Recommended Posts

Just a bit of common sense, if it was a missile, don't you think somebody would have reported SEEING it?

I'm also guessing most of you missed this link, which makes a lot more sense than the flash:

http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm << Has a picture of airplane debris!!!

This is probably the dumbest thread of all time. The people who claim this stuff have absolutely nothing better to do than come up wth this crap. The exist due to sheer ignorance. The fact is that they basically don't know what a plane looks like when it explodes. Google up some picks on when a plain crashes into the ground to see what it looks like. Just rubble. These are the same guys that said we never went to the moon.

yawn.

An airplane does disappear if it wasn't a plane, but rather...a missile. Go to www.thisiswhoweare.com and www.911timeline.net. I, myself believe the government did it (probably gonna get a bunch of people mad now :unsure:). ...

And the jet fuel could not have melted or destroyed all the debris, no matter what, nor destroy the steel beams (which melt at very very high temps, higher than those cause by exploding jet fuel) in the WTC.

There are 4 missing planes, and the passengers and crew on those four planes are missing. If there was a missle there is in fact still a plane that must be accounted for.

Jet fuel can melt and destroy aluminum. As for melting steel, you don't have to melt it just weaken it to point where it can't handle the weight of a building any longer.

Well, I don't know how this could have been a missile anyway. The United States military has no direct orders to fire on any civilian aircraft. This is one of the things being discussed for FUTURE instances where defensive action might need to be taken, but has yet to be approved.

And I don't want to hear about how the government would do such a thing to protect the Pentagon. To mobilize a jet fighter squad and intercept the aircraft takes time, especially back when there was no heightened security alerts or any of that garbage we have to deal with now. And I doubt they would be firing missiles all over Washington. I'm sure everyone here can attest that minutes before the first planes hit, America was as lax as ever. We didn't have fighter jets sitting on runways waiting to shoot planes down.

And all you people posting pictures of other airliners crashing are wasting time. Those accidents occured in remote areas with lots of space. I'm sure you could find a picture of the Pennsylvania crash and it will look like that; but we all know what happened with the airliners that hit the Trade Center. Those jets went INTO the building and then exploded. That's what happened here. It's not like the plane hit a brick wall and just fell to the ground.

And the jet fuel could not have melted or destroyed all the debris, no matter what, nor destroy the steel beams (which melt at very very high temps, higher than those cause by exploding jet fuel) in the WTC.

So, you are saying that the two towers didn't collapse due to the planes crashing into them? Hahahaha. So, what the H E L L brought them down? Wind? You don't need to melt steel to expose it's weakness. Steel can be manipulated at very high temperatures which is exactly what happened to the towers. Because the steel was weakened (notice I didn't say melted) it couldn't support the weight of the levels above. All it took was one level of the structure to be compromised and gravity does the rest.

Go to your local food store and find a stack of canned food. Pull one from the middle of the stack and see what happens. Or go play Jenga.

I can't believe how people believe everything they see. Some people without a life turned to their best friend Photoshop and did this. " WOW This video is telling us that it was a missle, I believe them now. Wow, this video is showing a swimming cow! Thats awsome that they can swim now". n00bs

Same here - it is worrysome

Go to your local food store and find a stack of canned food. Pull one from the middle of the stack and see what happens. Or go play Jenga.

Ever pull out the top 1/4 of a jenga, it falls from the top not the bottom, and it makes a nice little mess all across the table, it doesnt just pancake out. Like the WTC did, both of them i might add.

the US government did it to keep the sheep in line and to make sure we go to war.

Thats where I stand, flame me all you want, but if you want the real madman in the White House vote Bush sr and his figure head of a son, but if you want the lesser of the two evils then vote the Kerry.

I pray to God EVERY DAY that we only got 2 months for him left in office and not another 4 yrs.

Ever pull out the top 1/4 of a jenga, it falls from the top not the bottom, and it makes a nice little mess all across the table, it doesnt just pancake out. Like the WTC did, both of them i might add.

the US government did it to keep the sheep in line and to make sure we go to war.

Thats where I stand, flame me all you want, but if you want the real madman in the White House vote Bush sr and his figure head of a son, but if you want the lesser of the two evils then vote the Kerry.

I pray to God EVERY DAY that we only got 2 months for him left in office and not another 4 yrs.

(Y) :yes:

This is probably the dumbest thread of all time. The people who claim this stuff have absolutely nothing better to do than come up wth this crap. The exist due to sheer ignorance. The fact is that they basically don't know what a plane looks like when it explodes. Google up some picks on when a plain crashes into the ground to see what it looks like. Just rubble. These are the same guys that said we never went to the moon.

yawn.

it's ignorant to flame even though youve never researched this... if you did and still believed it then you would back up this post w/ some counterfacts to what we're talking about. all we're trying to do w/ this thread is discuss what we believe... then, of course, it gets flooded w/ people that cant deal with anything different from their little sheltered world, and all of a sudden we're crazy loonies. just let us believe what we want... we obviously let you believe what you want. the way i see it... there's some people that will never learn.. some that will. it really is like The Matrix. We took the red pill. you guys want the blue pill over and over. im trying to help the people that will learn that the US govt is not the perfect entity that brainwashed citizens think it is. the US is not the best country in the world. im proud to be an american... but not in the sense that the average american is.

