Identifying Yourself As A Lesbian Gets You Banned On XBOX Live


Recommended Posts

I hope you enjoy your ban :woot:

I have full confidence that I will not be banned, and if I am I will complain. If that does no good, I don't care since I will never buy another Xbox after the engineering flubs they made with the 360. If they want to "ruin my Kane & Lynch experience" (if that's possible) they're welcome to. :)

I have full confidence that I will not be banned, and if I am I will complain. If that does no good, I don't care since I will never buy another Xbox after the engineering flubs they made with the 360. If they want to "ruin my Kane & Lynch experience" (if that's possible) they're welcome to. :)

XD Yeah really, they don't need to ban you to ruin that experience, it's a pretty awful game itself.

It may not be illegal or offensive to you, but it clearly violates the XBL TOS which you willingly agree to adhere to when you register an account.

It's a shame, but rules are rules whether you agree with them or not.

You're missing my point. It may be against the TOS, but the TOS are discriminatory, just like the "back of the bus" rule and the "no coloreds at this water fountain" rule.

The problem is with this line from the TOS:

Create a Gamertag , avatar or use text in other profile fields that may offend other members.

Different people are offended by different things. If there's an XBOX gamer who's completely homophobic then someone having the word 'gay' in their name might be offensive to them. But 'gay' also has a definition that has absolutely nothing to do with sexual orientation. So, who's right? Who gets to determine whether or not that's offensive?

It seems that Microsoft isn't being the judge on grey areas like that, they leave it up to the members. If enough people complain, they consider it an offense. If you get enough ignorant people together, all kinds of things could be offensive. Not just words related to sexual orientation but even having words like 'white' or 'black' might be considered "offensive" by other gamers.

If I were a Microsoft customer and I was told that, due to other gamer's sheer ignorance, I was not permitted to have words or terms like 'straight', 'gay', 'white', 'black', 'Christian' in my Gamertag because they are "offensive" I would return my XBOX for an immediate refund and go to (eep) Linux.

It's pretty sad to see homophobic or racist people win these sorts of battles.

I'm kinda on both sides of this argument... It's wrong that she got banned but it is a "topic or content of a sexual nature" so did break the rules...

They don't seem too concerned about the verbal harassment and swearing on chat and that's against the rules, too.

Why am I suddenly reminded of Life of Brian? "I'm Brian of Nazareth!" "I'm Brian of Nazareth!" "We're all Brian of Nazareth!"

...

"We're all lesbians, Microsoft! Each and every last one of us!"

They don't seem too concerned about the verbal harassment and swearing on chat and that's against the rules, too.

Yeah and they also don't seem to care about the individuals with offensive images on their Halo 3 bungie upload thing either, or the kids playing M rated games, or the idiots who spam chat, sexually harass women players, racial slurs, and so on, witnessed all this myself, I heard horror stories about Xbox Live, unfortunately, all of them were true. lol

You're missing my point. It may be against the TOS, but the TOS are discriminatory, just like the "back of the bus" rule and the "no coloreds at this water fountain" rule.

And you're failing to see my point. Let's just agree to disagree.

Yeah and they also don't seem to care about the individuals with offensive images on their Halo 3 bungie upload thing either, or the kids playing M rated games, or the idiots who spam chat, sexually harass women players, racial slurs, and so on, witnessed all this myself, I heard horror stories about Xbox Live, unfortunately, all of them were true. lol

Exactly. You can be offensive and scream "***" all you want in chat but you can't put it in your profile? That just doesn't wash.

And you're failing to see my point. Let's just agree to disagree.

I see your point. The point in a protest, however, is to break a rule to call attention to the fact that the rule is unjust.

You're missing my point. It may be against the TOS, but the TOS are discriminatory, just like the "back of the bus" rule and the "no coloreds at this water fountain" rule.

There is a difference between a service and real life. When you buy a movie ticket at cinema hall and go in, you can't carry your own soda etc. in because it's their TOS. It's not discrimination.

They don't seem too concerned about the verbal harassment and swearing on chat and that's against the rules, too.

I am sure someone here on Neowin was suspended for something like that?

Yeah and they also don't seem to care about the individuals with offensive images on their Halo 3 bungie upload thing either, or the kids playing M rated games, or the idiots who spam chat, sexually harass women players, racial slurs, and so on, witnessed all this myself, I heard horror stories about Xbox Live, unfortunately, all of them were true. lol

The bungie upload was a hack I think, it was closed.

Kids playing M rated games: Do you want microsoft to police kids instead of parents?

Rest: If enough people complain, they are supposed top act

There is a difference between a service and real life. When you buy a movie ticket at cinema hall and go in, you can't carry your own soda etc. in because it's their TOS. It's not discrimination.

It is discrimination. Soda is not a person or a sexual preference. It's a product.

I am sure someone here on Neowin was suspended for something like that?

There is. Neowin doesn't ban people for saying they're gay, though.

