Recommended Posts

The overwhelming majority of consumers don't delay individual updates.  This is a totally niche activity and it's not unreasonable to limit it to pro versions of Windows.  For those complaining, you can either buy pro or lose control over updates.  It's not that big a deal and it's certainly not worth complaining about.  Personally, I prefer to have more computers patched than to give a few people an ability they don't really need.

It is not for you to judge what is or is not worth me complaining about. Anyone can say that about anyone else. Also, if I think I need an ability then I have that right. Especially if I already have that ability and it is simply being taken away that is of no benefit to me. 

 

If your Microsoft, you want people to be able to help themselves as much as possible. You don't want people going out on Twitter and b*** and saying how bad Windows 10 is. You get too many of those Tweets, Retweets, it starts trending, and pretty soon everyone is going to be looking at it.

 

If Microsoft had a history where Updates were seamless this would not be questioned. I've been on too many threads and read too many articles, though, where people have been having trouble. Heck they've even had Genuine Advantage trouble recently. You want a nightmare? That's a nightmare!

  • Like 2

So far , I've not seen any discussion of what on any site as to the following::  Say one allows the auto-upgrade to Windows 10. If after trying it for a period of time and the user decides that they don't want to keep Win10, will it be a simple process of "undoing" the MS update OR would one have to wipe the drive clean and reinstall Win 7 / 8.1 ?

It is not for you to judge what is or is not worth me complaining about. Anyone can say that about anyone else. Also, if I think I need an ability then I have that right. Especially if I already have that ability and it is simply being taken away that is of no benefit to me. 

 

If your Microsoft, you want people to be able to help themselves as much as possible. You don't want people going out on Twitter and b*** and saying how bad Windows 10 is. You get too many of those Tweets, Retweets, it starts trending, and pretty soon everyone is going to be looking at it.

 

If Microsoft had a history where Updates were seamless this would not be questioned. I've been on too many threads and read too many articles, though, where people have been having trouble. Heck they've even had Genuine Advantage trouble recently. You want a nightmare? That's a nightmare!

 

Of course there's a benefit to you.  More people running patched versions of Windows means fewer problems for everyone.  I also struggle to believe that the small number of people that want to micro-manage updates on Windows Home installations is likely to lead to anything trending on social media. 

 

I always set my PCs to update automatically and I've never run into any trouble (other than the odd automatic reboot at an inconvenient time).  For those rare cases where updates have cause problems, as others have pointed out, patches will now be tested by fast ring insiders before being pushed out to everyone else so they will be tested in the wild before being pushed out to your PC.   

 

At the end of the day, if the ability to delay updates is that important to you then you can just use a Pro edition. 

  • Like 2

Of course there's a benefit to you.  More people running patched versions of Windows means fewer problems for everyone.  I also struggle to believe that the small number of people that want to micro-manage updates on Windows Home installations is likely to lead to anything trending on social media. 

 

I always set my PCs to update automatically and I've never run into any trouble (other than the odd automatic reboot at an inconvenient time).  For those rare cases where updates have cause problems, as others have pointed out, patches will now be tested by fast ring insiders before being pushed out to everyone else so they will be tested in the wild before being pushed out to your PC.   

 

At the end of the day, if the ability to delay updates is that important to you then you can just use a Pro edition. 

 

I have auto update on a few of those computers that I work with or support but I don't want to give up that feature because I have had issues (even recently) with patches causing issues too so there are a few people's computers I have limited updates (so I can watch them), and I'm not going to tell someone to spend more money for pro when at the end of the day they can stick with 7 or 8.1.

The not being about to defer updates thing, I think thats just someone talking out of their ass again. Seriously that would cause all kinds of hell if you could not say no to updates, especially the way they been breaking stuff lately.

The not being about to defer updates thing, I think thats just someone talking out of their ass again. Seriously that would cause all kinds of hell if you could not say no to updates, especially the way they been breaking stuff lately.

 

 

 

  • Windows 10 Home users will have updates from Windows Update automatically available. Windows 10 Pro and Windows 10 Enterprise users will have the ability to defer updates.

 

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/windows-10-specifications

uh heck no to mandatory updates, at least in the pro version you can still pick..... I do so much software testing with development that I have to be able to apply updates one at a time.. I can't imagine how much stuff could break with mandatory updates if an update breaks your code...

 

WMC yeah it should of died off a while ago...

 

DVD playback, honestly when was the last time you watched a DVD on your system?

 

CD/DVD Recording (not on the list but just a point), when was the last time you recoded a CD/DVD?

 

Floppy Drive - this one speaks for its self....

Think the auto update is quite a silly mistake. Home users will be the ones with the least knowledge when something goes wrong. This could be a huge PR blunder, one that could destroy trust. I understand that we need to get users up to date but MS are not good enough at this yet - it's inevitably going to go wrong :-(

Think the auto update is quite a silly mistake. Home users will be the ones with the least knowledge when something goes wrong. This could be a huge PR blunder, one that could destroy trust. I understand that we need to get users up to date but MS are not good enough at this yet - it's inevitably going to go wrong :-(

By and far this is what is going on for home users already.  All of the home users I know have it automatically apply windows updates.

Plus side very very few issues caused by an update.

Have had Windows update run automatically since Windows 7, never had an issue with an update. This was when MS did not have a fast track to test the updates with, now they have that I doubt there will be any large scale problems.

