[Official] Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2


Recommended Posts

Definitely :yes:

MP Achievements suck because you get people just ruining the MP experience for achievements. classic example - ShadowRun (Although technically a MP only game but still ruined it)

True. Also Halo 3 is a good example of that.

True. Also Halo 3 is a good example of that.

Haha Halo 3 was hilarious :D

People switching to Japanese/Chinese language on their xboxes so they would play on Japanese servers. Only thing is, there are no Japanese players so it becomes a gathering for people looking for achievements :D me included

RECON!

Just average? Wow must take a lot to impress you :p

It was just a trailer. It didn't have any "wow" moments, the graphics were fairly good (but not spectacular; not like Killzone 2 or Crysis), and it just gave a glimpse of the storyline. I'm not sure why I'm supposed to be blown away by it? I mean, it'll be interesting to fight in the United States, but that's not exactly uncommon in videogames.

I'm sure the game will be amazing, but the trailer was just another trailer :)

Ooer no wonder they haven't been talking about the SP. That's quite locale to 'announce'. I can't be the only person who things CoD is looking very long in the tooth now though. It really needs a new engine.

It comes out next to L4D2, AC2, Uncharted 2 and looks fairly weak in comparison.

Ooer no wonder they haven't been talking about the SP. That's quite locale to 'announce'. I can't be the only person who things CoD is looking very long in the tooth now though. It really needs a new engine.

It comes out next to L4D2, AC2, Uncharted 2 and looks fairly weak in comparison.

What about the Source engine? Isnt L4D2 running on a 4-5 year engine?

Graphics in MW and MW2 arn't what we play it for..it's the gameplay :p

Unless your referring to gameplay when you say comparison?

What about the Source engine? Isnt L4D2 running on a 4-5 year engine?

Graphics in MW and MW2 arn't what we play it for..it's the gameplay :p

Unless your referring to gameplay when you say comparison?

It is though, you have to admit, it still looks better (maybe because that it's self was built from the ground up). I know it isn't about GFX but it still helps to look nice! ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      459
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      212
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!