You're missing my point. It may be against the TOS, but the TOS are discriminatory, just like the "back of the bus" rule and the "no coloreds at this water fountain" rule.

No the TOS isn't discriminatory.

for it to be that, only lesbian would be banned for writing their sexual orientation, but everyone gets banned for it, since it's against the TOS.

seriously, use words you actually understand the meaning of.

The problem is not that they are gay. The problem lies with them having to broadcast it to everyone just for the shock value. Not all of them do this but this woman was probably going into game rooms and talking about how cool it is to be gay just to get the reaction. In the end what did she get? XBOX banned and a stupid article with her nasty picture demonstrating just how much she wants to look like some neo punk rock activist man want to be. If you care about this, go back to Washington and bomb some more doctors and blue collar workers in the name of environmentalism -its better to keep these weird-o people all together while the rest of us can enjoy our lives.

Yeah and they also don't seem to care about the individuals with offensive images on their Halo 3 bungie upload thing either, or the kids playing M rated games, or the idiots who spam chat, sexually harass women players, racial slurs, and so on, witnessed all this myself, I heard horror stories about Xbox Live, unfortunately, all of them were true. lol

Oh, boohoo. Can't take the heat? Get a PS3. Nobody has a mic because it works like crap in the games.

No the TOS isn't discriminatory.

for it to be that, only lesbian would be banned for writing their sexual orientation, but everyone gets banned for it, since it's against the TOS.

seriously, use words you actually understand the meaning of.

I know what every word I use means, thanks.

Sexual orientation should be a private matter an not publicly announced. Its one thing if ones sexual orientation can be inferred from ones surroundings unless one surrounds themselves with lewd and obscene materials and behavior. No one should just run around announcing their orientation unless it is part of a consensual private conversation. While I support equal rights for all men and women, I don't believe that flagrant behavior such as public displays of affection should be tolerated any more in one group that it is in another. If no one can say anything about two men or two women making out in public without getting their heads chewed off, the same should hold true for a heterosexual couple. Equal is equal. This idea of superior treatment because of past opression only leads to more problems and true hatred. Again, ALL humans deserve EQUAL treatment

Why do so many gay people feel the need to declare to the world that they are gay anyway? It's really very tedious.

With regards to this matter, it seems clear to anyone whose knees don't jerk at the slightest thing, that this has nothing to do with her being a lesbian. It is, quite obviously, about inappropriate content in an inappropriate medium. There are far more appropriate places and mediums for her to discuss her sexual preferences.

If she didn't have the puerile need to declare to the world "Look at me, I'm a lesbian", then this wouldn't be an issue.

I see your point. The point in a protest, however, is to break a rule to call attention to the fact that the rule is unjust.

It's not unjust. She broke the rules and got banned. Simple as that.

Protest all you like. If you break the rules You'll get banned as well.

You don't see all the straight people shouting that they're straight so why did she have to put that she's a lesbian in her profile?

There are a lot of young kids that play xbox so I can see MSFTs point as to why that is against the TOS.

The problem with people like this is that they have an agenda and they don't think.

Personally I don't care what you are, don't tell me. Your sexual preference is your business, you don't need to tell me or the rest of the world. It's just stupid.

So, by that logic, it'd be OK to ban a black person because of their color or a Jewish person because of their religion? Their sexual orientation is no different.

Is there a law preventing a business from discriminating against sexual orientation?

Last I heard religion, sex (not sexual orientation), and race are protected.

Besides, I consider it in MS's best interest to maintain as much member annonimity as possible. Less, they end up being sued by the lesbian for being harrassed by it's members.

I do not treat anybody as a second class citizen and i always act appropriately in anybodies company. If my friends chose to kiss in front of me then i would merely turn away and try my best not to make it known to them as they are my friends.

I find it offensive, im not sorry for that. I don't hate gays i just dont like knowing.

Somebody is actually gonna get the point soon.........Maybe

Eww. They are not your friends if you would treat them that way. Do they read Neowin? I'm sure they'd be glad to get their "gayness" away from you.

It is discrimination. Soda is not a person or a sexual preference. It's a product.

There is. Neowin doesn't ban people for saying they're gay, though.

Can I call it discrimination if I am forced to buy Coke since that's all the Cinema serves but I only drink Pepsi?

