MVC's, the ones we missed


Recommended Posts

Oh please no with those rating formats. I've even had thread ratings disabled on my own forums.

These things are so easily abused, it's not even funny. I can just get a group of friends and uber downvote someone if I don't like them or something. :no:

Your analogy is flawed.

MVCs do not have authority over other members. We may have much expertise in some areas, but not necessarily more than non MVC members. Unlike managers who usually do have more expertise and experience than the simple worker (in their line of work, not necessarily elsewhere). We haven't been labelled as "gurus".

MVCs do not make decisions regarding other members and have no more influence than a non MVC, unlike a manager who could perhaps sack someone. The only exception to that is that we can put forward suggestions for new MVCs - which the staff will discuss and decide on separately without justifying their decisions to us (to protect privacy) - we're not going to be arguing with staff about it so our influence there is still limited.

New people register everyday, new people who could be experts in their field. Can MVCs be dished out every week? No.

Stop using terms like "the lower masses". It is not helpful, it is wrong. Non MVC members are not below those with MVCs. If you will insist on talking about the "lower masses" the MVCs will be in that group.

I've never taken a mod or admin's view as gospel over someone else's unless it actually looked like they really knew what they were talking about compared to the other person, and usually with sources/evidence. I don't recall seeing anyone else doing this either.

If someone wants to listen to an MVC over a non MVC, purely because they have a shiny badge, then they will fail at life for being too trusting and naive. Mo one can know everything and everyone gets things wrong.

No matter how many time people say it isnt, it will still be viewed in that way. My anaolgy is not flawed. I realise that the MVC was not created for that purpose, however many members will view it this way, especially any newbies that come along.

I suppose time will either prove me right or wrong.

Wow. It?s interesting how much of an issue this MVC is in some people?s eyes. And there is no way of winning. Personally, I won?t take what any MVC says over a ?regular? member, it?s just how it goes. If some people want to, that?s their problem. The only thing I still stand by is people will assume that the MVC?s were chosen for either just posting allot of news/tech solutions/software downloads etc and try to beat it, or they will assume that these people are arselickers and follow suit. Again, that?s their problem and their loss.

Personally I say well done to the people who got the badge but there is no doubt that not even Tesco?s can cope with the sales of sour grapes over this. Me? I?m not bitter, I think it?s a good idea because it will keep the smart people in line and give them something to reach for perhaps. The not so smart ones will assume what I mentioned above, and therefore will be the overall losers.

[T]here is no doubt that not even Tesco?s can cope with the sales of sour grapes over this.

It's amusing to see people keep saying "It's not because I'm bitter" etc. when they complain but I think for a lot of people complaining (bunoti> all) this is exactly the reason.

:rofl:

It's amusing to see people keep saying "It's not because I'm bitter" etc. when they complain but I think for a lot of people complaining (but not all) this is exactly the reason.

I've mainly stayed quiet and have only observe the comments given on this thread but I think it was about time I had my say in this. All things considered, I can understand why there are doubts and complaints on the introduction of this new group. Some of it is genuine while others is I feel a plea to be heard, though if you feel otherwise, I apologise. I will try to address all the main points which I hope you can understand and evaluate in a professional manner.

The first point is that there is a general consensus on the valuable contribution of some of those who were chosen, or lack there of. I can understand this as some on this board may have had a different experience with those they feel are undeserving of this, or they may feel they are much more qualified than the ones chosen. Considering it is human nature to feel emotions such as envy, you can hardly complain about their objections. That said, I believe it is wrong to demean them when they have received this award for their contributions in the years since Neowin was established, some of vouch by a number of people. Sure, in your eyes, you may feel that they have done what is considered wrong but then again, doesn't that mean that, as fellow human beings, shouldn't we look past what they have done before and outweigh the positives against the negatives? Shouldn't we give them the benefit of the doubt and see if they can live up to the badge that they have just been given? Because it is just a badge - nothing more, nothing less.

