Recommended Posts

The overwhelming majority of consumers don't delay individual updates.  This is a totally niche activity and it's not unreasonable to limit it to pro versions of Windows.  For those complaining, you can either buy pro or lose control over updates.  It's not that big a deal and it's certainly not worth complaining about.  Personally, I prefer to have more computers patched than to give a few people an ability they don't really need.

It is not for you to judge what is or is not worth me complaining about. Anyone can say that about anyone else. Also, if I think I need an ability then I have that right. Especially if I already have that ability and it is simply being taken away that is of no benefit to me. 

 

If your Microsoft, you want people to be able to help themselves as much as possible. You don't want people going out on Twitter and b*** and saying how bad Windows 10 is. You get too many of those Tweets, Retweets, it starts trending, and pretty soon everyone is going to be looking at it.

 

If Microsoft had a history where Updates were seamless this would not be questioned. I've been on too many threads and read too many articles, though, where people have been having trouble. Heck they've even had Genuine Advantage trouble recently. You want a nightmare? That's a nightmare!

  • Like 2

So far , I've not seen any discussion of what on any site as to the following::  Say one allows the auto-upgrade to Windows 10. If after trying it for a period of time and the user decides that they don't want to keep Win10, will it be a simple process of "undoing" the MS update OR would one have to wipe the drive clean and reinstall Win 7 / 8.1 ?

It is not for you to judge what is or is not worth me complaining about. Anyone can say that about anyone else. Also, if I think I need an ability then I have that right. Especially if I already have that ability and it is simply being taken away that is of no benefit to me. 

 

If your Microsoft, you want people to be able to help themselves as much as possible. You don't want people going out on Twitter and b*** and saying how bad Windows 10 is. You get too many of those Tweets, Retweets, it starts trending, and pretty soon everyone is going to be looking at it.

 

If Microsoft had a history where Updates were seamless this would not be questioned. I've been on too many threads and read too many articles, though, where people have been having trouble. Heck they've even had Genuine Advantage trouble recently. You want a nightmare? That's a nightmare!

 

Of course there's a benefit to you.  More people running patched versions of Windows means fewer problems for everyone.  I also struggle to believe that the small number of people that want to micro-manage updates on Windows Home installations is likely to lead to anything trending on social media. 

 

I always set my PCs to update automatically and I've never run into any trouble (other than the odd automatic reboot at an inconvenient time).  For those rare cases where updates have cause problems, as others have pointed out, patches will now be tested by fast ring insiders before being pushed out to everyone else so they will be tested in the wild before being pushed out to your PC.   

 

At the end of the day, if the ability to delay updates is that important to you then you can just use a Pro edition. 

  • Like 2

Of course there's a benefit to you.  More people running patched versions of Windows means fewer problems for everyone.  I also struggle to believe that the small number of people that want to micro-manage updates on Windows Home installations is likely to lead to anything trending on social media. 

 

I always set my PCs to update automatically and I've never run into any trouble (other than the odd automatic reboot at an inconvenient time).  For those rare cases where updates have cause problems, as others have pointed out, patches will now be tested by fast ring insiders before being pushed out to everyone else so they will be tested in the wild before being pushed out to your PC.   

 

At the end of the day, if the ability to delay updates is that important to you then you can just use a Pro edition. 

 

I have auto update on a few of those computers that I work with or support but I don't want to give up that feature because I have had issues (even recently) with patches causing issues too so there are a few people's computers I have limited updates (so I can watch them), and I'm not going to tell someone to spend more money for pro when at the end of the day they can stick with 7 or 8.1.

The not being about to defer updates thing, I think thats just someone talking out of their ass again. Seriously that would cause all kinds of hell if you could not say no to updates, especially the way they been breaking stuff lately.

The not being about to defer updates thing, I think thats just someone talking out of their ass again. Seriously that would cause all kinds of hell if you could not say no to updates, especially the way they been breaking stuff lately.

 

 

 

  • Windows 10 Home users will have updates from Windows Update automatically available. Windows 10 Pro and Windows 10 Enterprise users will have the ability to defer updates.

