why are people hating the shuffle and mini?


Recommended Posts

I'm tired of arguing with you guys, if somebody is dumb enough to buy a shuffle, then they deserve what they get.  Dont bitch and whine about it later though.

585353190[/snapback]

They won't bitch and whine about it later, they will gloat about how much better it is and how it has changed their lives listening to music on random... :rolleyes:

Someone want to explain this?

m_shufflesandisk.jpg

http://davesipaq.com/articles/iPOD_Shuffle...disk_MP3/3.html

585353412[/snapback]

:yes:

So am I getting this right?? No one is against the Mac Mini?

come on... there's gotta be a con...(reasonable arguements...not the "it's overrated" crap... tell me why) :ninja:

585353438[/snapback]

why would anyone have anything against the macmini? its small and cheap, u cant expect too much, its only 499.... looks awesome too

So am I getting this right?? No one is against the Mac Mini?

come on... there's gotta be a con...(reasonable arguements...not the "it's overrated" crap... tell me why) :ninja:

585353438[/snapback]

I was just now at the Apple store here in Des Moines and the Mac Mini is bad ass, I was messing around with it for about 5min and performance wise its great not to mention the great look of it.

just wondering why alot of people are complaining about the ipod shuffle and mac mini

ipod shuffle: finally, a USB mp3 player, if i had known that this was coming i wouldve bought it instead of my ipod mini

mac mini: cheapest mac ever, good solid power, u get to pick your own stuff (keyboard, screen, mouse, and speakers)

WAHTS WRONG WITH PEOPLE

585298081[/snapback]

First the IPod Shuffle is a terrbile eal, it's ugly, has low capacity, no screen and some of it's competitos beat it on features at a far lower price, it's an attempt to shaft dumb costumers with the IPod name

As for the Mini... well for starters it's a Mac, then there's teh fact that you get a grossly underpowered device for a hefty (for what you get) price tag, then you have to add everything else at your own expense.

So both are abysmal products which are also terrible deals based purely on marketing

BTW this thread is a flamefest, but I stand by what i just posted simply because i know it's true

As for the Mini... well for starters it's a Mac, then there's teh fact that you get a grossly underpowered device for a hefty (for what you get) price tag, then you have to add everything else at your own expense.

585353491[/snapback]

I'd hardly say it's "grossly underpowered" for the price when you compare it to other computers available in this form factor. Look back at page 9 of this thread. Someone posted a link to the Cappuccino computers, which are the closest thing in form factor to the Mac mini that I've seen. If you look at their web site, at first glance it appears that the systems start at about $419 or $469, depending on the model. But look closer, that price is JUST for the case and motherboard (and a driver CD, no operating system). No drives, no CPU, and no RAM. Like the Mac mini, they also don't include a monitor, keyboard, or mouse, but they are certainly no bargain.

As for the Mini... well for starters it's a Mac, then there's teh fact that you get a grossly underpowered device for a hefty (for what you get) price tag, then you have to add everything else at your own expense.

585353491[/snapback]

grossly underpowered? it seems to be faster than the pc in your sig :whistle: :whistle:

and actually its not underpowered at all thats what makes it so good

Yeesh. I don't get people comparing it to stuff that costs less.... of course they fail to mention that it's 40 TIMES LARGER

585353585[/snapback]

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :ninja:

Someone want to explain this?

m_shufflesandisk.jpg

http://davesipaq.com/articles/iPOD_Shuffle...disk_MP3/3.html

585353412[/snapback]

Someone care to mention that that player is larger than the shuffle? Or that the only reason it's "cheaper" is because you can get it from vendors that put it on sale? No, I guess you forgot those points.

Oh, and the Mac mini is an extremely powerful machine for the money. Those Cappuccino machines are underpowered for the price and are nowhere near the elegance of the Mac mini. Nice try though. ;)

grossly underpowered? it seems to be faster than the pc in your sig  :whistle:  :whistle:

and actually its not underpowered at all thats what makes it so good

:laugh:  :laugh:  :laugh:  :laugh:  :ninja:

585358926[/snapback]

You know, I didn't even pay attention to his sig till you pointed that out. That makes his comment all the more hilarious.

:laugh:

Oh, and the Mac mini is an extremely powerful machine for the money. Those Cappuccino machines are underpowered for the price and are nowhere near the elegance of the Mac mini. Nice try though. ;)

585359305[/snapback]

Check out my comments on the Cappuccino computers. For nearly the same price as a baseline mini, you only get the case and motherboard for the Cappuccino (no drives, no CPU, and no RAM). The fastest processor you can put in one is a P4 2.8Ghz (which I guess would be slightly faster than the Mac mini, but at what cost?). And people are saying the mini is a ripoff??????

Someone care to mention that that player is larger than the shuffle? Or that the only reason it's "cheaper" is because you can get it from vendors that put it on sale? No, I guess you forgot those points.