I meant some Neowin member was banned on XBL for shouting etc. I replied to someone else.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Meta announces a major leadership change at WhatsApp by Pradeep Viswanathan Meta has announced a major leadership change at WhatsApp, with Will Cathcart stepping down after seven years of leading the world's largest messaging platform. CRED CEO and founder Kunal Shah will take over as the next global head of WhatsApp. CRED is an Indian fintech company focused on creditworthy consumers. As part of the transition, Meta is also making a minority investment in CRED through its Series H funding round. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said Will Cathcart will remain at Meta and move into a new role focused on building new products from the ground up. Cathcart led WhatsApp during a major growth phase, helping the app reach more than 3 billion users worldwide. He also played a key role in expanding WhatsApp’s business offerings while keeping privacy and end-to-end encryption central to the product. Meta’s Chief Product Officer, Chris Cox, said Kunal Shah was selected after a search for a leader who understands WhatsApp’s global scale and future potential. In a leaked internal memo, Cox described Shah as a “serial founder” and one of India’s most respected entrepreneurs, adding that he brings “entrepreneurial energy” and a strong product mindset to the role. As part of the Series H funding round, CRED is raising ₹8,550 crore, or about $900 million, in a round led by Meta. The funding values CRED at ₹43,239 crore, or about $4.5 billion, on a post-money basis. It is important to note that this investment will not give Meta access to CRED customer information. Kunal posted the following on X regarding his new role at Meta: Although Kunal Shah will be stepping away from his operating role as CRED CEO, he will retain his personal shareholding in the company.
    • It wouldn't be hard for me to turn off my TV, if I had one. For one thing, I never scroll Instagram. The only reason I have an account is because Meta created one when it merged the account systems for its various services.
    • OpenAI's new GPT-5.5-Cyber tops Claude Mythos 5 in vulnerability benchmark by Pradeep Viswanathan OpenAI today announced a major expansion of Daybreak, a cybersecurity initiative designed to help defenders find, validate, and fix software vulnerabilities earlier in the development process. The availability of powerful AI models has definitely changed the cybersecurity landscape by making vulnerability discovery much faster. However, the bigger bottleneck for the industry is now patching those vulnerabilities. Impacted software teams need to validate the discovered issues, understand their impact, develop fixes, test them, and deploy patches. Back in March, OpenAI launched a preview of Codex Security, which uses agentic reasoning with automated validation to discover high-impact issues and actionable fixes specific to the codebase. Since then, it has scanned more than 30 million commits across over 30,000 codebases; more than 70,000 findings were marked as fixed by human reviewers, while over 500,000 findings were automatically determined to be fixed. Now, OpenAI is releasing an updated Codex Security plugin that can run deep scans, review recent code changes, generate security reports, trace attack paths, validate findings, and create codebase-specific patches for human review. It can also triage findings from existing scanners, advisories, bug bounty reports, and ticketing systems. OpenAI says the plugin can export results to vulnerability management systems and integrate with workflows using SARIF files, CodeQL queries, the Codex CLI, and the Codex app. Back in May, OpenAI announced the preview of GPT-5.5-Cyber, a new model built on top of the recently released GPT-5.5, designed for specialized cybersecurity work. Today, OpenAI launched the full version of GPT-5.5-Cyber through a limited release for verified defenders. On CyberGym, GPT-5.5-Cyber scored 85.6%, compared with 81.8% for GPT-5.5 and 83.8% for Claude Mythos 5. It also scored 39.5% on ExploitGym, compared with 25.95% for GPT-5.5, and 69.8% on SEC-bench Pro, compared with 63.1%. OpenAI also announced the new Daybreak Cyber Partner Program, which will allow security vendors and service providers to use GPT-5.5 with Trusted Access for Cyber in their products and services. Accenture, Akamai, Cisco, Cloudflare, CrowdStrike, IBM, Palo Alto Networks, Proofpoint, SentinelOne, Wiz, Zscaler, and others were listed as initial partners for this program. OpenAI is also launching Patch the Planet with Trail of Bits, HackerOne, Calif, researchers, and maintainers. More than 30 open-source projects have committed to participate, including cURL, Go, Python, Sigstore, and pyca/cryptography.
    • AMD confirms 26.6.2 FSR driver breaks on many Windows PCs by Sayan Sen Earlier today AMD released a major graphics driver update as it brings support for FSR 4.1 to Radeon RX 7000 series GPUs. The new update, version 26.6.2, also brings support for Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced and more. And while the driver technically supports Windows 10 version 21H2 and newer, the tech giant has confirmed that there is a major issue with the new driver on non-Windows 11 PCs as it fails to launch properly on such systems. The error message says, "The version of AMD Software that you have launched is not compatible with your currently installed AMD graphics driver." Therefore on the surface it looks like a compatibility problem. AMD has also confirmed that the device manager will display the yellow bang or yellow exclamation sign alongside your GPU under the Display adapters dropdown. Here is what the Radeon team's official advisory recommends to affected users: "Users Running Windows 10 and AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.2 May Encounter Yellow Bang in Device Manager Affecting AMD Radeon RX Series Graphics ... Our Engineers are currently investigating this issue and will provide a fix once it is available. Affected users may revert to AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.1 as a temporary workaround." As such you should revert back to the previous 26.6.1 driver which was released earlier this month. In case you were looking to play Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced and DOOM: The Dark Ages | Revelations you will probably have to wait a while if you want the driver to support those games officially. You can find the support article here on Microsoft's website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      208
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      100
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!