 

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/windows-10-specifications

uh heck no to mandatory updates, at least in the pro version you can still pick..... I do so much software testing with development that I have to be able to apply updates one at a time.. I can't imagine how much stuff could break with mandatory updates if an update breaks your code...

 

WMC yeah it should of died off a while ago...

 

DVD playback, honestly when was the last time you watched a DVD on your system?

 

CD/DVD Recording (not on the list but just a point), when was the last time you recoded a CD/DVD?

 

Floppy Drive - this one speaks for its self....

Think the auto update is quite a silly mistake. Home users will be the ones with the least knowledge when something goes wrong. This could be a huge PR blunder, one that could destroy trust. I understand that we need to get users up to date but MS are not good enough at this yet - it's inevitably going to go wrong :-(

Think the auto update is quite a silly mistake. Home users will be the ones with the least knowledge when something goes wrong. This could be a huge PR blunder, one that could destroy trust. I understand that we need to get users up to date but MS are not good enough at this yet - it's inevitably going to go wrong :-(

By and far this is what is going on for home users already.  All of the home users I know have it automatically apply windows updates.

Plus side very very few issues caused by an update.

Have had Windows update run automatically since Windows 7, never had an issue with an update. This was when MS did not have a fast track to test the updates with, now they have that I doubt there will be any large scale problems.

 

Does anyone have a list of differences between Windows 10 and Windows 10 Pro?

me too, I don't want MS to tell what to update, I don't want every single MS update.

 

 

For the record, you can still install 'desktop gadgets revived' and still have all your favorite gadgets running on the desktop with Windows 10.

 

 

Same, kinda thinking about just keeping 8.1 or 7 on computers other than the one I will have  Pro on, not sure I like the idea of not having the control over the updates.

 

Upgrade to the pro version then?  If you're modifying windows update settings then that makes you "pro". :p

Microsoft is obviously removing Media Center ...but no mention of Windows Media Player, which is still available....if not with RTM, at least there are all kinds of media players available..... I can see issues with glitchy updates rendering "home versions" with limited use till MS fixes an update...those with "home" will not be able to delay "glitchy updates" till MS has had a chance to fix them...another reason for those with "home" to pay the little extra to go from "home" to "pro"  :)

I can see issues with glitchy updates rendering "home versions" with limited use till MS fixes an update...those with "home" will not be able to delay "glitchy updates" till MS has had a chance to fix them...another reason for those with "home" to pay the little extra to go from "home" to "pro"  :)

Yeah, you need to read about how MS plans to move the updates, testing the first with Fast Ring Insiders.

Think the auto update is quite a silly mistake. Home users will be the ones with the least knowledge when something goes wrong. This could be a huge PR blunder, one that could destroy trust. I understand that we need to get users up to date but MS are not good enough at this yet - it's inevitably going to go wrong :-(

On the flip side, who are the users that get the most infections, especially due to not updating their machines?

 

Home users.

Knowing that there may be a broken update coming on... This is a must have setting

Which means you probably are not a typical home user. Get Pro.

 

 

They don't update, and they don't read about updates that break.

I'll bite...

 

I manage 2 computers at home, I do "support" (as someone calls it) to my friends and family, and I'm the IT guy at my small start up company.. Out of all these PCs I have turned off automatic updates on 2 (two) systems. 

 

Both of those computers are servers where uptime is critical so we want to do updates in our own time. 

 

A total of 0 (zero) times have there been anyone contacting me about troubles with their Windows update going wild and breaking things. Not even the old granny who live next door has had a problem that her computer updates automatically. 

 

I found the whole argument that the uneducated will now be the test subject for new patches rather silly. Most people who know nothing about computers accept recommended settings and then promptly forgets about it. The big incident with the never ending boot loop was the first in a long long time that affected more than a couple of random computers. And even then it was fixed even before most automatic updates had time to run.

 

Remember, a lot of casual PC users won't even have their computer on to run updates every 2nd Tuesday of the month, and probably won't run the update until any 0-day flaws have been ironed out anyway. 

