Recommended Posts

Even if organized religion was handed down from the wizard behind the curtain, it was still implemented in the way the person doing the authoring wanted as a social control, to try to make sure people didn't do bad things, if you're not scared of the law, maybe you'll be scared you'll catch a lightning bolt to the dome...

Also, when discoverers started to find things out about the world, they were called labelled lunatic/heretic/witch, and then now we use what they began to find even more...if you're trying to save your control over people, you can't have smarter people discovering things that debunk your little myths, now can you?

This isn't about whether someone choose to believe in religion or not. To me this is about whether or not God is real. And if God is real, then it isn't implausible that a God could inspire men to write scripture in an accurate way. After all, if God can create the world, it would be trivial to work through men to write the scripture accurately.

As for the time when scientists were labled heretics, etc., modern believers would argue that the church of the day wasn't following Christ's teachings. The church was akin to today's governments, and breed corruption. The church leadership were more interested in power than following Christ, and as such, tried to protect their status.

Today most Christians are just fine with science. I'm a Christian and also have a huge interest in science. I may not believe in the Big Bang, but then again, it's just a theory (and if it were some other field of science, I don't think the arguments supporting it would rise to the level of a theory, meaning because of the topic it gets more credit than I believe it deserves considering the contradictions and holes present in the theory, but that's another thread).

fact is religion makes us bow down to a god that might not even exist!

What if God does exist? Hell isn't the joyride the movies make it out to be. Hold a lighter up to your pinky finger for a minute and tell me how that feels, now imagine your whole body burning forever. That doesn't sound like a fun party to me. :no: So if God is real and does exist--and I believe He does--then I want to be on His side.

What if God doesn't exist? Well I'll have lived a good life and have no regrets. I'm happy as are most Christians I know. We have a faith that helps us get through the hard times. We have a sense of purpose in our life. We feel a sense of community and belonging. If God isn't real, our way of coping with life is just as good, and I'd argue better, than anyone else's way of living.

So to me, being a Christian is a win-win proposition. If God is real as I believe He is, then I'm going to heaven when I die. If God isn't real, well at least I'm living a life that I feel has purpose.

Fact is, without religion (for which our laws and such as derived from), we wouldn't have a society.

I agree with that point. Those which call your comment a joke, obviously dont know...

I find it hard to believe that people need proof for everything, alot of times I go along with something without proof and I end up fine. No need to always need proof.

With regards to religion, I think the whole bible was simply a best seller "back the the day" and here we have millions basing their lives on a book that was written when people thought the world was flat and the centre of the universe was where isreal is today...

No offense to those who have 'faith' and I hope I am wrong...

but I would not base my life on what Tom Clancy wrote... Even if he is a 'good read'

Ok start the onslaught of the "Burn in he|| Dixon" posts... :devil:

Ok, I need to reply as well....

Think about all this....There are clinical test where people complaining of an illness will be tested...some will be given real medicine and others placebos...and in some cases they get better even with the placebo...ok now you might ask why i bring this up.

this will all tie in together towards the end

Now people believe in religion, dont beleive in it, or aliens...there are probably more but im just naming those... People see things in the sky and report it and sometimes there are shows where all they show are these "alien ships"....all of a sudden people are reporting seeing things....its either real or all just made up in your mind, an optical allusion

ok now, there are also the type of people that have made "religions" based on movies (Star Trek, Star Wars, Matrix) etc... Some of these people truly believe that this **** is real...but because of technology, a man(s)'s idea is brought to life on a screen...so most of the people that watch this realize it is fake

back then, there wasnt this type of technology, so one man(s)'s story could be passed around and people would believe it... Maybe back then someone wasnt getting the attention they wanted and started a story....people just beleived it , and no one really could say that he made it up, which then became a religion and grew and grew into an (occult?) ...we just dont look at it that way

i dont know, i kind of forgot the point, not exactly sure if this makes sense...but it is something to think about

no u guys got it wrong, what i am trying to ask is do you guys believe that religion is real or is just an excuse to explain the unknown. i don't care about what kind of religion, but religion as a general catagory

You are absolutely right. No one is wrong, and everyone is right in this argument. The reasoning for that is since everyone has a belief (opinion), they will believe what they believe. I do feel that everyone needs something to believe in, whether it's an All-Mighty Supreme Being (God, Buddha, etc.), or the theories of Science. Human nature, if nothing else, has taught us that people MUST have some kind of belief to survive.