We have all done something wrong in our lives, including yours truly. There is no such thing as a perfect human being, though you can strive to do everything in life with as much perfection as possible. The word for this in Islam is called Jihad, which has now been skewed by others as something associated with warfare and terrorism, but it is far from that. Jihad is, in a certain manner, a quest - a quest to do everything in life - religion or otherwise - and see it as a challenge, to give 110% in everything that you do, how small the matter it may be. Sure, sometimes we do something that is wrong and we're reprimanded for that. But for the most part, we're given another chance to prove ourselves. Shouldn't the same be given to these same individuals? Why not let them see out their term (as it is a term and it's not permanent) and see how this might affect them. Maybe they will see that since they are now under the spotlight, they might strive to better themselves in the way they contribute and the way that they post. I do not know, as I'm only human. However, they should be given a time frame to prove themselves. Who knows, you could be surprised. However, if you feel that no such improvement is forthcoming, then bring up the matter with the mods and I'm sure they will listen to you, as it would be now within reason.

The other point is the fact that now a group such as this exist, comments made by regular members would be ignored. I don't know about you but I find this amusing :laugh: ! It doesn't mean a person who is made a senator will the voice of a regular citizen be ignored. Sure, in some cases you can trust their words but for the most part, it is taken with a pinch of salt :laugh: ! I'm sure that to ensure a Senator's topic of discussion is genuine, he has references to those who have the problem which he wishes to discuss, which for the most part are regular people. It is the same with the MVC group in what they say carry more weight though it is nothing without the contribution of other members, most of it who are just regular. They have an advantage in that because they have a different colour than regular members, threads that they post in are much easier to notice. This I feel is good because it will then encourage other members to see what the topic is all about, and see if they can make a contribution. One cannot exist without the other so to speak, and the creation of the MVC group is just a small part in that cycle.

You can also look at this in another manner in that you can compare the MVC's to major computer outlets (shows you how much of a geek I am :laugh: ) in that sometimes the advice given by the staff is like a yo-yo - inconsistent and sometimes wrong - though for the most part, they do give sound advice. Those who own a small retail outlet do not have the reputation that their major counterparts have but some, if not most of them can give advice worth their weight in gold, though there is usually a catch somewhere. In this case, the consumer will have the most to lose if they depend on only one side in searching for their right product. However, if the consumer has the intelligence and foresight to visit both of these shops and evaluate both of their advice, they might be able to get not only the right product, but maybe even a better product based on the advice given by both sides. This as a whole, leads to better satisfaction on the part of the consumer itself. So for those who say they would not depend on the words given by the MVC's, you may be losing out on sound advice. The same also goes for members who take the word of MVC's for granted. If you do so, then that means in life you are easily taken in by others simply because they dress/look/work/drive/etc. better.

At the end of the day, you should not take anything away from the fact these people who have been recognised for their contributions. So let's give them the respect they deserve and drop this matter for another day, when it might be relevant.

Scirwode

Since it's hip to post negative criticism, here's mine: You'd have to be insane to accept MVC status, unless you like people sucking up to you. A fair portion on these forums feels the need to worship posters whose name are in a different color (except orange). Everything said is going to be treated as gospel. I'd rather have people accept my insults and opinions because of merit and not because of a colored nickname (then again, I don't care about my merit either).

Actually, I wish I could disable nickname coloring.

But anyway, don't let me stop you.

Since it's hip to post negative criticism, here's mine: You'd have to be insane to accept MVC status, unless you like people sucking up to you.

I don't like people sucking up to me, and I'm certainly not insane. The problem with your argument is this: we've already built our own merit and people have listened to us as intelligent people long before we got the MVC badge. We're simply being recognized for it.

I sure as hell don't recognize most of you folks.

--edit: Which goes hand in hand with what I've said before. You don't know how many people actually listened to you. It was enough to get you that MVC badge, but might as well have been a tiny but vocal fraction. The new tag however guaranteed a boat load of suck ups.

Yeah, but you are hardly a common face around all the sections of Neowin.

I read a lot of sections. I just don't post because a lot of threads make me want to beat some people with a bag of hammers. Since I ran out of email addresses to bridge the bans, I showed some ability to learn and simply don't post.

Anyway, the point stands. Color nicknames cause gravitational pulls as soon they start posting in threads. To be witnessed especially in forums that are more banter than tech.

Since it's hip to post negative criticism, here's mine: You'd have to be insane to accept MVC status, unless you like people sucking up to you. A fair portion on these forums feels the need to worship posters whose name are in a different color (except orange).