 

Now, you can argue all you want that you need to disable updates because you are a developer, or your moms best friends brother in law once had a computer that crashed during patch tuesday, but then you clearly aren't in the demographics for using the Home edition, and you should just go for the Pro instead of calling this the thing that will kill Windows.

 

 

Now, DVD and Bluray players still exist, and for free too, so no big problem there, same with built in Floppy support, which still will work with vendor drivers. 

  • Like 3

Think the auto update is quite a silly mistake. Home users will be the ones with the least knowledge when something goes wrong. This could be a huge PR blunder, one that could destroy trust. I understand that we need to get users up to date but MS are not good enough at this yet - it's inevitably going to go wrong :-(

Precisely my point.

 

I've already addressed the "you don't have a right to complain" question so I'll move on.

 

Microsoft used to have different versions of Windows just like they do now. In today's parlance, the offer would be a Home version and a Pro version.

 

What they did was to put just enough features in the Pro version so that you didn't really want the Home version. You really wanted the Pro version because those features were neat enough that you were willing to shell out the few extra bucks for them.

 

That's what I want. I want MS to give me a reason to upgrade by offering more features, not by taking them away. I haven't seen the differences in features between Home and Pro but am eagerly awaiting the comparison.

Upgrade to the pro version then?  If you're modifying windows update settings then that makes you "pro". :p

Sooo pay more for a feature I already have....

 

*I have Windows 7 Ultimate on 2 of my computers but I'm not shelling out extra $$ just so I can update the others.

 

Plus I have a few people computers I work on (not for work but personal favors that have to watch it because I've had Windows update cause issues with them before) and another I manually update for him because he only has a hotspot (limited gigs) so I update for him on my connection.

 

*don't think I'm going to go to them and say hay you get a free "upgrade for window 10 but need to shell out a extra 99$ if you want it not to break anything, but hay now you can use the window store...

what are power users doing using home edition? you have no reason to complain

 

Power user =/= rich

 

Get a clue.

The Windows 10 Home Edition forced update's is not that bad, the average "home user" needs protecting from themselves, so forcing the latest security updates to be installed would be helping the majority of people. This certainly benefits the majority of the user base this edition is targeted at.

 

 

Windows Updates. This is the most interesting one. In previous Windows versions, you could control how updates were installed. But those with Windows 10 Home will have updates from Windows Update made available automatically. Only Windows 10 Pro and Windows 10 Enterprise users will be able to defer updates.

 