does it not bother anyone that Kerry is a member of the Skull & Bones... Bush Sr. was a member, head of CIA, a member of the CFR? the bush's are personal friends w/ the Bin Ladens. is all this really just crackpot theories? i think it's just senseable to me... we grow up w/ our teachers telling us that "we live in a country where anyone can become president" this is clearly not true... most people have no idea where we get our presidents.. they arent average citizens (w/ the exception of Lincoln) most of them are royalty, they have lineage from the past. they all come from extremely wealthy families... so.. i dont know, you make the call.

heres a quote from the book im reading right now:

"A more recent example of members' fierce loyalty was shown in the 1980s scandal of President Bush's (Sr) connection with the criminal activity in the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI). As the bank's illegal activities came to light-involving many prominent names-attempts were made by the Bush administration to block or blunt any meaningful investigation. Finally a formal investigation of the BCCI was launched by the Senate Foreign Relations Sbucommitee on Terrorism, Narcotics, and International Opeations headed by Massachusetts senator John Kerry. Kerry was chairman of the Democractic Senate Campaign Commitee, which had received significant BCCI contributions, and he was also a member of Skull and Bones. The Kerry-led investigation foundered. Jack Blum, a special counsel to Kerry's subcommittee, stated, 'I proposed a serious investigation of BCCI and was brushed aside...A high-level cover-up of everything concerning BCCI was set into place after Customs stumbled across their money-laundering operation in Miami, and it's still in place.'"

ok, im done... i know it's not going to end, but i just wish the people that are just going to flame would leave... let us have a meaningful conversation about something we believe in.

you gotta be kiddin me rite?

so the WHOLE AIR PLANE MELTED? but not the building and the windows?

some of the windows HAD GLASS in them:S so the heat was hot enough to MELT AND VAPORIZE an airplane..but not the windows...lmao..hahaha

and dude..at a landing speed..you should be able to see AT LEAST A WING or somethin..usually the wings seperate fromthe plane..

and u tell me how come NO news crew filmed the insident?

not a SINGLE van (after the crash) a helicopter? a SINGLE NEWS CHANNEL COVERD THE CRASH! for WTC..we had 3980398093930 diff channels showing the crash live...but for pentegon..NOT EVEN A SINGLE CREW?

plzzzzz

It's Lexan not glass.

So, you are saying that the two towers didn't collapse due to the planes crashing into them? Hahahaha. So, what the H E L L brought them down? Wind? You don't need to melt steel to expose it's weakness. Steel can be manipulated at very high temperatures which is exactly what happened to the towers. Because the steel was weakened (notice I didn't say melted) it couldn't support the weight of the levels above. All it took was one level of the structure to be compromised and gravity does the rest.

Go to your local food store and find a stack of canned food. Pull one from the middle of the stack and see what happens. Or go play Jenga.

The planes crashing into the towers didn't bring them down as intended. The fire weakened the already damaged support structure and brought them down. If we gave more money to support our Fire Departments instead of paying for our President to go on vacation every week it is quite possible that towers could have survived long enough to allow all of the people inside to have escaped.

OK - here's my personal view. I'm not gonna argue it or defend it cos that would go on for days, but just wanted to express it.

9/11 has become the biggest scapegoat for EVERYTHING ever! It was tragic, the perpetrators were, well I honestly cannot think of words powerful enough to describe the simmering rage that still exists. The whole WTC thing sickened me.

However, I truly believe that no plane crashed into the pentagon. I have never seen a picture of it, but seen plenty of the aftermath with NO PLANE. The damage looks too minor, the hole (impact area) too small.

But, back on topic. 9/11 being a scapegoat. Anything is being traced back to it nowadays.

Passport rulings being changed and civil liberties being revoked - 9/11.

War with (insert middle east nation here) - 9/11.

Massive "defence" budget - 9/11.

Heck I was queuing in my local bank, and the "queue assistant" (what a job) traced the delays back to 9/11 (people now need to prove they are not terrorists laundering money is the crux of it).

Yes it was terrible, but the sooner that people learn to move on and not be so reactionary about it, the sooner the governments will know they cannot label it the scapegoat for war that it has become.

have you ever seen a car run into a home? It doesnt stop at the wall and bounce off. It goes INTO the building. But yeah I saw it hit but you are right I didnt see what I saw :rolleyes:

You expect everyone to just trust you and take your word for it?

You may have very well saw what you said you saw, but then again, you could be full of BS. That is just another thing people will have to decide for themselves. You can't force people to change their beliefs. I for one find it hard to believe that it was something other than a plane, but then again, I don't see how a plane would but through multiple levels of 9ft thick steel reinforced concrete. It's a lose-lose situation, I doubt any of us will ever know the FULL truth about what happened that day.

im not paranoid or anything but can i ask 3 small questions ive picke dup on after reading this thread.

A) where are all the body bags from the pentagon. out of say 50-100 people surely a few body bags would come out of there.

B) why confiscate all videos even from petrol stationsacross the freeway and yet allow the most obvious one the pentagon camera itself to be released.

C) yes , where is the airplane debri. ive be4en interested in airoplanes from ww1 all the way through to the present day and ive never once seen any film , documentary et cet con airplane crashes without debri of some kind.mainly the engines as they r made from almost solid matter not airplane fuselage which would burn easily under airfuel heat.

im not trying to drum up any theories just wondering about these 3 facts.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!