why are people hating the shuffle and mini?


Recommended Posts

Removing the controls is stupid. That's just getting rid of necessary functionality.

Personally, I'd never have a use for the Shuffle. As of today, I've got 4259 songs. 120 on a player is NOT going to cut it.

And the lack of the screen wouldn't bother me. Besides, for someone who's got enough songs that a Shuffle is practical, aren't they going to have just about every song remembered by name? I sure as hell don't though, I'd have to have a better memory than God. :D

Well, the shuffle is just a stupid idea, 'nuff said ...i can't believe you actually bought a ipod mini, that's funny...

The mini is underpowered, over priced still, and not nearly as cheap as a equally as fast PC...you'll end up paying another 100-150 on all the parts "you get to pick"  :rolleyes:  :blink:

585350147[/snapback]

I'd love to see the equally good computer. I think you're forgetting about how the mini's small form factor is also a nice selling point, something the PCs outside of building one yourself have never been able to beat without being extremely underpowered Pentiums.

Well, the shuffle is just a stupid idea, 'nuff said ...i can't believe you actually bought a ipod mini, that's funny...

The mini is underpowered, over priced still, and not nearly as cheap as a equally as fast PC...you'll end up paying another 100-150 on all the parts "you get to pick"  :rolleyes:  :blink:

585350147[/snapback]

Yes.

Obviously you'll be proved correct by the total lack of shuffle and mini sales....

Well, the shuffle is just a stupid idea, 'nuff said ...

The mini is underpowered, over priced still, and not nearly as cheap as a equally as fast PC...you'll end up paying another 100-150 on all the parts "you get to pick"  :rolleyes:  :blink:

585350147[/snapback]

It isn't a stupid idea when it is marketed toward people who are active and don't have time to look to see what song it is, espcially if they put it on there in the first place! It makes perfect sense for the target market. Just because you aren't in it doesn't mean it's a stupid idea.

The Mac mini isn't underpowered. I suppose you've never used a Powerbook. Is that underpowered? The mini is only slighty slower but it has the same FSB.

It's new, it's different and it's trendy so the elitist kids consider it cool to hate

585350401[/snapback]

You left out "it's selling very well", but otherwise, I think you hit the nail right on the head.

It isn't a stupid idea when it is marketed toward people who are active and don't have time to look to see what song it is, espcially if they put it on there in the first place!  It makes perfect sense for the target market.  Just because you aren't in it doesn't mean it's a stupid idea.

The Mac mini isn't underpowered.  I suppose you've never used a Powerbook.  Is that underpowered?  The mini is only slighty slower but it has the same FSB.

585350381[/snapback]

in my opinion both the iPod Mini and the Shuffle are stupid and useless for the price you pay...as someone posted earlier there are equally priced (or cheaper) alternatives that have a screen ...as for the iPod Mini, it's basically the price of a "real" iPod ...it's jsut a massive waste of money

As for the mac mini ...underpowered, yes. Have I used a Powerbook? Yes, was I impressed, no, not really.

JagedEdge,

http://www.cappuccinopc.com/

http://www.logisysus.com/

:ninja: :cool:

unspec,

Yeah...I am glad they are holding down there 5% market share :whistle: :rolleyes:

The iPod Mini/Shuffle are perfect examples of how stupid the western world has become. If you are willing to buy a 4GB

MP3 player for around $400 (Canadian), then you are fu*king idiot. iPod Shuffle fans are such hypocrites, trying to argue with everyone who is against their 'amazing' music product no matter what they say. First of all, do you have an iPod Shuffle? Do you use it while you run and exercise? I am guessing that most of the fu*king computer-addicts on here do not 'work out' or run regularly at all. You are spending so much time on your PC that you simply do not care to do those healthy activities. Secondly, doesn't it sound a little strange to have an MP3 Player for solely exercise use? What if you would like to buy an affordable MP3 Player for all-around use? Anyways, I won't type too much and just end this post with a good analogy...

An iPod Shuffle is like a Presidential voting ballot without any names on the card, just circles to fill.

I can see it now... Someone's presidential slogan: "Life is random. Meet the President you didn't know you voted for!"

http://www.cappuccinopc.com/

http://www.logisysus.com/

:ninja:?:cool::

585351090[/snapback]

I just looked at both of the sites, and the P4 based systems they sell (they appear to both sell the same systems, just rebadged)[bstart>[/b]> at $469 without drives, processors, or memory (no mouse, keyboard, or monitor either). They are a similar form factor though, but far from being a better deal than a Mac mini.

This thread is notihng but ignorant, rabid windows fanboys trying to come up with reasons to hate Apple now that they're taken over a market and destroyed the price point argument. So now they whine about power, failing to not that a Mac Mini obliterates any PC for an equal price.

I wouldn't buy the iPod Shuffle for myself (the cost per gigabyte is too high), but I'm getting it for my sister to replace her 128MB Samsung Yepp player that I bought for her. It cost over $200CDN when I purchased it less than a year ago.

Compared to that MP3 player, the Shuffle is amazing.

- more capacity

- lower cost, show me one decent 512MB flash player for $128CDN

- integrates with iTunes (so syncing is much easier for her)

- better battery life

- no more annoying menu interface and controls

The funny thing is, that Samsung Yepp player is in repairs at this very moment because the LCD died--how ironic is that.

Edited by tariq
I wouldn't buy the iPod Shuffle for myself (the cost per gigabyte is too high), but I'm getting it for my sister to replace her 128MB Samsung Yepp player that I bought for her. It cost over $200CDN when I purchased it less than a year ago.

