Recommended Posts

Views like this are always interesting. Aren't governments and families a form of social control? For that matter, isn't work, school, or any social structure a form of social control? Does that mean that to be truly free we have to shed all social structure, abolish all organizations and survive solely on the arrogant belief that we have it all figured out? :p

that reminds me of Carl Marx :p

yeah, hahaha. :laugh:

that is why the quran has got stuff which scientists are discoering now. they even take guidance from it. :yes:

Riiiight. Typical zanwar response. Care to prove it? And none of these incredibly pro-islamic sites. How about some place reputible this time...hmmm?

The modern state of christianity is about following rules.

Somone who has no idea about the current state of the church isn't qualified to say such things. Christianity ISN'T based on the 10 commandments, as others have said. It's never been about rules. The foundation of Christianity is a relationship with Jesus. Always has been that way, always will.

Religion comes from our ritualistic nature. Ritualism is evidenced even amongst the higher apes. Every religion thinks that it alone has the answer. Thus, religion is inherently flawed. It can bring meaning to life, but it can also bring blindness and idiocy. When one is educated in the anthropological origins of religion, and one begins to deconstruct say, the social setting that led to Christianity, one can see that it is nothing more than a somewhat abberant creation of mankind. Spirituality is fine, religion is blindness. The key to happiness is not in books or a shaman/priest's teachings, rather is to seek meaning in knowledge and understanding of everything.

Edited by Athlon7
Religion comes from our ritualistic nature. Ritualism is evidenced even amongst the higher apes. Every religion thinks that it alone has the answer. Thus, religion is inherently flawed. It can bring meaning to life, but it can also bring blindness and idiocy. When one is educated in the anthropological origins of religion, and one begins to deconstruct say, the social setting that led to Christianity, one can see that it is nothing more than a somewhat abberant creation of mankind. Spirituality is fine, religion is blindness. The key to happiness is not in books or a shaman/priest's teachings, rather is to seek meaning in knowledge and understanding of everything.

Those are some interesting thoughts you have there... although your assumptions are unfounded. First of all you failed to acknowledge the purpose of ritualism and why certain rituals exist. Ritual is different than habit, mind you. Secondly, you also incorrectly assumed that every religion "thinks that it alone has the answer". That is not true of Islam, although it does claim to be the most recently revealed and most direct path to God.

I'm also curious as to what that social setting was that led to Christianity? And I'd also like to see you justify religion as an "abberant creation" of mankind (and I'd like to see you do it in the context of Islam, actually). Contrary to your statement, religion has been quite the norm throughout the history of modern man (modern in the genetic sense).

I will however agree with you, that knowledge and understanding are absolutely essential to mankind's existance. In all my extra-curricular study, the more knowledge and understanding I gained, the stronger my faith in God has become, because it seems every bit of truth in this world furthur validates the existance of God and His very real presence.

Riiiight.  Typical zanwar response.  Care to prove it?  And none of these incredibly pro-islamic sites.  How about some place reputible this time...hmmm?

More logical than us proving to you that the Quran is scientifically accurate (since pro-Islamic sites featuring quotes from the Quran as they relate to modern science isn't enough for you), how about you prove that the Quran is scientifically inaccurate? :)

I'd love to see you do that! I mean, I've even had a non-Muslim physics teacher tell the class how the Quran describes nuclear detonation. Not just that, but the Quran covers biology, physics, geology, etc... especially in physics, you'll find it interesting that the Quranic explanation for the creation of the universe is pretty much the Big Bang theory (which I believe is the prevailing theory regarding the creation of the universe).

Anyways, it'd be interesting to hear your comments on this! :)

Edited by RufioPan
Somone who has no idea about the current state of the church isn't qualified to say such things. Christianity ISN'T based on the 10 commandments, as others have said. It's never been about rules. The foundation of Christianity is a relationship with Jesus. Always has been that way, always will.

I agree, thats the end, the goal, but to reach that goal you need the commandments, right? correct me if Im wrong please but the commandments are there to be respected and followed, to talk about the state is not the same to talk about the final goal.

