? you have no reason to complain

 

Power user =/= rich

 

Get a clue.

The Windows 10 Home Edition forced update's is not that bad, the average "home user" needs protecting from themselves, so forcing the latest security updates to be installed would be helping the majority of people. This certainly benefits the majority of the user base this edition is targeted at.

 

 

Windows Updates. This is the most interesting one. In previous Windows versions, you could control how updates were installed. But those with Windows 10 Home will have updates from Windows Update made available automatically. Only Windows 10 Pro and Windows 10 Enterprise users will be able to defer updates.

 

Does this mean they will automatically installed or you will get told there are updates available. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Simple answer is yes, you will still get the Windows updates and as long as browser is up to date, you will be good. Only thing secure boot does is protect you against boot level threats and make it harder to install other OS's. I've been looking into this pretty thoroughly lately myself as wifes computer has secure boot disabled plus my other, older computers that run Linux, don't have secure boot enabled. Have seen all kinds of questions about this on the Linux Mint and MX Linux forums. Just don't suddenly enable secure boot now.
    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!