Neowin.net Minecraft Server (Old Server)


Message added by Brandon H,

Come join the new Minecraft server discussion thread :)

 

 

Recommended Posts

Having XRay doesn't make gathering most resources any different. It makes getting stuff like Diamonds easier sure, but you still have to grind to get stone, diorite, granite, sand etc which is what makes up most of any build.

 

At this point however there is no point in continuing this discussion. Despite their being a majority of players who are OK with XRay it has been banned.

Where does it say that Xray itself has been banned?

 

Flying is banned. Mining under other people's space is banned. But: You can still use Xray under your own space or free space on the map, seeing how it's a client mod, therefore a ban cannot be enforced.

Where does it say that Xray itself has been banned?

 

Flying is banned. Mining under other people's space is banned. But: You can still use Xray under your own space or free space on the map, seeing how it's a client mod, therefore a ban cannot be enforced.

 

Mining under other peoples spaces has always been a no-no, and most players didn't do that AFAIK. Although, as I mentioned earlier, without a map it's tricky to be sure you aren't - but that's bye-the-bye.

 

Like I said before, the majority of players that I have discussed this with are OK with the full use of XRay (subject to not strip mining under someones base obv.), yet it has still effectively been banned to all intents and purposes. Maybe my sample is biased, but that is what I see. Let's also not fool ourselves, if there was a way the server could detect or disable XRay (many mods listen for a MOTD message, XRay doesn't) then that would likely have been implemented by now.

 

I would suggest that if a clear majority of active players are OK with the full use of XRay, then we allow the full use of XRay (subject to not mining anothers base, that rule is fine with me).

 

If there are enough players that still want to be on the server, but are that unhappy with XRay, we could set aside a region (maybe the NW quarter from spawn) that is a no-fly zone.

You know, what you're asking for is 'can we play creative on what we wanted to be a survival server?'

 

Most of you voted for survival. Then play survival. No one can prevent you from using the resource finding feature of Xray, but flying? No. 

I really dont care either way

 

I come on to have a laugh and have some fun with the other guys on the server

 

If you steal my stuff i will hunt you down and kick your ass :P lol

 

but when it all comes down to it....ITS A GAME!!!

  • Like 2

You know, what you're asking for is 'can we play creative on what we wanted to be a survival server?'

 

Most of you voted for survival. Then play survival. No one can prevent you from using the resource finding feature of Xray, but flying? No. 

 

I am not asking for Creative. I don't like playing Creative, it gets boring quickly. I have never done any of my big builds using creative on any of the 3 Neowin MC servers (with the exception of the Airport, but that was huge) I have been involved with so far.

 

You say that most of us voted Survival, so we got Survival. Fair enough. However, now most of us are now voting (at least out of those I've discussed the matter with) to allow the use of the XRay mod as well. Why doesn't that count?

 

I am not trying to be a trouble maker, I am not trying to stir up tensions. I'm just trying to understand the rationale behind decisions.

The rationale is this:

 

First off, Dahrken and I had some suspicions. Some of you made progress a bit too fast to play vanilla. Nothing could be proven though.

Then Crisp posted the screenshots where the F3 information clearly said '1.8/XRay'. I don't know, but when you play without said mod and struggle to gather iron while others have diamond blocks you feel betrayed.

Lastly other users voiced their dissatisfaction with people flying around. This is where I decided to put a stop to that at least. As said before - there is no way I can stop you from using the mod to mine. But I can mandate a no-fly zone. If you want to shorten the travel distances, feel free to build an underground railway or set up 'travel agents'. 

 

Clear enough?

 

Clear enough?

 

To be honest, not really.

 

When it first came to light you asked all the players on the server at the time if they were OK with it. It was a resounding YES, so you said fair enough, continue. Then a couple players moaned, and the decision was reversed. It seems that the wishes of a couple players are overruling the wishes of a majority. That doesn't seem fair.