More logical than us proving to you that the Quran is scientifically accurate (since pro-Islamic sites featuring quotes from the Quran as they relate to modern science isn't enough for you), how about you prove that the Quran is scientifically inaccurate? :)

I'd love to see you do that! I mean, I've even had a non-Muslim physics teacher tell the class how the Quran describes nuclear detonation. Not just that, but the Quran covers biology, physics, geology, etc... especially in physics, you'll find it interesting that the Quranic explanation for the creation of the universe is pretty much the Big Bang theory (which I believe is the prevailing theory regarding the creation of the universe).

Anyways, it'd be interesting to hear your comments on this! :)

No....YOU have to prove it ACCURATE. Thats how it works.

If I say I am sitting next to a giant toaster, I have to prove to you that I AM. You don't have prove that I am NOT.

I mean, how can the scientific information be accurate if theres no scientific information :)

More logical than us proving to you that the Quran is scientifically accurate (since pro-Islamic sites featuring quotes from the Quran as they relate to modern science isn't enough for you), how about you prove that the Quran is scientifically inaccurate??:))

I'd love to see you do that!? I mean, I've even had a non-Muslim physics teacher tell the class how the Quran describes nuclear detonation.? Not just that, but the Quran covers biology, physics, geology, etc... especially in physics, you'll find it interesting that the Quranic explanation for the creation of the universe is pretty much the Big Bang theory (which I believe is the prevailing theory regarding the creation of the universe).

Anyways, it'd be interesting to hear your comments on this!:)? :)

nice o;). ;)

yo superfula and tool, look and lea:happy:ppy:

Here embryology is discussed in the Quran 1400 YEARS AGO! And scientists and dr's are finding about max 30 years ago!

Quran and Modern Science Link 1

Link 2

Here they are discussing the Quranic revelations regarding several aspects in science, and the scientist even said that the Quran really "IS A DIVINE REVELATION".

Link 3

Man i know what people are gonna say when i post this but this is my opinion sumed up in a quote by Karl Marx

"Religion is the opiate of the masses"

Really thats all I think it is,

Its good for nothing but creating divides in the world, its responsible for wars and deaths of innocent people.

erm, it also brings people together, more than it seperates 'em.

I agree that it also brings people together... but MORE than it divides people? I don't think you could find any evidence to actually prove that in the real world.

Think of it this way: how many times has a religion brought people together (in a good way) in huge masses, simultaniously around the world, or at least within an entire country? Or how many times have people of two different religions come together to praise eachother for loving and worshipping God?

Now think of how many massive wars with thousands of casualties (per war) have been faught as a direct result of religious disputes, and think of how many of those wars are still being waged. And think of events like the Holocaust, where Hitler singled out a group based on their religios beliefs and murdered them in the millions, while the German people at the time did virtually nothing to stop him (obviously knowing at some point he had lost his mind and was murdering innocent civilians in massive numbers).

I am not necissarily trying to state that religion is all bad by saying this, I'm just trying to point out the reality of the situation, since many people, especially those adamently defending religion, conveniently forget.

erm, it also brings people together, more than it seperates 'em.

I agree that it also brings people together... but MORE than it divides people? I don't think you could find any evidence to actually prove that in the real world.

Think of it this way: how many times has a religion brought people together (in a good way) in huge masses, simultaniously around the world, or at least within an entire country? Or how many times have people of two different religions come together to praise eachother for loving and worshipping God?

Now think of how many massive wars with thousands of casualties (per war) have been faught as a direct result of religious disputes, and think of how many of those wars are still being waged. And think of events like the Holocaust, where Hitler singled out a group based on their religios beliefs and murdered them in the millions, while the German people at the time did virtually nothing to stop him (obviously knowing at some point he had lost his mind and was murdering innocent civilians in massive numbers).

I am not necissarily trying to state that religion is all bad by saying this, I'm just trying to point out the reality of the situation, since many people, especially those adamently defending religion, conveniently forget.

Yup, and then a Muslim/Jewish suicide bomber kills aload of kiddies who just got their presents.

Get my point?

