Recommended Posts

I am unsure about it but it does make sense :/ I just don't see why Apple would do this does seem out of type for them. Although they do permit Windows on a Mac, so perhaps it has to go both ways around :)

Except you know, providing drivers for the masses of hardware out there.

Isn't it clear? They're unifying the OS X name because it will all be abstract now between Macs and their touch devices. Cocoa touch is coming to desktop macs. (a tablet, if you may)

Except you know, providing drivers for the masses of hardware out there.

Isn't it clear? They're unifying the OS X name because it will all be abstract now between Macs and their touch devices. Cocoa touch is coming to desktop macs. (a tablet, if you may)

I thought about this and came up with a solution.

Apple will only support OS X on specific hardware (similar to what they do now, but from other OEMs such as Dell, HP, etc.). It really solves that problem.

BTW, I agree that this is highly unlikely. Most posts are more wishful thinking :p

I thought about this and came up with a solution.

Apple will only support OS X on specific hardware (similar to what they do now, but from other OEMs such as Dell, HP, etc.). It really solves that problem.

BTW, I agree that this is highly unlikely. Most posts are more wishful thinking :p

Does make the most sense though :p they'd be able to support the drvers more easily :p

I really don't see that happening at all.

I don't know what your opinion on them moving to the x86 platform was, but I remember reading those same types of posts even a day before the announcement :p

I think it is possible, but again, I doubt it too. Just playing devil's advocate here ;)

Mac OS price increase by three-fold? You nuts? lol

Only sales figure I have is that they sold 2.3 million macs in the first quarter of the year. (mostly Macbooks and iMacs likely, followed by Macbook Pro and Mac Pros). They also sold 2 million Leopard copies the first two weeks of release. (at $129)

Actually $129 is upgrade price so $299 for full version isn't that bad?

I don't see Apple doing it though, doesn't make sense :/

IMO Apple will not be taking the risk of releasing OSX in the wild. They have too much at stake. Rather, a slow progression to product diversification and market penetration will be their way to innovate and grow.

IMO Apple will not be taking the risk of releasing OSX in the wild. They have too much at stake. Rather, a slow progression to product diversification and market penetration will be their way to innovate and grow.

I agree, plus Apple does have something like $15 billion in cash. So they certainly aren't hurting.

Are you calling my case a beige box? :whistle:

My next build will be more smexy than a Mac Pro and I'd love to have OS X on it.

If you've ever taken a look at the build quality of a Mac Pro (or even the Powermac before it) you'd know it'd have to be a pretty decent PC case to get anywhere near it. It really is a solid, beautifully built piece of kit. I inherited a Powermac G5 at work (for free!) off someone in another team and I was stunned at how sturdy and how special it was.. really really nice.

[Yoda]Silver paint and plastic, a Mac it does not make...[/Yoda]

Yoda Sarcasm aside, I'm sure you realise that the case pictured is an Antec P182, and only uses plastic between layers of aluminium for noise dampening...

It's a very nice case, maybe not quite as nice as the Mac Pro case (but damn close if you ask me), but we have to remember it is made to fit a far more wide ranging set of components.

Yoda Sarcasm aside, I'm sure you realise that the case pictured is an Antec P182, and only uses plastic between layers of aluminium for noise dampening...

It's a very nice case, maybe not quite as nice as the Mac Pro case (but damn close if you ask me), but we have to remember it is made to fit a far more wide ranging set of components.

Yes, humor and sarcasm aside it is a decent case, however I've yet to ever (honestly) see a case on par with the Mac Pro case. It is the most stable and well designed case I've ever seen in my years of computing. As far as PC's go, the Antec case is a wonderful piece of hardware for what it is. :)

Yes, humor and sarcasm aside it is a decent case, however I've yet to ever (honestly) see a case on par with the Mac Pro case. It is the most stable and well designed case I've ever seen in my years of computing. As far as PC's go, the Antec case is a wonderful piece of hardware for what it is. :)

Yes, but if you know exactly what is going to go inside a case you can design it precisely around those components. That's the Apple advantage, the Mac Pro isn't a better design on a level playing field, I would argue that given the constraints, the Antec design team would win in having the best design for a 'generic' case (something that Apple has never done)... again, in my opinion.

If they do add multi touch in mac osx i wonder what the reaction would be. I bet they would show some intresting demos, compared to microsofts lame one

I can see apple getting this first and it actully sucucding

Technically multi touch is already present in their MacBook Airs and Pros. IMO it sucks, but it's a natural progression from the 2-finger scroll/click.

Yoda Sarcasm aside, I'm sure you realise that the case pictured is an Antec P182, and only uses plastic between layers of aluminium for noise dampening...

It's a very nice case, maybe not quite as nice as the Mac Pro case (but damn close if you ask me), but we have to remember it is made to fit a far more wide ranging set of components.

Yoda would laugh @ Cara for such a trademark comment :laugh:

Apple is not large enough as a software company to release OS X on PC's. Just think about the problems Microsoft had with drivers on Vista. Microsoft is a much bigger company, and trying to get as many devices as possible to just work has proven to be very difficult for them with each release of an operating system.

If anything, Apple's entry into Intel has been giving them a lot of headaches with hardware compatibility. When Leopard first came out, there were various users with various Mac models that were having some wacky driver-related issues. Their resources are being stretched thin between the PowerPC hardware, and all the variations in Intel macs. That is why I do not think Apple would dare release a PC version of their OS.

On another note, didn't Apple announce at WWDC 2006 that Leopard was going to be the last PowerPC release? For some reason, I keep thinking that they already announced that.

Even I run low on material this time of year! ;)

Seriously though, WWDC promises to be EXTREMELY good this year. :)

Yar it happens to the best of us apparently :laugh:

If you think PC users getting OS X is absurd for us to think about, then that's a fair statement but just to let you know I would most certainly buy a copy if such a thing happened.

But granted there's a whole lot of love @ WWDC indeed :yes:

Do you really think Apple will go in the hassle of writing like 10 billion drivers just to get this thing half working on a PC, when their Mac sales are already increasing more than anyone else's?

In 10.6 (if they will talk about it), a thing I'd like is the implementation of something like better support for games. They don't have DirectX, people don't really like to code in OpenGL, etc. etc. and Apple doesn't care right now about video games at all, when it is a great industry and a turning point when deciding if you want a Mac or a PC.

If they ever realize that and work hard in 10.6 to support video games correctly, mabe companies will be able to do a Mac version and people will finally stop pointing out that Macs are not for video games. Of course not!!! There's no support from Apple! It's pretty much the only thing Windows users can report to me and all I can say is "errr.... yeah you're right... ******"

We have to say that they were happy to have Sega and a couple of other companies to develop video games on OS X iPhone. They could only be happier to have more developers on the Mac.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!