Recommended Posts

Keep in mind that Leopard was 3/4 to 1 year late, based upon their original release schedule (late 2006-early 2007).

Tiger was released in April 2005. Leopard was then announced 2 months later in June at WWDC 2005. It's already been 7 months since the Leopard release, so at least an announcement of 10.6 is logical. We didn't see much about Leopard until WWDC of 2006, so I don't think we'll get much more. However if Apple intends to stick with their quoted 18-month cycle, a preview certainly isn't out of the realm of possibility. I doubt we'll see another 30-month stretch with no updates like we did between Tiger and Leopard.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/625430-wwdc-08/page/5/#findComment-589456321
Share on other sites

Just saw that as well. It certainly gives credence to TUAW's initial report.

No it doesn't, didn't you read those posts from other members here? They definitively stated no 10.6 announcement at WWDC. They can't be wrong :rolleyes:

I'm stoked to see what Jobs has to offer in the next version of OS X.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/625430-wwdc-08/page/5/#findComment-589456403
Share on other sites

No it doesn't, didn't you read those posts from other members here? They definitively stated no 10.6 announcement at WWDC. They can't be wrong :rolleyes:

Indeed! Biting my tongue ;)

I'm stoked to see what Jobs has to offer in the next version of OS X.

I am as well. The Ars story is hard to believe, but far from unbelievable.

Edited by Chad
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/625430-wwdc-08/page/5/#findComment-589456423
Share on other sites

Maybe I've missed it, but I haven't seen a lot of discussion here on changes to the .mac service that may be announced next week. Personally I'm very interested to see how this service may expand, but I don't care for the rumored name change.

http://www.tuaw.com/2008/06/03/inside-mac-and-me/

Anyone have any thoughts or insights?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/625430-wwdc-08/page/5/#findComment-589456591
Share on other sites

Back of the 10.6 box will have these bullet points:

More security!

You know how we told you Mac OS X is the most secure thing around? Well, we were wrong. So we are adding even more security measures.

Stability!

We actually make things work. AirPort will stay connected for more than 5 seconds and Back to My Mac will actually connect. You will totally love how Safari wont crash anymore.

Cocoalicious!

You don't have a clue what Cocoa is, but all of our apps are now built using Cocoa. Yes, even iTunes. Cocoa, making our apps tasty, just like chocolate.

Screw you PowerPC owners!

We have no good reason to cut PPC support, but we are going to anyways.

64-Bit Only!

It makes it go faster! VROOM VROOM!*

It's just like the System Updates you've come to know and love!

We feel letting users download system updates was unfair since they didn't get a shiny box. So we are now giving you system updates for the price of OS updates. If you love us, you WILL buy system updates masked as OS updates.

*64-Bit generally wont make your computer any faster, but you're too much of a sucker to realise that.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/625430-wwdc-08/page/5/#findComment-589456911
Share on other sites

I don't really care about the .mac name change to .me either.

I think it's a mistake on their marketing tactics.

me reminds me of exactly that..windows Me lol crapware.

obviously they are about to kick off some type of Marketing campaign that goes with the new name.....probably a new product or something.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/625430-wwdc-08/page/5/#findComment-589456967
Share on other sites

Ok, I might have misspoke earlier, a broadcast went out to managers today about the circulation of 10.6 rumors at WWDC, what that tells me is there is more truth than fiction to the rumors as normally they are simply ignored. The last 'Rumor' that was addressed in this way was the MacBook Air and we all know how that turned out.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/625430-wwdc-08/page/5/#findComment-589456987
Share on other sites

Ok, I might have misspoke earlier, a broadcast went out to managers today about the circulation of 10.6 rumors at WWDC, what that tells me is there is more truth than fiction to the rumors as normally they are simply ignored. The last 'Rumor' that was addressed in this way was the MacBook Air and we all know how that turned out.

:rolleyes:

Well when one website you go to says one thing and then another website that you don't go to says the opposite, you tend to follow what the website that you go to is saying.

What site said 10.6 would drop support for Carbon? I didn't read anything like that at TUAW, Ars, or MacRumors.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/625430-wwdc-08/page/5/#findComment-589457063
Share on other sites

What site said 10.6 would drop support for Carbon? I didn't read anything like that at TUAW, Ars, or MacRumors.

MacRumours (relaying from Ars) said it may be Cocoa-Only, but the full meaning of that remains vague. You can interpret that as no Carbon, no Carbon UI, whatever you want. I only stated dropping Carbon would mean the big apps would be screwed.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/625430-wwdc-08/page/5/#findComment-589457078
Share on other sites

I personally doubt it's entirely true, I am not sure even Steve is capable of asking for ?85 for those few changes. I'd love a new release of Mac OS X, but I wouldn't pay ?85 for security and stability 'fixes' when I feel both secure and stable already.

I would love to see Office and Creative Suite applications working in Cocoa though. I've found it hard to explain the UI 'feel' that is different between the two, but I most certainly feel it. Would anyone be able to put into words the difference you notice between Carbon and Cocoa in terms of UI?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/625430-wwdc-08/page/5/#findComment-589457169
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!