Could this be malware?


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, devnulllore said:

Yes I am logging into my Microsoft Account. Mi licence is valid as far as I know. The registration is in my bios.

The lag, yes but Explorer has not crashed since I got rid of the insiders build.

I think others may have already mentioned it but are you able to take a video of this happening, either using OBS or simply recording the screen with a camera?

I was just monitoring the processes while trying to get it to repeat and suddenly 'chrome - software reporter tool' showed up 6 times and pegged my CPU and the power usage level went to very high stayed there for a few seconds then stopped. Could this be a suspect? As for getting a video I have never tried it.

16 minutes ago, devnulllore said:

Here is what I was talking about with Chrome and the software reporting tool.

taskmanager.jpg

Possible, I've seen that process bring some systems to it's knees. I've removed chrome from a few of my machine's because of it. That software reporter tool uses a ridiculous mount of cpu.

32 minutes ago, devnulllore said:

I was just monitoring the processes while trying to get it to repeat and suddenly 'chrome - software reporter tool' showed up 6 times and pegged my CPU and the power usage level went to very high stayed there for a few seconds then stopped. Could this be a suspect? As for getting a video I have never tried it.

I doubt it because you said in a previous post it was happening on a clean install with nothing else yet installed.

47 minutes ago, Vince800 said:

I doubt it because you said in a previous post it was happening on a clean install with nothing else yet installed.

No, you are correct I had not thought of that. Either way I disabled the tool to see if it helps.

Yeah I am curious as well why yours is showing 32..

 

I just fired chrome up.. And it showing as 64 on my system

chrome.thumb.png.26aa2514f939f67084b8aa91ee8441c8.png

 

What version of chrome are you running?

Google Chrome is up to date

Version 76.0.3809.100 (Official Build) (64-bit)

47 minutes ago, BudMan said:

Yeah I am curious as well why yours is showing 32..

 

I just fired chrome up.. And it showing as 64 on my system

chrome.thumb.png.26aa2514f939f67084b8aa91ee8441c8.png

 

What version of chrome are you running?

Google Chrome is up to date

Version 76.0.3809.100 (Official Build) (64-bit)

I am using the 64 bit version. copy and paste from Chrome: Version 76.0.3809.100 (Official Build) (64-bit)

 

I'd try uninstalling chrome for a while see if it clears up. As an alternative to Chrome I'd recommend Brave.

 

Brave is still chromium based but without some of googles bloat and with a built in adblocker and a few other nice things. It can still use extensions from the chrome web store too

 

https://brave.com 

  • Thanks 1

The time you have spent on this even at 10$ an hour you could of prob bought whole new machine ;)

 

You got something really odd going on - if you say your system is 64bit, and you install 64 bit software and its running as 32bit?  Why would that chrome software reporting show its running 32?  Had you installed multiple copies of chrome?  You say your doing a clean install, but then we come to find out you have xyz installed.. Clean would be NOTHING but the OS..

 

Are you running anything that is putting stuff in compatibility mode?

 

Run it like that.. Do you have any problems before you install software X... Run it like that for a while, do you see the issue?  If not then move on to installing software Y..

 

Also noticed you EVGA X server something running - so this again points to not being actually "clean" install.  Don't use your MS account when you install it... Just install it pure clean..

It is the 64 bit version of Chrome and I had already eliminated my graphics software before installing it. The issue began again before I even installed new drivers so I was in the process of installing the software to see if anything exacerbated the situation. Chrome did that.

So I updated all my drivers as I usually would and am still having the issue. Windows Explorer CPU usage spikes, system lags for a second or two them stops and Windows Explorer crashes my desktop every now and then.

 

Does this now sound more hardware related? Where do I go from here? I checked my MB temps and they are all ok.

Need to drill into the processes to really see.  I don’t know. I can’t do it for you.  I gave you the tools.  

 

For errors to not show in event cower is odd if it is a hardware issue.  If it were a big hardware issue you would get blue screens....is you computer locking up to where you have to reboot it?   The issue you were having was high drive usage, has this changed?   Are you now seeing high cpu usage?  Os is it crashing?

Oh sorry I completely forgot to check the event log since the new install. I have a bunch of errors and warnings. The first error is DistributedCOM 10010. There are dozens of these all in about 10 minute increments. The second error is Service Control Manager 7009, 7023, 7031 and 7034. Then I have Bits Client 16392, volmgr 46 and KernalPNP 225. There are also dozens of warnings if you want me to list them. That's where I am so far. Let me know if you need any more info.

I really think that it would be helpful if you could record a video of this happening as it may be an easy answer if we could actually see what you're getting here. You could even record the screen using a camera or phone if you're not familiar with OBS etc.

 

Just as thought, are you sorting folders by date? I've found that on Windows if you have a large number of files in a directory and it's sorted by date, it will take a few seconds to sort itself on first access sometimes.

Well you should prob look into the details of each error/warning and look to correct stuff that is not correct.

 

I'm not seeing any dcom 10010 errors, but in mine I see some 10016, which I have just corrected.  Decom permissions can be adjusted..

 

Volmgr 46, points to crash dump file not there? Not created?

http://www.eventid.net/display-eventid-46-source-volmgr-eventno-10647-phase-1.htm

 

Are you disabling swap?? ie your pagefile?

On 8/7/2019 at 8:05 AM, devnulllore said:

Untitled-1.thumb.jpg.d07831a3535fc348ebe747ec2ac6b686.jpg

I ran the rescue disk and deleted the boot folder but still accesses the drive and causes hitching (system pauses) when it does.

TL;DR 6 pages, so sorry if it's been addressed already, but you are missing lots of unallocated space there, ~ 46GB.

I hadn't noticed that screenshot before.. I would agree 46GB of SSD space is nothing to sneeze at ;)  If had to guess, I would say its setting for over provisioning... Would have nothing to do with this issue.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      452
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!