Does this mean they will automatically installed or you will get told there are updates available. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Dupe of "Microsoft further improving Windows 11 Taskbar with latest builds", published <20 minutes apart
    • Dupe of "Windows 11 is getting redesigned taskbar settings in new build", published <20 minutes apart
    • Ooooh! Two editorial from Paul Hill on the same day! Is it my birthday or something? 😉 Okay, let's see if I get it right. SearXNG develops a meta-search engine app. Individuals install it on their relays. Users connect to these relays to have their own identity-stripping meta-search engine instead of relying on DuckDuckGo. And some of these volunteers have listed their SearXNG instances on SearX.space. That was a lot of wrap my head around. I hope I haven't missed anything.
    • You sound like some Ukrainians in Crimea before 2014: "I didn't vote for USSR disbanding - I want Ukraine to be part of Russia again" 🤣
    • Uninstalr 3.1 by Razvan Serea Introducing Uninstalr: Easy to use and very accurate software uninstaller for Windows. It can uninstall multiple apps at the same time and we think it’s pretty cool. Developed with expertise by Macecraft Software - the minds behind jv16 PowerTools. Key Features Batch uninstall many apps at the same time. Supports unattended uninstallation of apps. Supports monitoring of new software installations. Also detects portable apps and previously uninstalled software leftovers. Shows all the data added to your system by installed software on a file by file basis. Shows all the data it will remove before starting the uninstallation. Filter and search the list of installed software. According to our benchmark, Uninstalr is the most accurate software uninstaller by leaving the least amount of leftovers when uninstalling apps. Supports detection and uninstallation of Microsoft Store, Steam, Big Fish Game System, Chocolatey, NuGet and Ninite installed software. Supports Windows Dark Mode. Supports Windows 11, 10, 8 and 7. Comes with these translations builtin: Chinese Simplified, Chinese Traditional, Czech, Danish, English, Filipino, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hindi, Hungarian, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Malay, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Spanish, Swedish, Thai, Turkish, Ukrainian and Vietnamese. Has a single executable file portable version and a normal setup version. Uninstalr is freeware, lightweight and easy to use. No bells and whistles, no nonsense. Uninstalr’s custom uninstallation engine has a dedicated support for the detection and uninstallation of 15 types of apps: Normal Windows apps Microsoft Store apps Portable apps Chocolatey apps Ninite apps PortableApps.com apps Steam games EA App games Epic Games Store games Riot platform games GOG Galaxy games WarGaming.net games Battle.net games itch.io games Big Fish platform games Uninstalr 3.1 changelog: Key Changes Uninstalr now starts and shows the list of installed apps faster after the initial scan has been completed, and with much smaller memory usage. Uninstalr now detects and highlights apps that automatically start with Windows. Greatly improved the detection of portable apps. Improvements New feature: Uninstalr now detects and highlights apps that automatically start with Windows. New feature: Uninstalr now highlights possible leftovers and apps from Russia and China. This can be disabled from the Settings. New feature: A new filter that allows you to show only software that is installed to other than the system drive. New feature: Users can now select to always do the deepest and the most accurate scan for installed apps, at the cost of the analysis taking a longer time. Greatly improved the detection of portable apps, such as added dedicated support for MiTeC, EZ Tools and SysInternals tools. Improved support for portable apps installed via Windows System Control Center (WSCC). NirSoft portable apps are now listed with "NirSoft" prefix for easier identification. Improved the speed of uninstalling apps. The main installed software listing search will now find "Xbox GameBar" if you search for "Game bar" and vice versa. The tooltip now displays more detailed information of the installed apps, such as its registry key and uninstaller path. The links in the About section now look more like clickable links. The main menu is now more clearly indicated in the main user interface. Microsoft Teams Meeting Add-in for Microsoft Office ships with some Windows 11 installations and is now considered a builtin Windows app and only listed if builtin Windows apps filter is enabled. Added a Help button to the main user interface that opens the help section of the website. Added an option not to close Uninstalr after uninstallation. If you open the Uninstalr website from the app, the website now receives the version number of your current Uninstalr version and warns you if you are using anything but the latest version. Improved the accuracy of the New Software Monitor. Improved confirmation messages for Steam and other platform related uninstalls. Improved the uninstallation performance of Steam games. Fixes: Known bug fixed: Some installed app names are capitalized incorrectly, such as "CCleaner Portable" is listed as "ccleaner portable". Known bug fixed: Some apps can be listed twice, for example, Smart Defrag can be listed once as Smart Defrag and then Smart Defrag Home. Known bug fixed: On the pre-uninstallation screen, the Scripts checkbox can be checked by default on Dark Mode but not on the normal mode. Known bug fixed: Perform Deep Analysis can be started only by clicking the button, not via the Right Click menu, main menu or F4 keyboard shortcut. Muse Hub could be incorrectly listed as Adobe Muse. SyncTrayzor was incorrectly detected as two unrelated software, SyncTrayzor and Syncthing. Smart Defrag was incorrectly listed