I think you've countered your point Tom. As you said, subscribers are treated no differently even though they have a badge and a colored name, how can you be sure that we will be? Staff are treated with a certain respect because they have power. We have no power. We are a lot more like subscribers than staff.

In fact, I'd say it's been sort of the opposite of worship in many cases (like, for example....in this thread). MVC's are now in the spotlight (perhaps a better term would be crosshairs), our words will likely be scrutinized and questioned by most forum goers. At least, that's what I would expect... That's what I would do.

Edited by Bant

OMG *yawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwn*

12 pages of boring bickering from members who can't accept that the MVC group was created for only a select few members who have obviously contributed to a lot of peoples problems and queries...

You say the members themselves haven't picked the MVCs??? Well, I have news for you: The staff are also members!! :o *SHOCK HORROR!* Yes they are in fact and IMO they are the members who will know more about who deserves the MVC badge because they patrol all forums regularly. They are bound to see the people who contribute the highest standard and they are also bound to see which members are more satisfied with the help they recieve.

At the end of the day, the people in charge have picked these MVCs in order to HELP you people who are complaining. Having MVCs will help us because it will allow us to know who has helped other members the most. It doesn't mean we will not listen to other members or take only MVCs' help as gospel.

Please just get over your jealousy and enjoy your time here!

Let's keep this thread at 12 pages shall we? Because IMO it's getting repetitive and various staff and MVCs have had to repeat themselves over and over again...pointlessly!

Thank you and good night!

Looks like someone is working on a earning a new badge of his own. :whistle:

Yeah, let's pull an Orwell and kill negative criticism at its core. I didn't even start unpacking any insults.

Not trying to suck up or anything - Tom, I think you deserve an MVC award.

No thanks. Actually, the universe would implode if I'd get awarded with something positive here.

I think you've countered your point Tom. As you said, subscribers are treated no differently even though they have a badge and a colored name, how can you be sure that we will be? Staff are treated with a certain respect because they have power. We have no power. We are a lot more like subscribers than staff.

People know that Orange badges pay for their "priviledge". This is different.

In fact, I'd say it's been sort of the opposite of worship in many cases (like, for example....in this thread). MVC's are now in the spotlight (perhaps a better term would be crosshairs), our words will likely be scrutinized and questioned by most forum goers. At least, that's what I would expect... That's what I would do.

They're being questioned and attacked here because this is the only chance to do so. Try it in a random thread where one shows up and enjoy your warning or posting restriction.

You say the members themselves haven't picked the MVCs??? Well, I have news for you: The staff are also members!! :o *SHOCK HORROR!*

I'm going to draw a red laser dot on my forehead by saying this, but the staff aren't members anymore. Not in the sense of being representative of the member base. They've their own secret section where things are being discussed and made fun of. Circlejerking in forums results in a different view of things. That happens on any forum that has special sections with different "forum culture" and elitism. Just like I think the subscriber only sections aren't exactly a good thing.

If I had a say in this, each forum would have run a nomination thread for a certain time, with an unsaid rule that any exaggerated prose automatically disqualifies a nomination. But alas...

Edited by Tom Servo

I think it's clear not everyone can be pleased, no matter what. I understand some of your points Tom but others seem just taken out of the wild, for example the subscriber only forum. Those people pay an extra, not obligatory, so Neowin gives them something extra back. I don't even the think that extra forum really makes us, non-subscribers, miss out on something.

I think it's clear not everyone can be pleased, no matter what. I understand some of your points Tom but others seem just taken out of the wild, for example the subscriber only forum. Those people pay an extra, not obligatory, so Neowin gives them something extra back. I don't even the think that extra forum really makes us, non-subscribers, miss out on something.

how do you know! we could be missing out on a lot lol

re: mvc's, my opinion is meh, i came to forum to ask questions when needed and help where i can, not to earn some green badge differentiating me from the rest of the forum but that's just me :)

re: mvc's, my opinion is meh, i came to forum to ask questions when needed and help where i can, not to earn some green badge differentiating me from the rest of the forum but that's just me :)

That's the point everyone seems to be overlooking. Up until now all of us (the MVC's) were here for the exact same reason, and still are...to be a part of the forum and help others whenever we could. There were no badges and we didn't know that we would get one. It just happened. We never helped people just to get a badge, because one never existed anyways, but it's nice to be recognized for it. You people are going way overboard with this.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      455
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!