I don't think I am actually getting involved in the part of this argument that is Science vs Religion...If you read my first post I think (think!) I said summat bout the bible being quite accurate. There is no reason why that shouldn't apply to the Quran.

Now, another point - ZAnwar, EXPLAIN STUFF YOURSELF. You might not necessarily be able to explain yourself, and thats all those articles are doing, they are EXPLAINING what your point is. Try and do it yourself, without quotes. I dares ya.

Somone who has no idea about the current state of the church isn't qualified to say such things. Christianity ISN'T based on the 10 commandments, as others have said. It's never been about rules. The foundation of Christianity is a relationship with Jesus. Always has been that way, always will.

Interesting point, but Jewism has the commandments, Christianity was originaly Jewism but with belief that Jesus was a prophet. Yes, I know now that there are a lot of other differences, but I am talking about the beginning.

Therefore, religion is based around the Ten Commandments. Oh yes, and the Deadly sins. We shouldn't forget those now.

very handy link zanwar... :thumbs:

STFU...Contribute to the discussion, don't just cheerlead biatch.

Edited by tool

Admit, it was a waste of a post. He gets gratitude in the way we can use his post to argue against him.

Oh yeah, I don't like to descriminate, but the one thing that really annoys me with Muslims, but whereas most religions can take and accept that they are not alone, and that others beliefs count too (well maybe not Jews), but they actively despise other religions and somehow think that their religion is "the one". No human or body of humans have the right to claim that.

Admit, it was a waste of a post. He gets gratitude in the way we can use his post to argue against him.

Oh yeah, I don't like to descriminate, but the one thing that really annoys me with Muslims, but whereas most religions can take and accept that they are not alone, and that others beliefs count too (well maybe not Jews), but they actively despise other religions and somehow think that their religion is "the one". No human or body of humans have the right to claim that.

I take off my wizard robe and wizard cap.

Ah yes bashing religion and its followers :| ... to be honest if it wasn't for religion you'd have a lot of people out their not caring about humanity and doing good .. so whether you believe it or not there are some benefits from it ... anyways I always found this quote interesting...

"Religion...is the opium of the people" - Karl Marx

What i also find interesting today is that if any of the religions that exist today where 'invented' today they would be considered cults lol

I also watched that movie Rabbit-Proof Fence and it's disguisting to see what people had to suffer through having their beliefs bashed and taking away because of some other ethnocentric majority.

Personally I don't care what religion someone practices, as long as they don't try to push it i.e. Jovanh's (however you spell it) Witness .. and that it helps them be better people.

Admit, it was a waste of a post. He gets gratitude in the way we can use his post to argue against him.

Oh yeah, I don't like to descriminate, but the one thing that really annoys me with Muslims, but whereas most religions can take and accept that they are not alone, and that others beliefs count too (well maybe not Jews), but they actively despise other religions and somehow think that their religion is "the one". No human or body of humans have the right to claim that.

what?

it is coz Islam is the "right" one. i have showed you a lot of reading material, but you being ignorant dont read it! :angry:

Christianity also teaches that the only way to get into Heaven is through Jesus, and that all the other ways are invalid. However, we don't actively rub it in your faces as much, that's all. :)

hahahaha, that gave me a laugh! :shifty:

it doesnt say in the bible once that Jesus is God, people (christians) being sheep, follow exactly what they are told :whistle:

i don't know really.. but i saw a hilarious thing last night..

i was watching a sciencesjow on tv where they discussed the string-theory and unification..

the funny thing was that a scientist who was sort of an expert was still blending in god in his way of explaining

that god meant it this way and other crap.. you can guess from which nation he was. :p

I mean how can you be a religious scientist?

that is just bs..