Compared to that MP3 player, the Shuffle is amazing.

- more capacity

- lower cost, show me one decent 512MB flash player for $128CDN

- integrates with iTunes (so syncing is much easier for her)

- better battery life

- no more annoying menu interface and controls

The funny thing is, that Samsung Yepp player is in repairs at this very moment because the LCD died--how ironic is that.

585351666[/snapback]

hahaha the irony is that your going to the trouble of repairing the LCD when you want to buy a player that doesnt have one anyway. I hope you're not paying too much for the repair...

I dont know if newegg ships to canada but here are equivalent mp3 players if not better than the shuffle:

http://www.newegg.com/app/viewproductdesc....603-502&DEPA=10

http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc....-102-134&depa=0

Yeah...I am glad they are holding down there 5% market share  :whistle:  :rolleyes:

585351090[/snapback]

I think you're totally missing the point.

The market decides whether it's overpriced or not. So, if they sell well (and this is the important bit) in the market they were designed for then they are by definition not overpriced or underpowered.

Apple isn't out to get the biggest market share, they are out to make money. If they can get extra market share in the PC market at the same time, that's great. However you shouldn't confuse the two goals.

Just because a product does not have the features/price you want, does not mean that it is not a good product.

hahaha the irony is that your going to the trouble of repairing the LCD when you want to buy a player that doesnt have one anyway. I hope you're not paying too much for the repair...

I dont know if newegg ships to canada but here are equivalent mp3 players if not better than the shuffle:

http://www.newegg.com/app/viewproductdesc....603-502&DEPA=10

http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc....-102-134&depa=0

It's being repaired on warranty and I'm going to try to sell it thereafter. The point I was trying to make is that a screen really isn't needed and a player without a screen means one less thing a careless sister can break.

Call me a brand ######, but I'd never buy that Buslink MP3 player or anything like that for something I or someone would have to use everyday (the interface probably blows and I wouldn't be surprised if it has other flaws). Not that I love paying more, a no-name budget DVD player for a second room is fine for example.

I've considered that Creative player, but it's not as cheap and comes with features that aren't needed (FM tuner and recorder).

And - how competitive would Apple be when they did release just another 128 MB MP3 player (to add to the zillion out there) with radio, and whatever they add these days, and sell it for the same price? (I wouldn't buy it personally)

585347534[/snapback]

"Think Different" for the sake of being different then? ;)

If apple sold a car without a trunk around a "free of baggage" theme, I'm sure you guys would be convinced that it was the greatest thing - less weight, simpler, and *gasp* different than any other car out there. Enough. This is pointless, go ahead and get yourselves a 1 gig shuffle and listen to hours of every song but the one you actually want to at the moment because you simply cant find it. :rolleyes:

You know, I was actually waiting on you to run out fo ways to half-way legitimately bash Apple products and go after the owners. Simple fact is, if you don't have sense enough to use the fast-forward button to go through AT MOST 239 songs in less than five minutes, or make a playlist with the song you want so much at the top, then I can see how not having your hand held through everything and not having to think could put you off a product.

You know, I was actually waiting on you to run out fo ways to half-way legitimately bash Apple products and go after the owners.? Simple fact is, if you don't have sense enough to use the fast-forward button to go through AT MOST 239 songs in less than five minutes, or make a playlist with the song you want so much at the top, then I can see how not having your hand held through everything and not having to think could put you off a product.

585352561[/snapback]

5 minutes to sample 239 songs? I dont think so. Try 239 songs x 5 secs to listen to each song (thats right because you CANT SEE IT) /60 secs = 20 mins. At the most 20 mins to find the song you're looking for. TOP??? there is no top, how do you know where the top is? YOU CANT SEE A PLAYLIST TO NAVIGATE TO THE TOP. You are at random hip hop song 1, then you are at random techno song 205, then you are at random easy listening song 142....of course these song numbers are meaningless since you really have no clue what number you are at, at any time (not that it would matter even if you did, because itunes loaded them all for you).

The pathetic excuses for apple arent working. You're going to have to keep waiting for me to run out of these legitimate ways.

Edited by leedogg

You aren't suppose to navigate through playlists! It has the functionality to Shuffle. Done. That's it. If people aren't happy with this then they can choose one out of the zillions out there that all have screens, that all have the same price point.

How many iPod Flash players would Apple sell if they made a version with a screen, basically like the zillions out there and sell it for the same price along with the other players. The fact is, a small screen with 2 or 3 lines to displays is never going to be intuitive.

People don't need screens on these small players. Its not suppose to have all you music on it - only a playlist you made, OR, shuffle. Apple is giving what MOST people want and nothing they don't want. Its cost effective for the company and the customers. They already make a full blown MP3 player - iPod, the mini, and the photo.

It's new, it's different and it's trendy so the elitist kids consider it cool to hate

585350401[/snapback]

Sad, but true. I can understand why some people might want other MP3 players, which is perfectly fine, but there are some of them deliberately put down the iPod to justify that what they bought was better.

"Think Different" for the sake of being different then? ;)

585352221[/snapback]

If you want to put it that way. And wasn't a good move for the customers and themselves? Well the numbers will confirm that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I forgot to add on my comment that when robots will take physical jobs, it's when they become more cheaper to manufacture and sell. That will be the starting point of the end to lanscaping, trash pickup, factory jobs, etc.
    • How many people can actually use a 2.5gig ethernet port? Most people do not have more than a 1gig internet connection, heck most have less than that. Most people at home do not have a switch that has multiple 2.5gig ports either.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!