twice as Smart Defrag 11 and Smart Defrag Home. It was possible to enter non-printable characters to the search input boxes of the main screen, and the path listing screen, which caused the UI to look funny. Changing the translation from Settings, especially many times in a row, caused the UI to distort. If you had multiple instances of portable apps on your system, such as the 64b and 32b versions of the same portable app, typically only one of them was detected, not both. In some very rare cases, Uninstalr UI could start with random characters in its search input boxes, which could make the UI look rather confusing. This was a rare issue, only reported by two users. The pre-uninstallation screen could display non-existing paths for example as the software's installation directory or main exe file. This was a cosmetic issue. New Software Monitor cannot detect the installation of Claude. Selecting all the found software made the UI look funny with the top panel covering everything else (because the names of all the selected software were listed there). Sometimes a Steam game could be listed a normal app instead of a Steam game. If the system restart after an uninstallation is delayed, e.g. because of Windows Updates being installed, this additional delay is incorrectly added to the time how long the uninstallation process took. This cosmetic bug could cause the program incorrectly report an uninstallation time longer than the actual uninstallation time. Uninstalling Minecraft could simply fail. The Only scan the system drive for installed apps setting does not fully work. If some apps are installed to a non system drive and this setting is enabled, the app could still be detected and listed on the main user interface. Changing any settings could also incorrectly alter the Only Scan The System Drive For Installed Apps setting. Microsoft OneDrive and Copilot are not always detected. If you enter something to the search filter field, then select the text and press the Delete key, this triggers the Uninstall button click even if your intent was to delete the text input. If you press the F5 key to refresh the screen during the uninstallation loading screen, the program will crash. If you enabled some setting, such as "Do not analyze installed app installation sizes", it could automatically be unchecked later. Uninstalr doesn't warn you if you try to remove Fortec antivirus. There should be a warning if user attempts to remove any antivirus or antimalware type program. Such programs should not be uninstalled using a third party uninstaller, as they are typically protected against automated uninstallation, for security reasons. With "Do not analyze installed app installation sizes" option checked from the Settings, Uninstalr could still display some installation size related elements in the UI which was confusing. The "Only scan the system drive" option moved under Improve Scan Speed from the General settings. If two software have the exact same name and version number, selecting both of them for uninstallation fails because only one is actually selected. Sorting the installed apps by size sometimes fails and the order is incorrect. The "Don't show which paths are currently analyzed" did not work correctly - some parts of the UI still show the currently analyzed path with this setting checked. The "Don't list software less than 10 MB" filter did not work correctly - some apps smaller than 10 MB could still be listed. Uninstalr could start very quickly and display an empty list of detected apps. Restarting the app usually fixed the issue and the list of installed apps was properly displayed. If you placed portable Uninstalr to a same folder with other portable apps, those were not detected because Uninstalr automatically added its installation folder to the ignore list. When trying to uninstall some specific software, Uninstalr could get stuck on the Searching for more data relating to the app phase. Uninstalr could sometimes do a silent uninstallation even if user had unchecked the Perform a silent uninstallation option. Known issues: Uninstalr can fail to run with an Out Of Memory error in systems that have a lot of installed apps. Using the New Software Monitor tool multiple times during one session can cause the program to get stuck on the Scanning stage. The "uninstallation completed" message box sometimes closes when the user moves the mouse cursor over the button before user clicks it. There is no feedback for the user after Fix Information feature has been used. The Right Click menu's Select by publisher option can display the number of apps per each publisher without correct vertical alignment. The default user interface might not display all of the found installed apps if you have over 600 installed apps. If you do, using the Screen Reader Compatible Interface solves the issue. Leftover apptype filter checkbox is shown in red font only in Dark Mode. Clicking the app's icon from the Windows Taskbar doesn't minimize/restore the app like other apps. The warning about an app that user wishes to uninstall being related to some other app user did not select can sometimes be inaccurate. If app's language is changed without restarting Uninstalr, the list of installed software might not automatically refresh. When software is being uninstalled, the UI can say it is processing paths unrelating to the uninstalled app. This is purely cosmetic and does not mean these paths are removed. Uninstalr might not properly detect and/or uninstall Steam games if they are installed to a drive different than Steam's default location in C:\. You might see "This action is only valid for products that are currently installed" error message from Windows Installer during uninstallation. This is a cosmetic issue. Download: Uninstalr 3.1 | 7.1 MB (Free, paid version available) Download: Uninstalr Setup 3.1 View: Uninstalr Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!