And about the aliens...well, to quote Jodie Foster in Contact, "It's pretty arrogant for us to believe we're the only ones out there...seems like an awful waste of space to me." (or something along those lines). Besides, just because "God created the Heavens and the Earth", what's to say he didn't create another planet? The earthen people (tring to stay away from Earthlings here) wouldn't need to know "back in the day."

Now. I'm done thinking deeply....my brain hurts!

--Kas :wacko:

Edited by Kasandoro
What if God does exist? Hell isn't the joyride the movies make it out to be. Hold a lighter up to your pinky finger for a minute and tell me how that feels, now imagine your whole body burning forever. That doesn't sound like a fun party to me. :no: So if God is real and does exist--and I believe He does--then I want to be on His side.

What if God doesn't exist? Well I'll have lived a good life and have no regrets. I'm happy as are most Christians I know. We have a faith that helps us get through the hard times. We have a sense of purpose in our life. We feel a sense of community and belonging. If God isn't real, our way of coping with life is just as good, and I'd argue better, than anyone else's way of living.

So to me, being a Christian is a win-win proposition. If God is real as I believe He is, then I'm going to heaven when I die. If God isn't real, well at least I'm living a life that I feel has purpose.

Sorry to double-post, but I had to second SkolVikings' post. I am a Christian, and feel the same as you do dude.

I couldn't have said it better myself.

--Kas

You are absolutely right.  No one is wrong, and everyone is right in this argument.  The reasoning for that is since everyone has a belief (opinion), they will believe what they believe.

Wrong! Either Jesus Christ is really God or He isn't. Either Allah is really god or he isn't. Etc... People can believe whatever they want to believe, but something is true and the rest isn't. Either God is real, or Allah is real, or there is no god at all, etc. When we die something is going to happen (even if that something is nothing).

There is/are no god(s).

Religion; A creation of the human mind for which it craved to know "Where did we come from, where did it all start?"

And so was created to answer that question, with no rock-solid proof whatsoever.

www.christianburner.com is a good site for info about how the Christian beliefs in a "god" is flawed.

The closest I can resemble a "god", would be nature itself. "It" has no conscience, no thinking, no mercy, "it" is nothing more than pure physics/chemistry/biology, "it" is the way things work.

This is what I have concluded over the many years of arguing about religion. Because there is no proof doesn't mean it isn't true, correct. But that is all that it seems to boil down to for the people who choose to believe in such a rediculously absurd fantasy tale.

I am a Christian too...and its easier to believe that a mighty and powerful being (God) created the earth and everything else out of nothing. Its harder to believe than from nothing...and with no reason...the big bang occurred and with some luck earth and the rest of what we know was created.

look, you are saying the bible is a best seller?

YEP I am saying the Biible WAS a best seller... Muslims and the Koran... I know little of... So I dont mock what I dont know...and If i am going to offend anyone... it will be people I know... I was brought up in catholic school and have read the bible and studied Catholic religon... ergo I can poke fun at the bible and the writing skills of matt, marc, luc and jon...

Also how the Church says everything has to stay the same even after 2000 years.,.. hahaha what a joke....

I believe when we die we ROT... lights out it is over... so make the most of it while you are here...

If I am wrong... GREAT... AWESOME... but I doubt I am and I am not counting on an afterlife...

So if you need something to help you days go by... a crutch to keep your spirits up... maybe religon is for you....

:pinch: waiting for he reacton for hte freakishly catholic HAHAHA

Surah an-Nur verse 31 reads:

And say to the faithful women to lower their gazes, and to guard their private parts, and not to display their beauty except what is apparent of it, and to extend their headcoverings (khimars) to cover their bosoms, and not to display their beauty except to their husbands.

So its like a lucky dip? and you find out when you marry her?

I am a Christian too...and its easier to believe that a mighty and powerful being (God) created the earth and everything else out of nothing. Its harder to believe than from nothing...and with no reason...the big bang occurred and with some luck earth and the rest of what we know was created.

and god had a reason to create everything? prove it

its easier to believe that a mighty and powerful being (God) created the earth and everything else out of nothing. Its harder to believe than from nothing...and with no reason...the big bang occurred and with some luck earth and the rest of what we know was created.

How do you figure that it is easy to believe that a GOD created earth rather than the big bang theory...

I dunno I think Steven Hawking could argue circles around the pope...

that's thats, what i think...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!