 

At this point I'm done discussing this unless any other players care to chime in on either side. As I have already stated I will abide by whatever decision is made. Even if XRay was outright (with an admittedly unenforceable) banned, I would honour that.

 

Whatever the outcome, no hard feelings. :)

<bro hug>

I haven't chimed in because I don't really care either way. I don't use the mod and I don't care if others do. So if people want it banned, I'll just go with the flow, same if it is allowed. I'm fairly far out from spawn, so I generally never see anyone, let alone have people flying over my home.

 

As long as anyone using the mod is being respectful, not mining and hording all the ores, not flying in to destroy builds or steal items, then it doesn't affect my game in the slightest. I enjoy the challenge of looking for diamonds, collecting my resources and fighting mobs. I like to look at others builds, but I don't really feel upset if they have progressed faster than me. I don't have a big house (in fact I have a wooden shack), but I have built a slime farm and a XP/Gold farm, so I'm happy with my progress.

 

 

 

On another note, I found a dungeon where someone had destroyed the spawner  :cry:  That's just wrong!

 

:)

Dungeons have a mob spawner in them, the walls are made of mossy cobblestone, and there will be a couple of chests with loot.

 

Monster_Spawner.gif

2011-12-21_18.00.55.png


On another note, I found a dungeon where someone had destroyed the spawner  :cry:  That's just wrong!

 

:)

 

If I find a dungeon I usually leave the spawner, but surround it with torches. No point in breaking the spawner. Would be nice if we could pick them up.

I haven't played on the server in a long time, and probably won't play for a long time.

 

However, I personally don't agree with the mod, it also puts me off coming back as IMO if you want a vanilla survival server then any mods that aid the player in anyway like this is pointless. If it's not part of the core game then why use it, it just takes away from the word survival for me. 

 

just my 2 cents regardless of whether I'm playing or not.

From what I read from Meph, it is fairly clear.

 

X-Ray, because we cannot regulate it at present is a basis of don't mention you're using it and we will look the other way.

 

Flying in any form excluding moderator use is not allowed.

 

The two are not linked in any way. At all.

Dungeons have a mob spawner in them, the walls are made of mossy cobblestone, and there will be a couple of chests with loot.

 

Monster_Spawner.gif

2011-12-21_18.00.55.png

 

If I find a dungeon I usually leave the spawner, but surround it with torches. No point in breaking the spawner. Would be nice if we could pick them up.

 

 

ok that confirmed it i have never found one :(

I think that's a terrible decision.  While I understand from a server owners perspective as I too have a Vanilla server, I hands down say X-ray is not allowed.  Not this 'We can't control it so it's fine unless we catch you do it'.  You either ban it or you don't, you need to make it clear to people that it's unacceptable.

Survival + Flying + X-Ray != Creative Mode

 

It's a weird mash-up of both. You still have to mine, you still need to farm and resources are still limited.

 

Stuff can be stolen whether or not this mod is in use, and I'm not sure why stealing came into the debate about flying.

 

I would go as far as saying x-ray takes away from the game more than flying if anything. Before flying, I hardly bumped into other players at all, and during, I finally managed to get a gauge for the world's layout in absence of a map.

 

I'm not begging for it back, I'm surprised it was taken away to be honest, there seem to be far more people happy to use flying than a smaller, more vocal minority.

 

It's not part of the core game and survival was voted for, that's a fact. But if the majority of players were using the mod, doesn't that mean to say, that the majority of players wanted Survival + Flying + X-Ray?

 

Anyway, if flying stays banned, I won't be coming back, which is a shame, because I only just joined in the last week!

 

P.S. wasn't impressed when a mod decided to kill off most of my chickens and walked off with them. I was stood right there and I could have done it myself, if only I were asked to! I had to ask for them back.

Furthermore, I had clearly stated before this event that I'd culled most of them off earlier on to see if it would improve the lag problems, which I stated that it had not, and this also went ignored.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!