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Can you still click his nose in the about box?
    • In that case this product has no value to me. I'd rather use older Creative SB that were better in my opinion or onboard audio chip.
    • FxSound 1.2.9.0 / 1.2.10.0 Beta by Razvan Serea FxSound (formerly DFX Audio Enhancer / FxSound Enhancer) is now free, making high-quality audio enhancement accessible to everyone. Designed for all PC sound systems, from average setups to audiophile-grade equipment, it offers automatic or fully customizable processing. As automatic or customizable as you want, it utilizes the highest-grade processing to deliver more volume, better equalization, and a wider, deeper sound. For the serious audiophiles, FxSound gives you the tools to adjust the FxSound Effects and EQ to your exact preferences. Turn FxSound on and immediately hear the difference in sound quality. FxSound is ideal for budget audiophiles, music lovers, gamers, transcriptionists, Netflix enthusiasts, and more. It’s particularly beneficial for those relying on quiet laptop speakers or low-quality audio hardware. As a free tool, FxSound excels in boosting volume, enhancing bass, and improving sound quality. No other free EQ for Windows matches its ease of use. FxSound Is Now Completely Free and Unrestricted FxSound Pro is now free for everyone, not just those who can afford it. Get free and unrestricted access to better sound today. FxSound is now entirely supported by users. Click here to donate to help fund continued development and improvements to FxSound. FxSound 1.2.9.0 changelog: Auto save preset when Equalizer or Effects settings are changed Reset to factory defaults can reset the unsaved preset changes Settings dialog UI improvements for Audio and Equalizer sections Output device list is now displayed in the device preference order Preset is selected immediately when the preset for an active output device changes from settings Fixes and improvements in preferred output device selection Fixed crash issue #487 Fixed preset not getting applied and EQ flat after update (#403 and #472) Fixed system audio device not being restored on reboot (#483) Fixed preset export and import dialogs not shown when always on top is enabled Fixed audio not being restored on exit after the preset save dialog Fixed FxSound on/off handling on Windows session changes FxSound 1.2.10.0 Beta changelog: Command line options can now be applied to an already running instance of FxSound Command line option added to launch FxSound minimized to the system tray Fixed output device not being changed through hotkeys when FxSound is off (#524) Individual hotkeys can now be disabled with Delete key (#515) Fixed the but to prevent invalid hotkeys from being registered (#523) Bluetooth devices removed from device settings are removed from device preference list Fixed device detection failures Fixed application hang when retrieving the audio mix format fails Fixed presets import dialog file name combo box text alignment Fixed output device not being applied through command line Fixed a delay blocking application load when minimizing to the system tray Fixed EQ band sliders not refreshing when switching number of bands (#521) Fixed user-set mute being overridden by FxSound Fixed icon visibility in ARM64 version Finnish language support added Corrected Persian translations Download: FxSound 1.2.9.0 | ARM64 | ~70.0 MB (Open Source) Download: FxSound 1.2.10.0 Beta | ARM64 View: FxSound Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • mIRC 7.84 Final by Razvan Serea mIRC is a full featured Internet Relay Chat client for Windows that can be used to communicate, share, play or work with others on IRC networks around the world, either in multi-user group conferences or in one-to-one private discussions. It has a clean, practical interface that is highly configurable and supports features such as buddy lists, file transfers, multi-server connections, SSL encryption, proxy support, UTF-8 display, customizable sounds, spoken messages, tray notifications, message logging, and more. mIRC also has a powerful scripting language that can be used both to automate mIRC and to create applications that perform a wide range of functions from network communications to playing games. mIRC has been in development for over a decade and is constantly being improved and updated with new technologies. mIRC 7.84 changelog: Added custom dialog editbox option 'optional' for grayed out optional text. Fixed DirectShow temporary wave file not being deleted on exit. Changed $urlget() to retry a connection without compression in the event of an error. Updated code signing certificate to use Azure Artifact Signing. Fixed menubar display bug when in dark mode. Fixed /server -a not preserving existing entry's codepage. Fixed Address Book nick colors "idle time" display bug. Changed installer to no longer require administrator access on startup. Added support for displaying an MDI window's System menu when right-clicking its titlebar. Updated libararies to OpenSSL v3.5.7, TagLib v2.2.1, Zlib v1.3.2, and ADA v0.5.5. Updated CA root certificates cacert.pem file. For a full list of recent changes, please see the versions.txt file. Download: mIRC 7.84 | 4.3 MB (Shareware) View: mIRC Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      470
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      165
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!