 

Does anyone have a list of differences between Windows 10 and Windows 10 Pro?

me too, I don't want MS to tell what to update, I don't want every single MS update.

 

 

For the record, you can still install 'desktop gadgets revived' and still have all your favorite gadgets running on the desktop with Windows 10.

 

 

Same, kinda thinking about just keeping 8.1 or 7 on computers other than the one I will have  Pro on, not sure I like the idea of not having the control over the updates.

 

Upgrade to the pro version then?  If you're modifying windows update settings then that makes you "pro". :p

Microsoft is obviously removing Media Center ...but no mention of Windows Media Player, which is still available....if not with RTM, at least there are all kinds of media players available..... I can see issues with glitchy updates rendering "home versions" with limited use till MS fixes an update...those with "home" will not be able to delay "glitchy updates" till MS has had a chance to fix them...another reason for those with "home" to pay the little extra to go from "home" to "pro"  :)

I can see issues with glitchy updates rendering "home versions" with limited use till MS fixes an update...those with "home" will not be able to delay "glitchy updates" till MS has had a chance to fix them...another reason for those with "home" to pay the little extra to go from "home" to "pro"  :)

Yeah, you need to read about how MS plans to move the updates, testing the first with Fast Ring Insiders.

Think the auto update is quite a silly mistake. Home users will be the ones with the least knowledge when something goes wrong. This could be a huge PR blunder, one that could destroy trust. I understand that we need to get users up to date but MS are not good enough at this yet - it's inevitably going to go wrong :-(

On the flip side, who are the users that get the most infections, especially due to not updating their machines?

 

Home users.

Knowing that there may be a broken update coming on... This is a must have setting

Which means you probably are not a typical home user. Get Pro.

 

 

They don't update, and they don't read about updates that break.

I'll bite...

 

I manage 2 computers at home, I do "support" (as someone calls it) to my friends and family, and I'm the IT guy at my small start up company.. Out of all these PCs I have turned off automatic updates on 2 (two) systems. 

 

Both of those computers are servers where uptime is critical so we want to do updates in our own time. 

 

A total of 0 (zero) times have there been anyone contacting me about troubles with their Windows update going wild and breaking things. Not even the old granny who live next door has had a problem that her computer updates automatically. 

 

I found the whole argument that the uneducated will now be the test subject for new patches rather silly. Most people who know nothing about computers accept recommended settings and then promptly forgets about it. The big incident with the never ending boot loop was the first in a long long time that affected more than a couple of random computers. And even then it was fixed even before most automatic updates had time to run.

 

Remember, a lot of casual PC users won't even have their computer on to run updates every 2nd Tuesday of the month, and probably won't run the update until any 0-day flaws have been ironed out anyway. 

 

Now, you can argue all you want that you need to disable updates because you are a developer, or your moms best friends brother in law once had a computer that crashed during patch tuesday, but then you clearly aren't in the demographics for using the Home edition, and you should just go for the Pro instead of calling this the thing that will kill Windows.

 

 

Now, DVD and Bluray players still exist, and for free too, so no big problem there, same with built in Floppy support, which still will work with vendor drivers. 

  • Like 3

Think the auto update is quite a silly mistake. Home users will be the ones with the least knowledge when something goes wrong. This could be a huge PR blunder, one that could destroy trust. I understand that we need to get users up to date but MS are not good enough at this yet - it's inevitably going to go wrong :-(

Precisely my point.

 

I've already addressed the "you don't have a right to complain" question so I'll move on.

 

Microsoft used to have different versions of Windows just like they do now. In today's parlance, the offer would be a Home version and a Pro version.

 

What they did was to put just enough features in the Pro version so that you didn't really want the Home version. You really wanted the Pro version because those features were neat enough that you were willing to shell out the few extra bucks for them.

 

That's what I want. I want MS to give me a reason to upgrade by offering more features, not by taking them away. I haven't seen the differences in features between Home and Pro but am eagerly awaiting the comparison.

Upgrade to the pro version then?  If you're modifying windows update settings then that makes you "pro". :p

Sooo pay more for a feature I already have....

 

*I have Windows 7 Ultimate on 2 of my computers but I'm not shelling out extra $$ just so I can update the others.

 

Plus I have a few people computers I work on (not for work but personal favors that have to watch it because I've had Windows update cause issues with them before) and another I manually update for him because he only has a hotspot (limited gigs) so I update for him on my connection.

 

*don't think I'm going to go to them and say hay you get a free "upgrade for window 10 but need to shell out a extra 99$ if you want it not to break anything, but hay now you can use the window store...

what are power users doing using home edition? you have no reason to complain

 

Power user =/= rich

 

Get a clue.

The Windows 10 Home Edition forced update's is not that bad, the average "home user" needs protecting from themselves, so forcing the latest security updates to be installed would be helping the majority of people. This certainly benefits the majority of the user base this edition is targeted at.

 

 

Windows Updates. This is the most interesting one. In previous Windows versions, you could control how updates were installed. But those with Windows 10 Home will have updates from Windows Update made available automatically. Only Windows 10 Pro and Windows 10 Enterprise users will be able to defer updates.

 

Does this mean they will automatically installed or you will get told there are updates available. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      471
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!