585359305[/snapback]

Sandisk:

2.96 x 1.28 x .82

1.0 ounce w/o battery

1.4 ounces w/ battery

15 hours

Shuffle:

3.3 x 0.98 x 0.33

.78 ounces

12 hours

The sandisk is shorter, but fatter. Roughly .6 ounces heavier....imo .6 worthy ounces of additional features...especially considering the battery life is longer even with the indigo lcd...

Does anybody else think that as thin as the shuffle is, it seems like it would snap if sat on?

Do I care why its cheaper? not at all.

Edited by leedogg
grossly underpowered? it seems to be faster than the pc in your sig  :whistle:  :whistle:

585358926[/snapback]

Its still performs more instruction per clock cycle than your brain, judging by what ive seen from you as a member here since you've joined

Its still performs more instruction per clock cycle than your brain, judging by what ive seen from you as a member here since you've joined

585362140[/snapback]

I dont like deliberately bashing other members, but i agree that i havn't seen a useful post from ph3412t3h13 yet.

I also challenge anyone to fine a post or thread topic that he has created that contains a single capital letter. Im beginning to think his shift and caps lock are broken off :whistle:

I think this just goes to show that not all of Steve Job's table scraps are golden.

585298230[/snapback]

Table scrap ? Nice! I didnt know that mods could troll too. :whistle:

Heh, it's funny you guys are arguing over this. Fact is, Apple got it right. The shuffle is selling like mad. They don't care what the techie minority thinks about the player (meaning Leedogg and other haters). They care about what the average public thinks.

585349546[/snapback]

lol, True. Some people falsely assume that majority of Neowinian opinions = final word of the public. If that was the case, we'd have had a different president by now. :D

First of all, do you have an iPod Shuffle? Do you use it while you run and exercise? I am guessing that most of the fu*king computer-addicts on here do not 'work out' or run regularly at all. You are spending so much time on your PC that you simply do not care to do those healthy activities.

585351271[/snapback]

Another example of a self-centered person? If you sit all day infront of the computer doesnt mean we do the same. Try to go out more from now on ;)

Someone want to explain this?

m_shufflesandisk.jpg

http://davesipaq.com/articles/iPOD_Shuffle...disk_MP3/3.html

585353412[/snapback]

I already posted that along with the fact that the Sandisk MP3 player died on me in a span of a month. The toggle switch has a tendency to come off lose.

I dont like deliberately bashing other members, but i agree that i havn't seen a useful post from ph3412t3h13 yet.

I also challenge anyone to fine a post or thread topic that he has created that contains a single capital letter. Im beginning to think his shift and caps lock are broken off  :whistle:

585362517[/snapback]

so let me get this straight

u geeks come over her on my topics just to say it is a pointless topic?

take a look at all the other topics that other people make!! are my topics really all that bad in comparison???

for gods sake get a life u tards

yep

thats what they said about my topic "god?: in the poll section...

lets just see how many pages that has shall we....

585364166[/snapback]

So the more pages the thread has the smarter you look like to all the members on neowin, uh i dont think so.

So the more pages the thread has the smarter you look like to all the members on neowin, uh i dont think so.

585364173[/snapback]

sigh...

another one

let me ask you something ripgut and to all the poeple out there who bitch at me:

why

do

you

give

a

****?

you complain about me wasting space and making pointless topics when u take out your own time just to bitch at me!

perhaps it is not i who is the loser here...

now what i expect people to comment on taht as well i guess

the internet is a place where u can do and say almost anything

this is basically my impression of u guys who bitch at me:

someone posts a topic enitiled: New mac released OMG!!!!!

and then u say: whoa... tone down the caps loser, another pointless topic, ur wasting 1 inch of my 40 inch screen, do u realize that my life revolves around this forum and that u are basically wasting my life?, haha! now i get a chance to bitch pointlessly again! what fun!

*sigh*...another one.

let me ask you something ripgut and to all the poeple out there who bitch at me: why do you give a ****?

you complain about me wasting space and making pointless topics when u take out your own time just to bitch at me!

perhaps it is not i who is the loser here...now what i expect people to comment on taht as well i guess the internet is a place where u can do and say almost anything

this is basically my impression of u guys who bitch at me: someone posts a topic enitiled: New mac released OMG!!!!!

And then u say: whoa... tone down the caps loser, another pointless topic, ur wasting 1 inch of my 40 inch screen, do u realize that my life revolves around this forum and that u are basically wasting my life?, haha! now i get a chance to bitch pointlessly again! what fun!

585364268[/snapback]

There, all fixed for ya :)

So, ph3412t3h13 makes a perfectly valid comment in his own, quite useful thead, and ripgut decides it would be "cool" be a jackass and peddle his idiocy in the same thread? Oh, and quote flames are so lame it actually makes me pity you.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!